留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

隐伏地裂缝扩展的大型原位浸水试验研究

汪丽 李新生 李同录

汪丽, 李新生, 李同录, 2019. 隐伏地裂缝扩展的大型原位浸水试验研究. 地质力学学报, 25 (3): 412-420. DOI: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2019.25.03.038
引用本文: 汪丽, 李新生, 李同录, 2019. 隐伏地裂缝扩展的大型原位浸水试验研究. 地质力学学报, 25 (3): 412-420. DOI: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2019.25.03.038
WANG Li, LI Xinsheng, LI Tonglu, 2019. LARGE-SCALE IN-SITU SUBMERGING EXPERIMENT ON BURIED GROUND-FISSURES EXPANSION. Journal of Geomechanics, 25 (3): 412-420. DOI: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2019.25.03.038
Citation: WANG Li, LI Xinsheng, LI Tonglu, 2019. LARGE-SCALE IN-SITU SUBMERGING EXPERIMENT ON BURIED GROUND-FISSURES EXPANSION. Journal of Geomechanics, 25 (3): 412-420. DOI: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2019.25.03.038

隐伏地裂缝扩展的大型原位浸水试验研究

doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2019.25.03.038
基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金项目 41772278

校级自然科学基金资助项目 2018KY1115

详细信息
    作者简介:

    汪丽(1978-), 女, 硕士, 讲师, 主要从事地质灾害研究。E-mail:120771691@qq.com

  • 中图分类号: P642.2

LARGE-SCALE IN-SITU SUBMERGING EXPERIMENT ON BURIED GROUND-FISSURES EXPANSION

  • 摘要: 隐伏构造地裂缝具有潜在的灾害效应和扩展的随机性,地表水是诱发隐伏地裂缝扩展的因素之一。文章基于野外调查资料,定性分析了地表水对隐伏地裂缝扩展效应的水压作用及黄土湿陷作用机理,在此基础上选取西安曲江新区隐伏地裂缝黄土场地开展了大型原位现场浸水模拟试验。通过沉降观测、数据分析和数值模拟,得出水压作用是诱发隐伏裂缝扩展的辅助因素,因黄土湿陷作用在裂缝两侧形成的差异沉降是主要诱因,靠近隐伏地裂缝的区域沉降量最大,距离裂缝越远沉降量越小,整体呈现抛物线形的沉降模式,验证了地表水诱发浅表层黄土隐伏裂缝扩展的作用机理。相关认识对于研究隐伏构造地裂缝的扩展机理以及防治工作具有重要的指导意义。

     

  • 图  1  典型隐伏地裂缝剖面图[9]

    Figure  1.  Profiles of typical buried ground-fissures[9]

    图  2  隐伏地裂缝扩展力学分析示意图

    σw—水压力,σa—土压力;σa1—隐伏地裂缝以上的土压力;σa2—隐伏地裂缝以下的土压力

    Figure  2.  Mechanical analysis diagram of buried ground-fissures

    图  3  现场原位试验探槽剖面图

    Figure  3.  Profiles of in-situ exploratory trench

    图  4  试验区域地裂缝及试坑平面图

    Figure  4.  Plane of ground fissure and foundation pit in the test area

    图  5  试坑观测点平面布置图

    Figure  5.  Plane of observation points in the foundation pit

    图  6  试验场地地裂缝出露

    Figure  6.  Ground fissure exposed on the spot

    图  7  各列测点的平均沉降量随时间变化曲线图

    Figure  7.  Average settlement curves of each column of measuring points over time

    图  8  第3列标点沉降量随时间变化曲线图

    Figure  8.  Settlement curves of the third column over time

    图  9  试坑沉降变形等值线图

    Figure  9.  Contour map of the foundation settlement

    图  10  模型平面示意图

    Figure  10.  Schematic diagram of the model plane

    图  11  模拟地面沉降变形图

    Figure  11.  Diagram of simulated ground settlement deformation

    图  12  垂直裂缝点累积沉降量曲线与数值模拟对比图

    Figure  12.  Curves of settlement between the measured and the numerical

    图  13  地裂缝扩展示意图

    Figure  13.  Diagrammatic sketch of the ground fracture expansion

    表  1  试验场地土体物理性质指标

    Table  1.   Index of physical property of soils in the test area

    取土深度/m 土样比重/(kN/m3) 孔隙比/% 浸水前 停水当天 裂缝出露当天
    含水率/% 饱和度/% 含水率/% 饱和度/% 含水率/% 饱和度/%
    1.0 2.72 1.003 0.19 51.5 0.27 73.2 0.21 56.9
    2.0 2.72 1.112 0.20 48.9 0.33 80.7 0.24 58.7
    3.0 2.72 0.999 0.22 59.9 0.34 92.6 0.27 73.5
    4.0 2.72 0.996 0.22 60.1 0.32 87.4 0.25 68.3
    5.0 2.72 1.008 0.21 56.7 0.29 78.3 0.23 62.1
    6.0 2.72 1.148 0.21 49.8 0.27 64.0 0.24 56.9
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  自重湿陷量计算值与分层沉降值

