Karst groundwater enrichment law in Laiwu Basin
-
摘要: 基于在莱芜盆地开展的水文地质调查与泉水保护工作,通过资料收集、野外地质调查、水文地质钻探及岩矿测试,对区内碳酸盐岩岩溶发育特征及富水规律进行研究。结果表明:莱芜盆地碳酸盐岩分布受构造控制明显,集中分布在盆地南部,呈单斜状产出,在盆地北缘、东缘地区零星分布;岩溶发育受地层岩性、地质构造、地下水动力条件及岩浆侵入等多因素影响;地表岩溶形态以溶沟、溶槽为主,地下岩溶以溶蚀裂隙、溶孔溶洞为主,主要发育400 m以浅;岩溶水主要富集在多期构造断块区域、阻水断裂形成的上盘、地下水承压排泄区及莱芜矿山背斜两翼岩溶发育区。研究结果可为鲁中南缺水山区地下水资源开发与利用提供科学技术支撑。Abstract:
Objective The Laiwu Basin is a typical monocline fault basin in the central and southern regions of Shandong Province. It has a complex geological structure and an uneven distribution of groundwater resources within the region. Previous researchers have conducted a large number of hydrogeological and spring water protection studies, but no relevant research has been conducted on the relationship between the development laws of fissure karst and the distribution of karst groundwater. Methods In this study, karstification and groundwater enrichment characteristics were investigated in the Laiwu Basin through research methods of data collection, field geological surveys, hydrogeological drilling, and rock and mineral testing. Results Carbonate strata are concentrated in the southern part of the Laiwu Basin, with a monoclinal structure controlled by the geological structure, which is scattered sporadically in the northern and eastern regions. Karst development is affected by many factors, such as formation lithology, geological structure, groundwater dynamic conditions, and magma intrusion. The principal surface karst features are grikes and karst valleys. In addition, the principal underground karst features were dominated by dissolution fissures and holes at 400 m depth. Karst groundwater is primarily concentrated in multistage structural fault basins, hanging walls formed by water-blocking faults, groundwater pressure discharge areas, and karst development areas on the anticlinal flank of the mine. Conclusion The karst water cycle in the Laiwu Basin has a general regularity of monoclinic basins but is influenced by multiple factors, forming karst water systems of varying sizes that are relatively independent. Significant differences were observed in the development characteristics and water abundance patterns of karsts in different regions. Fault structures and geological water-blocking areas have relatively abundant karst water, whereas the shallow karst water has a strong runoff cycle. [ Significance ] This study provides scientific and technical support for the exploitation and utilization of groundwater resources in water-scarce mountainous areas of central and southern Shandong Province. -
