LI Chang-feng, HOU Ming-cai, ZHANG Xiao-qing, et al., 2015. FORMATION MECHANISM OF HIGH-QUALITY RESERVOIRS IN THE UPPER PERMIAN CHANGXING FORMATION IN YUANBA GAS FIELD, NORTHEASTERN SICHUAN BASIN. Journal of Geomechanics, 21 (2): 278-289.
Citation: HU Jinjie, TANG Youjun, HE Daxiang, et al., 2020. Comparison and exploration of hydrocarbon expulsion patterns of different types of source rocks. Journal of Geomechanics, 26 (6): 941-951. DOI: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2020.26.06.075

Comparison and exploration of hydrocarbon expulsion patterns of different types of source rocks

doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2020.26.06.075
More Information
  • Hydrocarbon expulsion from source rocks is a very important part in the accurate prediction of oil and gas resources in petroliferous basins. In order to obtain the hydrocarbon expulsion efficiency and mechanism, the source rocks of different organic matter types were selected for the gold tube simulation experiments, product change characteristics and hydrocarbon expulsion efficiency of different types of source rocks in different evolution stages are summarized. The results show that, the type has a great influence on the proportion of light and heavy hydrocarbons in total oil and residual oil, but has little on that in discharged oil; the discharged oil is dominated by heavy hydrocarbons in the immature-mature stage and light hydrocarbons in the high-mature-overmature stage. The type has obvious influence on the amount of oil generation and discharge. The better the type of source rock is, the higher the amount of oil generation and discharge is. The oil generation and discharge amount of typeⅠsource rocks is the highest and that of typeⅢsource rocks is the lowest. The better the type of source rock is, the higher the oil discharge efficiency is. The low oil discharge efficiency of typeⅢsource rocks is related to the high generation of gaseous hydrocarbon and the high content of vitrinite in macerals.

     

  • Full-text Translaiton by iFLYTEK

    The full translation of the current issue may be delayed. If you encounter a 404 page, please try again later.
  • BEHAR F, VANDENBROUCKE M, TANG Y, et al., 1997.Thermal cracking of kerogen in open and closed systems:determination of kinetic parameters and stoichiometric coefficients for oil and gas generation[J].Organic Geochemistry, 26(5-6):321-339. doi: 10.1016/S0146-6380(97)00014-4
    BOWKER K A, 2003.Recent development of the Barnett Shale play, Fort Worth Basin[J].West Texas Geological Society Bulletin, 42(6):4-11.
    CAI X Y, 2012.Hydrocarbon generation-expulsion mechanisms and efficiencies of lacustrine source rocks:a case study from the Dongying sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology, 33(3):329-334, 345.(in Chinese with English abstract) http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201203003.htm
    CHEN A D, 2010.Quantification of hydrocarbon expulsion[J].Complex Hydrocarbon Reservoirs, 3(4):1-5.(in Chinese with English abstract) http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-FZYQ201004002.htm
    CHEN J P, SUN Y G, ZHONG N N, et al., 2014.The efficiency and model of petroleum expulsion from the lacustrine source rocks within geological frame[J].Acta Geologica Sinica, 88(11):2005-2032.(in Chinese with English abstract) http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dizhixb201411001
    CHEN R Y, WANG H T, CHEN J P, et al., 2015.An experimental method to evaluate the hydrocarbon generation and expulsion efficiency in the Songliao basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience, 26(5):915-921.(in Chinese with English abstract) http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201505015.htm
    CHEN Z H, ZHA M, JIN Q, 2004.An investigation on generation and expulsion of hydrocarbon from source rocks of the shahejie formation in the well niu-38, Dongying depression[J].Chinese Journal of Geology, 39(3):356-366.(in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.researchgate.net/publication/289884651_An_investigation_on_generation_and_expulsion_of_hydrocarbon_from_source_rocks_of_the_Shahejie_Formation_in_the_well_Niu-38_Dongying_Depression
    CHEN Z H, LIU W, 2007.Key factors of controlling the hydrocarbon expulsion of the source rock in Dongying Sag[J].Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition), 22(6):40-43, 49.(in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.researchgate.net/publication/285884203_The_hydrocarbon-expulsion_characters_and_the_potential_resource_evaluation_of_the_3rd_member_of_Shahejie_formation_in_Dongying_sub-depression
    FU J M, XU S P, SHENG G Y, et al., 1987.Preliminary study on hydrocarbon formation of Fushun Coal resin(Ⅱ)[M]//Annals of Open Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences.Beijing: Science Press: 13-22.(in Chinese)
    FU N, LI Y C, XU J Y, et al., 2012.A new biomarker combination in the Wenchang Formation source rock of middle-deep lacustrine Facies and oil-source correlations in Zhu Ⅲ depression[J].China Offshore Oil and Gas, 24(4):13-19.(in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.researchgate.net/publication/291302294_A_new_biomarker_combination_in_the_Wenchang_formation_source_rock_of_middle-deep_lacustrine_facies_and_oil-source_correlations_in_Zhu_III_depression
    FU N, LIN Q, WANG K, 2017.Main source rock reevaluation of Member 2 of Liushagang Formation in the sags of Beibuwan basin[J].China Offshore Oil and Gas, 29(5):12-21.(in Chinese with English abstract) http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-ZHSD201705002.htm
    FU S Y, PENG P A, ZHANG W Z, et al., 2003.Kinetic study of the hydrocarbon generation from Upper Paleozoic coals in Ordos Basin[J].Science in China Series D:Earth Sciences, 46(4):333-341. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_zgkx-ed200304003.aspx
    GUO J G, LI J H, PANG X Q, et al., 2013.Study on expulsion efficiency of hydrocarbon for the Jurassic source rock in the southern margin of Junggar Basin[J].Geoscience, 27(5):1081-1088.(in Chinese with English abstract) http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ201305010.htm
    HORSFIELD B, DISKO U, LEISTNER F, 1989.The micro-scale simulation of maturation:outline of a new technique and its potential applications[J].Geologische Rundschau, 78(1):361-373. doi: 10.1007/BF01988370
    HUANG C Q, ZHANG J G, XI H, 2014.Research on Mechanism and Direction of Hydrocarbon Primary Migration[J].Ground Water, 36(1):181-184.
