Processing math: 100%
ZHAO Wei-hua, WEI Jian-xin, SUN Dong-sheng, et al., 2016. STUDY ON SEISMIC PROPERTY OF CRACK-INCLUDED PHYSICAL MODEL. Journal of Geomechanics, 22 (4): 967-975.
Citation: XIAO Chang-hao, LI Gong-jian, LIU Huan, et al., 2016. CHARACTERISTICS OF RARE EARTH AND TRACE ELEMENTS OF STIBNITE FROM THE BIJIASHAN ANTIMONY DEPOSIT, SOUTHWEST YUNNAN: IMPLICATIONS FOR ORE GENESIS. Journal of Geomechanics, 22 (2): 310-324.

CHARACTERISTICS OF RARE EARTH AND TRACE ELEMENTS OF STIBNITE FROM THE BIJIASHAN ANTIMONY DEPOSIT, SOUTHWEST YUNNAN: IMPLICATIONS FOR ORE GENESIS

More Information
  • Taking the Bijiashan antimony deposit as the research object, we reveal the source and nature of ore-forming fluid using ICP-MS analysis of stibnite based on the fine dissection of ore deposits. The REE patterns of stibnite show enrichment of LREE with the intense fractionation, with obvious Tb and Dy positive anomaly and Eu positive anomaly, which is similar with the REE patterns of the Himalayan alkali-rich porphyry. Furthermore, the characteristics of strongly Sr and Ba positive anomaly in the trace element of stibnite, is consistent with that of the Himalayan alkali-rich porphyry. The Y/Ho ratios of stibnite increase along with the increase of altitude and degree of oxidation. The Y/Ho ratios of stibnite with high degree of oxidation is similar with the Y/Ho ratios of sea water and the Y/Ho ratios of stibnite with low degree of oxidation is similar with the Y/Ho ratios of the Lianhuashan alkali-rich porphyry, which suggests that ore-forming fluid may be from the mixture of magmas and atmospheric water and that is also supported by H-O isotope study. Isotope analysis reveals that Pb is from multiple sources and S of stibnite is a mixture of biological sulfur and magmatic sulfur. Results display that the deposit controlled by interformational fracture zone is an epithermal deposit which formed in distal volcanic settings.

     

  • 地壳岩体中普遍发育裂隙和断层, 这些裂隙和断层是影响岩层结构力学性质和连通性的重要因素, 受地应力的作用, 这些裂隙通常在空间上相互平行分布[1~5]。裂隙可以是储集空间, 也可以是渗流通道, 在油气成藏理论分析与开发设计中都受到了密切的关注[4~5]。利用实验室制作的人工物理模型进行弹性波速测试, 是研究裂隙对地震波性质影响的一个重要手段[6~11]。Hudson理论能够定量分析裂隙的密度、高宽比等对裂隙介质弹性参数的影响[12~16]。地下岩石裂隙系统处于一定的地应力环境之中, 应力变化会影响基质和裂隙材料的弹性性质[17~22], 围压下人工模型裂隙对地震波速度的实验测试能够研究Hudson裂缝介质理论在不同深度条件下的应用, 并对理论和相关数据的拓展应用提供实验支持, 因此具有重要的理论与现实意义。

    基于Hudson理论, 用等重量的环氧树脂多次分层浇铸作为基质, 在环氧树脂层间置入等厚的硬币状橡胶模拟裂隙, 每层均匀置入等量等厚的裂隙材料[6~7, 11]。模型的裂隙密度由ε=Nr3/V公式计算得出, 其中N是裂隙的总个数, r是裂隙圆片的半径, V是模型体积[14]。首先制作出均匀的立方体, 再钻取3个直径25 mm相互正交的圆柱状试样(XYZ)进行实验, 其中XY相互垂直平行于裂隙材料定向分布形成的面理, Z样品垂直于面理, 圆柱两端经过磨床抛光, 平整度达到0.5%。样品裂隙分布如图 1所示。

    图  1  样品裂隙分布与XYZ分布示意图
    Figure  1.  Simplified diagram of distribution of crack and X Y Z

