西昆仑塔什库尔干地块马尔洋一带中寒武世花岗岩的发现及地质意义

李瑞强; 贺承广; 陈泳霖; 姚帅; 王坤; 李兰兰

doi:10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2019.25.04.057

西昆仑塔什库尔干地块马尔洋一带中寒武世花岗岩的发现及地质意义

doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2019.25.04.057

李瑞强^{1, 2,},
贺承广^{1, 2, ,},
陈泳霖^{1, 2},
姚帅^{1, 2},
王坤^{1, 2},
李兰兰^{1, 2}

1.
河南省地质调查院, 河南郑州 450001
2.
河南省金属矿产成矿地质过程与资源利用重点实验室, 河南郑州 450001

基金项目:

中国地质调查局地质调查项目 12120114081801

详细信息

作者简介:
李瑞强(1983-), 男, 工程师, 主要从事区域地质矿产调查研究。E-mail:lrq1125@126.com

通讯作者:
贺承广(1985-), 男, 硕士、工程师, 主要从事区域地质调查和构造地质研究。E-mail:2692624526@qq.com

中图分类号: P588.12
计量
- 文章访问数: 332
- HTML全文浏览量: 119
- PDF下载量: 12
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2018-04-27
- 修回日期: 2019-04-10
- 刊出日期: 2019-08-01

THE DISCOVERY AND GEOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF MID-CAMBRIAN GRANITES IN MAERYANG AREA, TASHKURGHAN MASSIF, WEST KUNLUN

LI Ruiqiang^{1, 2
,},
HE Chengguang^{1, 2
, ,},
CHEN Yonglin^{1, 2},
YAO Shuai^{1, 2},
WANG Kun^{1, 2},
LI Lanlan^{1, 2}

1.
Henan Institute of Geological Survey, Zhengzhou 450001, Henan, China
2.
Henan Key Laboratory for Metal Mineral Ore-forming Geological Process and Utilization of Resource, Zhengzhou 450001, Henan, China

摘要

摘要: 西昆仑塔什库尔干地块马尔洋一带发育一期中寒武世花岗质岩浆活动，岩石类型为片麻状花岗闪长岩和二长花岗岩，LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb测年表明，其侵入时代分别为（506.0±6.8）Ma和（514.0±9.3）Ma。岩石SiO₂含量为67.83%~75.76%，具中高钾、准铝质-弱过铝质等特征；岩石稀土总量与平均陆壳相当（∑REE=90.85×10^-6~186.10×10^-6），轻、重稀土分馏程度较强（（La/Yb）_N=5.38~22.43），负Eu异常明显（δEu=0.42~0.71）；微量元素以富集Rb、K、Ba、Th、U等大离子亲石元素和亏损Nb、Ta、P、Ti等高场强元素为特征。地质学及岩石地球化学特征指示该期花岗岩属准铝质到弱过铝质高分异Ⅰ型花岗岩，锆石饱和温度指示其为高温岩浆岩，总体具有壳幔混源的特征，富云包体指示壳源成分占有较大的比例。该期花岗岩与邻区中-晚寒武世中酸性侵入岩指示塔什库尔干-甜水海地块南缘很可能存在一条中寒武世以来的岩浆弧带，其可能为在原特提斯（有限）洋盆于中寒武世向北俯冲、消减背景下幔源物质上涌底侵加热古老陆壳进而发生部分熔融的产物。这也预示着塔什库尔干地区在经过震旦纪-早寒武世伸展裂解阶段之后，于中-晚寒武世其大地构造环境及地球动力学背景发生了重大转折。
- 西昆仑 /
- 塔什库尔干地块 /
- 中寒武世花岗岩 /
- 高温岩浆岩 /
- 原特提斯洋 /
- 俯冲消减
Abstract: The paper reports a mid-Cambrian granitic magmatic activity which is comprised of gneissic granodiorite and monzogranite in Maeryang area of Tashkurgan massif, West Kunlun. LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb dating yields the emplacement ages of ca. (506.0±6.8) Ma and (514.0±9.3) Ma, respectively. The granites are characterized by moderate-high alkaline, quasi-aluminum to weak peraluminum, and a moderate range of SiO₂ (67.83%~75.76%). Addtionally, the total REE of granites is equivalent to the average continental crust (∑REE=90.85×10^-6~186.10×10^-6) and marked by obvious fractionation between light and heavy REE ((La/Yb)N=5.38~22.43) and negative Eu anomalies(δEu=0.42~0.71). The intrusions have geochemical features of enrichment of LILEs such as Rb, K, Ba, Th, U and depletion of HFSEs such as Nb, Ta, P, Ti. The geological and petrogeochemical characteristics of the granites indicate that they are quasi-aluminous to weakly peraluminous highly fractionated Ⅰ-type granites. Zircon saturation temperature reflects that the mid-Cambrian granites can be assigned to the high-temperature magmatic rocks. The presence of mica-rich enclaves in the granites which were most likely derived from crust-mantle mixing magma indicates that the crust composition accounts for a large proportion. The intermediate acid magma intrusion during middle-late Cambrian in Tashkurghan and its adjacent region shows that there was a magmatic arc zone in the southern margin of Tashkurgan-Tianshuihai massif. The granites in Maeryang area might originate in the partial melting of ancient continental crust heated by upwelling and underplating mantle during the Proto-Tethys ocean northward subduction in mid-Cambrian. It also indicates that the tectonic environment and geodynamic background during the middle-late Cambrian period have taken a major turn after the Sinian-early Cambrian extension and cracking stage in the Tashkurgan area.
- West Kunlun /
- Tashkurghan massif /
- mid-Cambrian granites /
- high-temperature granites /
- Proto-Tethys Ocean /
- subduction
注释:

责任编辑:范二平

HTML全文

图 1 塔什库尔干地区大地构造位置及侵入岩分布图(据文献[2]修改)

Figure 1. Tectonic position and intrusive rock distribution of the Tashkurghan region (Modified after reference[2])

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 西昆仑马尔洋一带构造地质简图

1—第四系；2—上石炭统—下二叠统特给乃奇克达坂组；3—下石炭统；4—早志留世温泉沟组；5—震旦系—寒武系纽芬兰统马尔洋岩组三岩段；6—震旦系—寒武系纽芬兰统马尔洋岩组二岩段；7—震旦系—寒武系纽芬兰统马尔洋岩组一岩段；8—古元古界瓦恰岩组；9—古元古界五古力牙特岩组；10—渐新世花岗闪长岩；11—晚三叠世二长花岗岩；12—早石炭世英云闪长岩；13—中寒武世二长花岗岩；14—中寒武世花岗闪长岩；15—晚寒武世辉长岩；16—韧性断层；17—片麻理；18—片理；19—锆石年龄；20—采样位置及编号

Figure 2. Tectonic and geological sketch of the Maeryang area, West Kunlun

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 中寒武世花岗岩与马尔洋岩组接触关系及岩体内部富云包体特征

Figure 3. Contacts between the Middle Cambrain granites and the Maeryang formation and the characteristics of mica-rich enclaves in granites

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 马尔洋一带片麻状花岗闪长岩与二长花岗岩镜下特征

Bt—黑云母；Ep—绿帘石；Kfs—钾长石；Pl—斜长石；Qz—石英；Zo—黝帘石

Figure 4. Microphotograph features of gneiss granodiorite and monzogranite in Maeryang area

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 马尔洋一带中寒武世花岗岩锆石CL图像

TW135/5-1—花岗闪长岩；TW185/70-1—二长花岗岩

Figure 5. CL images of zircons of mid-Cambrian granites in Maeryang area

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 马尔洋一带中寒武世花岗岩LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb谐和图

a—花岗闪长岩样品(TW135/5-1)；b—二长花岗岩样品(TW185/70-1)

Figure 6. LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb concordia diagrams of mid-Cambrian granites in Maeryang area

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 马尔洋一带花岗岩的岩石地球化学判别图解

Figure 7. Rock geochemical discrimination diagram of granite in the Maeryang area

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 中寒武世花岗岩稀土元素球粒陨石标准化配分型式图^[25]和微量元素原始地幔标准化蛛网图^[26]

Figure 8. Chondrite-normalized REE patterns^[25] and primitive mantle-nomalized trace elements patterns^[26] of the Middle Cambrian granites

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 中寒武世花岗岩岩石成因类型判别图解

Figure 9. Genetic type discrimination diagram of Middle Cambrian granites

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 中寒武世花岗岩源岩判别图解及Ab-An-Qtz三元共结压力曲线图

Figure 10. Discrimination diagrams of source rock and Ternary cojunction pressure curves of Ab vs. An vs.Qtz of the Middle Cambrian granites

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 中寒武世花岗岩构造判别图解

Figure 11. Tectonic discrimination diagram of Middle Cambrian granites

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 马尔洋一带花岗岩LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb同位素分析结果

Table 1. LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb isotope data of granites in Maeryang area