Key words:
- Laiwu Basin /
- karstification /
- groundwater /
- enrichment pattern /
- hydrogeololgy
-
0. 引言
现代科技日新月异,传感器技术得到了快速发展,遥感技术在各行业中都得以体现,尤其是在地质找矿和成矿远景预测的工作中发挥着越来越重要的作用。
绝大多数内生矿床均伴随热液围岩蚀变现象[1]。围岩蚀变通常会生成含铁的金属矿物和含OH-或CO32-的蚀变矿物,这些矿物会在遥感影像上呈现出特定的色调[2]。利用遥感数据与地质资料、物化探资料相结合对蚀变信息进行提取,是遥感主要的找矿手段。遥感蚀变信息的提取方法主要有波段比值法、主成分分析法以及光谱角法[2]等,但是受地形、地貌、岩性等因素的影响,这些方法的提取结果具有一定的误差。
本文选取我国重要矿集区内蒙古帮帮乃别力切尔地区作为研究区,提出一种改进的蚀变信息提取方法,在利用地貌、岩性信息对研究区影像分区提取羟基蚀变信息和铁染蚀变信息后,对提取的蚀变信息进行地形校正,有效去除了一部分误差,提高了蚀变信息提取的精度,为该区矿产勘查及找矿工作提供了有效参考和依据。
1. 研究区概况及技术流程
研究区帮帮乃别力切尔地区位于内蒙古巴彦淖尔市乌拉特后旗南部渣尔泰山—狼山多金属成矿带,地处华北地台北缘狼山南侧,属于内蒙渣尔泰山—狼山裂陷槽,其含矿构造为中元古界渣尔泰山岩群以及上太古界色尔腾山岩群[3]。渣尔泰山岩群受东西向的断裂带控制;色尔腾山岩群发育北东向和北西向断裂,有利于形成大型矿床。该区的基底岩系为乌拉山群、色尔腾山群和太古代花岗闪长岩共同组成[4]。盖层由上太古界、中元古界、中生界和岩浆岩所组成。
本研究的技术流程见图 1。
2. 数据预处理
本文选用Landsat7 ETM+影像、ASTER影像作为数据源,同时收集研究区对应的数字高程数据和相关地质资料进行综合研究。遥感数据预处理主要包括数据检查、辐射校正、无损失拉伸以及去除干扰等。
① 数据检查:矿物蚀变信息提取对遥感数据的质量要求较高,因此首先要对遥感影像数据进行严格的检查和筛选。为了从遥感影像中获得更多的信息,选取研究区范围内少云、少冰雪遮盖、植被覆盖率较低的遥感数据,同时检查影像是否存在异常斑点和条带。
② 辐射校正:利用直方图法和线性拉伸法对遥感影像进行辐射校正。
③ 去除干扰:在提取矿化蚀变信息之前,去除影像中的各种干扰因素,如阴影、云、植被、水体等。
经过数据预处理之后的遥感影像如图 2。
3. 岩性构造解译
结合研究区地质资料,采用目视解译和人机交互解译的方法对遥感影像进行岩性、构造信息解译。
研究区内的地层主要有中元古界、中生界和新生界。其中含矿地层为中元古界渣尔泰山群浅变质岩岩群和色尔腾山岩群片岩岩群[5]。结合该区地质资料,对研究区影像进行了断裂构造解译。
对研究区进行线性构造和环形构造提取,该区以北东向、东西向的线性构造为主体,局部存在北北西向的线性构造带。这些线性构造和环形构造由区域构造运动所形成,有利于发生矿化作用,并且为沉积成矿提供了良好的场所[6~7]。
4. 矿化蚀变信息提取
4.1 遥感影像分区
将ETM743进行RGB彩色合成,可以很好地表现出研究区内的地貌和岩性特征。然后综合地质图的地层、地貌和岩性特征信息,在ETM743彩色合成影像上对研究区进行分区(见图 3)。对去除干扰生成掩膜的影像数据利用分区矢量文件进行裁剪,得到3幅区域影像。
4.2 分区提取蚀变信息
研究区内泥化蚀变类型主要有绢云母化、绿泥石化等,铁化蚀变类型主要为黄铁矿化。
本文主要采用Crosta主成分分析法,对经过数据预处理及分区处理的各个区块分别进行矿化异常信息提取。
4.2.1 羟基蚀变信息提取
OH-离子在ETM5波段具有高反射作用,而在ETM7波段具有强吸收作用。对ETM1、4、5、7波段进行主成分分析,提取研究区内含羟基(OH-)的蚀变矿物。主分量反映羟基信息的标准是:在该主分量的特征向量中,ETM4、ETM7的贡献系数与ETM5的贡献系数符号相反[8]。
对3个区块分别进行ETM1、4、5、7主成分分析,并分析生成的向量矩阵,其中第四主分量符合ETM4和ETM7贡献系数与ETM5贡献系数符号相反的要求,表明第四主分量为羟基异常主分量。
4.2.2 铁染蚀变信息提取
根据铁染信息的反射波谱特征,对ETM1、3、4、5波段进行主成分分析,提取研究区范围内含Fe3+的矿物。包含铁染信息的主分量的判断标准是:构成该主分量的特征向量中,ETM1和ETM4的贡献系数符号与ETM3的贡献系数符号相反。
对3个区块分别进行ETM1、3、4、5波段主成分分析,生成的向量矩阵显示,第四主分量为铁染异常主分量。
4.3 蚀变信息地形校正
首先对研究区内的DEM高程数据进行分析,了解其分辨率和高程分布趋势,然后利用DEM数据生成的坡度影像图(见图 4),对分区块提取的蚀变信息进行地形校正。
利用波段运算将地形校正因子引入ETM1、4、5、7波段主成分分析中的第四主成分羟基异常主组分以及第四主成分铁染异常主组分,分别进行地形校正(见图 5,红色区域为羟基蚀变信息,蓝色区域为铁染蚀变异常)。
4.4 后处理
由于得到的矿物蚀变异常信息提取图中存在大量无规律的孤点,为了使异常点成条带状分布,更好地反映蚀变信息的分布情况和趋势,本文对蚀变异常信息进行了滤波处理,并将提取的羟基蚀变信息点和铁染异常信息点分别与ETM743彩色合成影像图进行影像叠加[9],结果如图 6、图 7所示。
研究区内存在的与矿化作用有密切关系的蚀变类型主要有黄铁矿化、磁黄铁矿化、黑云母化、碳酸盐化和绿泥石化。将分别提取的铁染蚀变信息和羟基信息综合,得到遥感蚀变信息解译图(见图 8)。
综合地质资料、物化探资料,对研究区遥感影像数据按区域地貌、构造、岩性特征进行分区块蚀变信息提取,可以避免由于岩性区别而对蚀变异常信息的影响,使蚀变信息提取结果更加准确。根据研究区地形的坡度值,对所提取的蚀变信息进行地形校正,可以消除地形对蚀变异常信息提取的影响。加入地形校正的分区蚀变信息提取方法可以更好地对蚀变异常信息进行显示,减少地形、岩性等对异常信息提取造成的影响,为区域成矿预测提供了更为准确的依据和参考。