    HU H J, JIANG Y L, LIU J D, et al., 2019.Dynamic accumulation process of coal-formed gas in Wenliu area, Dongpu depression[J].Journal of Geomechanics, 25(2):215-222. https://journal.geomech.ac.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?flag=1&file_no=20190207&journal_id=dzlxxb
    HUNT J M, 1979.Petroleum Geochemistry and Geology[M].San Francisco:W H Freeman and Company, 1-61.
    JIANG F J, PANG X Q, JIANG Z X, et al., 2010.The quality evaluation and hydrocarbon-expulsion characters of source rocks in the 3rd member of Shahejie Formation in the Bohai sea[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 31(6):906-912.(in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-SYXB201006005.htm
    KANG H Q, CHENG T, JIA H C, et al., 2017.The hydrocarbon generation characteristic of marine source rock in Meso-Cenozoic continental marginal basins[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 38(6):649-657.(in Chinese with English abstract) http://en.cnki.com.cn/article_en/cjfdtotal-syxb201706004.htm
    LIU D H, FU J M, DAI T M, et al., 1986.Preliminary study on the production stages and characteristics of coal-formed gas, coal-formed oil[M]//Annals of China Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences.Gui Yang: Guizhou people's press 185-196.(in Chinese)
    LI J, MA W, WANG Y F, et al., 2018.Modeling of the whole hydrocarbon-generating process of sapropelic source rock[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 45(3):445-454.(in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187638041830051X
    LI Z M, ZHENG L J, JIANG Q G, et al., 2018.Simulation of hydrocarbon generation and expulsion for lacustrine organic-rich argillaceous dolomite and its implications for shale oil exploration[J].Earth Science, 43(2):566-576.(in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.researchgate.net/publication/324643627_Simulation_of_Hydrocarbon_Generation_and_Expulsion_for_Lacustrine_Organic-Rich_Argillaceous_Dolomite_and_Its_Implications_for_Shale_Oil_Exploration
    LIAO L L, 2016.Whole-rock based experimental study on hydrocarbon generation, retention, and expulsion from different source rocks and geological application[D].Guangzhou: Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences.(in Chinese with English abstract)
    LIU D H, FU J H, ZHENG C B, et al., 2004.Research on hydrocarbon generation of Ordovician marine Carbonatite of the ordos basin and genesis of Changqing gas fields[J].Acta Geologica Sinica, 78(4):542-550.(in Chinese with English abstract)
    LIU D H, ZHOU Z Y, JIA R F, et al., 1982.The extent of asphalt alteration in oil-generating carbonate rocks and thermal alteration experiments on asphalt[J].Geochimica(3):237-243.(in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.1080/01436590220126612
    LIU D L, DU Z M, XU X M, et al., 2017.The main control factors on effective paleogene primary oil and gas migration:a comparative study of exploration results from Xijiang A and Xijiang B structural traps, Zhujiangkou basin[J].Marine Geology Frontiers, 33(10):40-48.(in Chinese with English abstract) http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-HYDT201710005.htm
    LIU J Z, TANG Y C, 1998.An example of predicting the amount of methane hydrocarbon generation by Kerogen hydrocarbon generation kinetics[J].Chinese Science Bulletin, 43(11):1187-1191.(in Chinese)() doi: 10.1360/csb1998-43-11-1187
    LIU Q Y, KROOSS B M, JIN Z Y, et al., 2008.Comparison of the gas compound generation of Tarim coal and its Macerals in open system non-isothermal pyrolysis with ultra-high temperature[J].Natural Gas Geoscience, 19(6):748-753.(in Chinese with English abstract)
    LIU Q Y, LIU W H, MENG Q X, 2006.Organic geochemistry of n-alkanes from Tarim coal with different materials in pyrolysis under closed system[J].Natural Gas Geoscience, 17(3):313-318.(in Chinese with English abstract)