    考虑裂隙密度和裂隙高宽比2个影响因素, 制作了两组样品:第一组, 相同裂隙直径2 mm, 裂隙密度分别是2%、4%、6%的模型3块; 第二组, 相同裂隙密度4%, 裂隙直径分别为2 mm、2.5 mm和3 mm的模型3块。采用分层浇铸制作了纯基质(裂隙密度为0) 样品1块(编号M1);此外还将裂隙材料做成块状, 钻取柱状样品(编号M0)。分组编号及单个柱体物理参数见表 1

    表  1  样品参数信息
    Table  1.  Sample parameters
    样品编号直径/mm高度/mm裂隙密度/%裂隙直径/mm密度/(g·cm-3)
    M025.4037.12--1.109
    M1-125.3847.480-1.174
    Z02X25.3243.26221.168
    Z02Y25.4248.82221.180
    Z02Z25.4243.46221.174
    Z04X25.4247.84421.176
    Z04Y25.4447.66421.176
    Z04Z25.4247.52421.175
    Z06X25.4049.42621.166
    Z06Y25.4249.56621.178
    Z06Z25.4247.36621.177
    Z08X25.4245.7442.51.169
    Z08Y25.4047.0242.51.176
    Z08Z25.4248.8242.51.171
    Z10X25.4249.02431.173
    Z10Y25.4248.16431.176
    Z10Z25.4047.74431.175
    下载: 导出CSV 
    | 显示表格

    应用美国NER公司生产的AutoLab2000C岩石物性测试系统进行了波速测量, 脉冲透射法三分量探头一次触发能够获取纵波和相互垂直的两个横波等3个信号, 其中纵波换能器频率700 kHz, 横波换能器频率500 kHz, 测试误差小于0.5%。试验获得了样品在0~25 MPa围压条件下的纵、横波速度。对于裂隙材料, 由于其柔软的特性, 仅进行了常压条件下的速度测量, 纵波速度为1385 m/s, 未测到横波信号; 对于分层浇铸无裂隙样品M1-1(纯基质), 无围压条件波速测试结果表明3个方向的纵波速度和6个横波速度分量各自近似相等, 因此可认为基质为均匀各向同性。纵波速度测试结果用VpXX(快纵波)、VpYY(中间纵波)和VpZZ(慢纵波)表示, 分别代表XYZ方向的纵波速度。横波速度用Vs后加两个字母表示, 第一个字母表示传播方向, 第二个字母表示偏振方向, 例如VsXZ表示传播方向为X偏振方向为Z的横波速度。波速由公式V=1/t计算得出, 其中t为首波到时。

    试验结果表明, 随着围压的增大, 样品的纵、横波速度都近线性增加。纵波速度VpXX与VpYY近似相等且大于VpZZ; 横波速度VsXY与VsYX近似相等, VsXZ、VsZX、VsYZ与VsZY近似相等且小于VsXY与VsYX, 这符合横向各向同性样品的特征。图 2显示了样品Z04纵波、横波速度随围压的变化。

    图  2  样品Z04实测纵、横波速度随围压的变化
    Figure  2.  The measured Vp and Vs varying with the confining pressure (Sample Z04)

    根据Hudson理论, 应用基质和裂隙材料的剪切模量、拉梅系数和宽高比等参数, 经修正计算可得到理论上的裂纹模型的纵横波速度[12~13]。本文应用分层浇铸基质样品升压至25 MPa的不同围压条件下实测波速计算得出的弹性参数、裂隙介质的弹性常数, 结合给定裂隙尺寸及裂隙密度, 计算了不同围压下含裂隙集合体的快慢纵横波速度。计算结果与实测结果随围压变化有近似的变化规律, 高围压时计算与实测结果吻合很好, 低围压下个别数据误差相对较大主要是探头与样品端面耦合不好造成的, 实测数据与计算数据之差在±0.5%之内。图 3显示了样品Z02实测纵、横波速度与理论计算结果随围压的变化。

    图  3  样品Z02实测与计算纵、横波速度随围压的变化
    Figure  3.  The measured and calculated Vp and Vs varying with the confining pressure (Sample Z02)

    基于Hudson理论实测并计算了裂隙直径2 mm, 裂隙密度分别为2%、4%和6%的3个模型的波速及各向异性, 分析裂隙密度的变化对横向各向同性介质弹性性质的影响。图 4a显示了3种裂隙密度样品快、慢纵波速度随围压的变化, 随着围压的增大, 3种裂隙密度的样品纵波速度均近似保持同样的速率线性增加。裂隙密度在2%~6%之间, 随着裂隙密度的增大快纵波与慢纵波速度不同程度地降低, 慢纵波降低幅度较大, 这与前人常压条件下的试验结果[6]变化规律一致。图 4b给出了3种裂隙密度样品横波随围压的变化, 图中显示, 裂隙密度在2%~6%之间, 随着裂隙密度增大, 快横波速度变化不明显, 慢横波速度则大幅降低。