5. 结论
本文提出了改进的蚀变信息提取方法,即对研究区按地貌、岩性进行分区块提取,同时对提取的信息进行地形校正的方法。利用改进的蚀变信息提取方法,对内蒙古帮帮乃别力切尔地区进行了羟基蚀变信息和铁染蚀变信息提取,取得了很好的提取效果。
此次的研究成果为今后内蒙古帮帮乃别力切尔地区的矿产勘查工作提供了重要的找矿参考基础,对其他地区遥感技术地质找矿应用具有一定的指导作用。
-
图 2 莱芜盆地水文地质结构图(剖面位置见图1)
a−盆地南部水文地质剖面图;b−盆地北部水文地质剖面图
Figure 2. Hydrogeological Structure Map of Laiwu Basin (The profile position is shown in Figure 1)
(a)Hydrogeological profile map of the southern basin;(b)Hydrogeological profile map of the northern basin
图 5 谷家台侵入接触带岩溶发育示意图(据刘元晴等,2020a修改)
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of intrusion contact zone and karst development in Gujiatai (modified from Liu et al.,2020a)
表 1 岩溶层组类型划分表
Table 1. Classification of karst strata groups
岩溶层组类型 碳酸盐
岩占比/%地层 主要岩性 分布区域 纯碳酸盐岩组 灰岩层组 >70 奥陶系马家沟群八陡组、五阳山组、
北庵庄组,寒武系张夏组中厚层灰岩、微晶灰岩,云斑灰岩、
生物碎屑灰岩等莱芜盆地牛泉镇—高
庄镇一带白云岩层组 奥陶系马家沟群阁庄组、土峪组、东黄
山组,寒武系三山子组,寒武系朱砂洞组中厚层白云岩、灰质白云岩 莱芜盆地牛泉镇—高
庄镇一带不纯碳酸盐岩组 碳酸盐岩夹碎屑岩层组 30~70 寒武系炒米店组 中薄层灰岩、疙瘩状灰岩夹泥质页岩 清泥沟—老君堂 碎屑岩夹碳酸盐岩层组 <30 寒武系崮山组、馒头组 黄绿色、紫红色页岩夹薄层灰岩 清泥沟—老君堂 表 2 岩矿测试分析结果统计表
Table 2. Statistical table of rock test analysis results
地层 主要岩性 CaO含量/% 可溶岩含量/% 可溶岩均值/% 线岩溶率/% 白垩系 安山岩、辉绿岩等 2.95~8.25 6.50~11.74 9.12 / 古近系朱家沟组 灰质砾岩、砂泥岩等 1.19~49.27 2.81~49.69 29.33 8.5 奥陶系马家沟群 灰岩、白云岩、微晶灰岩等 44.54~52.55 49.50~54.56 52.48 23.5 奥陶系三山子组 白云岩、微晶白云岩等 29.53~50.91 48.30~51.67 49.92 22.5 寒武系炒米店组 灰岩、竹叶状灰岩等 24.31~51.56 40.11~52.10 49.50 20.6 寒武系崮山组 瘤状灰岩、页岩等 42.02~52.26 38.56~52.80 46.25 17.8 寒武系张夏组 石灰岩、泥晶灰岩等 14.66~46.72 22.37~48.23 37.70 15.6 鲕粒灰岩 46.88~52.43 47.82~53.99 51.95 22.8 寒武系馒头组 薄层页岩夹灰岩等 1.58~19.50 3.89~21.44 20.51 10.6 泥质灰岩、灰岩等 10.66~53.32 19.48~53.81 38.48 13.5 寒武系朱砂洞组 白云岩、微晶白云岩等 25.68~46.82 38.08~53.04 47.18 19.7 -
[1] CHEN C W, HE X, ZAI J X, 2021. Karst development feature and contrl factor analysis of Jinchanghe orefield in W Yunnan[J]. Yunnan Geology, 40(4): 479-483. (in Chinese with English abstract [2] DUAN Z, GAO M B, GAO J L, et al., 2022. Phlogopite 40Ar/39Ar dating of the Zhangjiawa iron deposit, Laiwu district, Shandong Province: implications for regional iron skarn mineralization of North China Craton[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 96(4): 1279-1296. (in Chinese with English abstract [3] GAO F, WANG Z T, JIN F S, et al., 2016. Risk assessment of karst collapse in the Laiwu of Shandong Province[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 26(S2): 359-362. (in Chinese with English abstract [4] LI B, WANG J X, ZHAO W J, et al., 2019. Analysis on isotopic characteristics of water body of Muwen River Basin in Laiwu