    MA W, LI J, WANG D L, et al., 2016.Hydrocarbon expulsion efficiency of source rocks and its influencing factors[J].Natural Gas Geoscience, 27(9):1742-1751.(in Chinese with English abstract)
    MAO R, MI J K, ZHANG S C, et al., 2012.Study on the hydrocarbon generation characteristics of different coaly source rocks by gold-tube pyrolysis experiments[J].Natural Gas Geoscience, 23(6):1127-1134.(in Chinese with English abstract)
    MI J K, ZHANG S C, WANG X M, 2009.Comparison of different hydrocarbon generation simulation approaches and key technique[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 31(4):409-414.(in Chinese with English abstract)
    PAN Y H, LI M W, SUN Y G, et al., 2018.Thermo-compression simulation of hydrocarbon generation and expulsion of inter-salt dolomitic shale, Qianjiang Sag, Jianghan Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 40(4):551-558.(in Chinese with English abstract)
    PEPPER A S, CORVI P J, 1995.Simple kinetic models of petroleum formation.Part Ⅲ:modelling an open system[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology, 12(4):417-452. doi: 10.1016/0264-8172(95)96904-5
    SUN Y G, CHEN J P, DENG C P, 2011.The thermal simulation experiment and efficiency of petroleum expulsion from high-quality lacustrine source rocks[C]//Proceedings of the 13th National Academic Conference on Organic Geochemistry.Nanning: Chinese Petroleum Society: 140-141.(in Chinese)
    TISSOT B P, WELTE D H, 1978.Petroleum formation and occurrence:a new approach to oil and gas exploration[M].Berlin:Springer
    WANG B S, LIU D H, ZHANG L J, et al., 1980.Investigation and simulation experiments on the characteristics of the genesis and evolution of petroleum in Huanghua depression in Bohai bay[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 1(1):43-51.(in Chinese with English abstract)
    WANG Y F, XIAO X M, 2010.An investigation of paleogeothermal gradients in the northeastern part of Sichuan basin[J].Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 15(4):57-61.(in Chinese with English abstract)
    WANG Z C, MI J K, LI X Q, et al., 2009.Current Situation and problems of simulation experiment approach of hydrocarbon generation[J].Natural Gas Geoscience, 20(4):592-597.(in Chinese with English abstract)
    XIAO Z H, HU G Y, LI Z S, 2007.Effect of presssure on hydrocarbon generation of source rock in close system[J].Natural Gas Geoscience, 18(2):284-288.(in Chinese with English abstract)
    XIAO Z H, HU G Y, LI Z S, 2008.An analysis of characteristics of hydrocarbon generation from pyrolysis experiment of source rock[J].Natural Gas Geoscience, 19(4):544-547.(in Chinese with English abstract)
    YOU L, ZHAO Z J, WU S J, et al., 2018.Main factors to influence physical property of Liushagang 1 Member, Wushi Sag, Beibuwan Basin[J].Natural Gas Technology and Economy, 12(2):6-10.(in Chinese with English abstract)
    ZHANG G C, ZHANG H H, ZHAO Z, et al., 2016."Joint control of source rocks and geothermal heat"-oil enrichment pattern of China's offshore basins[J].China Petroleum Exploration, 21(4):38-53.(in Chinese with English abstract)
    ZHANG H Z, LIU D H, FU J M, et al., 1986.Experimental study on pyrolysis gas of different coal and rock components[M]//.Annals of China Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences.Gui Yang: Guizhou people's press 150-152.(in Chinese)
    ZHANG S C, ZHANG L Y, ZHA M, 2009.Research on simulation of hydrocarbon expulsion difference in lacustrine source rocks:a case study of Paleogene Es3 member in the Dongying Depression[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 16(6):32-35.(in Chinese with English abstract)
    ZHANG W H, XUE H T, TIAN S S, et al., 2015.Analysis on factors affecting the hydrocarbon expulsion efficiency from the perspective of hydrocarbon generation[J].Contemporary Chemical Industry, 44(10):2391-2394.(in Chinese with English abstract)