样品点号	Th	U	Th/U	²⁰⁷Pb/²⁰⁶Pb	1σ	²⁰⁷Pb/²³⁵U	1σ	²⁰⁶Pb/²³⁸U	1σ	²⁰⁷Pb/²⁰⁶Pb	1σ	²⁰⁷Pb/²³⁵U	1σ	²⁰⁶Pb/²³⁸U	1σ
样品点号	×10^-6		Th/U	同位素比值						年龄/Ma
花岗闪长岩(TW135/5-1)
1	284	682	0.42	0.0590	0.0007	0.693	0.008	0.0851	0.0009	568	11	534	5	526	6
2	41	138	0.30	0.0623	0.0018	0.689	0.018	0.0802	0.0012	684	32	532	11	497	7
3	232	965	0.24	0.0589	0.0006	0.654	0.006	0.0805	0.0009	563	10	511	4	499	5
4	420	1360	0.31	0.0588	0.0005	0.663	0.005	0.0818	0.0008	558	10	516	3	507	5
6	1166	2607	0.45	0.0589	0.0005	0.699	0.005	0.0860	0.0009	565	10	538	3	532	5
7	299	1296	0.23	0.0589	0.0006	0.703	0.007	0.0865	0.0009	565	10	541	4	535	5
9	252	642	0.39	0.0656	0.0010	0.625	0.009	0.0691	0.0008	793	13	493	6	431	5
10	582	683	0.85	0.0578	0.0008	0.631	0.008	0.0792	0.0009	522	13	497	5	491	5
11	496	1677	0.30	0.0595	0.0006	0.669	0.006	0.0815	0.0008	585	10	520	4	505	5
12	702	1032	0.68	0.0590	0.0007	0.685	0.007	0.0842	0.0009	566	11	530	4	521	5
13	241	620	0.39	0.0603	0.0008	0.704	0.009	0.0847	0.0010	613	12	541	5	524	6
14	286	1380	0.21	0.0592	0.0007	0.688	0.007	0.0843	0.0009	573	11	532	4	522	5
15	268	510	0.52	0.0590	0.0010	0.651	0.010	0.0800	0.0010	567	15	509	6	496	6
16	558	1872	0.30	0.0585	0.0011	0.647	0.011	0.0802	0.0008	547	43	506	6	497	5
17	168	564	0.30	0.0579	0.0014	0.605	0.013	0.0757	0.0009	527	55	480	8	470	5
18	388	861	0.45	0.0604	0.0007	0.683	0.007	0.0820	0.0009	617	10	528	4	508	5
19	340	649	0.52	0.0597	0.0011	0.623	0.010	0.0757	0.0009	594	17	492	6	470	6
20	323	1155	0.28	0.0593	0.0007	0.637	0.007	0.0779	0.0008	578	11	500	4	483	5
21	96	340	0.28	0.0582	0.0008	0.667	0.008	0.0831	0.0009	537	12	519	5	514	5
22	463	1579	0.29	0.0593	0.0005	0.667	0.005	0.0816	0.0008	579	10	519	3	505	5
23	253	538	0.47	0.0598	0.0007	0.695	0.008	0.0844	0.0009	596	11	536	5	522	5
24	479	1590	0.30	0.0593	0.0006	0.645	0.006	0.0789	0.0008	578	10	505	4	489	5
二长花岗岩(TW185/70-1)
1	172	265	0.42	0.0586	0.0014	0.673	0.017	0.0828	0.0011	554	51.8	522	10.0	513	6.4
2	126	218	0.30	0.0578	0.0015	0.675	0.019	0.0840	0.0011	520	57.4	524	11.2	520	6.6
4	111	199	0.24	0.0569	0.0017	0.676	0.020	0.0861	0.0012	487	58.3	525	11.9	532	7.0
5	492	612	0.31	0.0573	0.0012	0.694	0.017	0.0867	0.0013	502	46.3	535	10.1	536	7.6
6	160	315	0.24	0.0564	0.0013	0.677	0.016	0.0859	0.0010	478	51.8	525	9.8	531	5.7
7	155	283	0.45	0.0571	0.0015	0.674	0.018	0.0848	0.0011	494	57.4	523	10.8	525	6.8
8	112	244	0.23	0.0594	0.0017	0.691	0.020	0.0837	0.0011	583	67.6	533	12.0	518	6.7
9	205	402	0.43	0.0565	0.0013	0.660	0.017	0.0833	0.0010	472	51.8	514	10.2	516	5.7
10	180	339	0.39	0.0581	0.0015	0.684	0.019	0.0843	0.0010	600	57.4	529	11.3	522	5.8
11	181	336	0.85	0.0577	0.0013	0.687	0.018	0.0851	0.0010	517	51.8	531	10.5	527	6.0
12	193	334	0.30	0.0571	0.0013	0.660	0.016	0.0827	0.0009	498	45.4	515	9.5	512	5.4
13	234	391	0.68	0.0612	0.0014	0.717	0.017	0.0841	0.0009	656	51.8	549	9.9	521	5.6
14	197	346	0.39	0.0603	0.0016	0.700	0.019	0.0832	0.0010	617	52.8	539	11.2	515	5.9
15	385	403	0.21	0.0582	0.0015	0.669	0.018	0.0824	0.0011	600	55.6	520	11.0	510	6.4
17	149	265	0.52	0.0642	0.0019	0.751	0.021	0.0846	0.0011	746	63.0	569	12.4	523	6.7
19	211	373	0.30	0.0586	0.0015	0.679	0.017	0.0832	0.0009	550	55.5	526	10.1	515	5.6
20	207	334	0.30	0.0565	0.0014	0.687	0.019	0.0867	0.0011	472	53.7	531	11.2	536	6.7
22	221	311	0.45	0.0563	0.0015	0.664	0.018	0.0842	0.0011	461	26.9	517	11.0	521	6.3
23	147	239	0.52	0.0553	0.0020	0.646	0.024	0.0839	0.0012	433	81.5	506	14.5	520	7.2
24	137	227	0.28	0.0652	0.0024	0.785	0.029	0.0860	0.0013	789	78.9	588	16.4	532	8.0
25	113	219	0.28	0.0575	0.0018	0.682	0.021	0.0853	0.0012	522	73.1	528	12.5	528	7.3
26	104	177	0.29	0.0575	0.0020	0.683	0.023	0.0857	0.0013	509	74.1	528	13.6	530	7.6
27	184	330	0.47	0.0563	0.0015	0.647	0.017	0.0825	0.0010	461	26.9	506	10.4	511	5.9
28	244	371	0.30	0.0577	0.0015	0.658	0.018	0.0816	0.0010	520	57.4	513	10.7	506	6.0
31	141	247	0.57	0.0605	0.0021	0.701	0.025	0.0837	0.0012	620	74.1	539	14.6	518	7.3
32	220	351	0.63	0.0593	0.0016	0.681	0.018	0.0824	0.0011	576	57.4	527	11.1	510	6.4

