ANALYSIS AND TEXTUAL RESEARCH OF THE SEISMOGENIC STRUCTURE OF THE QIN-LONG EARTHQUAKE IN 600 A.D.

WANG Shidi; SHI Yaqin; REN Fengwen

doi:10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2018.24.02.017

Volume 24 Issue 2

Apr. 2018

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of Geomechanics > 2018 > 24(2): 157-168

WANG Shidi, SHI Yaqin, REN Fengwen, 2018. ANALYSIS AND TEXTUAL RESEARCH OF THE SEISMOGENIC STRUCTURE OF THE QIN-LONG EARTHQUAKE IN 600 A.D.. Journal of Geomechanics, 24 (2): 157-168. DOI: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2018.24.02.017

Citation:

PDF( 10641 KB)

ANALYSIS AND TEXTUAL RESEARCH OF THE SEISMOGENIC STRUCTURE OF THE QIN-LONG EARTHQUAKE IN 600 A.D.

doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2018.24.02.017

WANG Shidi^{1, 2
,},
SHI Yaqin^{3
,
,},
REN Fengwen³

1.
State Key Laboratory of Continental Dynamics, Xi'an 710069, Shannxi, China
2.
Department of Geology, Northwest University, Xi'an 710069, Shannxi, China
3.
Seismological Bureau of Shaanxi Province, Xi'an 710068, Shannxi, China

More Information

Received: 2017-12-10
Revised: 2018-03-01
Published: 2018-04-01

Abstract

Abstract

According to Chinese historical records, an earthquake struck the ancient Qin-Long area in 600 A.D., and caused serious social impact. The epicenter, earthquake magnitude, epicentral intensity, and seismogenic structure of this earthquake have long been disputed. In this study, based on the earthquake collapses found in Guguan town, Longxian county, combined with multiple research methods including historical data verification, satellite images interpretation, field observation, geologic trench excavation, age dating, it shows that the seismogenic structure of the earthquake is the Guguan segment of east Liupanshan fault, and the epicenter should be located near Guguan town, Longxian county. Its magnitude was around 6$ {}^{3}\!\!\diagup\!\!{}_{4}\; $ and the epicentral intensity was inferred as Ⅸ. This study on the historical earthquake in this area has great significance to the earthquake hazard assessment in Liupanshan area and the understanding of the kinetic process of the northeastward expanding of the Tibet Plateau.

Full-text Translaiton by iFLYTEK

The full translation of the current issue may be delayed. If you encounter a 404 page, please try again later.

FullText(HTML)

References(16)

