留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

佳木斯—伊通断裂韧性剪切变形时代及其地质意义

高万里 王宗秀 李磊磊 崔明明

高万里, 王宗秀, 李磊磊, 等, 2018. 佳木斯—伊通断裂韧性剪切变形时代及其地质意义. 地质力学学报, 24 (6): 748-758. DOI: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2018.24.06.077
引用本文: 高万里, 王宗秀, 李磊磊, 等, 2018. 佳木斯—伊通断裂韧性剪切变形时代及其地质意义. 地质力学学报, 24 (6): 748-758. DOI: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2018.24.06.077
GAO Wanli, WANG Zongxiu, LI Leilei, et al., 2018. THE DUCTILE SHEAR DEFORMATION AGE OF THE JIAMUSI-YITONG FAULT AND ITS GEOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE. Journal of Geomechanics, 24 (6): 748-758. DOI: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2018.24.06.077
Citation: GAO Wanli, WANG Zongxiu, LI Leilei, et al., 2018. THE DUCTILE SHEAR DEFORMATION AGE OF THE JIAMUSI-YITONG FAULT AND ITS GEOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE. Journal of Geomechanics, 24 (6): 748-758. DOI: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2018.24.06.077

佳木斯—伊通断裂韧性剪切变形时代及其地质意义

doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2018.24.06.077
基金项目: 

中国地质调查局工作项目 DD20189614

国家自然科学基金项目 41702204

详细信息
    作者简介:

    高万里(1985-), 男, 助理研究员, 博士, 从事区域构造和岩石大地构造方面的科研工作。E-mail:gwanli851202@163.com

  • 中图分类号: P542

THE DUCTILE SHEAR DEFORMATION AGE OF THE JIAMUSI-YITONG FAULT AND ITS GEOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE

  • 摘要: 作为郯庐断裂北段主干断裂的佳木斯-伊通断裂(简称佳-伊断裂),其最早开始活动的时代一直以来都存在争议。为了更好确定其活动时代,对佳-伊断裂昌图段南城水库附近的韧性剪切带展开了详细研究。野外构造解析和显微构造特征显示,剪切带糜棱面理走向北北东-南南西,其上发育北东方向的缓倾拉伸线理,指示该剪切带为逆冲-走滑韧性剪切特征。锆石U-Pb年龄测试结果表明,剪切带中糜棱花岗岩形成在174~173 Ma,该糜棱岩带被后期未变形辉绿岩脉侵入,辉绿岩脉的锆石U-Pb年龄为164 Ma,从而限定该期次韧性变形发生在174~164 Ma之间的中侏罗晚期。取自剪切带糜棱花岗岩内的变形黑云母40Ar/39Ar测试结果表明,糜棱花岗岩在187~166 Ma左右受到了显著的热事件的扰动。这些证据证明,佳-伊断裂在中侏罗晚期发生过显著的左行走滑韧性剪切,结合对东北地区火成岩研究成果的分析,佳-伊断裂中侏罗晚期的韧性变形可能与古太平洋板块向欧亚大陆的俯冲有关,该时期侵位的岩浆活动开始显著受到俯冲引发的挤压应力作用的影响。

     

  • 图  1  东北地区构造单元划分图

    1—额尔古纳地块;2—兴安地块;3—松辽-锡林浩特地块;4—佳木斯地块;5—松辽盆地;6—华北地块;7—完达山地体;8—主要断裂;9—研究区位置图

    Figure  1.  Tectonic sub-division of Northeast China

    图  2  韧性剪切带区域地质简图

    a—奥陶系马家沟组灰岩;b—志留纪花岗岩;c—石炭系本溪组砂岩;d—早二叠世二长花岗岩;e—早二叠超基性岩;f—侏罗纪花岗岩;g—白垩纪花岗岩;h—白垩系砂岩、泥岩;i—第四纪沉积物;j—韧性剪切带;k—断层;N—野外观测点

