
Citation: | CHEN Bai-lin, LIU Jian-sheng, ZHANG Yong-shuang, et al., 2010. ESTIMATION OF MAJOR EARTHQUAKE CYCLE AND FUTURE TENDENCY IN HEXI CORRIDOR AND ITS ADJACENT AREA, NW CHINACHEN. Journal of Geomechanics, 16 (2): 159-175. |
近断层大地震(如: 1994年美国North Ridge地震、1995年日本Kobe地震、1999年中国台湾集集地震、1999年土耳其Kocaeli地震、2003年伊朗Bam地震)独特的运动特征及其对工程结构的严重影响引起了地震工程界的密切关注[1~6]。Somerville等的研究表明,由于近断层地震动经常包含强烈的动态长周期脉冲和永久地面位移,其运动特征与远场地震动明显不同[1~2]。
汶川“5.12”震后调查表明:地震断裂带附近大量建筑物发生了破坏[7~13],断层上下盘的建筑物在地震时的破坏程度不同,而且即使位于断层同一侧,由于与断层位置关系的差异,地表建筑物的破坏情况也不尽相同。因此,研究断层在地震作用下对地表建筑物的灾害效应,揭示地表破裂的致灾机理对抗震设计和灾害预防具有重要的理论意义和实用价值。
汶川“5.12”地震在汶川县水磨镇西侧斜坡上形成了产状为331°∠54°的地表破裂(断层),同时使位于断层上盘的硅业公司主楼(距离断层约25 m)发生了差异性破坏现象,近断层一侧和远离断层一侧的破坏程度明显不同。
水磨镇硅业公司主楼走向北东—南西向,长35 m,宽12 m,高12 m,楼梯位于中部东南侧,厂房平面图见图 1,其受地震的破坏表现为西北侧的梁、柱破坏较轻,仅一个柱(图 1中18号柱)发生向东南方向错动,最大错动距离约3 cm (见图 2); 而东南侧的梁、柱破坏严重,其中4个钢筋混凝土柱(图 1中9、10、13和14号柱)受到垂向挤压破坏并发生水平剪切,钢筋弯曲(见图 3、图 4)。
本文基于对位于断层上盘的汶川县水磨镇硅业公司的实地调查,采用数值模拟方法研究了水磨镇硅业公司主楼在地震动作用下的动力响应特点,并分析了楼体破坏与断裂的关系。
汶川县水磨镇硅业公司位于龙门山构造带中南段的北端、水磨河河谷西北岸的高阶地上,其西北侧紧邻一个高度约35 m斜坡的坡脚。场地出露的地层有:泥盆系养马坝组(D2y)泥灰岩,厚度为89~137 m; 第四系冲洪积物,覆盖于养马坝组之上,厚度为0~7.3 m,由砂、砾石组成,其与基岩的接触界面倾向东南侧; 第四系残坡积物,位于厂房东南侧的陡坎下部,厚度为0~2.9 m。场地地质剖面图见图 5。
在建立模型时假设: ①平面应变状态; ②周围岩石为均匀的弹性各向同性材料; ③断裂为无厚度的接触面; ④岩石服从摩尔-库仑破坏准则,楼房梁单元为弹性。
模拟采用二维模型,模型走向为310°。根据现场实地观测,考虑到边界影响以及模拟的目的,建立地质模型见图 6。模型底部宽160 m,右侧高137 m,左侧高97 m,房高12 m,宽12 m (图中所示为楼房的侧剖面),楼梯高2 m,距房主梁2 m。模型中断层倾角54°。
模拟分为两个阶段:特征值分析和地震动力分析。在进行特征值分析时,通过点弹簧定义弹性边界,模型的左右两侧及底部边界均为弹簧边界。对于动力分析,采用Lysmer和Wass (1972)提出的粘性边界(viscous boundary)。鉴于该模拟的目的是研究断裂在地震作用时对地表建筑物的破坏作用,模拟时只对模型加载地震波时程荷载,不施加其他应力边界条件。
本研究区的岩性为泥盆系养马坝组(D2y)泥灰岩,表层为第四系冲洪积物和残坡积物。参考《工程地质手册(1992) 》并结合前人大量的数值模拟经验,采用工程地质类比法,确定材料的力学参数如表 1。
![]() |
地震动的数值模拟是通过输入地震记录(加速度时程记录)来实现的。该区选择距离最近的卧龙地震台在龙门山发生地震时的监测资料进行动力模拟。地震作用全过程历时135 s。