    图  4  直径2 mm的3种裂隙密度模型纵、横波速度随围压的变化
    Figure  4.  Vp and Vs of 3 samples (crack diameter 2 mm) with different crack density varying with confining pressure

    各向异性是进行波速分析从而描述岩石波速性质的重要指标, 本文应用Thomson提出的弱弹性各向异性的表示方法[23~25]进行了各向异性分析, 以ζγ分别代表波速的纵波和横波的各向异性, 定义如下:

    ζ=C11C332C33γ=C66C442C44

    式中:C11C33C66C44为弹性模量, 根据基质和裂隙材料的剪切模量、拉梅系数计算获得[12~13]图 5a显示了裂隙直径2 mm的3种不同裂隙密度样品纵波各向异性随围压的变化, 随围压增加, 纵波各向异性几乎不发生变化, 这也说明引起各向异性的裂隙本身的弹性性质没有发生改变; 其次, 裂隙密度从2%增大到6%, 纵波各向异性显著增加。图 5b显示了裂隙直径2 mm的3种不同裂隙密度样品横波各向异性随围压的变化, 横波各向异性与纵波各向异性的变化规律一致, 在数值上, 横波各向异性远大于纵波各向异性。

    图  5  直径2 mm的3种裂隙密度模型纵、横波各向异性随围压的变化
    Figure  5.  Vp and Vs anisotropy of 3 samples (crack diameter 2 mm) with different crack density varying with confining pressure

    图 6显示了25 MPa围压条件下, 裂隙直径2 mm的3种裂隙密度样品纵、横波速度各向异性与裂隙密度的关系, 回归分析得出, 纵、横波速度各向异性与裂隙密度线性相关, 裂隙密度在2%~6%之间, 随着裂隙密度增大, 各向异性线性增大, 且横波各向异性增加的速率要远大于纵波各向异性增加的速率, 这也说明在此裂隙密度范围内, 横波各向异性对于裂隙密度的改变更加敏感。此外, 通过纵、横波各向异性与裂纹密度的拟合公式, 计算得出在裂纹密度为0即无裂纹时各向异性近似为0, 这与实际情况相符, 可以作为试验数据向0裂纹密度线性推断的依据。

    图  6  围压25 MPa直径2 mm的3种模型纵、横波各向异性随裂隙密度的变化
    Figure  6.  Anisotropy of 3 samples varying with crack density (crack diameter 2 mm, confining pressure 25 MPa)

    应用Hudson理论, 本文实测并计算了裂隙密度4%, 裂隙直径分别是2.0 mm、2.5 mm和3.0 mm的3个模型的纵、横波速度, 研究裂隙直径变化对横向各向同性介质弹性性质的影响。模型制作采用等厚度的裂纹, 因此裂纹直径的改变反映了裂纹宽高比的变化, 进行分析时, 选取裂隙直径作为变量。

    图 7a, 随着围压的增大, 3种直径的样品纵波速度均近似以同样的速率线性增加。裂隙直径从2 mm增大到3 mm, 快纵波速度稍有增加, 慢纵波速度增加明显。图 7b显示了3种裂隙直径的样品横波速度随围压的变化, 从中可见裂隙密度4%, 裂隙直径从2 mm增加到3 mm, 快、慢横波速度均不变。

    图  7  裂隙密度4%的3种直径模型纵、横波速度随围压的变化
    Figure  7.  Vp and Vs of 3 samples with different diameter varying with confining pressure(crack density 4%)

    图 8a显示了3种等裂隙密度样品纵波各向异性随围压的变化, 随围压增大纵波各向异性基本保持不变, 随裂隙直径增大, 纵波各向异性降低; 图 8b给出了3种样品横波各向异性随围压的变化, 横波各向异性随围压与直径改变均不变。

    图  8  裂隙密度4%的3种直径模型纵、横波各向异性随围压的变化
    Figure  8.  Vp and Vs anisotropy of 3 samples with different crack diameters varying with confining pressure (Crack density 4%)

