留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

ASR法在井下矿山地应力测试中的应用前景分析

孙东生 陈群策 张延庆

孙东生, 陈群策, 张延庆, 2020. ASR法在井下矿山地应力测试中的应用前景分析. 地质力学学报, 26 (1): 33-38. DOI: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2020.26.01.003
引用本文: 孙东生, 陈群策, 张延庆, 2020. ASR法在井下矿山地应力测试中的应用前景分析. 地质力学学报, 26 (1): 33-38. DOI: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2020.26.01.003
SUN Dongsheng, CHEN Qunce, ZHANG Yanqing, 2020. Analysis on the application prospect of ASR in-situ stress measurement method in underground mine. Journal of Geomechanics, 26 (1): 33-38. DOI: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2020.26.01.003
Citation: SUN Dongsheng, CHEN Qunce, ZHANG Yanqing, 2020. Analysis on the application prospect of ASR in-situ stress measurement method in underground mine. Journal of Geomechanics, 26 (1): 33-38. DOI: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2020.26.01.003

ASR法在井下矿山地应力测试中的应用前景分析

doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2020.26.01.003
基金项目: 

国家科技重大专项项目 2016ZX05034

详细信息
    作者简介:

    孙东生(1980-), 男, 博士, 高级工程师, 主要从事地应力测试理论与方法研究。E-mail:dongshengsun@189.cn

  • 中图分类号: P553

Analysis on the application prospect of ASR in-situ stress measurement method in underground mine

  • 摘要: 现今地应力状态是井下矿山建设、巷道稳定性分析和冲击地压(煤与瓦斯突出)预测等方面的重要基础数据。目前井下矿山地应力测试主要以空芯包体解除法为主,实践中发现空芯包体解除应力计安装过程中,易出现不能与孔壁完全黏贴的情况,导致测试成功率较低且劳动强度较大。文章介绍了一种基于定向岩芯卸荷后非(滞)弹性恢复变形测量的近原位地应力测试方法(简称ASR法),并通过与水压致裂地应力测试结果对比,验证了ASR地应力测试方法的有效性。ASR法的可重复性结果表明,同一测点ASR地应力测量结果平均差系数最大为6.29%,验证了ASR地应力测量方法的可靠性。预期ASR法以其安全、高效且不受测量深度和测试环境限制等优点,在井下矿山地应力测试中具有广阔的应用前景。

     

  • 图  1  岩芯表面应变计的布置

    Figure  1.  The layout of strain gauges on the surface of a rock core

    图  2  雪峰山先导孔ASR法和水压致裂法测试曲线

    a—1260 m样品ASR法测试曲线;b—1267 m水压致裂法井下压力计记录曲线

    Figure  2.  Test curves of the ASR and hydraulic fracturing methods at Xuefengshan pilot hole

    图  3  3620.9 m和3621.1 m深度样品的非弹性应变恢复曲线

    Figure  3.  The anelastic strain recovery curves of samples from 3620.9 m and 3621.1 m

    表  1  ASR法与水压致裂法地应力测量结果对比

    Table  1.   Comparison of in-situ measurement results from the ASR method and the hydraulic fracturing method

    岩芯编号 深度/m σH/MPa σh/MPa σv/MPa
    ASR法 1260.00 42.03 29.09 33.40
    水压致裂法 1267.00 50.79 32.52 33.58
    均值 1263.50 46.41 30.81 33.49
    注:σH-最大水平主应力;σh-最小水平主应力;σv-垂向应力;σv根据上覆岩层重量计算(岩石密度取2.65 g/cm3)。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  ASR法地应力重复测量结果