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 中寒武世花岗岩主量元素(%)分析结果

Table 2. Major element composition (%) of the Middle Cambrian granites

样品编号	1	2	3	4	5
岩性	糜棱岩化二长花岗岩	片麻状花岗闪长岩	糜棱岩化花岗闪长岩	花岗质初糜棱岩	片麻状二长花岗岩
SiO₂	72.11	67.83	69.4	68.56	75.76
TiO₂	0.36	0.46	0.4	0.51	0.19
Al₂O₃	14.37	15.49	14.2	14.02	12.71
Fe₂O₃	0.59	1.29	0.96	1.32	0.57
FeO	2.37	2.8	2.33	2.62	0.52
MnO	0.05	0.09	0.07	0.08	0.01
MgO	0.63	0.9	1.47	1.83	0.33
CaO	2.26	3.05	3.45	3.71	2.06
Na₂O	3.62	3.99	2.81	2.72	3.53
K₂O	2.6	2.75	3.23	3.22	3.61
P₂O₅	0.11	0.16	0.16	0.11	0.035
LOI	0.46	0.69	1.06	0.81	0.42
TOTAl	99.54	99.48	99.55	99.52	99.74
σ	1.38	1.38	1.33	1.83	1.56
DI	80.61	75.97	73.83	71.7	88.24
A/CNK	1.115	1.027	0.987	0.954	0.945
Na₂O/K₂O	1.39	1.45	0.87	0.84	0.98