Basin[J]. Shandong Land and Resources, 35(7): 58-63. (in Chinese with English abstract [5] LI B, WANG J X, WU X, et al., 2020. Hydrogeological conditions and characteristics of water-rich sections in the eastern Laiwu basin, Shandong Province[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 39(5): 637-649. (in Chinese with English abstract [6] LI B, SONG Y X, GAO H, et al., 2021. Hydrogeological characteristics and water yield pattern of the Paleogene Zhujiagou formation in South-central Shandong Province[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 27(1): 117-126. (in Chinese with English abstract [7] LI G H, FENG J G, LU T M, et al. , 2019. Hydrochemical characteristics and water quality assessment of groundwater in Tailai Basin[J]. Water Resources and Power, 37(4): 52-55, 121. (in Chinese with English abstract [8] LI S Z, SUO Y H, ZHOU J, et al., 2022. Tectonic evolution of the South China Ocean-Continent Connection Zone: transition and mechanism of the Tethyan to the Pacific tectonic domains[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 28(5): 683-704. (in Chinese with English abstract [9] LIANG Y P, WANG W T, 2010. The division and characteristics of karst water systems in northern China[J]. Acta Geoscientia Sinica, 31(6): 860-868. (in Chinese) [10] LIAO Z S, 1985. On the development and management of karst water resource in North China[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 4(1-2): 107-114. (in Chinese with English abstract [11] LIU S F, 2020. Characteristics of the Mesozoic intrusive complexes and their relation to metallogeny in Laiwu area, Shandong Province[J]. Journal of Geology, 44(S1): 34-47. (in Chinese with English abstract [12] LIU Y Q, ZHOU L, LI W, et al., 2018. The characteristics and genetic analysis of the Paleogene semi-consolidated water-bearing Formation on the northwestern Margin of Laiwu Basin, Shandong Province[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 39(6): 737-748. (in Chinese with English abstract [13] LIU Y Q, ZHOU L, LI W, et al., 2020a. Characteristics and hydrogeological significance of hydrothermal dissolution in carbonate rocks from Laiwu Basin, Shandong Province[J]. Geoscience, 34(1): 199-206. (in Chinese with English abstract [14] LIU Y Q, ZHOU L, MA X M, et al., 2020b. Environmental geological problems and causes during development and utilization of groundwater in Laiwu Basin, Shandong Province[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 34(11): 118-124. (in Chinese with English abstract [15] MA M, GAO J L, GAO M B, et al., 