    ZHANG W Z, YANG H, LI J F, et al., 2006.Leading effect of high-class source rock of Chang 7 in Ordos Basin on enrichment of low permeability oil-gas accumulation:hydrocarbon generation and expulsion mechanism[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 33(3):289-293.(in Chinese with English abstract)
    ZHAO K, JIANG Y L, LIU H, et al., 2018.Analysis on the causes of different enrichment of hydrocarbon in Gudao and Chengdao buried-hills, Jiyang depression[J].Journal of Geomechanics, 24(2):220-228.(in Chinese with English abstract) https://journal.geomech.ac.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?flag=1&file_no=20180208&journal_id=dzlxxb
    ZHU X S, LV Y M, WANG C W, et al., 2020.Adsorbability of high rank coal reservoir and its influencing factors in Shizhuang area, South of Qinshui basin[J].Coal Technology, 39(3):121-124.(in Chinese with English abstract)
    蔡希源, 2012.湖相烃源岩生排烃机制及生排烃效率差异性:以渤海湾盆地东营凹陷为例[J].石油与天然气地质, 33(3):329-334, 345. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201203003.htm
    陈安定, 2010.排烃定量研究[J].复杂油气藏, 3(4):1-5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4667.2010.04.001
    陈建平, 孙永革, 钟宁宁, 等, 2014.地质条件下湖相烃源岩生排烃效率与模式[J].地质学报, 88(11):2005-2032. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE201411001.htm
    陈瑞银, 王汇彤, 陈建平, 等, 2015.实验方法评价松辽盆地烃源岩的生排烃效率[J].天然气地球科学, 26(5):915-921. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201505015.htm
    陈中红, 查明, 金强, 2004.东营凹陷牛38井沙河街组烃源岩生排烃评价[J].地质科学, 39(3):356-366. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0563-5020.2004.03.006
    陈中红, 刘伟, 2007.控制东营凹陷烃源岩排烃的几个关键因素[J].西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 22(6):40-43, 49. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-064X.2007.06.010
    傅家谟, 徐世平, 盛国英, 等, 1987.抚顺煤树脂体成烃的初步研究(Ⅱ)[M]//中国科学院地球化学研究所有机地球化学开放研究实验室研究年报.北京: 科学出版社: 13-22.
    傅宁, 李友川, 徐建勇, 等, 2012.珠三坳陷文昌组中深湖相烃源岩新的生物标志化合物组合模式与油源对比[J].中国海上油气, 24(4):13-19. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1506.2012.04.003
    傅宁, 林青, 王柯, 2017.北部湾盆地主要凹陷流沙港组二段主力烃源岩再评价[J].中国海上油气, 29(5):12-21. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHSD201705002.htm
    付少英, 彭平安, 张文正, 等, 2002.鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界煤的生烃动力学研究[J].中国科学(D辑), 32(10):812-818. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXK200210003.htm
    郭继刚, 李建华, 庞雄奇, 等, 2013.准噶尔盆地南缘侏罗系烃源岩排烃效率研究[J].现代地质, 27(5):1081-1088. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8527.2013.05.010
    黄传卿, 张金功, 席辉, 2014.油气初次运移机制与运移方向的研究[J].地下水, 36(1):181-184. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1184.2014.01.073
    胡洪瑾, 蒋有录, 刘景东, 等, 2019.东濮凹陷文留地区煤成气运聚机理及成藏过程[J].地质力学学报, 25(2):215-222. https://journal.geomech.ac.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?flag=1&file_no=20190207&journal_id=dzlxxb
    姜福杰, 庞雄奇, 姜振学, 等, 2010.渤海海域沙三段烃源岩评价及排烃特征[J].石油学报, 31(6):906-912. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201006005.htm
    康洪全, 程涛, 贾怀存, 等, 2017.中-新生代大陆边缘盆地海相烃源岩生烃特征[J].石油学报, 38(6):649-657. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201706004.htm
    李剑, 马卫, 王义凤, 等, 2018.腐泥型烃源岩生排烃模拟实验与全过程生烃演化模式[J].石油勘探与开发, 45(3):445-454. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201803011.htm
    李志明, 郑伦举, 蒋启贵, 等, 2018.湖相富有机质泥质白云岩生排烃模拟及其对页岩油勘探的启示[J].地球科学, 43(2):566-576. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX201802017.htm
    廖玲玲, 2016.基于全岩的不同类型烃源岩生-留-排烃的实验模拟与应用研究[D].广州: 中国科学院研究生院(广州地球化学研究所).
    刘道理, 杜忠明, 许新明, 等, 2017.古近系油气初次运移有效性的主控因素:以珠江口盆地西江A和西江B构造圈闭油气勘探效果对比为例[J].海洋地质前沿, 33(10):40-48. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HYDT201710005.htm
    刘德汉, 周中毅, 贾蓉芬, 等, 1982.碳酸岩生油岩中沥青变质程度和沥青热变质实验[J].地球化学(3):237-243. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0379-1726.1982.03.003
    刘德汉, 傅家谟, 戴童谟, 等, 1986.煤成气和煤成油产出阶段和特征的初步研究[M]//中国科学院地球化学研究所.中国科学院地球化学研究所年报.贵阳: 贵州人民出版社: 185-196.刘德汉, 付金华, 郑聪斌, 等, 2004.鄂尔多斯盆地奥陶系海相碳酸盐岩生烃性能与中部长庆气田气源成因研究[J].地质学报, 78(4): 542-550.
