Volume 14 Issue 4
Dec.  2008
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZHOU Xiao-jin, YANG Fan, 2008. SUPERPOSITION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF MARINE MESO-PALEOZOIC STRATA BY MESO-CENOZOIC BASINS IN SOUTHERN CHINA. Journal of Geomechanics, 14 (4): 346-361.
Citation: ZHOU Xiao-jin, YANG Fan, 2008. SUPERPOSITION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF MARINE MESO-PALEOZOIC STRATA BY MESO-CENOZOIC BASINS IN SOUTHERN CHINA. Journal of Geomechanics, 14 (4): 346-361.

SUPERPOSITION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF MARINE MESO-PALEOZOIC STRATA BY MESO-CENOZOIC BASINS IN SOUTHERN CHINA

More Information
  • Received: 2008-03-30
  • Published: 2008-12-01
  • This paper focuses on the main basin prototypes developed in four tectonic evolution periods and their superposition in southern China during the Meso-Cenozoic.According to the superposition and tectonic reconstruction of basin prototype, five types of late reconstruction could be recognized for marine Meso-Paleozoic in southern China, namely the persistent foredeep superposition, foredeep-slide-faultdepression superposition, foredeep-slide or fault superposition, nappe structure and shadow basin, and relict reconstruction.Moreover we discuss their main tectonic characteristics and difference in the condition for oil-gas preservation.The study indicates that the persistent foreland basin superposition, represented by the Sichuan Basin, is most favorable for preservation of marine Meso-Cenozoic natural gas.The second favorable type is the foredeep-slide-fault-depression superposition, with its examples in Jiangsu Basin and Wannan-Subei Basin in middle-lower Yangtze.Under the early foreland basin superposition (Late Triassic to Middle Jurassic)and the late fault depression-depression superposition (since Middle Cretaceous), it successively constituted a regional enclosed condition for marine Meso-Paleozoic, and offered a condition for preservation of the second oil-gas formation of marine Meso-Paleozoic although it had been deformed by the strong Yanshanian compression-strike-slip during Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous.The foredeepslide or fault superposition, represented by the Chuxiong Basin and Shiwan Mountain Basin, set up a regional enclosed condition for marine Meso-Paleozoic in the early stage (Late Triassic to Middle Jurassic), but then imposed an effect upon preservation of marine oil-gas, because it led the basins as a whole to form block structures under the effect of strike-slip and thrust since the second structure stage. In addition, it is pointed out that much attention should be drawn to the "shadow basin" in nappe structure, especially to oil-gas preservation condition below the regional decollement layer as well as the relict reconstructed weak deformation belt such as Nanpanjiang depression.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    张渝昌.中国含油气盆地原型分析[M].南京:南京大学出版社, 1997.89~124.
    [2]
    马力, 陈焕疆, 甘克文, 等.中国南方大地构造和海相油气地质(上)[M].北京:地质出版社, 2004.104~117.
    [3]
    廖宗廷, 周祖翼.中国东南地区大地构造演化的特征[J].石油实验地质, 1994, 16 (3):234~242. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-82501-2007213380.htm
    [4]
    王金渝, 周荔青, 郭念发, 等.苏浙皖石油天然气地质[M].北京:石油工业出版社, 2000.150~166.
    [5]
    郭正吾, 邓康龄, 韩永辉, 等.四川盆地形成与演化[M].北京:地质出版社, 1996.74~88.
    [6]
    孙连浦, 马永生, 郭彤楼, 等.十万大山盆地中生代沉积充填特征及其演化[J].世界地质, 2005, 24 (1):30 ~35. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5589.2005.01.005
    [7]
    卢庆治, 郭彤楼, 胡圣标.川东北地区热流史及成烃史研究[J].新疆石油地质, 2006, 27 (5):549~551. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3873.2006.05.009
    [8]
    王顺玉, 戴鸿鸣, 王海清, 等.四川盆地海相碳酸盐岩大型气田天然气地球化学特征与气源[J].天然气地球科学, 2000, 11 (2):10~17. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK200000999828
    [9]
    张林, 魏国齐, 李熙吉, 等.四川盆地震旦系—下古生界高过成熟烃源岩演化史分析[J].天然气地球科学, 2007, 18 (5):726~731. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1926.2007.05.019
    [10]
    刘光祥, 陶静源, 潘文蕾, 等.川东北及川东区天然气成因类型探讨[J].石油实验地质, 2002, 24 (6):513~515. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/sysydz200206006
    [11]
    王青, 张枝焕.由构造抬升引起的水溶气脱溶成藏问题[J].新疆石油地质, 2005, 26 (3):318~320. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3873.2005.03.029
    [12]
    肖开华, 陈红, 沃玉进, 等.江汉平原区构造演化对中、古生界油气系统的影响[J].石油与天然气地质, 2005, 26 (5):688~693. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9985.2005.05.021
    [13]
    覃建雄, 刘岫峰, 李余生, 等.江汉盆地海相地层油气勘探前景包裹体的证据[J].地球学报, 1999, 20 (1): 55~61. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK199900066080
    [14]
    郭彤楼.下扬子地区中古生界叠加改造特征与多源多期成藏[J].石油实验地质, 2004, 26 (4):319~323. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6112.2004.04.002
    [15]
    周明辉, 梁秋原.楚雄盆地油气保存单元划分与评价[J].云南地质, 2005, 24 (3):303~308. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1885.2005.03.008
    [16]
    李仲东, 罗志立, 刘树根.雪峰推覆体掩覆的下组合(Z—S)油气资源预测[J].石油与天然气地质, 2006, 27 (3):392~398. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9985.2006.03.015
    [17]
    李占奎, 丁燕云.大巴山推覆构造特征的探讨[J].物探与化探, 2007, 31 (6):495~498. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8918.2007.06.004
    [18]
    罗碧华, 秦启荣.逆冲推覆构造的研究类型和方法[J].内蒙古石油化工, 2007, 5:263~265. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK200702325120
    [19]
    朱志澄.逆冲推覆构造[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社, 1991.
    [20]
    刘特民, 刘炳温, 陈国栋, 等.南盘江盆地构造演化与油气保存区划分[J].天然气工业, 2001, 21 (1):18~22. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0976.2001.01.004
  • 加载中

Catalog

    Figures(19)  / Tables(1)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (179) PDF downloads(12) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return