三峡库区反倾岩质滑坡防治措施研究

谭维佳; 代贞伟; 陈云霞; 覃雯

三峡库区反倾岩质滑坡防治措施研究

谭维佳^1,,
代贞伟^{1, 2},
陈云霞³,
覃雯⁴

1.
长安大学地质工程与测绘学院, 西安 710054
2.
重庆市地质矿产勘查开发局107地质队, 重庆 401120
3.
中国地质调查局武汉地质调查中心, 武汉 430205
4.
重庆市铜梁区国土资源和房屋管理局, 重庆 402560

基金项目:

“十二五”国家科技支撑项目 2012BAK10B01

中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目自然科学类310826161013

中国地质调查局地质调查项目 12120114079101

中国地质调查局地质调查项目 DD20160268

详细信息

作者简介:
谭维佳(1988-)，男，地质工程专业，博士，工程师，主要从事工程地质与地质灾害研究工作。E-mail：371422852@qq.com

中图分类号: P642.22
计量
- 文章访问数: 167
- HTML全文浏览量: 95
- PDF下载量: 17
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2016-06-30
- 刊出日期: 2017-02-28

STUDY ON CONTROL MEASURES OF COUNTER-TILT ROCK LANDSLIDE IN THREE GORGES RESERVOIR REGION

1.
School of Geology Engineering and Geomatics, Chang'an University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710054, China
3.
Wuhan Centre of China Geological Survey, China Geological Survey, Wuhan, Hubei 430205, China

摘要

摘要: 选取巫峡段茅草坡-典型反倾岩质滑坡为研究对象，阐述了库岸滑坡防治措施的分阶段设计流程（原则、思路和方法）：首先基于已有的地质勘察资料和现阶段岸坡变形破坏特征分析岸坡变形破坏过程及现阶段所处的变形阶段，确定其相应的失稳模式和主控因素，提出滑坡防治比选方案；其次对于滑坡不同变形破坏阶段进行合理划分，运用数值模拟对滑坡防治各比选方案的治理效果开展岸坡不同变形破坏阶段的全过程评价，对比分析制定较合理的防治措施。研究结论主要有：（1）对同-岸坡而言，当其处于不同变形阶段时，其变形破坏模式和主控因素不完全相同，且同-防治方案的治理效果差别较大；（2）就茅草坡现阶段而言，滑坡处于变形破坏过程的坡脚弱化滑移阶段，此阶段变形破坏的主控因素为消落带岩体的弱化和滑移，格构护坡方案的造价低且防治效果最好，而锚杆锚固方案造价高且效果低。
- 三峡库区 /
- 反倾岩质滑坡 /
- 茅草坡岸坡 /
- 变形模式 /
- 防治措施
Abstract: In this paper, Maocaopo in the Wu Gorge section, a typical anti-dip rock landslide, was taken as the research object to describe the phased design process of prevention and control measures for this type of landslide (principle, idea and method):First, the deformation failure process and the current deformation stage of the bank slope were analyzed on the basis of existing geological survey data and the characteristics of bank slope deformation failure at the current stage, so as to determine the corresponding instability mode and main control factors, then propose alternative schemes for landslide prevention and control. Second, different deformation failure stages of the landslide were reasonably divided. Numerical simulation was applied to carry out whole-process evaluation of the outcome of each alternative scheme for landslide prevention and control at different deformation failure stages of the bank slope. Reasonable prevention and control measures were established through comparative analysis. Main conclusions of the research include the followings:(1) For the same bank slopes, their deformation failure mode and main control factors are not exactly the same at different deformation stages, and the same prevention and control scheme renders significantly different outcomes. (2) For the current stage of Maocaopo, the landslide is at the slope toe weakening and slipping stage of the deformation failure process. The main control factor of deformation failure at this stage is the weakening and slipping of rock mass in the hydro-fluctuation belt. The scheme of slope protection with lattice needs a lower construction cost and produces a better prevention and control effect, while the scheme of bolt anchoring needs a higher construction cost but has a poorer effect.
- Three Gorges Reservoir Region /
- counter-tilt rock landslide /
- Maocaopo bank slope /
- deformation mode /
- control measures

HTML全文

图 1 滑坡区地貌

Figure 1. Landscape of Maocaopo bank slope

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 三峡库区地质构造纲要图(据殷跃平)

Figure 2. Structure outline map of Three Gorges Reservoir region

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 茅草坡岸坡全貌

Figure 3. Full view of the Maocaopo bank slope

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 2-2′工程地质剖面图

Figure 4. Engineering geological profile of 2-2′

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 斜坡近地表岩体结构及变形迹象

Figure 5. Structure and deformation of the rock mass in near-surface of slope

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 防治方案一简图

Figure 6. Diagram of No.1 treatment plan

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 防治方案二简图

Figure 7. Diagram of No.2 treatment plan

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 最大位移云图

Figure 8. Maximum displacement nephogram

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 剪应变增量云图

Figure 9. Maximum shear strain increment nephogram

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 塑性区分布图

Figure 10. plastic zone distribution

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 治理工程现场施工图

Figure 11. Construction site of treatment project

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 治理效果对比

Table 1. Treatment effect comparison of different plans

防治方案	主要措施	防治位置	锚杆长度/m	工程造价/10⁴元	防治效果
					阶段1		阶段2
					最大位移降幅/%	剪应变增量降幅/%	最大位移降幅/%	剪应变增量降幅/%
方案一	锚索锚固	184~248 m(岩梁下部)	30	3764.6	57	24	53	17
方案二	格构锚固+混凝土护坡	156~178 m(消落带)	8~10	1357.5	87	97	13	0