    Table  2.   Repeated measurement results through the ASR method

    岩芯编号 深度/m σ1/MPa σ2/MPa σ3/MPa σH/MPa σh/MPa σv/MPa
    ASR1 3620.9 120.6 79.3 69.2 112.3 79.1 97.7
    ASR2 3621.1 126.4 89.0 78.5 117.2 78.9 97.8
    均值 2621.0 123.5 84.2 73.9 114.8 79 97.8
    平均差系数 2.35% 5.76% 6.29% 2.13% 0.13% 0.05%
    注:σ1-最大主应力;σ2-最大主应力;σ3-中间主应力;σH-最大水平主应力;σh-最小水平主应力;σv-垂向应力;σv根据上覆岩层重量计算(岩石密度取2.70 g/cm3)。平均差系数采用常用的统计学公式计算
    下载: 导出CSV
  • CAI M F, QIAO L, YU B, et al., 1999. Results and analysis of in-situ stress measurement at deep position of No. 2 mining area of Jinchuan Nichkel mine[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 18(4):414-418. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX904.011.htm
    CHEN Q C, SUN D S, CUI J J, et al., 2019. Hydraulic fracturing stress measurements in Xuefengshan deep borehole and its significance[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 25(5):853-865. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dzlxxb201905015
    LIN W R, 2008. A core-based method to determine three-dimensional in-situ stress in deep drilling wells:anelastic strain recovery technique[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 27(12):2387-2394. (in English with Chinese abstract) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2008.12.002
    LIN W R, KWASNIEWSKI M, IMAMURA T, et al., 2006. Determination of three-dimensional in situ stresses from anelastic strain recovery measurement of cores at great depth[J]. Tectonophysics, 426(1-2):221-238. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2006.02.019
    MATSUKI K, 2008. Anelastic strain recovery compliance of rocks and its application to in situ stress measurement[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 45(6):952-965. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2007.10.005
    MATSUKI K, TAKEUCHI K, 1993. Three-dimensional in situ stress determination by anelastic strain recovery of a rock core[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 30(7):1019-1022.
    SUN D S, 2018. Calculation software of ASR in-situ stress measurement method[PELVRES] 1. 0: No. 2976423[CP]. 2018-05-02. (in Chinese)
    SUN D S, LIN W R, CUI J W, et al., 2014. Three-dimensional in situ stress determination by anelastic strain recovery and its application at the Wenchuan Earthquake Fault Scientific Drilling Hole-1(WFSD-1)[J]. Science China Earth Sciences, 57(6):1212-1220. doi: 10.1007/s11430-013-4739-6
    SUN D S, SONE H, LIN W R, et al., 2017. Stress state measured at~7 km depth in the Tarim Basin, NW China[J]. Scientific Reports, 7:4503. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04516-9
    SUN D S, WANG L J, ZHAO W H, et al., 2010. The application of in-situ stress measurement to the study of coal and gas outburst in coal mines[J]. Geology in China, 37(1):223-228. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgdizhi201001026
    VOIGHT B, 1968. Determination of the virgin state of stress in the vicinity of a borehole from measurements of a partial inelastic strain tensor in drill cores[J]. Felsmechanik und Ingenieurgeologie. 6:201-215
    WANG L J, LIAO C T, OU M Y, et al., 1988. KX-81 triaxial hollow inclusion gauges for in-situ stress[M]//Institute of Geomechanics, Chinese Academy of Geosciences. Bulletin of the Institute of Geomechanics CAGS. Beijing: Geological Publishing House: 127-136. (in Chinese)
    WANG L J, PAN L Z, LIAO C T, 1991. Crustal stress measurements and their application in engineering[M]. Beijing:Geological Publishing House:110-145. (in Chinese)
    WANG L J, SUN D S, LIN W R, et al., 2012. Anelastic strain recovery method to determine in-situ stress and application example[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 55(5):1674-1681. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dqwlxb201205024
    WANG L J, SUN D S, ZHANG L R, et al., 2009. Application of in-situ stress measurement on bursts disasters of rock and CO2 in coal mine[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 34(1):28-32. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=mtxb200901006
    XIAN X F, XU J, WANG H T, 2001. Predication of potential danger region (zone) of coal and gas outburst[J]. Engineering Science, 3(2):39-46, 51. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-1742.2001.02.009
    YANG X C, WANG L J, 2000. Error processing and precision estimation for rock stress measurement[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 6(2):53-63. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dzlxxb200002009
    ZHAO W H, SUN D S, WANG H C, et al., 2008. Measurement of rock stress of Hongling coal mine[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 14(3):286-291. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dzlxxb200803010
    蔡美峰, 乔兰, 于波, 等, 1999.金川二矿区深部地应力测量及其分布规律研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 18(4):414-418. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/yslxygcxb199904011
    陈群策, 孙东生, 崔建军, 等, 2019.雪峰山深孔水压致裂地应力测量及其意义[J].地质力学学报, 25(5):853-865. http://journal.geomech.ac.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?flag=1&file_no=20190514&journal_id=dzlxxb
    林为人, 2008.基于岩芯非弹性应变恢复量测定的深孔三维地应力测试方法[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 27(12):2387-2394. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2008.12.002
    孙东生, 王连捷, 赵卫华, 等, 2010.地应力测量在煤与瓦斯突出灾害研究中的应用[J].中国地质, 37(1):223-228. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3657.2010.01.026
    孙东生, 2018. ASR法地应力计算软件[PELVRES] 1.0: 软著登字第2976423号[CP]. 2018-05-02.
    王连捷, 廖椿庭, 区明益, 等, 1988. KX-81型空芯包体三轴地应力计[M]//中国地质科学院地质力学研究所.地质力学文集第八集.北京: 地质出版社: 127-136.
    王连捷, 潘立宙, 廖椿庭, 1991.地应力测量及其在工程中的应用[M].北京:地质出版社:110-145.
    王连捷, 孙东生, 张利容, 等, 2009.地应力测量在岩石与CO2突出灾害研究中的应用[J].煤炭学报, 34(1):28-32. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9993.2009.01.006
    王连捷, 孙东生, 林为人, 等, 2012.地应力测量的非弹性应变恢复法及应用实例[J].地球物理学报, 55(5):1674-1681. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dqwlxb201205024
    鲜学福, 许江, 王宏图, 2001.煤与瓦斯突出潜在危险区(带)预测[J].中国工程科学, 3(2):39-46, 51. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-1742.2001.02.009
    杨小聪, 王连捷, 2000.地应力测量的误差处理及精度评定[J].地质力学学报, 6(2):53-63. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6616.2000.02.009
    赵卫华, 孙东生, 王红才, 等, 2008.沈阳红菱煤矿地应力测量[J].地质力学学报, 14(3):286-291. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6616.2008.03.010
  • 加载中
图(3) / 表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  185
  • HTML全文浏览量:  60
  • PDF下载量:  18
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2019-09-11
  • 修回日期:  2019-12-25
  • 刊出日期:  2020-02-28

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回