    Figure  2.  Geological sketch map of the ductile shear zone

    图  3  南城水库韧性剪切带野外剖面

    a—南城水库韧性剪切带剖面;b—构造要素赤平投影图

    Figure  3.  Structural section of the ductile shear zone in Nancheng reservoir

    图  4  韧性剪切带糜棱花岗岩野外特征

    a—侵入剪切带未变形辉绿岩脉;b—暗色包体沿糜棱面理定向排列;c—包体指示左旋剪切

    Figure  4.  Deformation photos of mylonite granites in the field

    图  5  韧性剪切带显微镜下特征

    a—SL011F显微镜下的长石定向排列;b—SL011 N显微镜下的长石旋转碎斑;Kf—钾长石;Qtz—石英

    Figure  5.  Ductile deformation photos under microscope

    图  6  韧性剪切带糜棱花岗岩及辉绿岩脉代表性锆石CL图像及锆石U-Pb年龄谐和图

    a—样品SL011D典型锆石CL图像;b—样品SL011D锆石U-Pb年龄谐和图;c—样品SL011 J典型锆石CL图像;d—样品SL011 J锆石U-Pb年龄谐和图;e—样品SL011T典型锆石CL图像;f—样品SL011T锆石U-Pb年龄谐和图

    Figure  6.  Representative zircon CL images with analyzed spots and U-Pb concordia diagram of mylonite granites and diabase from the shear zone