    图 9显示了25 MPa围压条件下, 4%裂纹密度的3种裂隙直径样品纵、横波各向异性随裂隙直径的变化, 可见在数值上横波各向异性远大于纵波各向异性, 随裂隙直径增加, 横波各向异性保持不变, 纵波各向异性逐渐降低。

    图  9  围压25 MPa裂隙密度4%的3种模型纵、横波各向异性随裂隙直径的变化
    Figure  9.  Anisotropy of 3 samples varying with crack diameters (Crack density 4%, confining pressure 25MPa)

    基于Hudson理论, 制作横向各向同性物理模型, 实测并计算了相同直径3种不同裂隙密度与相同裂隙密度3种不同裂隙直径的6个样品0~25 MPa围压条件下的纵(3个分量)、横波(6个分量)速度。对比发现, 实测结果与理论计算的结果吻合较好, 证明物理模型是有效的, 能够运用Hudson理论进行深部地震波性质以及裂隙参数分析。

    基质材料的近似各向同性与基质材料本身弹性性质不发生改变是Hudson理论的基础条件, 随围压的改变材料只发生弹性变形, 裂隙本身与材料颗粒的接触关系不发生改变。0~25 MPa围压条件下的地震波速度计算时, 运用了基质材料0~25 MPa围压条件下的实测弹性参数, 取得了很好的结果。

    实际岩石应用条件非常复杂, 基质颗粒的边界接触条件是一个重要的影响因素, 对于低孔低渗的结晶岩, 需要考虑矿物颗粒之间的接触关系; 但是对于相对高孔隙度的砂岩, 围压改变会轻易地改变颗粒的接触条件以及理论裂隙的高宽比, 这使得理论的应用变得更加复杂。除了要考虑颗粒间的接触关系之外, 还要考虑基质空隙的变化, 在这方面, 需要进行更加深入的探讨。

    应用Hudson理论制作了不同裂隙密度与裂隙直径的横向各向同性人工样品, 运用基质样品在0~25 MPa围压条件下的实测弹性常数计算了理论模型的纵、横波速度, 计算结果与实测结果吻合较好。

    随围压的增大, 模型纵、横波速度均近线性增加。裂隙密度从2%增大到6%, 纵波速度不同程度地降低, 慢纵波降低幅度相对较大, 快横波几乎不发生改变, 慢横波大幅降低。在裂隙密度2%~6%的范围内, 纵、横波各向异性与裂隙密度线性相关, 横波各向异性远大于纵波各向异性; 随着裂隙密度的增大, 纵、横波各向异性逐渐增大, 并且横波各向异性增加的速率要远大于纵波各向异性增加速率。

    裂隙直径从2 mm增大到3 mm, 快纵波增加很小, 慢纵波增加相对明显, 快、慢横波速度均不发生改变。随着围压的增大, 纵、横波各向异性基本保持不变。裂隙密度4%, 直径从2 mm增大到3 mm, 纵波各向异性逐渐降低, 横波各向异性保持不变。

    实际分析裂隙的情况时, 除了要考虑围压对基质弹性性质的影响外, 还需要关注岩石本身的颗粒边界条件和孔隙等性质。

  • [1]
    俞国芬, 薛步高, 俞开基.云南锑(金)成矿带划分及有关成矿问题讨论[J].云南地质, 2009, 28(1):8~15. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YNZD200901002.htm

    YU Guo-fen, XUE Bu-gao, YU Kai-ji.Thedivision of Sb (Au) metallogenetic zone and discussion of related metallogenetic problem of Yunnan [J].Yunnan Geology, 2009, 28(1):8~15. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YNZD200901002.htm
    [2]
    范朝俊.云南巍山锑、汞多金属矿带成矿物质来源初探[J].地球化学, 1991, 4:399~405. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0379-1726.1991.04.011

    FAN Chao-jun.A study on the origin of ore-forming materials in the antimony and mercury multiple-metal ore zone at Weishan, Yunnan Province, China [J].Geochimica, 1991, 4:399~405. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0379-1726.1991.04.011
    [3]
    董芳浏. 云南巍山—永平矿化集中区铜金多金属矿床成矿条件和成矿潜力研究[D]. 博士学位论文, 北京: 中国地质大学, 2002, 1~123. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10616-2002073180.htm