    Table  2.   Calculation of collapse and settlement of layer

    起止深度/mm 自重湿陷 分层沉降/mm
    分层自重湿陷系数δZSi 分层湿陷量:ΔZSi/mm 上盘 下盘
    2.5~4.0 0.028 37.8 4.3 4.1
    4.0~5.5 0.021 28.4 4.2 3.9
    5.5~7.0 0.024 32.4 5.4 5.0
    7.0~8.0 0.018 16.2 2.9 2.4
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  土体参数取值

    Table  3.   Parameters of the soil

    土体状态 容重/(kN/m3) 粘聚力/kPa 内摩擦角φ/(°) 弹性模量/MPa
    饱和 16 39 23 100
    自然 18 10 15 2
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 王景明, 王江帅, 刘全峰.地裂缝及其灾害的理论与应用[M].西安:陕西省科技出版社, 2000.

    WANG Jingming, WANG Jiangshuai, LIU Quanfeng. Theory of ground fissures hazards and its application[M]. Xi'an:Shaan Xi Science Technology Press, 2000. (in Chinese)
    [2] 彭建兵.西安地裂缝灾害[M].北京:科学出版社, 2012.

    PENG Jianbing. Xi'an ground fissures hazards[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2012. (in Chinese)
    [3] 王景明, 王春梅, 刘科.地裂缝及其灾害研究的新进展[J].地球科学进展, 2001, 16(3):303-313. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-8166.2001.03.003

    WANG Jingming, WANG Chunmei, LIU Ke. Progress in ground fissures and its hazard research[J]. Advance in Earth Science, 2001, 16(3):303-313. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-8166.2001.03.003
    [4] 齐信, 陈州丰, 邵民生, 等.九江地区第四系中典型地裂缝特征及构造意义[J].地质学报, 2015, 89(12):2266-2276. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2015.12.006

    QI Xin, CHEN Zhoufeng, SHAO Minsheng, et al. Typical fissure characteristics of the quaternary in the Jiujiang area and their tectonic significance[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2015, 89(12):2266-2276. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2015.12.006
    [5] 卢全中, 赵富坤, 彭建兵, 等.隐伏地裂缝破裂扩展研究综述[J].工程地质学报, 2013, 21(6):888-907. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/gcdzxb201306018

    LU Quanzhong, ZHAO Fukun, PENG Jianbing, et al. Overview on rupture propagation studies of buried ground-fissures[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2013, 21(6):888-907. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/gcdzxb201306018
    [6] 吴林强, 刘成林, 张涛, 等. "二元法"在构造裂缝定量预测中的应用-以松辽盆地青一段泥页岩为例[J].地质力学学报, 2018, 24(5):598-606. http://journal.geomech.ac.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?flag=1&file_no=20180502&journal_id=dzlxxb

    WU Linqiang, LIU Chenglin, ZHANG Tao, et al. The application of two factor method in quantitative prediction of tectonic fractures:a case study of shale in Qing-1 member, songliao basin[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 2018, 24(5):598-606. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://journal.geomech.ac.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?flag=1&file_no=20180502&journal_id=dzlxxb
    [7] 蒋臻蔚, 彭建兵, 王启耀.抽水作用下先期断裂对地裂缝的影响研究[J].工程地质学报, 2010, 18(5):651-656. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9665.2010.05.007

    JIANG Zhenwei, PENG Jianbing, WANG Qiyao. Influence of pre-existing fault on ground fissures during pumping action[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2010, 18(5):651-656. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9665.2010.05.007
    [8] 蒋臻蔚.水作用下地裂缝成因机制及数值模拟[D].西安: 长安大学, 2011. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10710-1012142449.htm

    JIANG Zhenwei. Earth fissure formation mechanism under the role of water and its numerical simulation[D]. Xi'an: Chang'an University, 2011. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10710-1012142449.htm
    [9] 汪丽.地表水与地裂缝活动关系的现场试验研究[D].西安: 长安大学, 2006. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-11941-2006163205.htm