    图  7  糜棱花岗岩黑云母40Ar/39Ar年龄谱

    Figure  7.  40Ar/39Ar age spectum for biotites from mylonitic granites

    表  1  糜棱花岗岩及辉绿岩锆石U-Pb年代学结果

    Table  1.   The result of zircon U-Pb from mylonite granites and diabase

    点号 Th U Th/U 同位素比值 年龄/Ma
    ×10-6 ×10-6 207Pb/206Pb 1sigma 207Pb/235U 1sigma 206Pb/238U 1sigma 207Pb/206Pb 1sigma 206Pb/238U 1sigma
    SL011D
    1.1 180.80 293.23 0.62 0.05378 0.00506 0.20319 0.01892 0.02759 0.00061 361 181 175 4
    2.1 155.67 218.18 0.71 0.05168 0.00262 0.19136 0.00934 0.02738 0.00054 333 117 174 3
    3.1 169.02 395.60 0.43 0.05136 0.00598 0.19572 0.02473 0.02704 0.00083 257 248 172 5
    4.1 133.63 321.15 0.42 0.05270 0.01108 0.20255 0.04103 0.02825 0.00131 317 428 180 8
    5.1 112.76 185.66 0.61 0.05350 0.00588 0.20377 0.01872 0.02844 0.00065 350 255 181 4
    6.1 159.18 373.62 0.43 0.05120 0.00275 0.19311 0.01042 0.02744 0.00038 250 124 175 2
    7.1 251.35 373.73 0.67 0.05102 0.00606 0.18744 0.02230 0.02705 0.00113 243 252 172 7
    8.1 258.35 366.03 0.71 0.04979 0.00707 0.18628 0.02957 0.02676 0.00032 183 304 170 2
    9.1 327.23 579.68 0.56 0.05045 0.00288 0.18788 0.01067 0.02711 0.00044 217 131 172 3
    10.1 85.95 239.54 0.36 0.05501 0.00782 0.19898 0.02430 0.02731 0.00079 413 322 174 5
    11.1 192.60 260.42 0.74 0.04942 0.00660 0.18287 0.02853 0.02656 0.00144 169 285 169 9
    12.1 139.81 273.83 0.51 0.05299 0.01644 0.19522 0.05309 0.02794 0.00136 328 594 178 9
    13.1 341.88 779.17 0.44 0.05132 0.00261 0.19103 0.00968 0.02703 0.00046 254 84 172 3
    14.1 181.49 408.88 0.44 0.05315 0.00593 0.20188 0.02449 0.02744 0.00098 345 254 175 6
    15.1 125.38 268.68 0.47 0.05352 0.00615 0.19413 0.01927 0.02751 0.00128 350 256 175 8
    16.1 137.36 376.73 0.36 0.05253 0.00258 0.19585 0.00915 0.02749 0.00031 309 113 175 2
    17.1 112.05 126.85 0.88 0.04901 0.01131 0.19625 0.05573 0.02824 0.00209 150 467 180 13
    SL011 J
    1.1 198.44 548.75 0.36 0.05029 0.00263 0.19032 0.00946 0.02768 0.00037 209 120 176 2
    2.1 205.54 1174.35 0.18 0.05001 0.00150 0.18478 0.00552 0.02690 0.00030 195 70 171 2
    3.1 83.75 342.43 0.24 0.05050 0.00303 0.19102 0.01193 0.02752 0.00044 217 139 175 3
    4.1 212.42 480.29 0.44 0.05115 0.00351 0.19049 0.01282 0.02732 0.00067 256 157 174 4
    5.1 243.39 427.44 0.57 0.05476 0.00281 0.20772 0.01037 0.02760 0.00045 467 119 175 3
    6.1 132.20 245.62 0.54 0.05347 0.00359 0.19959 0.01325 0.02720 0.00043 350 152 173 3
    7.1 206.47 540.07 0.38 0.05366 0.00430 0.20242 0.01681 0.02745 0.00072 367 181 175 5
    8.1 116.83 239.88 0.49 0.05359 0.00503 0.21620 0.02259 0.02897 0.00081 354 213 184 5
    9.1 273.11 345.52 0.79 0.04932 0.00577 0.18697 0.02155 0.02736 0.00111 161 256 174 7
    10.1 146.09 203.41 0.72 0.05560 0.01009 0.19454 0.03292 0.02608 0.00085 435 363 166 5
    11.1 330.23 738.29 0.45 0.05255 0.00207 0.20157 0.00774 0.02791 0.00029 309 91 177 2
    12.1 1341.93 1931.32 0.69 0.05130 0.00190 0.19133 0.00692 0.02698 0.00033 254 90 172 2
    13.1 418.26 460.23 0.91 0.04991 0.00219 0.18688 0.00809 0.02722 0.00033 191 106 173 2
    SL011T
    1.1 336.63 559.89 0.60 0.05264 0.00497 0.18088 0.01641 0.02506 0.00056 322 219 160 4
    2.1 209.99 366.47 0.57 0.05361 0.00946 0.17914 0.03089 0.02502 0.00087 354 356 159 5
    3.1 140.99 292.80 0.48 0.05133 0.00742 0.18798 0.02703 0.02625 0.00090 257 309 167 6
    4.1 172.89 369.22 0.47 0.05192 0.00584 0.18519 0.02049 0.02608 0.00072 283 60 166 5
    5.1 180.47 303.25 0.60 0.05346 0.00305 0.18867 0.01017 0.02573 0.00035 350 130 164 2
    6.1 328.22 400.90 0.82 0.05078 0.00240 0.17860 0.00811 0.02575 0.00031 232 114 164 2
    7.1 239.00 288.88 0.83 0.05378 0.00458 0.18730 0.01640 0.02532 0.00072 361 188 161 5
    8.1 139.38 210.48 0.66 0.05148 0.00542 0.18111 0.01972 0.02593 0.00068 261 44 165 4
    9.1 200.92 272.51 0.74 0.05144 0.00268 0.18046 0.00928 0.02566 0.00034 261 88 163 2
    10.1 207.68 261.23 0.80 0.05388 0.01021 0.18979 0.03259 0.02610 0.00138 365 381 166 9
    11.1 397.41 541.50 0.73 0.04893 0.00415 0.17701 0.01637 0.02592 0.00059 143 189 165 4
    12.1 262.79 547.40 0.48 0.05095 0.00460 0.17670 0.01577 0.02519 0.00062 239 209 160 4
    13.1 304.08 602.09 0.51 0.05075 0.00387 0.17999 0.01457 0.02572 0.00069 228 178 164 4
    14.1 194.73 235.44 0.83 0.05105 0.00749 0.18596 0.03266 0.02602 0.00122 243 307 166 8
    15.1 264.73 276.40 0.96 0.05292 0.00788 0.18701 0.02714 0.02566 0.00131 324 307 163 8
    16.1 617.91 574.82 1.07 0.05041 0.00377 0.18433 0.01398 0.02650 0.00046 213 179 169 3
    17.1 223.00 488.49 0.46 0.05128 0.00240 0.18294 0.00857 0.02602 0.00039 254 112 166 2
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  南城水库韧性剪切带糜棱岩中黑云母40Ar/39Ar分析数据