    DONG Fang-liu.Study on metallogenic condition and potentiality of copper-gold-polymetallic deposits in Weishan-Yongping mineralization district, Yunnan[D].China University of Geosciences, Beijing, 2002, 1~123. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10616-2002073180.htm
    [4]
    王勇. 云南巍山—永平铜金多金属矿化集中区成矿流体特征及流体地质填图研究[D]. 博士学位论文, 北京: 中国地质大学, 2002, 1~136. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YNYJ410.010.htm

    WANG Yong.Study on the characteristics of metallogenic fluids and fluid-geological mapping in the Weishan-Yongping opper-gold-polymetallic mineralization district, Yunnan [D].Beijing: China University of Geoscience, 2002.1~136. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YNYJ410.010.htm
    [5]
    常开永.云南巍山笔架山锑矿床成因.云南地质, 2007, 26(2):197~206. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLX201602011.htm

    CHANG Kai-yong. On the genesis of Bijiashan Sb deposit in Weishan, Yunnan [J]. Yunan Geology, 2007, 26(2):197~206. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLX201602011.htm
    [6]
    肖昌浩. 三江中南段低温热液矿床成矿系列研究[D]. 博士学位论文, 北京: 中国地质大学, 2013, 1~154. http://cpfd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CPFDTOTAL-DZDQ201601004012.htm

    XIAO Chang-hao.The Study on Minerogenic Series of Epithermal Deposits in Mid-southern Segment of the Sanjiang Orogenic Belt, Southwest China [D]. Beijing: China University of Geoscience, 2013, 1~154. http://cpfd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CPFDTOTAL-DZDQ201601004012.htm
    [7]
    刘英俊, 曹励明, 李兆麟.元素地球化学[M].北京:地质出版社, 1984, 1~548.

    LIU Ying-jun, CAO Li-ming, LI Zhao-lin.Geochemistry of Element [M].geological publishing house, Beijing, 2013, 1~154.
    [8]
    ZHANG Qian. Trace elements in galena and sphalerite and their geochemical significance in distinguishing the genetic types of Pb-Zn ore deposits [J]. Ore geology review, 1987, 39: 188~217. doi: 10.1007%2FBF02872218.pdf
    [9]
    韩照信.秦岭泥盆系铅锌成矿带中闪锌矿的标型特征[J].西安地质学院学报, 1994, 16(1):12~17. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGX401.001.htm

    HAN Zhao-xin. The typomorphic characteristic of the sphalerite in the qingling Devoniansystem lead-zinc metallogenic belt [J]. Journal of Xi'an college of geology, 1994, 16(1):12~17. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGX401.001.htm
    [10]
    BEAUDOIN Georges. Acicular sphalerite enriched in Ag, Sb, and Cu embedded within color banded sphalerite from the Kokanee Range, BC[J]. Canadian Mineralogist, 2000, 38: 1387~1398. doi: 10.2113/gscanmin.38.6.1387
    [11]
    GASPAR MariaL, JESCH Stephen A, VISWANATHA Raghuvir, et al. A block in endoplasmic reticulum-to-Golgi trafficking inhibits phospholipid synthesis and induces neutral lipid accumulation[J]. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2008, 283:25735~25751. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M802685200
    [12]
    CAMPBELL AndrewR and ROBINSON-COOK Sylveen.Infrared fluid inclusion microthermometry on coexisting wolframite and quartz[J].Economic Geology, 1987, 82(6):1640~1645. doi: 10.2113/gsecongeo.82.6.1640
    [13]
    CAMPBELL AndrewR and PANTER KS.Comparison of fluid inclusions incoexisting (cogenetic?) wolframite, cassiterite, and quartz from St.Michael's Mount and Cligga Head, Cornwall, England[J].Geochimicaet Cosmochimica Acta, 1990, 54(3):673~681. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(90)90363-P
    [14]
    云南省地质矿产局, 云南省区域地质志, 地质出版社, 1999, 1~137.