模拟结果表明:最大主应力值沿断层自下而上逐渐降低,但在断层上盘,厂房下伏的基岩(泥质灰岩)中出现增大的现象。而在厂房下地基(第四系冲洪积物)中应力值出现明显的减小趋势,这是由于第四系冲洪积物与基岩泥质灰岩的材料参数相差很大,在地震时有减震的作用。
厂房左侧(靠近断层一侧)梁底部平面应变单元节点的最大主应力值大于右侧,左侧为83.9 MPa,右侧为71.4 MPa,两者数值相差12.5 MPa (见图 7)。
但是在房屋左侧(靠近断层一侧)第四系冲洪积物的厚度为4.6209 m,右侧(远离断层一侧)第四系冲洪积物厚度为4.5364 m。按照抗震设计理论,左侧梁单元受到的主应力值应该小于右侧,但是模拟结果却相反。这是因为房屋左侧梁与断层的垂直距离为24.8556 m,右侧梁与断层的垂直距离为84.4065 m,这也就解释了左侧梁单元的主应力大于右侧梁单元主应力值的原因。
断层上盘剪应力值大于下盘,远离断层,剪应力值逐渐减小。
地基中,厂房左侧(靠近断层一侧)的剪应力值大于右侧,左侧为18.626 MPa,右侧为17.629 MPa (见图 8)。
从梁单元轴向应力曲线图(见图 9)可以看出,梁单元(图中梁单元由下至上编号,每楼层分为4个单元,下同)底部所受的轴向应力最大,且梁单元的轴向应力自下而上减小,到第二层上部时已经减小到底部的约二分之一,这与厂房底部柱体发生挤压破坏(见图 3、图 4)、而上部柱体没有破坏的特征相对应。
从梁单元剪应力曲线图(见图 10)可以看出,左侧梁单元剪应力最大值出现在楼梯与主体梁相交处(3号梁单元处),由12.008 MPa急剧增大到12.769 MPa,向上至第一层顶部(4号梁单元处)时又急剧减小到11.905 MPa。梁单元剪应力的这种变化规律与图 3显示的破坏特征一致。同时,可以看出,剪应力均为正值,反映其剪切方向为顺时针转动,与图 2-图 4显示的柱体剪切破坏特征相对应。根据梁单元轴向应力和剪应力特征及变化趋势,地震时楼体主梁的破坏是轴向应力和剪应力同时作用造成的。
断层附近剪应变发生较为复杂的变化,断层上盘和下盘的剪应变值有明显的差别,从地面上剪应变的分布看,厂房区域剪应变值较大。
从厂房底部的最大剪应变图(见图 11)可以看出,在梁的底部出现应变集中区,而且左侧(靠近断层一侧)大于右侧,左侧为0.03728,右侧为0.03079。
断层带上节点水平向加速度值在断层底部最小(-4.457 cm/s2),由底部向上增大,增大的幅度逐渐减小。断层位置的加速度明显增大,断层顶部的加速度最大值达638.7 m/s2 (卧龙台记录到的最大水平加速度为949.979 cm/s2)。
泥灰岩中一节点的最大水平加速度值为313.2 m/s2,冲洪积层中一节点最大水平加速度值为472.6 m/s2,残坡积物中一节点最大水平加速度值为637.8 m/s2,表明在软岩中,加速度明显增大。
(1) 位于断层上盘的厂房,靠近断层一侧的最大主应力值大于远离断层一侧。
(2) 断层上盘剪应力值大于下盘,远离断层,剪应力值逐渐减小; 厂房左侧(靠近断层一侧)的剪应力值大于右侧。
(3) 断层附近剪应变发生较为复杂的变化,断层上盘和下盘的剪应变值有明显的差别,厂房底部出现应变集中区,而且左侧(靠近断层一侧)大于右侧。
(4) 加速度值在断层底部最小,由底部向上增加。断层位置的加速度明显增大,断层顶部的加速度最大值达637.8 m/s2。在软岩中,加速度有明显的放大。
(5) 厂房所受的轴向应力在底部最大,向上逐渐减小,与厂房底部柱体发生挤压破坏的特征相对应; 厂房所受的剪应力值和剪切方向与柱体剪切破坏特征相对应。
(6) 断层的形成改变了局部的应力场条件和加速度特征,从而使位于断层上盘的楼房发生差异性破坏,紧邻断层一侧破坏强烈。地震时楼体主梁的破坏是轴向应力和剪应力同时作用造成的。
[1] |
时振梁, 环文林, 谢原定. 河西走廊西部的活动断层与地震, 中国活动断裂[C], 地震出版社, 1982. 212~ 218.
