RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FAULT-ACTIVITY AND HYDROCARBON ACCUMULATION IN MINFENG FAULT ZONE OF DONGYING SAG
-
摘要: 基于三维地震、测井和录井等资料, 采用断层生长指数法, 结合油气成藏史研究, 分析了东营凹陷民丰断裂带的断层活动特征, 并探讨了断层活动与油气成藏的关系。研究结果表明, 研究区断层活动具有持续性和继承性, 呈现出2个活动高峰期, 即沙三上亚段和东营组沉积时期。不同断层以及同一断层不同部位活动性存在明显差异。10号断层规模较大, 活动性最强, 为该区最重要的油源断层, 断层活动强度自西向东呈现强-弱-强的变化规律, 断层活动与烃源岩主生排烃期匹配关系较好, 为油气成藏提供了良好的垂向运移条件; 而其余1-9号断层为发育在10号断层下降盘的次级调节断层, 活动性弱, 与成藏期匹配较差, 不利于油气成藏。Abstract: Based on integration of 3D seismic, drilling and logging data and in combination with the history of hydrocarbon accumulation, we analyzed the features of faults activity by fault growth index and discussed the relationship between fault activity and hydrocarbon accumulation.The result shows that faults have sustaining and successive characterization, and there are two activity peak periods:one occurred in the later Es3 period and the other occurred in Ed period. There exist obvious differences in different faults and different locations of the same fault. The No.10 fault is the most important oil source fault which is larger in scale and the fault activity is the strongest in regular change pattern of "strong-weak-strong" from west to east. And the activity period of No.10 fault is matched with the main hydrocarbon expelling period of source rocks, which provide good conditions for vertical oil migration; While other faults are the secondary adjusting faults which develope in the thrown wall of No.10 fault, they are not conducive to the accumulation of hydrocarbon because their fault activities are weak and in poor matching with the main hydrocarbon expelling period.
-
Key words:
- fault activity /
- hydrocarbon accumulation /
- Minfeng fault zone /
- Dongying sag
-
海南岛位于华南和印支陆块之间,东邻菲律宾板块,其形成和演化受特提斯和太平洋两大动力学系统的控制。因此,有关海南岛的构造单元划分、各单元的构造属性以及构造演化过程长期存在争议。海南岛东北部潮滩鼻榴辉岩的发现为岛屿晚古生代以来大地构造演化的研究打开了一个新的窗口。然而,潮滩鼻榴辉岩孤立的露头、不寻常的洋壳型高温变质类型以及特殊的石炭纪变质时代(Liu et al.,2021;刘晓春等,2021)使研究者难以探究其真实的构造含义。所以,在海南岛和邻近区域寻找与榴辉岩有关的高压变质岩石是一项非常迫切的任务。最近,笔者在海南岛东部黄竹岭地区开展地质调查时又识别出了新的榴辉岩体(图1),其在海南省区域地质志中曾被称为公庙斜长角闪岩(海南省地质调查院,2017),在新填制的海南黄竹岭地区1∶5万地质图中被称为变质玄武岩(周岱等,2021),笔者称其为公庙榴辉岩。
图 1 海南岛地质简图及榴辉岩的出露位置(据海南省地质调查院, 2017; Shen et al., 2018修改)Figure 1. Simplified geological map of Hainan Island and exposed locations of eclogites (modified after Hainan Institute of Geological Survey, 2017; Shen et al., 2018)公庙榴辉岩主要呈较大的构造透镜体产出在泥盆纪强变形花岗岩中,西部与志留纪浅变质地层呈构造接触,并被三叠纪花岗岩所侵入。榴辉岩绝大部分退变严重,并遭受到强烈变形作用的改造,所以野外常以细粒斜长角闪岩的面貌出现,但局部可观察到相对粗粒的弱退变榴辉岩,肉眼可见石榴子石和翠绿色的绿辉石残留斑晶(图2a)。显微镜下观察和电子探针分析结果表明,榴辉岩相矿物主要包括石榴子石(含15%~44%镁铝榴石分子)、绿辉石(含33%~44%硬玉分子)、普通角闪石、黝帘石、石英和金红石−钛铁矿连晶(图2b),个别样品中含有蓝晶石或多硅白云母。使用传统的地质温压计对榴辉岩的峰期变质条件进行了初步估算,大致范围为780 ± 50 ℃、~2.0 GPa,属于高压中高温型榴辉岩。除角闪岩相至绿片岩相退变质作用之外,岩石在晚期还普遍叠加了一期葡萄石−绿纤石相变质作用。榴辉岩的原岩形成于~360 Ma,变质时代为310~290 Ma,但其原岩可能是在岛弧环境下形成的辉长岩,而非玄武岩。
榴辉岩的围岩只遭受到低级变质作用的影响,在浅变质地层和强变形花岗岩中均有白云母产出,后者中有时出现黑云母,但尚未发现其经历高压变质作用的岩相学证据。这2种岩石中的部分锆石发育很窄的变质增生边,使用离子探针小束斑获得的U-Pb年龄接近于榴辉岩最年轻的变质年龄(~285 Ma)。由此可见,榴辉岩的围岩与榴辉岩的变质时代接近,但变质级别明显不同,结合二者之间的构造接触关系,笔者推测这些岩石可能是在俯冲—增生—折返过程中混杂在一起的,代表一套增生型构造混杂岩。
公庙榴辉岩向北东距潮滩鼻洋壳型高温榴辉岩约100 km,两地榴辉岩具有相似的峰期矿物组合、相近的变质条件和p-T(压力−温度)演化轨迹以及近于相同的原岩和变质时代,似可在海南岛东部构成一条北东向长达100 km的晚古生代榴辉岩带。该榴辉岩带可能代表一条与古特提斯洋演化有关的古板块俯冲带,这对重构海南岛乃至古特提斯构造域东端晚古生代以来的大地构造演化将具有重要的启示。
-
图 4 10号断层不同位置断层生长指数图(剖面位置见图 1)