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 中寒武世花岗岩微量元素(×10^-6)分析结果

Table 3. Trace element composition (×10^-6) of the Middle Cambrian granites

样品编号	1	2	3	4	5
岩性	糜棱岩化二长花岗岩	片麻状花岗闪长岩	糜棱岩化花岗闪长岩	花岗质初糜棱岩	片麻状二长花岗岩
Rb	58.97	71.12	92.01	111.6	69.854
Sr	198.85	292.6	224.05	219	219.195
Ba	689.24	681.25	523.09	510.96	782.779
Th	9.03	8.7	7.98	8.77	12.44
U	1.13	2.43	1.8	3.85	2.722
Nb	13.17	15.67	4.19	6.26	10.05
Ta	0.61	0.95	0.4	0.74	0.855
Zr	210	216.5	129.7	158	135.024
Hf	5.7	5.61	3.47	4.09	3.237
Ni	2.4	2.26	8.56	9.99	3.69
Cr	7.29	7.95	22.46	22.59	4.79
V	17.23	23.25	67.37	84.98	12.089
Sc	8.44	10.08	11.03	13.25	5.124
Cs	1.43	2.72	2.97	4.96	1.112
La	66.67	57.62	53.54	68.17	27.766
Ce	140.4	115.3	120.5	156.8	50.13
Pr	16.94	13.07	15.01	20.93	5.787
Nd	62.64	51.57	58.41	83.36	21.72
Sm	10.43	9.48	10.99	16.7	4.771
Eu	2.19	2.36	2.44	3.38	0.798
Gd	9.46	9.14	9.85	14.35	5.24
Tb	1.18	1.09	1.27	2.02	0.83
Dy	5.88	5	5.93	10.24	5.066
Ho	1.16	0.94	1.14	2	1.112
Er	3.26	2.49	3.09	5.16	3.197
Tm	0.5	0.35	0.47	0.79	0.53
Yb	3.4	2.2	2.97	4.98	3.481
Lu	0.53	0.33	0.43	0.69	0.54
Y	31.82	23.61	29.91	50.93	30.02
ΣREE	179.9	186.1	90.85	103.14	130.97
LREE/HREE	11.80	11.58	10.37	8.68	5.55
(La/Yb)_N	22.44	13.47	8.6	6.48	5.38
δEu	0.61	0.64	0.74	0.68	0.49
δCe	0.91	0.9	0.9	0.91	0.91

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(49)