SHI Zhen-liang, HUAN Wen-lin and XIE yuan-ding. Active faults and earthquakes in west part of Hexi Corridor[A]. Active faults in China. Beijing: Seismological Press, 1982. 212~218(in Chinese).
|
[2] |
向宏发, 虢顺民. 河西走廊玉门-嘉峪关地区活动断裂的初步研究[C]. 现代地壳运动研究(5). 北京: 地震出版社, 1990. 139~145.
XIANG Hong-fa and GUO Shun-min. Preliminary study on active faults in Yumen-Jiayuhuan area of Hexi Corridor[A]. In: Institute of Geology, SSB, ed. Research on Recent Crustal Movement (5). Beijing: Seismological Press, 1990. 139~ 145(in Chinese).
|
[3] |
虢顺民, 向宏发, 黄昭, 等. Tapponnier P and Peltzer G. 祁连山-河西走廊断裂带与地震. 中法合作活断层对比研究[C]. 北京: 地震出版社, 1993, 94~102.
GUO Shun-min, XIANG Hong-fa, HUANG Zhao, et al. Qilian Mountain-Hexi corridor active fault zone and earthquake. Comparison studing of active faults on China-France cooperation[C]. Beijing: Seismological Press, 1993. 94~102(in Chinese).
|
[4] |
国家地震局地质研究所, 国家地震局兰州地震研究所.祁连山-河西走廊活动断裂系[M].北京:地震出版社, 1993.1~340.
Institute of Geology, SSB and Lanzhou Institute of Seismology, SSB.Active faults in Qilian mountain and Hexi corrdor [M].Beijing:Seismological Press, 1993.1~340(in Chinese).
|
[5] |
Pcltzer G, Tapponnier P, Gaudemer Y, 等. 昌马断裂的晚第四纪地貌断错、滑动速率及大地震重复[M]. 中法合作活断层对比研究, 北京: 地震出版社, 1993. 123~143.
Pcltzer G, Tapponnier P, Gaudemer Y, et al. Offsets of late Quaternary morphology, rate of slip, and recurrence of large earthquakes on the Changma fault, Gansu, China. Comparison studing of active faults on China-France cooperation. Beijing: Seismological Press, 1993. 123~143(in Chinese).
|
[6] |
才树华, 向宏发, 李伯栋, 等. Tapponnier P, Meyer B. 祁连山北缘断裂带中段全新世活动特征及其与地震的关系. 中法合作活断层对比研究[C]. 北京: 地震出版社, 1993. 113~122.
CAI Shu-hua, XIANG Hong-fa, LI Bo-dong et al. Tapponnier P and Meyer B. Holocene faulting and its relation to earthquake in the central segment of the northern Qilianshan fault zone. Comparison studing of active faults on China-France cooperation. Beijing: Seismological Press, 1993. 113~122(in Chinese).
