LIN Zong-man, 2012. A DEMANDING DEVELOPMENT TO HYDROCARBON RESOURCES IN CHUXIONG BASIN. Journal of Geomechanics, 18 (4): 359-378.
Citation: LIN Zong-man, 2012. A DEMANDING DEVELOPMENT TO HYDROCARBON RESOURCES IN CHUXIONG BASIN. Journal of Geomechanics, 18 (4): 359-378.

A DEMANDING DEVELOPMENT TO HYDROCARBON RESOURCES IN CHUXIONG BASIN

More Information
  • Mesozoic and Paleozoic marine hydrocarbon resources have been developed in South China except Sichuan Basin for half a century. The Chuxiong Basin is very important in oil and gas exploration in South China because of its material basis and favorable tectonic environment forming large-and-middle scale of hydrocarbon accumulation. Hydrocarbon source rocks mainly developed in €1, O1-2, D1-2, T3y, T3l, T3g, T3s and J1-2. Two important plays are Middle-Upper Devonian to the lower part of Upper Triassic marine formation and the upper part of Triassic land formation to Lower-Middle Jurassic. Exploration should be implemented along the margin of platform because of a bad hydrocarbon generation condition and other disadvantages as complicated structural deformation, intensive uplifting and high level of evolution inside the platform.

     

  • 致谢: 文中的插图由鄢犀利高级工程师、杨红同志绘制,笔者表示衷心感谢。
  • [1]
    李四光.从大地构造看我国石油资源勘探的远景[J].石油地质, 1955, 16. http://cpfd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CPFDTOTAL-DZXS201010001040.htm

    LI Si-guang. Exploration prospects of China's oil resources according to the tectonics[J]. Petroleum Geology, 1995, 16. http://cpfd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CPFDTOTAL-DZXS201010001040.htm
    [2]
    周堃. 原始海相盆地类型与含油条件[C]//石宝珩. 扬子海相地质与油气. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1993.

    ZHOU Kun. Original marine basin type and oil condition[C]//SHI Bao-heng. Yangtz marine geology and oil/gas. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 1993.
    [3]
    滇黔桂石油地质志编写组.中国石油地质志, 卷十一:滇黔桂油气区[M].北京:石油工业出版社, 1992.

    Writing Group of Petroleum Geology of Yunnan, Guizhou and Guangxi. Petroleum geology of China, Volume 11:Yunnan-Guizhou-Guangxi oil and gas areas[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 1992.
    [4]
    张渝昌.中国含油气盆地原型分析[M].南京:南京大学出版社, 1997.

    ZHANG Yu-chang. Analysis on original petroliferous basins in China[M]. Nanjing:Nanjing University Press, 1997.
    [5]
    王义昭. 哀牢山脉地质构造特征及其成因[C]//第三届全国构造会议论文集(上册). 1987.

    WANG Yi-zhao. Geological structural features and genesis of Ailao Mountains[C]//Proceedings of the 3th China National Conference on Tectonics (Vol. I). 1987.
    [6]
    李四光.地质力学概论[M].北京:科学出版社, 1973.

    LI Si-guang. Introduction of geomechanics[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 1973.
    [7]
    周新桂, 刘和甫, 王宗秀, 等.我国叠合盆地油气调查战略思考[J].地质力学学报, 2011, 17(2):111~120. http://journal.geomech.ac.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?flag=1&file_no=20110201&journal_id=dzlxxb

    ZHOU Xin-gui, LIU He-fu, WANG Zong-xiu, et al. Thoughts of strategic hydrocarbon survey on superimposed basins in China[J].Journal of Geomechanics, 2011, 17(2):111~120. http://journal.geomech.ac.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?flag=1&file_no=20110201&journal_id=dzlxxb
    [8]
    李会军, 周新桂, 张林炎.近年来我国发现大气田的地质特征和存在问题[J].地质力学学报, 2011, 17(2):121~131. http://journal.geomech.ac.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?flag=1&file_no=20110202&journal_id=dzlxxb

    LI Hui-jun, ZHOU Xin-gui, ZHANG Lin-yan. Geological characteristics and existing problems of large gas fields found recently in China[J].Journal of Geomechanics, 2011, 17(2):121~131. http://journal.geomech.ac.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?flag=1&file_no=20110202&journal_id=dzlxxb
    [9]
    林宗满.论中国东部中、新生代大地构造的基本特征[J].地质力学学报, 2010, 16(3):246~259. http://journal.geomech.ac.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?flag=1&file_no=20100303&journal_id=dzlxxb

    LIN Zong-man. General characteristics of the Mesozoic-Cenozoic tectonics in eastern China[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 2010, 16(3):246~259. http://journal.geomech.ac.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?flag=1&file_no=20100303&journal_id=dzlxxb
    [10]
    林宗满.郯城-庐江断裂基本特征及其控盆作用[J].地质力学学报, 2011, 17(4):322~337. http://journal.geomech.ac.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?flag=1&file_no=20110403&journal_id=dzlxxb