References

[1]	谢毓寿, 蔡美彪.中国地震历史资料汇编:第一卷[M].北京:科学出版社, 1983, 1~238. XIE Yushou, CAI Meibiao. Chinese historical seismic data compilation, first volume[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 1983, 1~238. (in Chinese)
[2]	郑文俊, 袁道阳, 张培震, 等.青藏高原东北缘活动构造几何图像、运动转换与高原扩展[J].第四纪研究, 2016, 36(4):775~788. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dsjyj201604001 ZHENG Wenjun, YUAN Daoyang, ZHANG Peizhen, et al. Tectonic geometry and kinematic dissipation of the active faults in the northeastern Tibetan Plateau and their implications for understanding northeastward growth of the plateau[J]. Quaternary Sciences, 2006, 36(4):775~788. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dsjyj201604001
[3]	戴华光, 贾云鸿, 苏向洲, 等.青藏高原东北缘最新构造变形的初步研究[J].地质力学学报, 1996, 2(4):15~20. http://journal.geomech.ac.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=19960472&flag=1 DAI Huaguang, JIA Yunhong, SU Xiangzhou, et al. Preliminary study on the latest tectonic deformations along northeast margin of the Qinghai Tibetan Plateau[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 1996, 2(4):15~20. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://journal.geomech.ac.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=19960472&flag=1
[4]	张岳桥, VERGELY P, MERCIER J L.华北地区上新世至第四纪断裂作用型式与左旋扩展[J].地质力学学报, 1999, 5(3):40~46. http://journal.geomech.ac.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=19990337&flag=1 ZHANG Yueqiao, VERGELY P, MERCIER J L. Pliocene-quaternary faulting pattern and left-slip propagation tectonics in North China[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 1999, 5(3):40~46. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://journal.geomech.ac.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=19990337&flag=1
[5]	施炜, 张岳桥, 马寅生, 等.六盘山盆地形成和改造历史及构造应力场演化[J].中国地质, 2006, 33(5):1066~1074. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=dizi200605017&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ SHI Wei, ZHANG Yueqiao, MA yinsheng, et al. Formation and modification history of the Liupanshan basin on the southwestern margin of the Ordos block and tectonic stress field evolution[J]. Geology in China, 2006, 33(5):1066~1074. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=dizi200605017&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
[6]	顾功叙.中国地震目录:(公元前1831——公元1969年)[M].北京:科学出版社, 1983, 1~910. GU Gongxu. Chinese seismic catalogue (1831 B. C. -1969 A. D.)[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 1983, 1~910.(in Chinese)
[7]	国家地震局兰州地震研究所.陕甘宁青四省(区)强地震目录[M].西安:陕西科学技术出版社, 1985, 10. Lanzhou Institute of Seismology, China Earthquake Administration. Catalogue of strong earthquakes in Shaanxi, Gansu, Ningxia and Qinghai provinces or region[M]. Xi'an:Shaanxi Science and Technology Press, 1985, 10. (in Chinese)
[8]	国家地震局震害防御司.中国历史强震目录[M].北京:地震出版社, 1995, 6~13. Earthquake Disaster Prevention Department, SSB. Catalogue of Chinese strong historical earthquakes[M]. Beijing:Seismological Press, 1995, 6~13. (in Chinese)
[9]	史志刚, 袁道阳, 李廷栋, 等.公元600年秦陇地震考证与发震构造探讨[J].科技导报, 2013, 31(12):48~52. doi: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2013.12.008 SHI Zhigang, YUAN Daoyang, LI Tingdong, et al. Textual research of A.D. 600 Qin-Long earthquake and discussion on its seismogenic structure[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2013, 31(12):48~52. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2013.12.008
[10]	师亚芹. 鄂尔多斯西南缘六盘山-宝鸡断裂带最新活动性及大震危险性[R]. 北京: 国家自然科学基金委员会, 2016. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/83599X/201521/666755023.html SHI Yaqin. The latest activity and seismic risk of Liupanshan-Baoji fault zone at SW margin of Ordos Block[R]. Beijing: National nature science foundation of China, 2016. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.cqvip.com/QK/83599X/201521/666755023.html
[11]	Tocher D. Earthquake energy and ground breakage[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1958, 48(2):147~153. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/ssa/bssa/article-abstract/48/2/147/115843/earthquake-energy-and-ground-breakage
[12]	陈达生.地震引起的地表破裂长度与震级之间的经验关系[J].华北地震科学, 1984, 2(2):26~32. https://www.wenkuxiazai.com/doc/32e518c78bd63186bcebbc27.html CHEN Dasheng. The empirical relationship between the length of the surface rupture caused by earthquake and the magnitude[J]. North China Earthquake Sciences, 1984, 2(2):26~32. (in Chinese) https://www.wenkuxiazai.com/doc/32e518c78bd63186bcebbc27.html
[13]	沈建文, 邱瑛, 赵志贺.震级-破裂长度关系与断层破裂模型[J].地球物理学报, 1990, 33(2):242~248. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/94718X/199002/228526.html SHEN Jianwen, QIU Ying, ZHAO Zhihe. Rupture length magnitude relationship and fault-rupture model[J]. Acta Geophysica Sinica, 1990, 33(2):242~248. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.cqvip.com/QK/94718X/199002/228526.html
[14]	叶文华, 徐锡伟, 汪良谋.中国西部强震的地表破裂规模与震级、复发时间间隔关系的研究[J].地震地质, 1996, 18(1):37~44. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/95728X/199601/2092157.html YE Wenhua, XU Xiwei, WANG Liangmou. Quantitative relationship between surface rupture parameter, earthquake magnitude and recurrence interval for surfacerupturing-earthquakes in west China[J]. Seismology and Geology, 1996, 18(1):37~44. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.cqvip.com/QK/95728X/199601/2092157.html
[15]	鄢家全, 张志中, 王健, 等.中国历史地震烈度表研究[J].地震学报, 2011, 33(4):515~531. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dizhen201104011 YAN Jiaquan, ZHANG Zhizhong, WANG Jian, et al. A study on seismic intensity scale of Chinese historical earthquakes[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 2011, 33(4):515~531. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dizhen201104011
[16]	朱书俊.确定历史地震震级的方法讨论[J].西北地震学报, 1984, 6(4):101~107. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZBDZ198404018.htm ZHU Shujun. Discussion of the method on detemining the magnitude of historical earthquakes[J]. Northwestern Seismological Journal, 1984, 6(4):101~107. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZBDZ198404018.htm