2020. Geophysical characteristics of Laiwu Area in western Shandong Province and establishment of exploration model for iron rich deposits[J]. North China Earthquake Sciences, 38(2): 13-20. (in Chinese with English abstract [16] MA Z M, LIU L C, CHEN H H, et al., 2002. Hydrochemical environmental evolution of Karst Water System in Tai’an, Shandong Province[J]. Geoscience, 16(4): 423-428. (in Chinese with English abstract [17] NIU S Y, HU H B, MAO J W, et al., 2004. Structure in western Shandong and its genetic mechanism[J]. Geology in China, 31(1): 34-39. (in Chinese with English abstract [18] SHI X P, LI L, HU Q Y, et al., 2010. Characteristics of NW-trending normal faults and physical modeling since Late Mesozoic in West Shandong Uplift, China[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni, 49(2): 130-137. (in Chinese with English abstract [19] SUN X, WANG K H, SUN Q T, et al., 2010. Types and distribution of Karst fissure water in central and southern Shandong Province[J]. Geotechnical Investigation & Surveying, 38(2): 52-56. (in Chinese with English abstract [20] WANG C, ZHANG L C, WANG Y Q, et al. , 2021. Study on groundwater pollution in Laiwu region[J]. Ground Water, 43(6): 21-24, 229. (in Chinese with English abstract [21] WANG W T, LIANG Y P, WANG Z H, et al. , 2012. Characteristics of climate change in northern China and its effect on groundwater in karst areas[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 39(6): 6-10, 28. (in Chinese with English abstract [22] WANG Y, YANG H B, ZHENG M Q, et al., 2019. Study on characteristics of groundwater storage structures and well explorating and locating within Tailai Basin[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 50(3): 52-65. (in Chinese with English abstract [23] WANG Y L, CHEN W Q, JIANG X Z, et al., 2015. Development features and formation mechanisms of karst collapses in the Tailai Basin, Shandong Province[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 34(5): 495-506. (in Chinese with English abstract [24] YU X F, LI D P, SHAN W, et al., 2022. Yanshanian gold metallogenic system and metallogenic model of the Guilaizhuang gold ore field, western Shandong[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 28(5): 821-841. (in Chinese with English abstract [25] ZHAI M G, MENG Q R, LIU J M, et al., 2004. Geological features of Mesozoic tectonic regime inversion in eastern North China and implication for geodynamics[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 11(3): 285-297. (in Chinese with English abstract [26] ZHAI M G, 