    LIN Zong-man. Characteristics of Tancheng-Lujiang Fault and its role on basin controlling[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 2011, 17(4):322~337. http://journal.geomech.ac.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?flag=1&file_no=20110403&journal_id=dzlxxb
  • Relative Articles

    GAO Yufei, TANG Xiaoyin, YANG Shuchun, ZHAO Xinyan, HU Shengbiao. 2024: Cenozoic tectonic-thermal history reconstruction of the Qinnan Depression, Bohai Basin. Journal of Geomechanics, 30(4): 622-632. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2023168
    LI Gang, WANG Ning, ZHANG Kaixun, BAI Guoping, HE Yubo, HU Jingjing, MENG Qiuhan, QIU Haihua. 2023: Analysis of petroleum systems and assessment of petroleum resources in the West Barents Sea Basin, Arctic. Journal of Geomechanics, 29(2): 174-187. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2022134
    WU Xunda, LIAO Jin, SUN Wenzhao, LIU Ping, LI Chunlei. 2021: Natural gas distribution and reservoir-forming law of the Yinggehai Basin, China. Journal of Geomechanics, 27(6): 963-974. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2021.27.06.078
    ZHANG Kaixun, HAN Shuqin, MENG Qiuhan, HU Jingjing, YAN Chunfeng. 2020: Classification of sedimentary basins and distribution patterns of oil and gas resources in the Arctic. Journal of Geomechanics, 26(6): 901-910. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2020.26.06.071
    ZHANG Xiong, ZHU Zhengjie, WEI Yuyan, ZHAO Yanjun, ZHANG Yu. 2019: RESEARCH ON THE EFFECT OF TECTONISM ON THE FORM AND PRESERVATION OF MARINE POTASH IN TRIASSIC JIALINGJIANG FORMATION IN DIANJIANG SALT BASIN, EASTERN SICHUAN BASIN. Journal of Geomechanics, 25(S1): 72-77. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2019.25.S1.013
    LI Jian-feng, ZHAO Yue, PEI Jun-ling, LIU Feng, ZHOU Zai-zheng, GAO Hai-long, GAO Liang, FU Zi-bo. 2017: CENOZOIC MARINE SEDIMENTATION PROBLEM OF THE TARIM BASIN. Journal of Geomechanics, 23(1): 141-149.
    MA Liang-tao, LI Shi-xiong. 2014: HYDROCARBON ACCUMULATION MODEL AND FUTURE EXPLORATION IN NORTHWEST SABAH BASIN. Journal of Geomechanics, 20(4): 404-412.
    ZHOU Xin-gui, LIU He-fu, WANG Zong-xiu, ZHANG Lin-yan, HUANG Chen-jun, LI Hui-jun, YAN Xi-li, MA Li-cheng. 2011: THOUGHTS OF STRATEGIC HYDROCARBON SURVEY ON SUPERIMPOSED BASINS IN CHINA. Journal of Geomechanics, 17(2): 111-120.
    LI Ya-hui, DUAN Hong-liang, TAN Ying. 2010: STRUCTURAL DIVISION OF MARINE MESOZOIC-PALEOZOIC IN LOWER YANGTZE REGION AND ITS SIGNIFICANCE FOR PETROLEUM EXPLORATION TARGETS. Journal of Geomechanics, 16(3): 271-280.