    Bureau of geology and mineral resources in Yunnan Province, Regional geology of Yunnan Province, 1999, 1~137.
    [15]
    张红雨, 苏犁, 秦红, 等.硫化物矿物中多组分元素ICP-MS测定方法研究[J].化学工程与技术, 2012, 2:67~72. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10616-1015312781.htm
    [16]
    汪津津, 胡煜昭, 韩润生.贵州晴隆锑矿田微量元素地球化学特征及其对成矿流体的指示意义[J].矿物学报, 2011, 31(3):571~577. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KWXB201103037.htm

    WANG Jin-jin, HU Yu-zhao, HAN Run-sheng.Geochemical characteristics and its implications of trace elements in Qinglong antimony deposit, Guizhou Province, China [J].Acta Mineralogica Sinica, 2011, 31(3):571~577. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KWXB201103037.htm
    [17]
    戚学祥, 李天福, 于春林.藏南沙拉岗锑矿稀土和微量元素地球化学示踪及成矿物质来源[J].现代地质, 2008, 22(2):162~172. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ200802003.htm

    QI Xue-xiang, LI Tian-fu, YU Chun-lin.Rare earth element and trace element geochemistry of Shalagang antimony deposit in the Southern Tibet and Its tracing significancefor the origin ofMetallogenic elements[J].Geoscience, 2008.22(2):162~172. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ200802003.htm
    [18]
    张建芳. 北喜马拉雅扎西康铅锌锑银矿床成因研究[D]. 武汉: 中国地质大学, 2010: 1~96.

    ZHANG Jian-fang.The genesis study of Zhaxikang lead zinc antimony silver deposit, North Himalayan [D].Wuhan:China University of Geoscience, 2010: 1~96.
    [19]
    BAU Michael.Rare-earth element mobility during hydrothermal and metamorphic fluid-rock interaction and the significance of the oxidation state of europium[J].Chemical Geology, 1991, 93:219~230. doi: 10.1016/0009-2541(91)90115-8
    [20]
    BAU Michael, DULSKI Peter.Comparing yttrium and rare earths in hydrothermal fluids from the Mid-Atlantic Ridge:Implications for Y and REE behavior during near-vent mixing and for the Y/Ho ratio of Proterozoic seawater[J].Chemical Geology, 1999, 155:77~90. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2541(98)00142-9
    [21]
    OUVILLE Eric, BIENVENU Philippe, Charlou Jean-luc, et al.Yttrium and rare earth elements in fluids from various deep-sea hydrothermal systems[J].Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1999, 63(5):627~643. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7037(99)00024-1
    [22]
    HAN F and Hutchinson R W.Evidence for the exhalative hydrothermal sedimentary origin of the Dachang Sn-polymetallic deposit-trace element and rare earth element geochemistry of the host rocks[J].Mineral Deposits, 1989, 8(3): 33~44. doi: 10.1007/s00710-006-0148-2
    [23]
    LARGE Ross R, BULL Stuart W, COOKE David R, et al.A genetic model for the HYC deposit, Australia: based on regional sedimentology, geochemistry, and sulfide-sediment relationship[J].Economic Geology, 1998, 93:1345~1368. doi: 10.2113/gsecongeo.93.8.1345
    [24]
    PARADIS Suzanne, NELSON Joanne L, IRWIN Steve E B.Age constraints on the Devonian shale-hosted Zn-Pb-Ba deposits, Gataga district, Northeastern British Columbia, Canada[J].Economic Geology, 1998, 93:184~200. doi: 10.2113/gsecongeo.93.2.184
    [25]
    HELLMAN PhillipL, SMITH RaymondE and HENDERSON Paul.Themobility of the rare earth elements:Evidence and implicationsfrom selected terraines affected by burialmetamorphism[J].Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 1979, 71:23~44. doi: 10.1007/BF00371879
    [26]
    FLEET A J. Aqueous and sedimentary geochemistry of the rare earth elements[C]//Henderson Ped. Rare earth element geochemistry. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1984: 343~373.
    [27]
    BENCE A E, TAYLOR B E.Rare earth elementsystematics of West Shasta metavolcanic rocks:petrogenesisand hydrothermal alteration[J]. Economical Geology, 1985, 80: 2164~2176. doi: 10.2113/gsecongeo.80.8.2164
    [28]
    MACLEAN Wallace H.Rare earth element mobility atconstant inter-REE ratios in the alteration zone at thePhelps Dodge massive sulphide deposit, Matagami, Quebec[J].Mineral Deposita, 1988, 23:231~238. doi: 10.1007/BF00206399
    [29]
    LOTTERMOSER Bernd.Rare earth element and hydrothermal ore formation processes[J].Ore Geology Reviews, 1992, 7: 25~41. doi: 10.1016/0169-1368(92)90017-F
    [30]
    MILLS Rachel-ann, ELDERFIELD Henry.Rare earth element geochemistry ofhydrothermal deposits from the active TAG Mound, 26°N Mid-Atlantic Ridge[J].Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1995, 59:3511~3524. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(95)00224-N
    [31]
    German C R, Klinkhammer G P, Edmond J M, et al.Hydrothermal scavenging of rare earth elementsin the ocean[J].Nature, 1990, 345:516~518. doi: 10.1038/345516a0
    [32]
    MÖLLER Peter, PAREKH P P, and SCHNEIDER H J.The application of Tb/Ca-Tb/La abundance ratios to problems of Fluorspar Genesis[J].Mineral Deposita, 1976, 11:111~116. doi: 10.1007/BF00203098
    [33]
    KLINKHAMMER G-P, ELDERFIELD H, EDMOND J-M, MITRA A.Geochemicalimplications of rare earth element patterns in hydrothermal fluidsfrom mid-ocean ridges[J].Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1994, 58:5105~5113. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(94)90297-6
    [34]
    HAAS Jonson R, SHOCK Everett L, SASSANI David C.Rare earth elements inhydrothermal systems:estimates of standard partialmolalthermodynamic properties of aqueous complexes of the rare earthelements at high pressures and temperature[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1995, 59: 4329~4350. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(95)00314-P
    [35]
    PAPIKE J J, FOWLER G W, SHEARER C K, et al.Ionmicroprobe investigation of plagioclase and orthopyroxene fromlunar Mg-suite norites: Implications for calculating parental melt REE concentrations and for assessing postcrystallization REE redistribution[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1996, 60(20): 3967~3978. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(96)00212-8
    [36]
    SHANNON Robert D.Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies ofinteratomic distances in halides and chalcogenides[J].Acta Cryst, 1976, A32:751~767. http://www.academia.edu/299902/Revised_Effective_Ionic_Radii_and_Systematic_Studies_of_Interatomic_Distances_In_Halides_and_Chalcogenides
    [37]
    王勇, 侯增谦, 莫宣学, 等.云南巍山—永平碰撞造山带走滑拉分盆地铜金多金属成矿流体系统:稳定同位素特征及热液来源[J].矿床地质, 2006, 25(1):60~70. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KCDZ200601007.htm

