SONG C H,YU F,SHI G,2023. The activity characteristics and comprehensive geophysical evidence of the Zhangyan–Jinshanwei concealed active fault in Shanghai, China[J]. Journal of Geomechanics,29(6):888−897 doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2023058
Citation: SONG C H,YU F,SHI G,2023. The activity characteristics and comprehensive geophysical evidence of the Zhangyan–Jinshanwei concealed active fault in Shanghai, China[J]. Journal of Geomechanics,29(6):888−897 doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2023058

The activity characteristics and comprehensive geophysical evidence of the Zhangyan–Jinshanwei concealed active fault in Shanghai, China

doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2023058
Funds:  This research is financially supported by the Shanghai Municipal Financial Funding Project (Grant No.18-29780).
More Information
  • The concealed faults in the urban area of Shanghai are well-developed, accumulating several hundred meters of loose sediment layers since the Quaternary. Hindered by the complex and highly disturbed urban environment, the detection and characterization of concealed faults face challenges, posing significant geological risks for urban safety. This study employs high-precision gravity area measurements, high-resolution shallow seismic exploration, and geophysical exploration methods. It integrates geological stratification from surrounding boreholes, stress, and chronostratigraphy analyses (C14 and optically stimulated luminescence) to investigate the Quaternary and current activity of the Zhangyan–Jinshanwei fault. Results show that the fault exhibits good spatial continuity, with evidence reflected in Bouguer gravity anomalies and seismic time profiles. The Zhangyan–Jinshanwei fault is identified as a thrust fault with inherited and newly developed activity characteristics. Its overall trend is northwestward at 315°, dipping southwest, with a fault distance of approximately 10 meters along the bedrock surface. The upper fault point has been displaced to the mid-Pleistocene in the Quaternary. The most recent active period occurred during the mid-Pleistocene, and the current northwestward stress state makes the fault susceptible to extensional and torsional activities. Continuous attention is required for the ongoing activity of this fault. This study's detection approach and findings can serve as a reference for similar urban concealed active fault detection and activity analysis.

     

  • Full-text Translaiton by iFLYTEK

    The full translation of the current issue may be delayed. If you encounter a 404 page, please try again later.
  • [1]
    BAO H Y, GUO Z F, ZHANG L L, et al. , 2013. Tectonic dynamics of eastern china since the formation of the pacific plate[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 28(3): 337-346. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [2]
    CAMERON M, 2009. Time depth conversion and seismic velocity analysis based on time offset velocity[J]. MA F Z, trans. Petroleum Geophysics, 7(1): 48-52. (in Chinese)
    [3]
    CHENG J Y, XIONG S Q, YIN C X, 2013. Geological and geophysical interpretation of the bouguer gravity map of China[J]. Geological Review, 29(2): 181-189. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [4]
    DENG Q D, XU X W, ZHANG X K, et al. , 2003. Methods and techniques for surveying and prospecting active faults in urban areas[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 10(1): 93-104. (in Chinese)
    [5]
    DENG Q D, LU Z X, YANG Z E, 2007. Remarks on urban active faults exploration and associated activity assessment[J]. Seismology and Geology, 29(2): 189-200. (in Chinese)
    [6]
    GU P T, 2006. Thinking of getotectonic attribution on Jinshan Group in Shanghai Area[J]. Shanghai Land & Resources, 27(4): 10-13. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [7]
    GU Q P, XU H G, ZHAO Q G, 2015. The seismic exploration method for buried active faults in thick sediment area: A case study of Qiaobei-Suqian fault[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 39(2): 408-415. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [8]
    GUAN X P, 1991. An effective and simple approach of subsurface inversion using parker's equation[J]. Computing Techniques for Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 13(3): 236-242. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [9]
    GUO T, HU J S, YIN K M, et al. , 2019. Gravity interface inversion method based on three-dimensional seismic peeling and its application[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2019, 43(5): 1090-1096. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [10]