2019. Tectonic evolution of the North China Craton[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 25(5): 722-745. (in Chinese with English abstract [27] ZHANG F Q, LI B T, 1990. Karst groundwater system in North China and problems of its development and utilization[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 9(1): 9-16. (in Chinese with English abstract [28] ZHANG Q Q, ZHANG S H, 2019. Devonian magmatism in the northern margin of the North China Block and its tectonic setting[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 25(1): 125-138. (in Chinese with English abstract [29] ZHANG X M, ZHANG Y Q, JI W, 2007. Fault distribution patterns of the luxi block, Shandong, and Mesozoic sedimentary-magmatic-structural evolution sequence[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 13(2): 163-172. (in Chinese with English abstract [30] ZHAO Y B, LIU Q J, HUANG X J, 2022. Characteristics of karst development and the law of groundwater enrichment in Shazhouba area of Ruijin City[J]. East China Geology, 43(2): 227-234. (in Chinese with English abstract [31] ZHOU L, LIU Y Q, LI W, et al. , 2020. Tectonic evolutionary characteristics and their hydrological geological significance in Laiwu Basin[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 20(2): 519-526. (in Chinese with English abstract [32] ZHOU X G, SUN B S, SHAO Z G, et al., 2004. Evolutionary characteristics of the boundary fault of the Wenxi Depression, Shandong, and its control on sedimentary sand bodies[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 10(3): 235-244. (in Chinese with English abstract [33] ZHU J, ZHAO D P, HE Q, 2023. Study on water pressure law and structural safety of tunnel lining in Karst weakly developed strata[J]. Railway Investigation and Surveying, 49(5): 137-142, 157. (in Chinese with English abstract [34] 陈朝稳,和祥,宰家宪,2021. 滇西金厂河矿区岩溶发育特征及控制因素分析[J]. 云南地质,40(4):479-483. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1885.2021.04.015 [35] 段壮,高明波,高继雷,等,2022. 山东莱芜张家洼铁矿床金云母40Ar/39Ar定年及其对成矿构造背景的启示[J]. 地质学报,96(4):1279-1296. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2022.04.010 [36] 高峰,王振涛,靳丰山,等,2016. 山东省莱芜盆地岩溶塌陷风险性评价[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,26(S2):359-362. [37] 李波,王金晓,赵无忌,等,2019. 莱芜盆地牟汶河流域水体同位素特征与分析[J]. 山东国土资源,35(7):58-63. [38] 李波,王金晓,吴璇,等,2020. 山东莱芜盆地东部水文地质条件及富水块段特征[J]. 中国岩溶,39(5):637-649. doi: 10.11932/karst2020y34 [39] 李波,宋一心,高菡,等,2021. 鲁中南地区古近系朱家沟组水文地质特征及富水模式[J]. 地质力学学报,27(1):117-126. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2021.27.01.012 [40] 李贵恒,冯建国,鲁统民,等,2019. 