    WANG Yong, HOU Zeng-qian, MO Xuan-xue, et al. Stable isotope characteristics and origin of ore-forming fluids in copper-goldpolymetallic deposits within strike-slip pull-apart basin of Weishan-Yongping continental collision orogenic belt, Yunnan Province, China [J]. Mineral Deposits, 2006, 25(1): 60~70. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KCDZ200601007.htm
    [38]
    侯增谦, 宋玉财, 李政, 等.青藏高原碰撞造山带Pb-Zn-Ag-Cu矿床新类型:成矿基本特征与构造控矿模型[J].矿床地质, 2008, 27(2):420~441. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KCDZ200802002.htm

    HOU Zeng-qian, SONG Yu-cai, LI Zheng, et al.Thrust-controlled, sediments-hosted Pb-Zn-Ag-Cu deposits in eastern and northernmargins of Tibetan orogenic belt:Geological features and tectonic model[J].Mineral Deposits, 2008, 27(2):420~441. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KCDZ200802002.htm
    [39]
    LEACH DL, SANGSTERDF, KELLEY KD, et al.Sediment-hosted lead-zincdeposits:A global perspective[J].Economic Geology, 2005, 100:561~607. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780080959757011098
    [40]
    DENG Jun, WANG Qing-fei, LI Gong-jian, et al.Tethys tectonic evolution and its bearing on the distribution of important mineral deposits in the Sanjiangregion, SW China[J].Gondwana Research, 2014a, 26(2):419~437. doi: 10.1016/j.gr.2013.08.002
    [41]
    DENG Jun, WANG Qing-fei, SANTOSH M.Cenozoic tectono-magmatic and metallogenic processes in the Sanjiang region, southwestern China[J].Earth-Science Reviews, 2014b, 138:268~299. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.05.015
  • 加载中

Catalog

    Figures(8)  / Tables(2)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (396) PDF downloads(16) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return