    GUO Y, LI J S. 2022. Application of High Density Electrical Method in Rock Exploration of Badong Formation in Fengjie Area[J]. Railway Investigation and Surveying, 48(6): 71-76. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [11]
    HUO E J, LIU C S, ZHANG Z Q, et al. , 2013. Study on hidden faults and their activity in Shanghai City[M]. Beijing: Seismological Press. (in Chinese)
    [12]
    LEI X D, QI B S, GUAN W, et al. , 2021. Research on the faults identification based on gravity anomaly in Beijing plain[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 64(4): 1253-1265. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [13]
    LI C B, JIANG R, ZENG J W, et al. , 2022. Construction of bedrock geological model in shallow overburden area: Application of a joint inversion of gravity anomaly and borehole data in the Tanlu Fault Zone, Sihong area[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 41(2-3): 425-435. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [14]
    LI C Y, WANG Y P, WANG Z C, 2007. Some analyses on the relation between the upper offset point and the latest activity times of buried faults in cities of eastern China: taking the Xingtai and Tangshan earthquake regions as an example[J]. Seismology and Geology, 29(2): 431-445. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [15]
    LI S Z, CAO X Z, WANG G Z, et al. , 2019. Meso-cenozoic tectonic evolution and plate reconstruction of the Pacific plate[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 25(5): 642-677. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [16]
    LI W L, TIAN Q N, LIU S F, et al. , 2018. Progress in the study of shallow seismic exploration technology in urban areas[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 42(4): 653-661. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [17]
    LIU X L, FAN J, ZHU J W, et al. Critical slowing-down characteristics of brittle fracture of rock bridge under uniaxial compression [J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2022, 53( 3) : 166-175. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [18]
    LU J M, WANG Y G, 2009. Principle of seismic exploration[M]. 3rd ed. Dongying: China University of Petroleum Press. (in Chinese)
    [19]
    MA S, WANG H W, XU S S, et al. , 2021. High-precision gravity is used to probe the structural characteristics of Zhangyan-Jinshanwei floor and the distribution of buried faults[J]. Advances in Geosciences, 11(8): 1024-1032. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [20]
    MENG X H, GUO L H, CHEN Z X, et al. , 2009. A method for gravity anomaly separation based on preferential continuation and its application[J]. Applied Geophysics, 6(3): 217-225. doi: 10.1007/s11770-009-0025-y
    [21]
    QI B S, FENG C J, TANG C X, et al. , 2018. Study on the regional crustal stability in Zhangjiakou and its adjacent areas[J]. Urban Geology, 13(3): 1-14. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [22]
    QIU J B, LI X, 2007. Quaternary stratigraphy and sedimentary environment in Shanghai[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific & Technical Publishers. (in Chinese)
    [23]
    Shanghai Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, 1988. Shanghai regional geology[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House. (in Chinese)
    [24]
    SHANG Y J, JIN W J, WANG G J, et al. , 2018. Comprehensive analysis of geophysical results via different exploration methods in granites of Daya Bay Neutrino tunnel[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 33(4): 1687-1699. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [25]
    SHEN B, 1994. Application of precision gravity measurement[J]. Earth Science, 1: 8-30. (in Chinese)
    [26]
    SONG C H, SHI G, WU H, et al. , 2021. Application of seismic detection by spark source for concealed faults in Shanghai urban water network area[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 27(6): 938-948. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [27]
    TAN C X, SUN Y, WU S R, et al. , 2009. A consideration on regional crustal stability assessment after MS8.0 Wenchuan strong earthquake in China[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 15(2): 142-150. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [28]
    WANG J, GAO Z W, LIU F X, et al. , 2020. Study on Tangshan-Hejian-Cixian earthquake fault zone by shallow seismic exploration method[J]. Seismology and Geology, 42(4): 866-880. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [29]
    WANG Q S, 2003. Gravitology[M]. Beijing: Seismological Press. (in Chinese)
    [30]
    WANG R J, 2010. Application and development of geophysical exploration technology in Shanghai[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific & Technical Publishers. (in Chinese)