Figure 4. Fault growth index in different locations of No.10 fault
表 1 民丰断裂带断层要素
Table 1. Elements of fault in Minfeng fault zone
断层名称 走向 倾向 最大延伸距离/km 活动时期 断距/m 断裂级别 断层1 北西西 南倾 7.3 Es3下—Ng 20~55 Ⅳ 断层2 北西西 南倾 5.3 Es3下—Ng 25~55 Ⅳ 断层3 北西西 南倾 5.6 Es3下—Ng 20~95 Ⅳ 断层4 北西西 南倾 2.5 Es3下—Ed 30~75 Ⅳ 断层5 北西西 南倾 6.2 Es3下—Ng 45~60 Ⅳ 断层6 北西西 南倾 4.6 Es3中—Ed 70~75 Ⅳ 断层7 北西西 南倾 6.4 Es3中—Ed 30~35 Ⅳ 断层8 北西西 南倾 4.8 Es3中—Ng 25~40 Ⅳ 断层9 北西西 南倾 2.2 Es3上—Ed 20~25 Ⅳ 断层10 北西西 北倾 9.5 Es4上—Nm 80~120 Ⅲ -
[1] 周心怀, 牛成民, 滕长宇.环渤中地区新构造运动期断裂活动与油气成藏关系[J].石油与天然气地质, 2009, 30(4):469~475. doi: 10.11743/ogg20090413ZHOU Xin-huai, NIU Cheng-min, TENG Chang-yu.Relationship between faulting and hydrocarbon pooling during the Neo-tectonic movement around the central Bohai Bay[J].Oil & Gas Geology, 2009, 30(4):469~475. doi: 10.11743/ogg20090413 [2] 操成杰, 周新桂, 何彬, 等.苏北盆地天长箕状断陷断裂体系及油气成藏规律[J].地质力学学报, 2003, 9(1):56~61. http://journal.geomech.ac.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?flag=1&file_no=20030107&journal_id=dzlxxbCAO Cheng-jie, ZHOU Xin-gui, HE Bin, et al.Fault system and formation law of oil reservoir in Tianchang halfgraben-like depression in Subei basin[J].Journal of Geomechanics, 2003, 9(1):56~61. http://journal.geomech.ac.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?flag=1&file_no=20030107&journal_id=dzlxxb [3] 侯读杰, 庞雄, 肖建新, 等.白云凹陷断裂作为天然气运移通道的地质-地球化学证据[J].地学前缘, 2008, 15(4):81~87. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY200804012.htmHOU Du-jie, PANG Xiong, XIAO Jian-xin, et al.The geological and geochemical evidence on the dentification of natural gas migration through fault system, Baiyun Sag, Pearl River Mouth Basin, China[J].Earth Science Frontiers, 2008, 15(4):81~87. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY200804012.htm [4] 高娟, 谢锐杰, 王东辉, 等.民丰地区砂砾岩体及沉积演化特征[J].断块油气田, 2008, 15(5):28~30. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT200805010.htmGAO Juan, XIE Rui-jie, WANG Dong-hui, et al.Glutenite and sedimentary evolution character-isticcs in Minfeng Area[J].Fault-block oil & Gas Field, 2008, 15(5):28~30. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT200805010.htm [5] 远光辉, 操应长, 王艳忠.东营凹陷民丰地区沙河街组四段-三段中亚段沉积相与沉积演化特征[J].石油与天然气地质, 2012, 33(2):277~286. doi: 10.11743/ogg20120214YUAN Guang-hui, CAO Ying-chang, WANG Yan-zhong.Sedimentary facies and their evolution of the 4th-middle 3rd members of Shahejie Formation in Minfeng area, DongyingSag[J].Oil & Gas Geology, 2012, 33(2):277~286. doi: 10.11743/ogg20120214 [6] 周瑶琪, 周振柱, 陈勇, 等.东营凹陷民丰地区深部储层成岩环境变化研究[J].地学前缘, 2011, 18(2):268~276. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201102030.htmZHOU Yao-qi, ZHOU Zhen-zhu, CHEN Yong, et al.Research on diagenetic environmental changes of deep reservoir in Minfeng area, Dongying Sag[J].Earth Science Frontiers, 2011, 18(2):268~276. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201102030.htm [7] 辛也, 王伟锋.东营凹陷民丰洼陷烃源岩评价[J].新疆石油地质, 2007, 28(4):473~475. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD200704028.htmXIN Ye, WANG Wei-feng.Evaluation of source rocks in Minfeng Sub-Sag, Dongying Sag[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2007, 28(4):473~475. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD200704028.htm [8] 李春光.中国东部盆地油气藏同生断层的定量研究[J].油气地质与采收率, 2003, 10(4):1~4. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS200304000.htmLI Chun-guang.Quantitative study of contemporaneous fault of eastern basin oil reservoir in China[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2003, 10(4):1~4. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS200304000.htm [9] 赵勇, 戴俊生.应用落差分析研究生长断层[J].石油勘探与开发, 2003, 30(3):13~15. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK200303003.htmZHAO Yong, DAI Jun-sheng.Identification of growth fault by fault fall analysis[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2003, 30(3):13~15. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK200303003.htm [10] Hooper E C D.Fluid migration along growth faults in compacting sediments[J].Journal of Petroleum Geology, 1991, 14:161~180. doi: 10.1111/jpg.1991.14.issue-S1 [11] 卢浩, 蒋有录, 徐昊清.饶阳凹陷主断层活动期与新近系油气成藏关系[J].断块油气田, 2011, 18(5):594~597. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT201105016.htmLU Hao, JIANG You-lu, XV Hao-qing.Relationship between fault activity Period and Neogene oil-gas accumulation in Raoyang Sag[J].Fault-block oil & Gas Field, 2011, 18(5):594~597. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT201105016.htm [12] 李继岩, 宋国奇, 赵仲祥, 等.惠民凹陷南部地区断层输导与封闭性能研究[J].油气地质与采收率, 2011, 18(4):17~20. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201104007.htmLI Ji-yan, SONG Guo-qi, ZHAO Zhong-xiang, et al.Main controlling factors analysis and evaluation on transporting and sealing performance of fault, south region of Huimin depression.PGRE, 2011, 18(4):17~20. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201104007.htm [13] 蒋有录, 刘华, 张乐, 等.东营凹陷油气成藏期分析[J].石油与天然气地质, 2003, 24(3):215~218. doi: 10.11743/ogg20030304JIANG You-lu, LIU Hua, ZHANG Le, et al.Analysis of petroleum accumulation phase in Dongying Sag[J].Oil & Gas Geology, 2003, 24(3):215~218. doi: 10.11743/ogg20030304 [14] 陈勇, 林承焰, 张善文, 等.东营凹陷民丰洼陷深层天然气储层流体包裹体油气地质研究[J].沉积学报, 2010, 28(3):620~625. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB201003027.htmCHEN Yong, LIN Cheng-yan, ZHANG Shan-wen, et al.Study on fluid inclusions in deep natural gas reservoirs in Minfeng Sub-Sag, Dongying Sag[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2010, 28(3):620~625. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB201003027.htm [15] 万涛, 蒋有录, 董月霞, 等.南堡凹陷断层活动与油气成藏和富集的关系[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 36(2):60~67. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDX201202009.htmWAN Tao, JIANG You-lu, DONG Yue-xia, et al.Relationship between faultactivity and hydrocarbon accumulation and enrichment in Nanpu Depression[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum, 2012, 36(2):60~67. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDX201202009.htm [16] 刘培, 蒋有录, 刘华, 等.渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷断层活动与新近系油气成藏关系[J].天然气地球科学, 2013, 24(3):541~547. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201303014.htmLIU Pei, JIANG You-lu, LIU Hua, et al.The relationship between fault-activity and hydrocarbon accumulation of Neogene in Zhanhua Depression, Bohai Bay Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience, 2013, 24(3):541~547. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201303014.htm 期刊类型引用(0)
其他类型引用(15)
-