    刘金钟, 唐永春, 1998.用干酪根生烃动力学方法预测甲烷生成量之一例[J].科学通报, 43(11):1187-1191. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0023-074X.1998.11.001
    刘全有, 刘文汇, 孟仟祥, 2006.塔里木盆地煤岩在不同介质条件下热模拟实验中烷烃系列有机地球化学特征[J].天然气地球科学, 17(3):313-318. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1926.2006.03.007
    刘全有, KROOSS B M, 金之钧, 等, 2008.塔里木盆地煤及其显微组分超高温开放体系热模拟实验气态产物对比研究[J].天然气地球科学, 19(6):748-753. doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2008.06.748
    马卫, 李剑, 王东良, 等, 2016.烃源岩排烃效率及其影响因素[J].天然气地球科学, 27(9):1742-1751. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201609020.htm
    毛榕, 米敬奎, 张水昌, 等, 2012.不同煤系源岩生烃特征的黄金管热模拟实验对比研究[J].天然气地球科学, 23(6):1127-1134. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201206021.htm
    米敬奎, 张水昌, 王晓梅, 2009.不同类型生烃模拟实验方法对比与关键技术[J].石油实验地质, 31(4):409-414. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6112.2009.04.018
    潘银华, 黎茂稳, 孙永革, 等, 2018.江汉盆地潜江凹陷盐间云质页岩热压生排烃模拟实验研究[J].石油实验地质, 40(4):551-558. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD201804015.htm
    孙永革, 陈建平, 邓春萍, 2011.湖相优质烃源岩排烃热模拟实验及排烃效率[C]//第十三届全国有机地球化学学术会议论文集.南宁: 中国石油学会: 140-141
    汪本善, 刘德汉, 张丽洁, 等, 1980.渤海湾盆地黄骅坳陷石油演化特征及人工模拟研究[J].石油学报, 1(1):43-51. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB198001005.htm
    王艳飞, 肖贤明, 2010.四川盆地东北地区古地温梯度模拟[J].海相油气地质, 15(4):57-61. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9854.2010.04.008
    王治朝, 米敬奎, 李贤庆, 等, 2009.生烃模拟实验方法现状与存在问题[J].天然气地球科学, 20(4):592-597. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX200904019.htm
    肖芝华, 胡国艺, 李志生, 2007.封闭体系下压力变化对烃源岩产气率的影响[J].天然气地球科学, 18(2):284-288. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1926.2007.02.024
    肖芝华, 胡国艺, 李志生, 2008.从烃源岩热模拟实验讨论其生烃特征[J].天然气地球科学, 19(4):544-547. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX200804019.htm
    尤丽, 招湛杰, 吴仕玖, 等, 2018.北部湾盆地乌石凹陷流一段储层物性主控因素研究[J].天然气技术与经济, 12(2):6-10. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1132.2018.02.002
    张功成, 张厚和, 赵钊, 等, 2016."源热共控"中国近海盆地石油富集规律[J].中国石油勘探, 21(4):38-53. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2016.04.005
    张惠之, 刘德汉, 傅家谟, 等, 1986.不同煤岩组分的热解成气实验研究[M]//中国科学院地球化学研究所.中国科学院地球化学研究所年报.贵阳:贵州人民出版社:150-152.
    张守春, 张林晔, 查明, 2009.湖相烃源岩排烃差异性模拟研究:以东营凹陷古近系沙三段为例[J].油气地质与采收率, 16(6):32-35. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9603.2009.06.008
    张文华, 薛海涛, 田善思, 等, 2015.从生烃角度分析排烃效率的影响因素[J].当代化工, 44(10):2391-2394. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-0460.2015.10.041
    张文正, 杨华, 李剑锋, 等, 2006.论鄂尔多斯盆地长7段优质油源岩在低渗透油气成藏富集中的主导作用:强生排烃特征及机理分析[J].石油勘探与开发, 33(3):289-293. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0747.2006.03.006
    赵凯, 蒋有录, 刘华, 等, 2018.济阳坳陷孤岛与埕岛潜山油气差异富集原因分析[J].地质力学学报, 24(2):220-228. https://journal.geomech.ac.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?flag=1&file_no=20180208&journal_id=dzlxxb
    朱学申, 吕玉民, 王存武, 等, 2020.沁南柿庄地区高煤阶煤储层吸附性及其影响因素[J].煤炭技术, 39(3):121-124. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTJS202003036.htm
  • Relative Articles

    YANG Geng, CHEN Zhuxin, LU Xuesong, ZHANG Yuqing. 2025: Mechanics and analog modeling of the Huo-Ma-Tu thrust sheet in the southern Junggar Basin fold and thrust belt. Journal of Geomechanics, 31(1): 8-23. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2023074
    WANG Bo, ZHANG Tongyao, SHI Changlin, WANG Xiaodong, SONG Jiankun, CHENG Yan, LIU Boyang, LI Kuo. 2022: A study of factors influencing activation energy of different types of source rocks in the Laizhou Bay Sag, Bohai Sea. Journal of Geomechanics, 28(3): 492-500. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2021156
    SHI Hui, LI Zongxing, YANG Yuanyuan, PENG Bo, HU Junjie, FANG Xinxin, ZHANG Hao, WEI Xiaojie. 2022: The factors influencing the enrichment of organic matters in the Carboniferous source rocks, Ounan depression, eastern Qaidam basin. Journal of Geomechanics, 28(2): 203-216. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2021135
    WANG Li, LI Zongxing, LIU Chenglin, PENG Bo, HU Junjie, PENG Xinfa, LIU Le. 2019: THE CARBONIFEROUS SOURCE ROCK MATURITY EVOLUTION IN THE DELINGHA DEPRESSION IN THE QAIDAM BASIN, NORTHWEST CHINA. Journal of Geomechanics, 25(3): 370-381. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2019.25.03.034
    SONG Sui-hong, HOU Jia-gen, LIU Yu-min, CAO Si-fan, HU Chen-bin. 2017: A STUDY ON THE DISTRIBUTION PATTERN OF SUPRASALT FAULT BASED ON NUMERICAL SIMULATION. Journal of Geomechanics, 23(3): 429-435.