    [31]
    WEI P , REN X H, JIAO H X, et al. Study on optimization inversion of initial in-situ stress field within slate area [J] . Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2022, 53(1): 190- 198. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [32]
    WU Z H, 2019. The definition and classification of active faults: history, current status and progress[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 40(5): 661-697. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [33]
    WU Z H, ZHANG H P, 2021. Chief editor’s address[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 27(2): 157-158. (in Chinese)
    [34]
    XU W M, CHEN S, SHI L, 2014. Seismic activity and gravity anomaly characteristics of Yutian in Xinjiang and surrounding regions[J]. Earth Science, 39(12): 1831-1841. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [35]
    XU X W, 2006. Active faults, associated earthquake disaster distribution and policy for disaster reduction[J]. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 1(1): 7-14. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [36]
    XU X W, YU G H, RAN Y K, et al. , 2015. An introduction to active faults in China: findings of active faults in 20 cities[M]. Beijing: Seismological Press. (in Chinese)
    [37]
    YAO X, 2014. Development and problems of regional crustal stability assessment study companying with discussion of the specification compilation[J]. Geological Review, 60(1): 22-30. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [38]
    ZHANG F X, JIANG Z K, ZHANG F Q, et al. , 2007. Calculating upward continuation of gravity anomalies using cosine transfrom[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 22(1): 57-62. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [39]
    ZHANG H, SHI G, WU H, et al. , 2020. In-situ stress measurement in the shallow basement of the Shanghai area and its structural geological significance[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 26(4): 583-594. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [40]
    ZHANG H, SHI G, WU H, et al. , 2021. Quaternary activity of the Luodian-Zhoupu buried fault in the shanghai region: integrated exploration and research[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 27(2): 267-279. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [41]
    ZHANG H L, ZHANG J, 1996. On the geological characteristics of Zhangyan copper deposit in Jinshan county of Shanghai City[J]. Shanghai Geology(4): 9-15. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [42]
    ZHANG H L, 1999. Shanghai geological and mineral records[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences Press. (in Chinese)
    [43]
    ZHANG H L, ZHANG L, XIA Y Y, 2014. The application of shallow seismic prospecting methods to urban active fault detection and risk assessment[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Geophysics, 11(1): 85-88. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [44]
    ZHANG Z Q, LIU C S, WANG F, 2004. Preliminary study on relation of fault activity and seismicity in the Shanghai region[J]. Earthquake Research in China, 20(2): 143-151. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [45]
    ZHOU C, ZHANG S, REN J L, et al. 2022. Application of OCTEM in the Preliminary Investigation of Railway Engineering[J]. Railway Investigation and Surveying, 48(6): 65-71. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [46]
    包汉勇, 郭战峰, 张罗磊, 等, 2013. 太平洋板块形成以来的中国东部构造动力学背景[J]. 地球科学进展, 28(03): 337-346. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2013.03.0337
    [47]
    CAMERON M, 2009. 基于时间偏移速度的时深转换和地震速度分析[J]. 马方正, 译. 油气地球物理, 7(1): 48-52.
    [48]
    程家印, 熊寿庆, 尹春霞, 1983. 全国重力图的地质-地球物理解释[J]. 地质论评, 29(2): 181-189. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0371-5736.1983.02.010
    [49]
    邓起东, 卢造勋, 杨主恩, 2007. 城市活动断层探测和断层活动性评价问题[J]. 地震地质, 29(2): 189-200. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2007.02.001
    [50]
    邓起东‚徐锡伟‚张先康‚等. 2003. 城市活动断裂探测的方法和技术[J]. 地学前缘, 10(1): 93-104.
    [51]
    顾澎涛, 2006. 关于上海地区金山群大地构造属性的思考[J]. 上海地质, 27(4): 10-13.
    [52]
    顾勤平, 许汉刚, 赵启光, 2015. 厚覆盖层地区隐伏活断层探测的地震方法技术: 以桥北镇-宿迁断层为例[J]. 物探与化探, 39(2): 408-415.
    [53]
    关小平, 1991. 利用Parker公式反演界面的一种有效方法[J]. 物探化探计算技术, 13(3): 236-242.
    [54]
    郭涛, 胡加山, 尹克敏, 等, 2019. 基于三维地震剥层的重力界面反演方法及应用[J]. 物探与化探, 43(5): 1090-1096.
    [55]
    郭宇, 李均山. 2022. 高密度电法在奉节地区巴东组岩层勘察中的应用[J]. 铁道勘察, 48(6): 71-76.
    [56]
    火恩杰, 刘昌森, 章振铨, 等, 2004. 上海市隐伏断裂及其活动性研究[M]. 北京: 地震出版社.
    [57]
    雷晓东, 戚帮申, 关伟, 等, 2021. 北京平原区断裂构造重力异常识别研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 64(4): 1253-1265.