    Table  2.   The data of biotite 40Ar/39Ar from Nancheng reservoir shear zone

    T/℃ (40Ar/39Ar)m (36Ar/39Ar)m (37Ar0/39Ar)m (38Ar/39Ar)m 40Ar/% 40Ar/39Ar 39Ar/×10-12mol 39Ar/% Age/Ma(T±1σ)
    700 287.8370 0.8525 0.0612 0.2220 12.48 35.9230 0.00 0.05 238±193
    770 53.8437 0.1557 1.5780 0.0449 14.77 7.9613 0.66 11.26 55.61±0.97
    810 56.9651 0.1421 3.5330 0.0418 26.69 15.2498 0.60 21.57 105.1±1.3
    860 37.4604 0.0573 0.5333 0.0275 54.89 20.5722 0.64 32.58 140.3±1.4
    910 32.9916 0.0249 0.0771 0.0219 77.69 25.6343 0.83 46.71 173.2±1.7
    950 30.5730 0.0147 0.1192 0.0181 85.78 26.2275 0.46 54.64 177.1±2.0
    1000 35.1301 0.0275 0.0945 0.0221 76.90 27.0169 0.68 66.24 182.1±1.9
    1050 34.7155 0.0233 0.1101 0.0211 80.18 27.8388 0.93 82.11 187.4±1.8
    1100 29.5513 0.0122 0.2629 0.0179 87.84 25.9623 0.53 91.09 175.4±1.8
    1150 29.2123 0.0158 1.2449 0.0201 84.30 24.6516 0.26 95.50 166.9±2.2
    1250 32.0643 0.0247 4.1140 0.0239 78.11 25.1284 0.20 98.98 170.0±2.6
    1400 30.9065 0.0288 1.2120 0.0143 72.76 22.5080 0.06 100.00 153.0±5.5
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] Zhang Y Q, Dong S W, Shi W. Cretaceous deformation history of the middle Tan-Lu fault zone in Shandong Province, eastern China[J]. Tectonophysics, 2003, 363(3~4):243~258. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=0516007830d99eb9097eb1b789716dfe
    [2] Grimmer J C, Jonckheere R, Enkelmann E, et al. Cretaceous-Cenozoic history of the southern Tan-Lu fault zone:apatite fission-track and structural constraints from the Dabie Shan (eastern China)[J]. Tectonophysics, 2002, 359(3~4):225~253. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040195102005139
    [3] 吴根耀, 梁兴, 陈焕疆.试论郯城-庐江断裂带的形成、演化及其性质[J].地质科学, 2007, 42(1):160~175. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0563-5020.2007.01.014

    WU Genyao, LIANG Xing, CHEN Huanjiang. An approach to the Tancheng-Lujiang fault zone:its creation, evolution and character[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 2007, 42(1):160~175. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0563-5020.2007.01.014
    [4] Wang Y. The onset of the Tan-Lu fault movement in eastern China:constraints from zircon (SHRIMP) and 40Ar/39Ar dating[J]. Terra Nova, 2006, 18(6):423~431. doi: 10.1111/ter.2006.18.issue-6
    [5] Zhu G, Wang Y S, Liu G S, et al. 40Ar/39Ar dating of strike-slip motion on the Tan-Lu fault zone, East China[J]. Journal of Structural Geology, 2005, 27(8):1379~1398. doi: 10.1016/j.jsg.2005.04.007
    [6] Mercier J L, Hou M J, Vergély P, et al. Structural and stratigraphical constraints on the kinematics history of the Southern Tan-Lu Fault Zone during the Mesozoic Anhui Province, China[J]. Tectonophysics, 2007, 439(1~4):33~66. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=ffc17cbea385505e2a6a8a288ab3d419
    [7] Zhu G, Liu G S, Dunlap W J, et al. 40Ar/39Ar geochronological constraints on syn-orogenic strike-slip movement of Tan-Lu fault zone[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2004, 49(5):499~508. doi: 10.1007/BF02900972
    [8] 朱光, 徐佑德, 刘国生, 等.郯庐断裂带中-南段走滑构造特征与变形规律[J].地质科学, 2006, 41(2): 226~241, 255.