    ZHOU Xiao-jin, YANG Fan. 2008: SUPERPOSITION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF MARINE MESO-PALEOZOIC STRATA BY MESO-CENOZOIC BASINS IN SOUTHERN CHINA. Journal of Geomechanics, 14(4): 346-361.
    LIU Gang, DONG Shu-wen. 2007: SEQUENCE STRATIGRAPHY AND PETROLEUM ACCUMULATION IN FORELAND BASINS. Journal of Geomechanics, 13(1): 51-59.
    LI Wen-yong, LI Dong-xu, WANG Hou-jin. 2006: NEW PROGRESS IN THE STUDY OF TECTONIC GEOMETRY OF THE NORTH YELLOW SEA BASIN. Journal of Geomechanics, 12(1): 12-22.
    WANG Hai-chao, WANG Yu-quan, QIN Yun-long, YANG Cai-hong, LI Li, Lu qingling, Fu jianli. 2006: SEDIMENTARY SLOPES OF THE BOHAI GULF BASIN AND THEIR OIL POTENTIAL. Journal of Geomechanics, 12(1): 23-30.
    XU Shou-yu, YAN Ke. 2005: STRUCTURAL SYSTEM AND HYDROCARBON DISTRIBUTION IN THE BOHAI GULF BASIN. Journal of Geomechanics, 11(3): 259-265.
    KANG Yu-zhu. 2003: STRUCTURAL FEATURES OF JUNGGAR TARIM AND TURPAN-HAMI BASINS XINJIANG AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF OIL AND GAS. Journal of Geomechanics, 9(1): 37-47.
    YUAN Jia-yin, ZHOU Xin-gui, XIAO Yu-ru. 2002: ANALYSIS OF OIL-GAS EXPLORATIVE POTENTIAL IN TARIM BASIM. Journal of Geomechanics, 8(3): 248-256.
    YIN Xiu-lan, LI Si-tian. 2000: OVERPRESSURE SYSTEM IN YINGGEHAI BASIN AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH OIL/GAS POOLS. Journal of Geomechanics, 6(3): 69-77.
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040102030405060
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 39.7 %FULLTEXT: 39.7 %META: 59.0 %META: 59.0 %PDF: 1.3 %PDF: 1.3 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 2.8 %其他: 2.8 %Cramlington: 0.3 %Cramlington: 0.3 %United States: 0.1 %United States: 0.1 %三明: 0.2 %三明: 0.2 %上海: 1.3 %上海: 1.3 %东营: 0.1 %东营: 0.1 %中卫: 3.7 %中卫: 3.7 %中山: 0.1 %中山: 0.1 %临汾: 0.3 %临汾: 0.3 %临沂: 0.1 %临沂: 0.1 %临沧: 0.1 %临沧: 0.1 %丹东: 0.8 %丹东: 0.8 %丽水: 0.2 %丽水: 0.2 %乌海: 0.2 %乌海: 0.2 %伊春: 0.1 %伊春: 0.1 %保定: 0.2 %保定: 0.2 %信阳: 0.1 %信阳: 0.1 %儋州: 0.1 %儋州: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %包头: 0.1 %包头: 0.1 %北京: 22.3 %北京: 22.3 %十堰: 0.1 %十堰: 0.1 %南京: 1.5 %南京: 1.5 %南宁: 0.1 %南宁: 0.1 %南昌: 0.2 %南昌: 0.2 %南阳: 0.1 %南阳: 0.1 %台州: 0.1 %台州: 0.1 %合肥: 0.1 %合肥: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.4 %呼和浩特: 0.4 %哈尔滨: 0.2 %哈尔滨: 0.2 %哥伦布: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.2 %四平: 0.1 %四平: 0.1 %大同: 0.1 %大同: 0.1 %大庆: 0.1 %大庆: 0.1 %大理白族自治州: 0.1 %大理白族自治州: 0.1 %大连: 0.2 %大连: 0.2 %天津: 2.0 %天津: 2.0 %太原: 0.2 %太原: 0.2 %娄底: 0.1 %娄底: 0.1 %宁波: 0.2 %宁波: 0.2 %安康: 0.4 %安康: 0.4 %宜昌: 0.2 %宜昌: 0.2 %宜春: 0.1 %宜春: 0.1 %宿州: 0.1 %宿州: 0.1 %常德: 0.1 %常德: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.1 %广安: 0.1 %广安: 0.1 %广州: 0.2 %广州: 0.2 %廊坊: 0.2 %廊坊: 0.2 %延边: 0.1 %延边: 0.1 %张家口: 2.6 %张家口: 2.6 %徐州: 2.1 %徐州: 2.1 %德州: 0.2 %德州: 0.2 %忻州: 0.1 %忻州: 0.1 %怀化: 0.1 %怀化: 0.1 %恩施: 0.1 %恩施: 0.1 %成都: 0.5 %成都: 0.5 %扬州: 1.2 %扬州: 1.2 %抚顺: 0.1 %抚顺: 0.1 %拉萨: 0.1 %拉萨: 0.1 %无锡: 0.4 %无锡: 0.4 %日喀则: 0.1 %日喀则: 0.1 %昆明: 3.1 %昆明: 3.1 %晋中: 0.1 %晋中: 0.1 %晋城: 0.1 %晋城: 0.1 %曲靖: 0.2 %曲靖: 0.2 %朝阳: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.3 %杭州: 0.5 %杭州: 0.5 %柳州: 0.1 %柳州: 0.1 %株洲: 0.1 %株洲: 0.1 %桂林: 0.2 %桂林: 0.2 %梧州: 0.1 %梧州: 0.1 %楚雄: 1.3 %楚雄: 1.3 %榆林: 0.1 %榆林: 0.1 %武威: 0.2 %武威: 0.2 %武汉: 0.9 %武汉: 0.9 %池州: 0.4 %池州: 0.4 %沈阳: 1.0 %沈阳: 1.0 %泉州: 0.2 %泉州: 0.2 %泰州: 0.1 %泰州: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.2 %洛阳: 0.2 %济南: 0.1 %济南: 0.1 %济宁: 0.3 %济宁: 0.3 %海口: 0.4 %海口: 0.4 %淮北: 0.1 %淮北: 0.1 %淮南: 0.1 %淮南: 0.1 %深圳: 0.1 %深圳: 0.1 %温州: 0.3 %温州: 0.3 %渭南: 0.1 %渭南: 0.1 %湖州: 0.1 %湖州: 0.1 %湘潭: 0.1 %湘潭: 0.1 %湘西: 0.1 %湘西: 0.1 %滁州: 0.2 %滁州: 0.2 %漯河: 0.2 %漯河: 0.2 %漳州: 0.1 %漳州: 0.1 %濮阳: 0.1 %濮阳: 0.1 %玉林: 0.2 %玉林: 0.2 %玉溪: 0.3 %玉溪: 0.3 %白沙: 0.1 %白沙: 0.1 %百色: 1.4 %百色: 1.4 %益阳: 0.1 %益阳: 0.1 %盐城: 0.2 %盐城: 0.2 %石嘴山: 0.2 %石嘴山: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.2 %秦皇岛: 0.4 %秦皇岛: 0.4 %红河: 0.1 %红河: 0.1 %绥化: 0.3 %绥化: 0.3 %芒廷维尤: 7.6 %芒廷维尤: 7.6 %苏州: 0.3 %苏州: 0.3 %荆州: 0.1 %荆州: 0.1 %莆田: 0.1 %莆田: 0.1 %莱芜: 0.2 %莱芜: 0.2 %菏泽: 0.1 %菏泽: 0.1 %葫芦岛: 0.8 %葫芦岛: 0.8 %蚌埠: 0.2 %蚌埠: 0.2 %衡水: 0.1 %衡水: 0.1 %西双版纳: 0.9 %西双版纳: 0.9 %西宁: 17.9 %西宁: 17.9 %西安: 0.8 %西安: 0.8 %许昌: 0.6 %许昌: 0.6 %贵阳: 0.2 %贵阳: 0.2 %赣州: 0.1 %赣州: 0.1 %赤峰: 0.5 %赤峰: 0.5 %达州: 0.1 %达州: 0.1 %运城: 0.3 %运城: 0.3 %连云港: 0.2 %连云港: 0.2 %通辽: 0.1 %通辽: 0.1 %遂宁: 0.1 %遂宁: 0.1 %邢台: 0.2 %邢台: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.3 %邵阳: 0.1 %邵阳: 0.1 %郑州: 1.1 %郑州: 1.1 %郴州: 0.2 %郴州: 0.2 %重庆: 1.0 %重庆: 1.0 %金华: 0.1 %金华: 0.1 %铁岭: 0.1 %铁岭: 0.1 %银川: 0.6 %银川: 0.6 %锦州: 0.1 %锦州: 0.1 %长春: 1.1 %长春: 1.1 %长沙: 0.5 %长沙: 0.5 %防城港: 0.1 %防城港: 0.1 %阳江: 0.1 %阳江: 0.1 %阿拉善盟: 0.1 %阿拉善盟: 0.1 %鞍山: 0.1 %鞍山: 0.1 %马鞍山: 0.5 %马鞍山: 0.5 %黔东南: 0.1 %黔东南: 0.1 %黔南: 0.1 %黔南: 0.1 %黔西南: 0.1 %黔西南: 0.1 %龙岩: 0.2 %龙岩: 0.2 %其他CramlingtonUnited States三明上海东营中卫中山临汾临沂临沧丹东丽水乌海伊春保定信阳儋州兰州包头北京十堰南京南宁南昌南阳台州合肥呼和浩特哈尔滨哥伦布嘉兴四平大同大庆大理白族自治州大连天津太原娄底宁波安康宜昌宜春宿州常德平顶山广安广州廊坊延边张家口徐州德州忻州怀化恩施成都扬州抚顺拉萨无锡日喀则昆明晋中晋城曲靖朝阳杭州柳州株洲桂林梧州楚雄榆林武威武汉池州沈阳泉州泰州洛阳济南济宁海口淮北淮南深圳温州渭南湖州湘潭湘西滁州漯河漳州濮阳玉林玉溪白沙百色益阳盐城石嘴山石家庄秦皇岛红河绥化芒廷维尤苏州荆州莆田莱芜菏泽葫芦岛蚌埠衡水西双版纳西宁西安许昌贵阳赣州赤峰达州运城连云港通辽遂宁邢台邯郸邵阳郑州郴州重庆金华铁岭银川锦州长春长沙防城港阳江阿拉善盟鞍山马鞍山黔东南黔南黔西南龙岩

Catalog

    Figures(8)  / Tables(5)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (670) PDF downloads(15) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return