|
[7] |
陈文彬, 刘百篪, 徐锡伟, 等.祁连山西段玉门断裂晚第四纪活动特征及相关问题的讨论[J].西北地震学报, 1999, 21(4):389~394. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0844.1999.04.008
CHEN Wen-bin, LIU Bai-chi, XU Xi-wei et al.Activity of the Yumen fault, western Qilian mountains, During late Quaterary and its implication to regional tectonic movements[J].Northwestern Seismological Journal, 1999, 21(4):389~394(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0844.1999.04.008
|
[8] |
闵伟, 张培震, 何文贵, 等.酒西盆地断层活动特征及古地震研究[J].地震地质, 2002, 24(1):35~44. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2002.01.003
MIN Wei, ZHANG Pei-zhen, HE Wen-gui, et al.Reseach on the active faults and paleoearthquakes in the western Jiuquan basin[J].Seismology and Geology, 2002, 24(1):27~34(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2002.01.003
|
[9] |
何文贵, 刘百篪, 袁道阳, 等.冷龙岭活动断裂的滑动速率研究[J].西北地震学报, 2000, 22(1):90~97. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0844.2000.01.017
HE Wen-gui, LIU Bai-chi, YUAN Dao-yang, et al.Resarch on slip rates of the Lenglongling active fault zone. Northwestern Seismological Journal, 2000, 22(1):90~97(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0844.2000.01.017
|
[10] |
何文贵, 郑文俊, 赵广堃, 等.2002年12月14日玉门5.9级地震发震构造研究[J].地震地质, 2004, 26(4): 688~697. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dzdz200404014
HE Wen-gui, ZHANG Wen-jun, ZHAO Guang-kun, et al.Study on the seismogenic structure of the Yumen, Gansu province 5.9 MS earthquake of December 14, 2002[J].Seismology and Geology, 2004, 26(4):688~697(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dzdz200404014
|
[11] |
陈柏林, 刘建生, 张永双, 等.玉门断裂全新世活动特征及其与玉门地震的关系[J].地质论评, 2005, 51(2): 138~142. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0371-5736.2005.02.004
CHEN Bai-lin, LIU Jian-sheng, ZHANG Yong-shuang, et al.Activity of the Yumen fault during Holocene epoch and its relation to Yumen earthquake[J].Geological Review., 2005, 51(2):138~142(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0371-5736.2005.02.004
|
[12] |
陈柏林, 刘建民, 刘建生, 等. 高台车站断裂全新世活动特征[J]. 地质学报, 2006, 80(4): 497~507. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=DZXE200604006&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
CHEN Bai-lin, LIU Jian-min, LIU Jian-sheng, WANG Chun-yu, ZHANG Yong-shuang, DONG Cheng and WU Nai-fen. Study on the Activity and Chronology of the Gaotai Railway Station Fault During Holocene Epoch[J]. ACTA Geologica Sinica, 2006, 80(4): 497~507(in Chinese with English abstract). http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=DZXE200604006&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
|
[13] |
陈柏林, 王春宇, 宫红良, 等. 关于河西走廊盆地榆木山北缘断裂晚第四纪活动特征的新认识[J]. 地质通报, 2007, 26(8): 976~983. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD200708008.htm
CHEN Bai-lin, WANG Chun-yu, GONG Hong-liang, LIU Jian-min, ZHANG Yong-shuang and LIU Jian-sheng. A new understanding of the characteristics of Late Quaternary activity of the northern Yumushan marginal fault in the Hexi corridor, northwestern China[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2007, 26(8): 976~983(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD200708008.htm
|
[14] |
陈柏林, 刘建生, 王春宇, 等.阿尔金断裂昌马大坝-宽滩山段全新世活动特征[J].地质学报, 2008, 82(4): 433~440. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dizhixb200804001
CHEN Bai-lin, LIU Jian-sheng, WANG Chun-yu, et al.Study on the Activity of the Changmadaba-Kuangtanshan Segment of Eastern Altyn Tagh Fault During Holocene Epoch[J].ACTA Geologica Sinica, 2008, 82(4):433~440. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dizhixb200804001
|
[15] |
谭成轩, 孙叶, 吴树仁, 等.5.12汶川MS 8.0大地震后关于我国区域地壳稳定性评价的思考[J].地质力学学报, 2009, 15(2):142~150. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6616.2009.02.004