[1]	姜春发, 王宗起, 李锦铁.中央造山带开合构造[M].北京:地质出版社, 2000. JIANG Chunfa, WANG Zongqi, LI Jintie. 2000. Opening-Closing Tectonics of Center Orogenic Belt[M]. Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 2000. (in Chinese)
[2]	李荣社, 计文化, 杨永成, 等.昆仑山及邻区地质[M].北京:地质出版社, 2008. LI Rongshe, JI Wenhua, YANG Yongcheng, et al. Geology of Kunlun Mountain and Adjacent Areas[M]. Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 2008. (in Chinese)
[3]	姜耀辉, 芮行健, 贺菊瑞, 等.西昆仑山加里东期花岗岩类构造的类型及其大地构造意义[J].岩石学报, 1999, 15(1):105-115. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98199901012 JIANG Yaohui, RUI Xingjian, HE Jurui, et al. Tetonic type of Caledonian granitoids and tectonic significance in the west Kunlun Mts[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 1999, 15(1):105-115. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98199901012
[4]	康磊, 校培喜, 高晓峰, 等.西昆仑慕士塔格岩体的岩石地球化学特征、岩石成因及其构造意义[J].地质通报, 2012, 31(12):2001-2014. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2012.12.009 KANG Lei, XIAO Peixi, GAO Xiaofeng, et al. Geochemical characteristics and petrogenesis of Muztagata intrusion in Western Kunlun orogenic belt and their tectonic significance[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2012, 31(12):2001-2014. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2012.12.009
[5]	康磊, 校培喜, 高晓峰, 等.西昆仑西段晚古生代-中生代花岗质岩浆作用及构造演化过程[J].中国地质, 2015, 42(3):533-552. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3657.2015.03.011 KANG Lei, XIAO Peixi, GAO Xiaofeng, et al. Neopaleozoic and Mesozoic granitoid magmatism and tectonic evolution of the western West Kunlun Mountains[J]. Geology in China, 2015, 42(3):533-552. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3657.2015.03.011
[6]	张传林, 陆松年, 于海锋, 等.青藏高原北缘西昆仑造山带构造演化:来自锆石SHRIMP及LA-ICP-MS测年的证据[J].中国科学D辑:地球科学, 2007, 37(2):145-154. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgkx-cd200702001 ZHANG Chuanlin, LU Songnian, YU Haifeng, et al. Tectonic evolution of the Western Kunlun orogenic belt in northern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau:Evidence from zircon SHRIMP and LA-ICP-MS U-Pb geochronology[J]. Science in China Series D:Earth Sciences, 2007, 50(6):825-835. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgkx-cd200702001
[7]	邓万明.喀喇昆仑-西昆仑地区蛇绿岩的地质特征及其大地构造意义[J].岩石学报, 1995, 11(S1):98-111. DENG Wanming. Geological features of ophiolite and tectonic significance in the Karakorum-west Kunlun Mts[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 1995, 11(S1):98-111. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	韩芳林, 崔建堂, 计文化, 等.西昆仑其曼于特蛇绿混杂岩的发现及其地质意义[J].地质通报, 2002, 21(8-9):573-578. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgqydz200208019 HAN Fanglin, CUI Jiantang, JI Wenhua, et al. Discovery of the Qimanyute ophiolite in the West Kunlun and its geological significance[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2002, 21(8-9):573-578. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgqydz200208019
[9]	肖序常, 王军, 苏犁, 等.再论西昆仑库地蛇绿岩及其构造意义[J].地质通报, 2003, 22(10):745-750. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2003.10.001 XIAO Xuchang, WANG Jun, SU Li, et al. A further discussion of the küda ophiolite, West Kunlun, and its tectonic significance[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2003, 22(10):745-750. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2003.10.001
[10]	高晓峰, 校培喜, 康磊, 等.西昆仑大同西岩体成因:矿物学、地球化学和锆石U-Pb年代学制约[J].岩石学报, 2013, 29(9):3065-3079. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/cckjdxxb201602011 GAO Xiaofeng, XIAO Peixi, KANG Lei, et al. Origin of Datongxi pluton in the West Kunlun orogen:Constraints from mineralogy, elemental geochemistry and zircon U-Pb age[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2013, 29(9):3065-3079. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/cckjdxxb201602011
[11]	LIAO S Y, JIANG Y H, JIANG S Y, et al. Subducting sediment-derived arc granitoids:Evidence from the Datong pluton and its quenched enclaves in the western Kunlun orogen, Northwest China[J]. Mineralogy and Petrology, 2010, 100(1-2):55-74. doi: 10.1007/s00710-010-0122-x
[12]	张辉善, 何世平, 计文化, 等.甜水海地块晚寒武世花岗岩对原特提斯洋演化的启示:来自锆石年代学和地球化学的证据[J].地质学报, 2016, 90(10):2582-2602. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2016.10.004 ZHANG Huishan, HE Shiping, JI Wenhua, et al. Implications of late Cambrian granite in Tianshuihai massif for the evolution of proto-Tethy Ocean:evidences from zircon geochronology and geochemistry[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2016, 90(10):2582-2602. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2016.10.004