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(17)

[1]	殷跃平.长江三峡工程移民迁建区地质灾害及防治研究[M].北京:地质出版社, 2004. YIN Yue-ping.Major geologic hazard and prevention on the releation site at the Three Gorges[M].Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 2004.
[2]	张倬元, 王士天, 王兰生.工程地质分析原理[M].北京:地质出版社, 1994. ZHANG Zhuo-yuan, WANG Shi-tian, WANG Lansheng.Fundamental analysis of engineering geology.Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 1994.
[3]	YIN Y, Wang H, Gao Y, et al.Real-time monitoring and early warning of landslides at relocated Wushan Town, the Three Gorges Reservoir, China[J].Landslides, 2010, 7(3):339~349. doi: 10.1007/s10346-010-0220~1
[4]	HUANG Bo-lin, YIN Yue-ping, LIU Guangning, et al.Analysis of waves generated by Gongjiafang landslide, Three Gorges Reservoir, China.Landslides, 2012, 9(3):395~405. doi: 10.1007/s10346-012-0331-y
[5]	黄波林.水库滑坡涌浪灾害水波动力学分析方法研究[D].中国地质大学(武汉)博士论文.2014. Water Wave Dynamic Analysis Method Study on Landslide-generated Impulse Wave Hazard in Reservoirs[D].A Dissertation Submitted to China University of Geosciences for the Doctor Degree of Geological Engineering.2014.
[6]	卢海峰, 刘泉声, 陈从新.反倾岩质边坡悬臂梁极限平衡模型的改进[J].岩土力学, 2012, 33(2):577~584. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201202042.htm LU Hai-feng, LIU Quan-sheng, CHEN Cong-xin.Improvement of cantilever beam limit equilibrium model of counter-tilt rock slopes[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2012, 33(2):577~584. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201202042.htm
[7]	吴宝和.地表水和地下水对岩质边坡稳定性影响及防渗措施[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2003, 14(3):1401~141. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGDH200303031.htm WU Bao-he.Influence of surface and ground water on the rock slope stability and seeping prevention.The Chinese journal of geological hazard control, 2003, 14 (3):140~141. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGDH200303031.htm
[8]	孙广忠等.中国典型滑坡[M].北京:科学出版社, 1988. SUN Guang-zhong, et al.Representative landslides in China.Beijing:Science press, 1988.
[9]	沈明荣, 邓海荣.水下岩质边坡在波浪作用下的稳定性分析[J].工程地质学报, 2006, 14(5):609~615.SHEN Ming-rong, DENG Hai-rong.Finite element analysis of submerged rock slope stability underwave acttion[J].工程地质学报, 2006, 14(5):609~615. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCDZ200605006.htm
[10]	邹丽芳, 徐卫亚, 宁宇, 等.反倾层状岩质边坡倾倒变形破坏机制综述[J].长江科学学院院报, 2009, 26(5):25~30. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJKB200905007.htm ZOU Li-fang, XU Wei-ya, NING Yu, et al.Overview of topping failure mechanism of countertendency layered rock slopes[J].Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2009, 26(5):25~30. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJKB200905007.htm
[11]	左保成, 陈从新, 刘小巍, 等.反倾岩质边坡破坏机制模型试验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2005, 24(19):3505~3511. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000~6915.2005.19.017 ZUO Bao-cheng, CHEN Cong-xin, LIU Xiao-wei, et al.Modeling experiment study on failure mechanism of counter-tilt rock slope[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 24(19):3505~3511. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000~6915.2005.19.017
[12]	ADHIKARY D P, DYSKIN A V.Modelling of progressive and instantaneous failures of foliated rock slopes[J].Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2007, 40(4):349~362. doi: 10.1007/s00603-006-0085~8
[13]	郭志华, 周创兵, 盛谦, 等.库水位变化对边坡稳定性的影响[J].岩土力学, 2005, 26(sup.):29~32. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GSSJ201701008.htm GUO Zhi-hua, ZHOU Chuang-bin, SHENG Qian, et al.Influence of reservoir water variation on slope stability[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2005, 26(sup.):29~32. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GSSJ201701008.htm
[14]	刘红岩, 秦四清.库水位上升条件下边坡滲流模拟[J].工程地质学报, 2007, 15(6):796~801. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCDZ200706016.htm LIU Hong-yan, QIN Si-qing.Simulation of seepage field in bank slope due to reservoir water level change[J].Journal of Engineering Geology, 2007, 15(6):796~801. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCDZ200706016.htm
[15]	廖红建, 盛谦, 高石夯, 等.库水位下降对滑坡体稳定性的影响[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2005, 24(19):3454~3458. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000~6915.2005.19.008 LIAO Hong-jian, SHENG Qian, GAO Shi-hang, et al.Influence of drawdown of reservoir water level on landslide stability[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 24(19):3454~3458. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000~6915.2005.19.008
[16]	刘才华, 陈从新, 冯夏庭.库水位上升诱发边坡失稳机理研究[J].岩土力学, 2005, 26(5):769~773. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX200505022.htm LIU Cai-hua, CHEN Cong-xin, FENG Xia-ting.Study on mechanism of slope instability due to reservoir water level rise[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2005, 26(5):769~773. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX200505022.htm
[17]	谭维佳.三峡库区反倾层状内嵌岩梁式岩质岸坡失稳机理和防治研究[D].长安大学, 2015. TAN Wei-jia.A study of the instability mechanism and failure control of the anti-dip stratified rock slope with embedded rock beam in the Three Gorges Reservoir Region[D].Chang'an University, 2015.