    [58]
    李长波, 蒋仁, 曾剑威, 等, 2022. 重力约束反演构建郯庐断裂带泗洪浅覆盖区隐伏基岩地质模型[J]. 地质通报, 41(2-3): 425-435. doi: 10.12097/j.issn.1671-2552.2022.2-3.020
    [59]
    李传友, 汪一鹏, 王志才, 2007. 中国东部城市地区隐伏断裂上断点与最新活动时代关系的初步分析: 以邢台、唐山地震区为例[J]. 地震地质, 29(2): 431-445.
    [60]
    李三忠, 曹现志, 王光增, 等, 2019. 太平洋板块中—新生代构造演化及板块重建[J]. 地质力学学报, 25(05): 642-677.
    [61]
    李万伦, 田黔宁, 刘素芳, 等, 2018. 城市浅层地震勘探技术进展[J]. 物探与化探, 42(04): 653-661.
    [62]
    刘先林, 范杰, 朱觉文, 等. 单轴压缩下岩桥脆性断裂的临界慢化特征[J]. 水利水电技术(中英文), 2022, 53(3): 166-175.
    [63]
    陆基孟, 王永刚, 2009. 地震勘探原理[M]. 3版. 东营: 中国石油大学出版社.
    [64]
    马森, 王浩文, 许少帅, 等, 2021. 利用高精度重力探查张堰–金山卫基底结构特征与隐伏断裂分布[J]. 地球科学前沿, 11(8): 1024-1032.
    [65]
    孟小红, 郭良辉, 陈召曦, 等, 2009. 基于优选延拓的重力异常分离方法及其应用(英文)[J]. 应用地球物理, 6(3): 217-225.
    [66]
    戚帮申, 丰成君, 谭成轩, 等, 2018. 张家口及邻区地壳稳定性研究[J]. 城市地质, 13(3): 1-14. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-1903.2018.03.001
    [67]
    邱金波, 李晓, 2007. 上海市第四纪地层与沉积环境[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社.
    [68]
    上海地质矿产局, 1988. 上海市区域地质志[R]. 北京: 地质出版社.
    [69]
    尚彦军, 金维浚, 王光杰, 等, 2018. 大亚湾中微子试验隧道工程不同物探方法探测结果综合分析[J]. 地球物理学进展, 33(4): 1687-1699. doi: 10.6038/pg2018BB0148
    [70]
    沈博, 1994. 精密重力测量的应用[J]. 地球科学, (1): 8-30.
    [71]
    宋春华, 施刚, 巫虹, 等, 2021. 上海城市水网地区电火花震源地震探测隐伏断裂的应用探索[J]. 地质力学学报, 27(6): 938-948.
    [72]
    谭成轩, 孙叶, 吴树仁, 等, 2009. “5.12”汶川MS8.0大地震后关于我国区域地壳稳定性评价的思考[J]. 地质力学学报, 15(2): 142-150.
    [73]
    王继, 高战武, 刘芳晓, 等, 2020. 用浅层人工地震方法探测唐山—河间—磁县地震构造带内的活动断裂[J]. 地震地质, 42(4): 866-880.
    [74]
    王谦身, 2003. 重力学[M]. 北京: 地震出版社.
    [75]
    王仁杰, 2010. 上海地球物理勘探技术应用与发展[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社.
    [76]
    魏鹏, 任旭华, 焦红星, 等. 板岩区初始地应力场优化反演研究[J]. 水利水电技术(中英文) , 2022, 53(1): 190-198.
    [77]
    吴中海, 2019. 活断层的定义与分类: 历史、现状和进展[J]. 地球学报, 40(5): 661-697.
    [78]
    吴中海, 张会平, 2021. 新构造与环境[J]. 地质力学学报, 27(2): 157-158.
    [79]
    徐伟民, 陈石, 石磊, 2014. 新疆于田及周边地区地震活动性与重力异常特征[J]. 地球科学: 中国地质大学学报, 39(12): 1831-1841.
    [80]
    徐锡伟, 2006. 活动断层、地震灾害与减灾对策问题[J]. 震灾防御技术, 1(1): 7-14.
    [81]
    徐锡伟, 于贵华, 冉勇康, 等, 2015. 中国城市活动断层概论: 20个城市活动断层探测成果[M]. 北京: 地震出版社.
    [82]
    姚鑫, 2014. 区域地壳稳定性评价研究进展与问题, 兼谈规范编制[J]. 地质论评, 60(1): 22-30.