[13]	朱杰, 李秋根, 王宗起, 等.西昆仑甜水海地体早寒武世花岗岩浆作用及其构造意义[J].西北地质, 2016, 49(4):1-18. ZHU Jie, LI Qiugen, WANG Zongqi, et al. Magmatism and Tectonic Implications of Early Cambrian Granitoid Plutons in Tianshuihai Terrane of the Western Kunlun Orogenic Belt, Northwest China[J]. Northwestern Geology, 2016, 49(4):1-18. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	胡军, 王核, 慕生禄, 等.西昆仑甜水海地块南屏雪山早古生代花岗岩地球化学、Hf同位素特征及其壳幔岩浆作用[J].地质学报, 2017, 91(6):1192-1207. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2017.06.003 HU Jun, WANG He, MU Shenglu, et al. Geochemistry and Hf isotopic compositions of early Paleozoic granites in Nanpingxueshan from the Tianshuihai terrance, west Kunlun:Crust-mantle magmatism[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2017, 91(6):1192-1207. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2017.06.003
[15]	Mattern F, Schneider W, Li Y, et al. A traverse through the western Kunlun (Xinjiang, China):Tentative geodynamic implications for the Paleozoic and Mesozoic[J]. Geologische Rundschau, 1996, 85(4):705-722. doi: 10.1007/BF02440106
[16]	MATTERN F, SCHNEIDER W. Suturing of the Proto-and Paleo-Tethys oceans in the western Kunlun (Xinjiang, China)[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2000, 18(6):637-650. doi: 10.1016/S1367-9120(00)00011-0
[17]	XIAO W J, WINDLEY B F, HAO J, et al. Arc-ophiolite obduction in the western Kunlun range (China):Implications for the Palaeozoic evolution of central Asia[J]. Journal of the Geological Society, 2002, 159(5):517-528. doi: 10.1144/0016-764901-093
[18]	中国科学院青藏高原综合科学考察队.喀喇昆仑山-昆仑山地区地质演化[M].北京:科学出版社, 2000. Qinghai-Tibet Plateau Comprehensive Scientific Expedition Team of Chinese Academy of Sciences. Geolosical evolution of the Karakornm-Knnlnn monntains[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2000. (in Chinese)
[19]	张传林, 杨淳, 沈加林, 等.西昆仑北缘新元古代片麻状花岗岩锆石SHRIMP年龄及其意义[J].地质评论, 2003, 19(3):239-244. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dzlp200303003 ZHANG Chuanlin, YANG Chun, SHEN Jialin, et al. Zircon SHRIMP age of Neoproterozoic gneissoid granites in the West Kunlun and Its significance[J]. Geological Review, 2003, 19(3):239-244. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dzlp200303003
[20]	LIU Y S, HU Z C, ZONG K Q, et al. Reappraisement and refinement of zircon U-Pb isotope and Trace element analyses by LA-ICP-MS[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2010, 55(15):1535-1546. doi: 10.1007/s11434-010-3052-4
[21]	HU Z C, LIU Y S, CHEN L, et al. Contrasting matrix induced elemental fractionation in NIST SRM and rock glasses during laser ablation ICP-MS analysis at high spatial resolution[J]. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2011, 26(2):425-430. doi: 10.1039/C0JA00145G
[22]	RICKWOOD P C. Boundary lines within petrologic diagrams which use oxides of major and minor elements[J]. Lithos, 1989, 22(4):247-263. doi: 10.1016/0024-4937(89)90028-5
[23]	MANIAR P D, PICCOLI P M. Tectonic discrimination of granitoids[J]. GSA Bulletin, 1989, 101(5):635-643. doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(1989)101<0635:TDOG>2.3.CO;2
[24]	MIYASHIRO A. Volcanic rock series in island arcs and active continental margins[J]. American Journal of Science, 1974, 274:321-355. doi: 10.2475/ajs.274.4.321
[25]	THOMPSON R N. Magmatism of the British Tertiary volcanic province[J]. Scottish Journal of Geology, 1982, 18(1):49-107. doi: 10.1144/sjg18010049
[26]	SUN S S, MCDONOUGH W F. Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts:Implications for mantle composition and process[J]. Geological Society, London, Special Publication, 1989, 42(1):313-345. doi: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1989.042.01.19
[27]	吴福元, 李献华, 杨进辉, 等.花岗岩成因研究的若干问题[J].岩石学报, 2007, 23(6):1217-1238. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0569.2007.06.001 WU Fuyuan, LI Xianhua, YANG Jinhui, et al. Discussions on the petrogenesis of granites[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2007, 23(6):1217-1238. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0569.2007.06.001
[28]	WHALEN J B, CURRIE K L, CHAPPELL B W. A-type granites:geochemical characteristics, discrimination and petrogenesis[J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 1987, 95(4):407-419. doi: 10.1007/BF00402202
[29]	WOLF M B, LONDON D. Apatite dissolution into peraluminous haplogranitic melts:An experimental study of solubilities and mechanism[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1994, 58(19):4127-4145. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(94)90269-0
[30]	李献华, 李武显, 李正祥.再论南岭燕山早期花岗岩的成因类型与构造意义[J].科学通报, 2007, 52(9):981-992. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/kxtb200709001 LI Xianhua, LI Wuxian, LI Zhengxiang. On the genetic classification and tectonic implications of the Early Yanshanian granitoids in the Nanling Range, South China[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2007, 52(14):1873-1885. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/kxtb200709001
[31]	ALTHERR R, SIEBLE W. Ⅰ-type plutonism in a continental back-arc setting:Miocene granitoids and monzonites from the central Aegean Sea, Greece[J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 2002, 143(4):397-415. doi: 10.1007/s00410-002-0352-y