    ZHU Guang, XU Youde, LIU Guosheng, et al. Structural and deformational characteristics of strike-slippings along the Middle-Southern sector of the Tan-Lu Fault Zone[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 41(2): 226~241, 255. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [9] 王勇生, 朱光, 宋传中, 等.大别山东端郯庐断裂带由走滑向伸展运动转换的40Ar-39Ar年代学记录[J].地质科学, 2006, 41(2):242~255. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0563-5020.2006.02.007

    WANG Yongsheng, ZHU Guang, SONG Chuanzhong, et al. 40Ar-39Ar Geochronology records of transition from strike-slip to extension in the Tan-Lu Fault Zone on eastern terminal of the Dabie Mountains[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 2006, 41(2):242~255. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0563-5020.2006.02.007
    [10] 孙晓猛, 王书琴, 王英德, 等.郯庐断裂带北段构造特征及构造演化序列[J].岩石学报, 2010, 26(1):165~176. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98201001019

    SUN Xiaomeng, WANG Shuqin, WANG Yingde, et al. The structural feature and evolutionary series in the northern segment of Tancheng-Lujiang fault zone[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2010, 26(1):165~176. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98201001019
    [11] 王凯红, 纪春华, 王秀萍.敦密断裂带的地质特征及演化[J].吉林地质, 2004, 23(4):23~27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-2427.2004.04.003

    WANG Kaihong, JI Chunhua, WANG Xiuping. The geologic features of the Dunmi faulted zone and its evolution[J]. Jilin Geology, 2004, 23(4):23~27. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-2427.2004.04.003
    [12] 李碧乐, 孙丰月, 姚凤良.中生代敦化-密山断裂大规模左旋平移及其对金矿床形成的控制作用[J].大地构造与成矿学, 2002, 26(4):390~395. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1552.2002.04.008

    LI Bile, SUN Fengyue, YAO Fengliang. Large scale sinistral strike-slip movement of Dunhua-Mishan fracture zone and its control on gold metallogeny in the Mesozoic[J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 2002, 26(4):390~395. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1552.2002.04.008
    [13] 殷长建, 彭玉鲸, 王彦生, 等.伊舒断裂带年代学新证据[J].吉林地质, 2005, 24(1):6~15. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-2427.2005.01.003

    YIN Changjian, PENG Yujing, WANG Yansheng, et al. New evidences of chronology of rift belt of Yitong-Shulan[J]. Jilin Geology, 2005, 24(1):6~15. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-2427.2005.01.003
    [14] WANG Y, D. Formation time and dynamic characteristics of the Northern part of the TanLu Fault Zone in East China[J]. Seismology and Geology, 1997, 19(2):186~192. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK199700063329
    [15] 顾承串, 朱光, 翟明见, 等.依兰-伊通断裂带中生代走滑构造特征与起源时代[J].中国科学:地球科学, 2016, 46(12):1579~1601. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=JDXK201612003&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ

    GU Chengchuan, ZHU Guang, ZHAI Mingjian, et al. Features and origin time of Mesozoic strike-slip structures in the Yilan-Yitong Fault Zone[J]. Science China Earth Sciences, 2016, 59(12):2389~2410. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=JDXK201612003&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
    [16] 孟婧瑶, 刘永江, 梁琛岳, 等.佳-伊断裂带韧性变形特征[J].世界地质, 2013, 32(4):800~807. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5589.2013.04.018

    MENG Jingyao, LIU Yongjiang, LIANG Chenyue, et al. Characteristics of ductile deformation of Jiamusi-Yitong fault[J]. Global Geology, 2013, 32(4):800~807. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5589.2013.04.018
    [17] 周建波, 张兴洲, 马志红, 等.中国东北地区的构造格局与盆地演化[J].石油与天然气地质, 2009, 30(5):530~538. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9985.2009.05.002

    ZHOU Jianbo, ZHANG Xingzhou, MA Zhihong, et al. Tectonic framework and basin evolution in Northeast China[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2009, 30(5):530~538. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9985.2009.05.002
    [18] 王成文, 孙跃武, 李宁, 等.中国东北及邻区晚古生代地层分布规律的大地构造意义[J].中国科学D辑:地球科学, 2009, 39(10):1429~1437. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=JDXK200910010&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ

    WANG Chengwen, SUN Yuewu, LI Ning, et al. Tectonic implications of Late Paleozoic stratigraphic distribution in Northeast China and adjacent region[J]. Science in China Series D:Earth Sciences, 2009, 52(5):619~626. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=JDXK200910010&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
    [19] Xiao W J, Kusky T, Safonova I, et al. Tectonics of the central Asian orogenic belt and its pacific analogues[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2015, 113:1~6. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2015.06.032
    [20] 葛肖虹, 马文璞.东北亚南区中-新生代大地构造轮廓[J].中国地质, 2007, 34(2):212~228. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3657.2007.02.003

    GE Xiaohong, MA Wenpu. Mesozoic-Cenozoic tectonic framework of southern Northeast Asia[J]. Geology in China, 2007, 34(2):212~228. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3657.2007.02.003
    [21] 侯可军, 李延河, 田有荣. LA-MC-ICP-MS锆石微区原位U-Pb定年技术[J].矿床地质, 2009, 28(4):481~492. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-7106.2009.04.010

    HOU Kejun, LI Yanhe, TIAN Yourong. In situ U-Pb zircon dating using laser ablation-multi ion counting-ICP-MS[J]. Mineral Deposits, 2009, 28(4):481~492. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-7106.2009.04.010
    [22] Liu Y S, Hu Z C, Gao S, et al. In situ analysis of major and trace elements of anhydrous minerals by LA-ICP-MS without applying an internal standard[J]. Chemical Geology, 2008, 257(1~2):34~43. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.08.004
    [23] Ludwig K R. Users manual for Isoplot/Ex rev. 2.49:A geochronological toolkit for Microsoft excel[M]. Berkeley:Berkeley Geochronology Center Special Publication, 2001, 1~55.
    [24] 张彦, 陈文, 陈克龙, 等.成岩混层(I/S)Ar-Ar年龄谱型及39Ar核反冲丢失机理研究-以浙江长兴地区P-T界线粘土岩为例[J].地质论评, 2006, 52(4):556~561. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0371-5736.2006.04.015

    ZHANG Yan, CHEN Wen, CHEN Kelong, et al. Study on the Ar-Ar age spectrum of diagenetic I/S and the Mechanism of 39Ar recoil loss-examples from the clay mineral s of P-T boundary in Changxing, Zhejiang Province[J]. Geological Review, 2006, 52(4):556~561. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0371-5736.2006.04.015
    [25] 陈文, 张彦, 张岳桥, 等.青藏高原东南缘晚新生代幕式抬升作用的Ar-Ar热年代学证据[J].岩石学报, 2006, 22(4):867~872. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98200604010

    CHEN Wen, ZHAN Yan, ZHANG YueQiao, et al. Late Cenozoic episodic uplifting in southeastern part of the Tibetan plateau-evidence from Ar-Ar thermochronology[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2006, 22(4):867~872. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98200604010
    [26] 李东涛, 胡晋伟, 李景弘, 等.郯庐断裂带在辽北地区三叠纪左行韧性剪切带的发现及变形特征[J].地质与资源, 2008, 17(4):254~258. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1947.2008.04.004

    LI Dongtao, HU Jinwei, LI Jinghong, et al. The Triassic left-lateral ductile shear zone of Tan-Lu Fault Zone and its deformation in Northern Liaoning Province[J]. Geology and Resources, 2008, 17(4):254~258. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1947.2008.04.004
    [27] 朱光, 谢成龙, 王勇生, 等.郯庐高压走滑韧性剪切带特征及其40Ar/39Ar定年[J].岩石学报, 2005, 21(6):1687~1702. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=ysxb98200506016

    ZHU Guang, XIE Chenglong, WANG Yongsheng, et al. Characteristics of the Tan-Lu high-pressure strike-slip ductile shear zone and its 40Ar/39Ar dating[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2005, 21(6):1687~1702. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=ysxb98200506016
    [28] 窦立荣, 宋建国, 王瑜.郯庐断裂带北段形成的年代学及其意义[J].地质论评, 1996, 42(6):508~512. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0371-5736.1996.06.004

    DOU Lirong, SONG Jianguo, WANG Yu. Chronology of the formation of the Northern Tan-Lu Fault Zone and its implications[J]. Geological Review, 1996, 42(6):508~512. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0371-5736.1996.06.004
    [29] 王书琴, 孙晓猛, 杜继宇, 等.郯庐断裂带北段构造样式解析[J].地质论评, 2012, 58(3):414~425. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0371-5736.2012.03.002

