Citation: | ZHANG Yi-kun, 2007. RHEOLOGIC IMPLICATIONS OF CONJUGATE SHEAR ANGLES. Journal of Geomechanics, 13 (3): 212-219. |
[1] |
Watterson J.The future of failure:stress or strain?[J].Journal of Structural Geology, 1999, 21:939~948. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8141(99)00012-7
|
[2] |
Ramsay JG.Shear zone geometry:a review[J]. Journal of Structural Geology, 1980, 2:83~89. doi: 10.1016/0191-8141(80)90038-3
|
[3] |
Bahroudi A, Koyi HA, Talbot CJ.Effect of ductile and frictional decollements on style of extension[J].Journal of Structural Geology, 2003, 25:1401~1423. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8141(02)00201-8
|
[4] |
Park RG.Shear-zone deformation and bulk strain in granite-greenstone terrain of the Western Superior Provinces, Canada[J]. Precambrian Research, 1981, 14:31~47. doi: 10.1016/0301-9268(81)90034-6
|
[5] |
Robertson EC. Viscoelasticity of Rocks. In: State of Stress in the Earth' s Crust, W. R. Judd (ed. )[M]. New York: Elsevier, 1964. 181~233.
|
[6] |
Zhang Y. Rheologic implications of the geometry of ductile shear zones. In: Maximum Lateral Displacement Rate Theory, Chapter 2. Nanjing, 2005, 123p.
|
[7] |
Zhang Y. Rheologic implications of the geometry of low-angle normal faults. In: Maximum Lateral Displacement Rate Theory, Chapter 3. Nanjing, 2006, 123p.
|