    WANG Li. Field testing study on relationship between surface water and ground fissures[D]. Xi'an: Chang'an University, 2005. (in Chinese) http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-11941-2006163205.htm
    [10] 卢全中, 彭建兵, 范文等.陕西三原双槐树地裂缝的发育特征[J].工程地质学报, 2007, 15(4):458-462. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9665.2007.04.005

    LU Quanzhong, PENG Jianbing, FAN Wen, et al. Development features of ground fissure in Shuanghuaishu village, Sanyuan county, Shaanxi province[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2007, 15(4):458-462. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9665.2007.04.005
    [11] 万晓龙, 高春宁, 王永康, 等.人工裂缝与天然裂缝耦合关系及其开发意义[J].地质力学学报, 2009, 15(3):245-252. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6616.2009.03.006

    WAN Xiaolong, GAO Chunning, WANG Yongkang, et al. Coupled relationship between created and natural fractures and its implication to development[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 2009, 15(3):245-252. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6616.2009.03.006
    [12] 黄传艳, 李秀云, 王乐, 等.深层岩石二次人工致裂缝效果影响因素分析[J].水利水电技术, 2018, 49(8):186-192. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/slsdjs201808025

    HUANG Chuanyan, LI Xiuyun, WANG Le, et al. Analysis on factors of influences on secondary artificial fracturing effect on deep rock[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2018, 49(8):186-192. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/slsdjs201808025
    [13] HOLZER T L. Ground failure in areas of subsidence due to ground-water decline in the United States[C]//Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Land Subsidence. Anaheim, California: IAHS Publisher, 1976, 121: 423-433.
    [14] HOLZER T L. Ground failure induced by groundwater Withdrawal from unconsolidated sediment[C]//HOLZER T H. Man-Induced Land Subsidence, Geological Society of America. Colorado: Reviews in Engineering Geology, 1984, 6: 67-105.
    [15] 陕西省地质矿产厅.西安地区环境地质图集[M].西安:西安地图出版社, 1999.

    Deparment of Geology and Resources of Shaanxi Province. The atlas of environmental geology of Xi'an area[M]. Xi'an:Map Press of Xi'an, 1999. (in Chinese)
    [16] 山西省地质环境监测中心.山西省地面沉降与地裂缝调查报告[R].太原: 山西省地质环境监测中心, 2009.

    Geo-Environmental Monitoring Center. Investigation of land subsidence and ground fissures in Shaanxi province[R]. Taiyuan: Geo-environment Monitoring Center, 2009. (in Chinese)
    [17] 武强, 姜振泉, 李云龙.山西断陷盆地地裂缝灾害研究[M].北京:地质出版社, 2003.

    WU Qiang, JIANG Zhenquan, LI Yunlong. Ground fissures hazards research of Shaanxi fault basin[M]. Beijing:Geolgical Publishing House, 2003. (in Chinese)
    [18] 陈星, 黄强兵, 刘妮娜, 等.地震作用下邻近地裂缝带地铁隧道工程场地地表沉降研究[J].地质力学学报, 2018, 24(5):714-722. http://journal.geomech.ac.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?flag=1&file_no=20180515&journal_id=dzlxxb

    CHEN Xing, HUANG Qiangbing, LIU Nina, et al. Study on ground settlement of engineering site of metro tunnel adjacent to ground fissure zone under the action of earthquake[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 2018, 24(5):714-722. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://journal.geomech.ac.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?flag=1&file_no=20180515&journal_id=dzlxxb
    [19] 高孝巧, 张达.逆断层控制构造裂缝发育的力学机制模拟[J].地质力学学报, 2015, 21(1):47-55. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6616.2015.01.006

    GAO Xiaoqiao, ZHANG Da. Numerical simulation of structural fractures controlled by reverse fault[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 2015, 21(1):47-55. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6616.2015.01.006
    [20] 石玉玲, 门玉明, 彭建兵, 等.西安城区地裂缝破裂扩展的数值模拟[J].水文地质工程地质, 2008, 35(6):56-60. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3665.2008.06.013

    SHI Yuling, MEN Yuming, PENG Jianbing, et al. Numerical simulation of ground-fissure cracking and extending in Xi'an[J]. Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology, 2008, 35(6):56-60. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3665.2008.06.013
  • 加载中
图(13) / 表(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  293
  • HTML全文浏览量:  102
  • PDF下载量:  10
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2018-01-18
  • 修回日期:  2019-03-14
  • 刊出日期:  2019-06-01

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回