    WANG Shuqin, SUN Xiaomeng, DU Jiyu, et al. Analysis of structural styles in northern segment of Tancheng-Lujiang fault zone[J]. Geological Review, 2012, 58(3):414~425. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0371-5736.2012.03.002
    [30] 孙晓猛, 刘永江, 孙庆春, 等.敦密断裂带走滑运动的40Ar/39Ar年代学证据[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2008, 38(6):965~972. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=CCDZ200806009&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ

    SUN Xiaomeng, LIU Yongjiang, SUN Qingchun, et al. 40Ar/39Ar geochronology evidence of strike-slip movement in Dunhua-Mishan fault zone[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2008, 38(6):965~972. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=CCDZ200806009&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
    [31] 秦亚, 梁一鸿, 胡兆初, 等.吉林南部荒沟山地区侏罗纪花岗岩地球化学特征及构造意义[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 40(1):97~105. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9727.2013.01.013

    QIN Ya, LIANG Yihong, HU Zhaochu, et al. Geochemical characteristics and tectonic significance of Jurassic granites in Huanggoushan area, South of Jilin, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition), 2013, 40(1):97~105. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9727.2013.01.013
    [32] 张超, 郭巍, 徐仲元, 等.吉林东部延边地区二长花岗岩年代学、岩石成因学及其构造意义研究[J].岩石学报, 2014, 30(2):512~526. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98201402015

    ZHANG Chao, GUO Wei, XU Zhongyuan, et al. Study on geochronology, petrogenesis and tectonic implications of monzogranite from the Yanbian area, eastern Jilin Province[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2014, 30(2):512~526. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98201402015
    [33] 朱光, 王薇, 顾承串, 等.郯庐断裂带晚中生代演化历史及其对华北克拉通破坏过程的指示[J].岩石学报, 2016, 32(4):935~949. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98201604001

    ZHU Guang, WANG Wei, GU Chengchuan, et al. Late Mesozoic evolution history of the Tan-Lu Fault Zone and its indication to destruction processes of the North China Craton[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2016, 32(4):935~949. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98201604001
    [34] 朱光, 牛漫兰, 刘国生, 等.郯庐断裂带肥东段走滑运动的40Ar/39Ar法定年[J].地质学报, 2005, 79(3):303~316. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5717.2005.03.003

    ZHU Guang, NIU Manlan, LIU Guosheng, et al. 40Ar/39Ar dating for the strike-slip movement on the feidong part of the Tan-Lu Fault Belt[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2005, 79(3):303~316. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5717.2005.03.003
    [35] 张岳桥, 董树文.郯庐断裂带中生代构造演化史:进展与新认识[J].地质通报, 2008, 27(9):1371~1390. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2008.09.002

    ZHANG Yueqiao, DONG Shuwen. Mesozoic tectonic evolution history of the Tan-Lu fault zone, China:advances and new under-standing[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2008, 27(9):1371~1390. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2008.09.002
    [36] 唐杰, 许文良, 王枫, 等.古太平洋板块在欧亚大陆下的俯冲历史:东北亚陆缘中生代-古近纪岩浆记录[J].中国科学:地球科学, 2018, 48(5):549~583. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXK201805004.htm

    TANG Jie, XU Wenliang, WANG Feng, et al. Subduction history of the Paleo-Pacific slab beneath Eurasian continent:Mesozoic-Paleogene magmatic records in Northeast Asia[J]. Science China Earth Sciences, 2018, 61(5):527~559. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXK201805004.htm
    [37] 许文良, 王枫, 裴福萍, 等.中国东北中生代构造体制与区域成矿背景:来自中生代火山岩组合时空变化的制约[J].岩石学报, 2013, 29(2):339~353. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98201302001

    XU Wenliang, WANG Feng, PEI Fuping, et al. Mesozoic tectonic regimes and regional ore-forming background in NE China:constraints from spatial and temporal variations of Mesozoic volcanic rock associations[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2013, 29(2):339~353. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98201302001
  • 加载中
图(7) / 表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  497
  • HTML全文浏览量:  159
  • PDF下载量:  19
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2018-08-19
  • 修回日期:  2018-10-30
  • 刊出日期:  2018-12-01

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回