    [83]
    张凤旭, 姜正奎, 张凤琴, 等, 2007. 利用余弦变换计算重力异常的向上延拓[J]. 地球物理学进展, 22(1): 57-62.
    [84]
    张浩, 施刚, 巫虹, 等, 2020. 上海地区浅部地应力测量及其构造地质意义分析[J]. 地质力学学报, 26(4): 583-594.
    [85]
    张浩, 施刚, 巫虹, 等, 2021. 上海罗店-周浦隐伏断裂第四纪活动性综合探测与研究[J]. 地质力学学报, 27(2): 267-279. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2021.27.02.025
    [86]
    张宏良, 张洁, 1996. 上海金山张堰铜矿床地质特征[J]. 上海地质, 4: 9-15.
    [87]
    张宏良, 1999. 上海地质矿产志[M]. 上海: 上海社会科学院出版社.
    [88]
    张慧利, 张琳, 夏媛媛, 2014. 浅层地震勘探在城市活断层探测与危险性评价中的应用[J]. 工程地球物理学报, 11(1): 85-88. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7940.2014.01.016
    [89]
    章振铨, 刘昌森, 王锋, 2004. 上海地区断裂活动性与地震关系初析[J]. 中国地震, 20(2): 143-151. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4683.2004.02.004
    [90]
    周超, 张硕, 任金龙, 等. 2022. OCTEM在铁路工程前期勘察中的应用[J]. 铁道勘察, 48(6): 65-71.
  • Relative Articles

    2025: Deformation and geochronology of a ductile shear zone on the south side of Foping Dome in the South Qinling. Journal of Geomechanics. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2025008
    LI Yebo, HUANG Luyuan, YAO Rui, TIAN Yiwei, YANG Shuxin. 2024: Spatiotemporal evolution of interseismic coupling and stress accumulation near an asperity on a vertical strike-slip fault: Insights from three-dimensional viscoelastic numerical simulation. Journal of Geomechanics, 30(6): 878-892. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2023134
    LI Bin, ZHANG Wen, WEN Ran. 2022: Study on the hydraulic fracturing in-situ stress measurement in super-long highway tunnels in southern Shaanxi:Engineering geological significance. Journal of Geomechanics, 28(2): 191-202. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2021053
    WENG Jianqiao, ZENG Lianbo, LYU Wenya, LIU Qi, ZU Kewei. 2020: Width of stress disturbed zone near fault and its influencing factors. Journal of Geomechanics, 26(1): 39-47. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2020.26.01.004
    FENG Chengjun, QI Bangshen, ZHANG Peng, SUN Dongsheng, MENG Jing, NIU Linlin, WANG Miaomiao, TAN Chengxuan, CHEN Qunce. 2018: CRUSTAL STRESS FIELD AND ITS TECTONIC SIGNIFICANCE NEAR THE LONGMENSHAN FAULT BELT, AFTER THE WENCHUAN Ms8.0 EARTHQUAKE. Journal of Geomechanics, 24(4): 439-451. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2018.24.04.046
    QIN Xianghui, CHEN Qunce, MENG Wen, TAN Chengxuan, ZHANG Chongyuan, FENG Chengjun. 2018: EVALUATING MEASURED IN-SITU STRESS STATE CHANGES ASSOCIATED WITH EARTHQUAKES AND ITS IMPLICATIONS: A CASE STUDY IN THE LONGMENSHAN FAULT ZONE. Journal of Geomechanics, 24(3): 309-320. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2018.24.03.033
    ZONG Kaihong, ZONG Wen, KANG Congxuan, LUO Ding, BAI Shibiao. 2018: CHRONOLOGY STUDY OF THE QUATERNARY STRATA IN YBK1 CORE IN THE NORTH WING OF THE YANGTZE RIVER DELTA. Journal of Geomechanics, 24(1): 116-127. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2018.24.01.013
    HUO Hailong, ZHANG Da, CHEN Zhengle, BI Minfeng, CHEN Guohua, HE Xiaolong, LI Ning, LI Xingjian, XUE Wei, OUYANG Yongpeng. 2018: DEFORMATION CHARACTERISTICS AND GEOCHRONOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS OF MESOZOIC NAPPE STRUCTURE IN JINGDEZHEN AREA, NORTHEASTERN JIANGXI. Journal of Geomechanics, 24(1): 9-24. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2018.24.01.002
    BAO Linhai, DU Yi, GUO Qiliang, ZHANG Yanshan. 2017: IN-SITU STRESS MEASUREMENT AND RESEARCH ON TECTONIC STRESS FIELD DISTRIBUTION LAW OF CHENGDU-LANZHOU RAILWAY. Journal of Geomechanics, 23(5): 734-742.