    XU Jiu-sheng, WEN Zhi-gang, HU Dao-gong, ZHANG Yao-ling, QI Bang-shen. 2015: EVALUATION OF THE HYDROCARBON GENERATION POTENTIAL OF SOURCE ROCKS OF THE JURASSIC YAOJIE FORMATION IN MULI DEPRESSION OF QILIAN MOUNTAINS. Journal of Geomechanics, 21(3): 446-452.
    YAO Hong-xin, LI Wen-sheng, WANG Gen-hou. 2013: OIL AND GAS CHARACTERISTICS OF THRUSTING-NAPPE STRUCTURE BELT IN HUOYANSHAN, XINJIANG. Journal of Geomechanics, 19(2): 206-213.
    LI Hui-jun, ZHOU Xin-gui, ZHANG Lin-yan. 2011: GEOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND EXISTING PROBLEMS OF LARGE GAS FIELDS FOUND RECENTLY IN CHINA. Journal of Geomechanics, 17(2): 121-131.
    LIU Chun-xiao, QIAN Li, DENG Guo-zhen. 2007: DOMINANT CONTROLLING FACTORS AND REGULARITIES OF FORMATION OF PETROLEUM ACCUMULATIONS IN THE TAZHONG AREA. Journal of Geomechanics, 13(4): 355-367.
    TONG Heng-mao, ZHANG Sheng-gen, HU Yuan-qing. 2006: A QUANTITATIVE MODEL OF HEAT PRODUCTION BY FAULTING AND ITS EFFECT ON THERMAL EVOLUTION OF HYDROCARBON SOURCE ROCKS. Journal of Geomechanics, 12(4): 445-453.
    JIA Qi-shan, LI Sheng-li, MA Qian, XU Wen-shi. 2006: GEOCHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF HYDROCARBON SOURCE ROCKS IN THE NO. 2 STRUCTURAL BELT OF THE NANPU SUBBASIN, EASTERN HEBEI OIL FIELD, AND SOURCE ROCK CORRELATION. Journal of Geomechanics, 12(4): 469-475.
    ZHOU Yong-sheng, LI Jian-guo, WANG Sheng-zu. 2003: PHYSICAL EXPERIMENTAS ON STRIKE-SLIP FAULT AND PULL-APART BASIN. Journal of Geomechanics, 9(1): 1-13.
    KANG Yu-zhu. 2002: NEW THEORY OF MARINE OIL FORMATION AND DISCOVER OF TAHE OILFIELD,NORTHERN TARIM BASIN. Journal of Geomechanics, 8(3): 201-206.
    ZHOU Yong-sheng, LI Jian-guo, WANG Sheng-zu, ZHANG Liu. 2002: PHYSICAL EXPERIMENTS ON CONTINENT EXTENSIONAL STRUCTURES. Journal of Geomechanics, 8(2): 141-148.
    ZENG Long-wei, LIU Li, ZHENG Yong-hong. 2002: SIMULATION AND ANALYSIS ON THE HISTORY OF GENERATING AND EJECTING HYDROCARBON AT THE NORTHERN SECTION OF EAST SAG IN THE LIAOHE BASIN. Journal of Geomechanics, 8(3): 272-278.
    QIAN Wei-hong. 2000: A DYNAMICAL MODEL FOR CONTINENTAL DRIFT AND EXPERIMENTAL SIMULATED RESULTS. Journal of Geomechanics, 6(1): 15-21.
    Zhao Yinzhen, Jiang Xirong. 1997: TECTONIC EVOLUTION AND THE GOLD DISTRIBUTION IN EASTERN HEBEI. Journal of Geomechanics, 3(1): 30-37.