[32]	LV B X, WANG Z, ZHANG N D, et al. Granitoids in the Sanjiang region and their metallogenic specialization[J]. Geological Publishing House, 1993:169-242.
[33]	HOFMANN A W. Chemical differentiation of the Earth:The relationship between mantle, continental crust, and oceanic crust[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1989, 90(3):297-314.
[34]	GREEN T H. Significance of Nb/Ta as an indicator of geochemical processes in the crust-mantle system[J]. Chemical Geology, 1995, 120(3-4):347-359. doi: 10.1016/0009-2541(94)00145-X
[35]	RUDNICK R L, FOUNTAIN D M. Nature and composition of the continental crust:A lower crustal perspective[J]. Reviews of Geophysics, 1995, 33(3):267-309. doi: 10.1029/95RG01302
[36]	LASSITER J C, DEPAOLO D J. Plume/lithosphere interaction in the generation of continental and oceanic flood basalts: chemical and isotopic constraints[M]//MAHONEY J, COFFIN F. Large Igneous Provinces: Continental, Oceanic, and Planetary Flood Volcanism. Washington, D. C.: AUG, 1997: 335-355.
[37]	WATSON E B, HARRISON T M. Zircon saturation revisited:Temperature and composition effects in a variety of crustal magma types[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1983, 64(2):295-304. doi: 10.1016/0012-821X(83)90211-X
[38]	CHAPPELL B W, BRYANT C J, WYBON D, et al. High-and Low-temperature Ⅰ-type granite[J]. Resource Geology, 1998, 48(4):225-235. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-3928.1998.tb00020.x
[39]	MILLER C F, MCDOWELL S M, MAPES R W. Hot and cold granites? Implications of zircon saturation temperatures and preservation of inheritance[J]. Geology, 2003, 31(6):529-532. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(2003)031<0529:HACGIO>2.0.CO;2
[40]	WINTER J D. An introduction to igneous and metamorphic petrology[M]. New Jersey:Prentice Hall, 2001:1-348.
[41]	PEARCE J A, HARRIS N B W, TINDLE A C. Trace element discrimination diagrams for the tectonic interpretation of granitic Rocks[J]. Journal of Petrology, 1984, 25(4):956-983. doi: 10.1093/petrology/25.4.956
[42]	张旗, 潘国强, 李承东, 等.花岗岩构造环境问题:关于花岗岩研究的思考之三[J].岩石学报, 2007, 23(11):2683-2698. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0569.2007.11.002 ZHANG Qi, PAN Guoqiang, LI Chengdong, et al. Are discrimination diagrams always indicative of correct technic settings of granites? Some crucial questions on granite study (3)[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2007, 23(11):2683-2698. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0569.2007.11.002
[43]	BATCHELOR R A, BOWDEN P. Petrogenetic interpretation of granitoid rock series using multicationic parameters[J]. Chemical Geology, 1985, 48(1-4):43-55. doi: 10.1016/0009-2541(85)90034-8
[44]	中国地质调查局西安地质调查中心.西昆仑一阿尔金成矿带基础地质综合研究报告[R].西安: 中国地质调查局西安地质调查中心, 2013. China Geological Survey Xi'an Geological Survey Center. Comprehensive Study Report on Basic Geology of West Kunlun-Alkin metallogenic Belt[R]. Xi'an: China Geological Survey Xi'an Geological Survey Center, 2013. (in Chinese)
[45]	许志琴, 戚学祥, 刘福来, 等.西昆仑康西瓦加里东期孔兹岩系及地质意义[J].地质学报, 2004, 78(6):733-743. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5717.2004.06.003 XU Zhiqin, QI Xuexiang, LIU Fulai, et al. The Kangxiwar Caledonian Khondalite series in West Kunlun, China, and its geological significance[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2004, 78(6):733-743. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5717.2004.06.003
[46]	周辉, 储著银, 李继亮, 等.西昆仑库地韧性剪切带的⁴⁰Ar/³⁹Ar年龄[J].地质科学, 2000, 35(2):233-239. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0563-5020.2000.02.013 ZHOU Hui, CHU Zhuyin, LI Jiliang, et al. ⁴⁰Ar/³⁹Ar dating of ductile shear zone in Kuda, west Kunlun, Xinjiang[J]. Scientia Geologica Sinica, 2000, 35(2):233-239. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0563-5020.2000.02.013
[47]	王建平.西昆仑塔什库尔干混杂岩的地质特征及其大地构造意义[J].地质通报, 2008, 27(12):2057-2066. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2008.12.011 WANG Jianping. Geological features and tectonic significance of mélange zone in the Taxkorgan area, West Kunlun[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2008, 27(12):2057-2066. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2008.12.011
[48]	边小卫, 崔建堂, 王炬川, 等.西昆仑康西瓦南一带康西瓦岩群的厘定及其地质意义[J].西北地质, 2015, 48(3):31-38. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6248.2015.03.004 BIAN Xiaowei, CUI Jiantang, WANG Juchuan, et al. Redefinition of the Kangxiwa Group in South Kangxiwa Area of West Kunlun and its geological significance[J]. Northwestern Geology, 2015, 48(3):31-38. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6248.2015.03.004
[49]	黄建国, 杨瑞东, 杨剑, 等.西昆仑北缘库斯拉甫一带寒武纪中酸性岩浆活动及地质意义[J].地球化学, 2013, 42(5):454-466. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dqhx201305006 HUANG Jianguo, YANG Ruidong, YANG Jian, et al. Cambrian intermediate-acid magmatic activity and its geological significance in the Kusilafu region at the north margin of the Western Kunlun[J]. Geochimica, 2013, 42(5):454-466. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dqhx201305006