    LIU Wen-ye. 2006: APPLICATION OF WAVELET ANALYSIS IN HIGH-RESOLUTION SEQUENCE STRATIGRAPHIC DIVISION. Journal of Geomechanics, 12(1): 64-70.
    PENG Hua, CUI Wei, MA Xiu-min, LI Jin-suo. 2006: HYDROFRACTURING IN-SITU STRESS MEASUREMENTS OF THE WATER DIVERSION AREA IN THE FIRST STAGE OF THE SOUTH-NORTH WATER DIVERSION PROJECT (WESTERN LINE). Journal of Geomechanics, 12(2): 182-190.
    MA Xiu-min, PENG Hua, LI Jin-suo. 2005: APPLICATION OF HYDRAULIC FRACTURING IN-SITU STRESS MEASUREMENTS IN TUNNELLING IN WESTERN XINJIANG. Journal of Geomechanics, 11(4): 386-393.
    TAN Cheng-xuan, SUN Ye, WANG Lian-jie. 2003: SOME PROBLEMS OF IN-SITU CRUSTAL STRESS MEASUREMENTS. Journal of Geomechanics, 9(3): 275-280,260.
    DING Yuan-chen, WANG Xi-hai, HE Pei-yuan. 2001: THE SWAYING PROBLEM OF UNIVERSAL TESTING MACHINE IN THE MEASUREMENT OF ROCK STRESS BY AE METHOD DING Yuan-chen,WANG Xi-hai,HE Pei-yuan. Journal of Geomechanics, 7(4): 346-350.
    WANG Xue-chao, GUO Qi-liang, ZHANG Hui, LIU Zhen-hong. 2000: CRUSTAL STRESS MEASUREMENT IN NORTHEASTERN QINGZANG PLATEAU BY HYDROFRACTURING. Journal of Geomechanics, 6(2): 64-70.
    YONG Xiao-cong, WANG Lian-jie. 2000: ERROR PROCESSING AND PRECISION ESTIMATION FOR ROCK STRESS MEASUREMENT. Journal of Geomechanics, 6(2): 53-63.
    LI Hong, CHEN Jingsong, JIANG Nansheng, WANG Fujiang, ZHANG Bochong. 1999: INSITU STRESS MEASUREMENT BY A METHOD USING ORIENTED CORE. Journal of Geomechanics, 5(1): 87-91.
    SUN Jianzhong, ZHANG Jingzhao, PENG Jianbing, ZHANG Jun, LI Bingcheng. 1998: CHRONOLOGICAL STUDIES ON ACTIVE FAULTS AND GROUND FISSURES IN GUANZHONG AREA, SHAANXI PROVINCE,CHINA. Journal of Geomechanics, 4(4): 88-97.
    Jiang Fuchu, Wu Xihao, Xiao Huaguo, Wang Sumin, Xue Bin. 1997: THE HIGH-RESOLUTION LATE PLEISTOCENE LOESS STRATIGRAPHY IN TAOHUAYU,MANGSHAN,ZHENGZHOU. Journal of Geomechanics, 3(2): 11-17.
    Ding Yuanchen, Shao Zhaogang. 1996: A COMPARISON OF THE RESULTS OF STRESS MEASUREMENTS OBTAINED BY AE WITH THAT BY HYDROFRACTURING AT TAIYUAN,SHANXI. Journal of Geomechanics, 2(1): 70-76.