    Chen Zhengle, Zhou Xianqiang, Yang Nong, Chen Xuanhua. 1996: MODELING THE MIGRATION AND ACCUMULATION OF ORE-FORMING ELEMENTS UNDER HIGH TEMPERATURES AND PRESSURES. Journal of Geomechanics, 2(2): 90-93.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(8)

    1. Chang Zhong,Hui Shi,Xiao-Yin Tang,Hao Zhang,Yuan-Yuan Yang,Jun-Jie Hu,Xiao-Jie Wei,Jia-Qi Wang. Reconstruction of the thermal evolution since the late paleozoic in the Ounan Sag, Eastern Qaidam Basin, NW China: New constraints from vitrinite reflectance data and(U-Th)/He thermochronology. Petroleum Science. 2024(05): 2984-3000 .
    2. 畅厚鹏,徐建永,徐耀辉,刘岩,李威,钟鸣宇,李阳,王豫昌. 基于热压生排烃模拟实验的不同类型湖相烃源岩生排烃特征. 天然气地球科学. 2024(12): 2240-2252 .
    3. 刘诗局,高岗,靳军,张莉莉,刚文哲,向宝力,王静,王明. 咸化湖相富含层状藻与结构藻烃源岩的成烃特征新探与意义. 地质学报. 2023(03): 879-887 .
    4. 王圣柱,梅文科,熊峥嵘,白仲才,熊伟,于洪洲,鲍军. 准噶尔盆地东北缘石炭系烃源岩生烃演化特征及其石油地质意义. 石油实验地质. 2023(04): 667-680 .
    5. 王波,张铜耀,史长林,王晓东,宋建坤,程焱,刘博阳,李阔. 渤海莱州湾凹陷不同类型烃源岩活化能影响因素分析. 地质力学学报. 2022(03): 492-500 . 本站查看
    6. 刘显阳,吴凯,孔庆芬,刘大永,施健飞,彭平安. 鄂尔多斯盆地长7段页岩半开放体系生排烃模拟实验研究. 地球化学. 2022(04): 434-440 .
    7. 张向涛,史玉玲,刘杰,温华华,杨兴业. 珠江口盆地惠州凹陷古近系文昌组优质湖相烃源岩生烃动力学. 石油与天然气地质. 2022(05): 1249-1258 .
    8. 吴迅达,廖晋,孙文钊,刘平,李春雷. 莺歌海盆地天然气运聚成藏条件与分布富集规律. 地质力学学报. 2021(06): 963-974 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(2)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0401020304050
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 25.6 %FULLTEXT: 25.6 %META: 69.1 %META: 69.1 %PDF: 5.2 %PDF: 5.2 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 6.3 %其他: 6.3 %China: 0.1 %China: 0.1 %三亚: 0.1 %三亚: 0.1 %上海: 1.3 %上海: 1.3 %上饶: 0.1 %上饶: 0.1 %东莞: 0.3 %东莞: 0.3 %东营: 0.3 %东营: 0.3 %中卫: 3.2 %中卫: 3.2 %中山: 0.1 %中山: 0.1 %临汾: 0.2 %临汾: 0.2 %乌鲁木齐: 0.3 %乌鲁木齐: 0.3 %乐山: 0.1 %乐山: 0.1 %九江: 0.1 %九江: 0.1 %伊春: 0.1 %伊春: 0.1 %佳木斯: 0.2 %佳木斯: 0.2 %保定: 0.2 %保定: 0.2 %克拉玛依: 0.2 %克拉玛依: 0.2 %兰州: 0.6 %兰州: 0.6 %内江: 0.1 %内江: 0.1 %凉山: 0.1 %凉山: 0.1 %北京: 17.1 %北京: 17.1 %南京: 0.6 %南京: 0.6 %南宁: 0.4 %南宁: 0.4 %南昌: 0.2 %南昌: 0.2 %南阳: 0.1 %南阳: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.5 %呼和浩特: 0.5 %咸阳: 0.1 %咸阳: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.2 %哈尔滨: 0.2 %哈里亚纳: 0.2 %哈里亚纳: 0.2 %哥伦布: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.1 %唐山: 0.1 %唐山: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.2 %大庆: 0.4 %大庆: 0.4 %大连: 0.3 %大连: 0.3 %天津: 1.1 %天津: 1.1 %宁波: 0.1 %宁波: 0.1 %安庆: 0.1 %安庆: 0.1 %安康: 0.4 %安康: 0.4 %宣城: 0.2 %宣城: 0.2 %巴中: 0.1 %巴中: 0.1 %巴彦淖尔: 0.1 %巴彦淖尔: 0.1 %巴音郭楞: 0.1 %巴音郭楞: 0.1 %布达佩斯: 0.3 %布达佩斯: 0.3 %常德: 0.1 %常德: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.1 %广州: 0.8 %广州: 0.8 %庆阳: 0.1 %庆阳: 0.1 %张家口: 2.9 %张家口: 2.9 %张掖: 0.1 %张掖: 0.1 %徐州: 0.8 %徐州: 0.8 %怀化: 0.1 %怀化: 0.1 %惠州: 0.4 %惠州: 0.4 %成都: 1.5 %成都: 1.5 %扬州: 0.1 %扬州: 0.1 %文山: 0.1 %文山: 0.1 %新乡: 1.1 %新乡: 1.1 %无锡: 0.9 %无锡: 0.9 %日照: 0.1 %日照: 0.1 %昆明: 0.9 %昆明: 0.9 %曲靖: 0.1 %曲靖: 0.1 %朝阳: 0.1 %朝阳: 0.1 %杭州: 0.2 %杭州: 0.2 %松原: 0.3 %松原: 0.3 %武汉: 2.2 %武汉: 2.2 %汕头: 0.2 %汕头: 0.2 %池州: 0.1 %池州: 0.1 %沈阳: 0.2 %沈阳: 0.2 %沧州: 0.2 %沧州: 0.2 %泰州: 0.1 %泰州: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.1 %济宁: 0.2 %济宁: 0.2 %海口: 0.2 %海口: 0.2 %海西: 0.1 %海西: 0.1 %淄博: 0.1 %淄博: 0.1 %淮南: 0.1 %淮南: 0.1 %深圳: 0.2 %深圳: 0.2 %温州: 0.1 %温州: 0.1 %湛江: 0.3 %湛江: 0.3 %滨州: 0.1 %滨州: 0.1 %漯河: 0.3 %漯河: 0.3 %漳州: 0.1 %漳州: 0.1 %潮州: 0.1 %潮州: 0.1 %濮阳: 0.1 %濮阳: 0.1 %焦作: 0.2 %焦作: 0.2 %白银: 0.1 %白银: 0.1 %盘锦: 0.1 %盘锦: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.9 %石家庄: 0.9 %福州: 0.5 %福州: 0.5 %秦皇岛: 0.3 %秦皇岛: 0.3 %绥化: 0.1 %绥化: 0.1 %舟山: 0.2 %舟山: 0.2 %芒廷维尤: 15.0 %芒廷维尤: 15.0 %芝加哥: 0.5 %芝加哥: 0.5 %苏州: 0.3 %苏州: 0.3 %莫斯科: 0.1 %莫斯科: 0.1 %菏泽: 0.1 %菏泽: 0.1 %蚌埠: 0.1 %蚌埠: 0.1 %衡水: 0.1 %衡水: 0.1 %西宁: 20.0 %西宁: 20.0 %西安: 2.0 %西安: 2.0 %诺沃克: 0.1 %诺沃克: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.2 %贵阳: 0.2 %赤峰: 0.1 %赤峰: 0.1 %达州: 0.8 %达州: 0.8 %运城: 1.0 %运城: 1.0 %邯郸: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.2 %邵阳: 0.1 %邵阳: 0.1 %郑州: 0.2 %郑州: 0.2 %鄂州: 0.2 %鄂州: 0.2 %重庆: 0.4 %重庆: 0.4 %铜仁: 0.1 %铜仁: 0.1 %银川: 0.5 %银川: 0.5 %锦州: 0.2 %锦州: 0.2 %长春: 0.9 %长春: 0.9 %长沙: 0.5 %长沙: 0.5 %长治: 0.1 %长治: 0.1 %阿什本: 0.1 %阿什本: 0.1 %青岛: 1.3 %青岛: 1.3 %鞍山: 0.1 %鞍山: 0.1 %驻马店: 0.2 %驻马店: 0.2 %黄冈: 0.1 %黄冈: 0.1 %黄石: 0.1 %黄石: 0.1 %黔南: 0.1 %黔南: 0.1 %其他China三亚上海上饶东莞东营中卫中山临汾乌鲁木齐乐山九江伊春佳木斯保定克拉玛依兰州内江凉山北京南京南宁南昌南阳呼和浩特咸阳哈尔滨哈里亚纳哥伦布唐山嘉兴大庆大连天津宁波安庆安康宣城巴中巴彦淖尔巴音郭楞布达佩斯常德平顶山广州庆阳张家口张掖徐州怀化惠州成都扬州文山新乡无锡日照昆明曲靖朝阳杭州松原武汉汕头池州沈阳沧州泰州洛阳济宁海口海西淄博淮南深圳温州湛江滨州漯河漳州潮州濮阳焦作白银盘锦石家庄福州秦皇岛绥化舟山芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州莫斯科菏泽蚌埠衡水西宁西安诺沃克贵阳赤峰达州运城邯郸邵阳郑州鄂州重庆铜仁银川锦州长春长沙长治阿什本青岛鞍山驻马店黄冈黄石黔南

Catalog

    Figures(5)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (724) PDF downloads(55) Cited by(10)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return