泰莱盆地地下水水化学特征及水质评价[J]. 水电能源科学,37(4):52-55,121. [41] 李三忠,索艳慧,周洁,等,2022. 华南洋陆过渡带构造演化:特提斯构造域向太平洋构造域的转换过程与机制[J]. 地质力学学报,28(5):683-704. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.20222809 [42] 梁永平,王维泰,2010. 中国北方岩溶水系统划分与系统特征[J]. 地球学报,31(6):860-868. [43] 廖资生,1985. 论北方岩溶水资源的开发与管理问题[J]. 中国岩溶,4(1-2):107-114. [44] 刘书锋,2020. 山东莱芜地区中生代侵入杂岩特征与成矿关系[J]. 地质学刊,44(S1):34-47. [45] 刘元晴,周乐,李伟,等,2018. 山东莱芜盆地西北缘古近系半固结含水岩组的特征及其成因[J]. 地球学报,39(6):737-748. doi: 10.3975/cagsb.2018.080801 [46] 刘元晴,周乐,李伟,等,2020a. 山东莱芜盆地碳酸盐岩热液溶蚀特征及水文地质意义[J]. 现代地质,34(1):199-206. [47] 刘元晴,周乐,马雪梅,等,2020b. 莱芜盆地地下水开发利用中的环境地质问题及成因[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,34(11):118-124. [48] 马明,高继雷,高明波,等,2020. 鲁西莱芜地区地球物理特征及富铁矿床勘查模型建立[J]. 华北地震科学,38(2):13-20. [49] 马振民,刘立才,陈鸿汉,等,2002. 山东泰安岩溶水系统地下水化学环境演化[J]. 现代地质,16(4):423-428. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8527.2002.04.015 [50] 牛树银,胡华斌,毛景文,等,2004. 鲁西地区地质构造特征及其形成机制[J]. 中国地质,31(1):34-39. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3657.2004.01.004 [51] 时秀朋,李理,胡秋媛,等,2010. 鲁西隆起晚中生代以来北西向正断层特征及物理模拟[J]. 中山大学学报(自然科学版),49(2):130-137. [52] 孙逊,王克红,孙启堂,等,2010. 鲁中南山区岩溶裂隙水富水带类型及分布特征[J]. 工程勘察,38(2):52-56. [53] 王超,张立川,王应强,等,2021. 莱芜地区地下水污染研究[J]. 地下水,43(6):21-24,229. [54] 王维泰,梁永平,王占辉,等,2012. 中国北方气候变化特征及其对岩溶水的影响[J]. 水文地质工程地质,39(6):6-10,28. [55] 王延岭,陈伟清,蒋小珍,等,2015. 山东省泰莱盆地岩溶塌陷发育特征及形成机理[J]. 中国岩溶,34(5):495-506. doi: 10.11932/karst201505y01 [56] 汪云,杨海博,郑梦琪,等,2019. 泰莱盆地地下水蓄水构造特征及勘查定井研究[J]. 水利水电技术,50(3):52-65. [57] 于学峰,李大鹏,单伟,等,2022. 鲁西归来庄金矿田燕山期金成矿系统及成矿模式[J]. 地质力学学报,28(5):821-841. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.20222815 [58] 翟明国,孟庆任,刘建明,等,2004. 华北东部中生代构造体制转折峰期的主要地质效应和形成动力学探讨[J]. 地学前缘,11(3):285-297. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.2004.03.027 [59] 翟明国,2019. 华北克拉通构造演化[J]. 地质力学学报,25(5):722-745. [60] 张凤岐,李博涛,1990. 中国北方岩溶地下水系统和开发利用中的几个问题[J]. 中国岩溶,9(1):9-16. [61] 张琪琪,张拴宏,2019. 华北地块北缘泥盆纪岩浆活动及其构造背景[J]. 地质力学学报,25(1):125-138. [62] 张锡明,张岳桥,季玮,2007. 山东鲁西地块断裂构造分布型式与中生代沉积—岩浆—构造演化序列[J]. 地质力学学报,13(2):163-172. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6616.2007.02.009 [63] 赵毅斌,刘前进,黄旭娟,2022. 瑞金市沙洲坝地区岩溶发育特征与地下水富集规律[J]. 华东地质,43(2):227-234. [64] 周乐,刘元晴,李伟,等,2020. 莱芜盆地构造演化特征及水文地质意义[J]. 科学技术与工程,20(2):519-526. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2020.02.012 [65] 周新桂,孙宝珊,邵兆刚,等,2004. 山东汶西凹陷边界断裂演化特征及其对沉积砂体的控制[J]. 地质力学学报,10(3):235-244. [66] 朱君,赵东平,和琦,2023. 岩溶弱发育地层隧道衬砌水压规律及结构安全性研究[J]. 铁道勘察,49(5):137-142,157. 期刊类型引用(1)
1. 范杰,尹飞,李泽群,曹鲁刚,付宪军,刘凤双,白超琨,丁战勋. 山东莱芜富铁矿区LW23ZK01深孔钻探技术研究. 地质与勘探. 2024(06): 1228-1236 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(0)
-