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04010203040
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 28.3 %FULLTEXT: 28.3 %META: 66.0 %META: 66.0 %PDF: 5.7 %PDF: 5.7 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 4.5 %其他: 4.5 %其他: 0.3 %其他: 0.3 %Gainesville: 0.1 %Gainesville: 0.1 %上海: 6.2 %上海: 6.2 %东莞: 0.1 %东莞: 0.1 %中卫: 1.2 %中卫: 1.2 %临沂: 0.1 %临沂: 0.1 %丽水: 0.1 %丽水: 0.1 %乌鲁木齐: 0.1 %乌鲁木齐: 0.1 %伯尔尼: 0.4 %伯尔尼: 0.4 %信阳: 0.1 %信阳: 0.1 %儋州: 0.1 %儋州: 0.1 %北京: 13.2 %北京: 13.2 %十堰: 0.1 %十堰: 0.1 %南京: 0.7 %南京: 0.7 %南宁: 0.1 %南宁: 0.1 %厦门: 0.1 %厦门: 0.1 %古吉拉特: 0.1 %古吉拉特: 0.1 %合肥: 0.1 %合肥: 0.1 %吕梁: 0.1 %吕梁: 0.1 %周口: 0.1 %周口: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.3 %呼和浩特: 0.3 %哥伦布: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.1 %唐山: 0.1 %唐山: 0.1 %大同: 0.1 %大同: 0.1 %天津: 1.8 %天津: 1.8 %太原: 0.1 %太原: 0.1 %宁波: 0.1 %宁波: 0.1 %安康: 0.1 %安康: 0.1 %宣城: 0.1 %宣城: 0.1 %巴音郭楞: 0.3 %巴音郭楞: 0.3 %广州: 0.4 %广州: 0.4 %廊坊: 0.3 %廊坊: 0.3 %弗吉: 0.1 %弗吉: 0.1 %张家口: 7.3 %张家口: 7.3 %怀化: 0.1 %怀化: 0.1 %成都: 1.0 %成都: 1.0 %扬州: 0.3 %扬州: 0.3 %日喀则: 0.1 %日喀则: 0.1 %昆明: 0.4 %昆明: 0.4 %昌吉: 0.1 %昌吉: 0.1 %朝阳: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.3 %杭州: 0.6 %杭州: 0.6 %武汉: 0.7 %武汉: 0.7 %池州: 0.1 %池州: 0.1 %沈阳: 0.1 %沈阳: 0.1 %波士顿: 0.1 %波士顿: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.3 %洛阳: 0.3 %济南: 0.6 %济南: 0.6 %温州: 0.3 %温州: 0.3 %湘西: 0.1 %湘西: 0.1 %漯河: 0.7 %漯河: 0.7 %珠海: 0.1 %珠海: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.6 %石家庄: 0.6 %芒廷维尤: 21.4 %芒廷维尤: 21.4 %芝加哥: 1.8 %芝加哥: 1.8 %荆州: 0.1 %荆州: 0.1 %荆门: 0.1 %荆门: 0.1 %莆田: 0.1 %莆田: 0.1 %莫斯科: 0.6 %莫斯科: 0.6 %萍乡: 0.7 %萍乡: 0.7 %西宁: 15.7 %西宁: 15.7 %西安: 0.9 %西安: 0.9 %诺沃克: 4.8 %诺沃克: 4.8 %贵阳: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %费利蒙: 0.1 %费利蒙: 0.1 %赣州: 0.1 %赣州: 0.1 %运城: 1.9 %运城: 1.9 %遵义: 0.1 %遵义: 0.1 %邢台: 0.1 %邢台: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %郑州: 0.4 %郑州: 0.4 %鄂尔多斯: 0.1 %鄂尔多斯: 0.1 %酒泉: 0.1 %酒泉: 0.1 %重庆: 0.3 %重庆: 0.3 %银川: 0.1 %银川: 0.1 %长春: 0.4 %长春: 0.4 %长沙: 1.6 %长沙: 1.6 %长治: 0.4 %长治: 0.4 %其他其他Gainesville上海东莞中卫临沂丽水乌鲁木齐伯尔尼信阳儋州北京十堰南京南宁厦门古吉拉特合肥吕梁周口呼和浩特哥伦布唐山大同天津太原宁波安康宣城巴音郭楞广州廊坊弗吉张家口怀化成都扬州日喀则昆明昌吉朝阳杭州武汉池州沈阳波士顿洛阳济南温州湘西漯河珠海石家庄芒廷维尤芝加哥荆州荆门莆田莫斯科萍乡西宁西安诺沃克贵阳费利蒙赣州运城遵义邢台邯郸郑州鄂尔多斯酒泉重庆银川长春长沙长治

Catalog

    Figures(8)  / Tables(2)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (449) PDF downloads(39) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return