TAN Cheng-xuan, SUN Ye, WU Shu-ren, et al.A consideration on regional crustal stability assessment after MS 8.0 Wenchuan strong earthquake in China[J].Journal of Geomechanics, 2009, 15(2):142~150. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6616.2009.02.004
|
[16] |
姚鑫, 张永双.基于差分干涉雷达的汶川地震同震形变特点[J].地质力学学报, 2009, 15(2):151~161. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6616.2009.02.005
YAO Xin, ZHANG Yong-shuang.Co-seismic deformation of 5.12 Wenchuan earthquake based on D-INSAR[J].Journal of Geomechanics, 2009, 15(2):151~161. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6616.2009.02.005
|
[17] |
张永双, 雷伟志, 石菊松, 等.四川5.12地震次生地质灾害的基本特征初析[J].地质力学学报, 2008, 14(2):109~116. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6616.2008.02.002
ZHANG Yong-shuang, LEI Wei-zhi, SHI Ju-song, et al.General characteristics of 5.12 earthquake-induced geo-hazards in Sichuan[J].Journal of Geomechanics, 2008, 14(2):109~116. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6616.2008.02.002
|
[18] |
张永双, 石菊松, 孙萍, 等.汶川地震内外动力耦合及灾害实例[J].地质力学学报, 2009, 15(2):131~ 141. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6616.2009.02.003
ZHANG Yong-shuang, SHI Ju-song, SUN Ping, et al.Coupling between endogenic and exogenic geological processes in the Wenchuan earthquake and example analysis of geo-hazards[J].Journal of Geomechanics, 2009, 15(2):131~141. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6616.2009.02.003
|
[19] |
王连捷, 周春景, 孙东生, 等.汶川5.12地震引起的库仑应力变化及其对周边地震活动的影响[J].地质力学学报, 2008, 14(3):193~200. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6616.2008.03.001
WANG Lian-jie, ZHOU Chun-jing, SUN Dong-sheng, et al.Coulomb stress changes caused by Wenchuan earthquake and its influence on seismic activity in the adjacent area[J].Journal of Geomechanics, 2008, 14(3):193~200. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6616.2008.03.001
|
[20] |
王连捷, 崔军文, 周春景, 等.汶川5.12地震发震机理的数值模拟[J].地质力学学报, 2009, 15(2):105~113. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6616.2009.02.001
WANG Lian-jie, CUI Jun-wen, ZHOU Chun-jing, et al.Numerical modeling for Wenchuan earthquake mechanism[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 2009, 15(2):105~113. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6616.2009.02.001
|
[21] |
姚鑫, 张永双, 杨农, 等.玉树地震地表变形InSAR观测及初步分析[J].地质力学学报, 2010, 16(2):129~136. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6616.2010.02.003
YAO Xin, ZHANG Yong-shuang, YANG Nong, et al.D-InSAR Deformation Observation and Preliminary Analysis of the MS7.1 Yushu Earthquake[J].Journal of Geomechanics, 2010, 16(2):129~136. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6616.2010.02.003
|
[22] |
王连捷, 崔军文, 王薇, 等.青海玉树MS 7.1地震发震过程的数值模拟[J].地质力学学报, 2010, 16(2): 137~145. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6616.2010.02.004
WANG Lian-jie, CUI Jun-wen, WANG Wei, et al.Numercal modeling of Yushu MS 7.1 earthquake mechanism[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 2010, 16(2):137~145. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6616.2010.02.004
|
[23] |
马寅生, 张永双, 胡道功, 等.玉树地震地表破裂与宏观震中[J].地质力学学报, 2010, 16(2):115~124. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6616.2010.02.002
MA Yin-sheng, ZHANG Yong-shuang, HU Dao-gong.et al.The Surface Ruptures And The Macroscopical Epicenter Of Yushu MS 7.1 Earthquake[J].Journal of Geomechanics, 2010, 16(2):115~124. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6616.2010.02.002
|
[24] |
Harks T C, Bucknam R C, Lajoie K R, et al.Modefication of wave cut and faulting-controlled landforms[J].Journal of Geophysical Research, 1984, 89(B7):5771~5791. doi: 10.1029/JB089iB07p05771
|
[25] |
甘肃省地质矿产局.甘肃省区域地质志[M].北京:地质出版社, 1989.1~692.
Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources of Gansu province.Regional geology of Gansu province[M].Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 1989.1~692(in Chinese with English abstract).
|
[26] |
葛肖红, 刘俊来.北祁连造山带的形成与背景[J].地学前缘, 1999, 6(4):223~230. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.1999.04.004
GE Xiao-hong and LIU Jun-lai.Formation and tectonic background of the northern Qilian orogenic belt[J].Earth Science Frontiers, 1999, 6(4):223~230(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.1999.04.004
|
[27] |
尹安.喜马拉雅-青藏高原造山带地质演化[J].地球学报, 2001, 22(3):193~230. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1006-3021.2001.03.001
YIN An.Geologic evolution of the Himalayan-Tibetan orogen[J].ACTA Geoscientia Sinica, 2001, 22(3):193~230(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1006-3021.2001.03.001
|
[28] |
朱弟成, 潘桂棠, 莫宣学, 等. 印度大陆和欧亚大陆的碰撞时代[J]. 地球科学进展, 2004, 19(4): 564~571. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXJZ200404012.htm
ZHU Di-cheng, PAN Gui-tang, MO Xuan-xue, DUAN Li-ping and LIAO Zhong-li[J]. The age of collision between India and Eurasia. Advances Earth Science, 2004, 19(4): 564~571(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXJZ200404012.htm
|
[29] |
莫宣学, 赵志丹, 周肃, 等.印度-亚洲大陆的碰撞时限[J].地质通报, 2007, 26(10):1240~1244. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2007.10.002
MO Xuan-xue, ZHAO Zhi-dan, ZHOU Su, et al.On the timing of India-Asia continental collision[J].Geological Bulletin of China, 2007, 26(10):1240~1244(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2007.10.002
|
[30] |
宋春晖, 方小敏, 李吉均, 等.青藏高原北缘酒西盆地13Ma以来沉积演化与构造隆升[J].中国科学(D辑), 2001.31(增刊):155~162. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK200101570153
SONG Chun-hui, FANG Xiao-min, LI Ji-jun, et al.Tectonic uplift and sedimentary evolution of the Jiuxi basin in the northern margin of the Tibetan plateau since 13Ma B P[J].Science in China (Series D), 2001, 31(Suppl):155~162(in Chinese). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK200101570153
|
[31] |
宋春晖, 孙淑荣, 方小敏, 等.酒西盆地晚新生代沉积物重矿物分析与高原北部隆升[J].沉积学报, 2002, 20(4):552~559. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0550.2002.04.004
SONG Chun-hui, SUN Shu-rong, FANG Xiao-min, et al.Analysis of Tectonic Upl if t and Heavy Minerals of Sediments on Jiuxi Basin in the Northern Margin of Tibetan Plateau since the Late Cenozoic[J].ACTA Sedimentologica SINICA, 2002, 20(4):552~559(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0550.2002.04.004
|
[32] |
方小敏, 赵志军, 李吉均, 等.祁连山北缘老君庙背斜晚新生代磁性地层与青藏高原隆升[J].中国科学(D辑), 2004, 34(2):97~106. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_zgkx-cd200402001.aspx
FANG Xiao-min, ZHAO Zhi-jun, LI Ji-jun, et al.Magnetostratigraphy of Late Cenozoic Laojunmiao anticline in the northern Qilian Mountains and its implications for the northern Tibetan plateau uplift[J].Science in China (Series D), 2004, 34(2):97~106(in Chinese). http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_zgkx-cd200402001.aspx
|
[33] |
陆洁民, 郭召杰, 赵泽辉, 等.新生代酒西盆地沉积特征及其与祁连山隆升关系的研究[J].高校地质学报, 2004, 10(1):50~61. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7493.2004.01.004
LU Jie-min, GUO Zhao-jie, ZHAO Ze-hui, et al.Cenozoic Sedimentation Characteristics of Jiuxi Basin and Uplift History of Northern Qilian Mountain[J].Geological Journal of China Universities, 2004, 10(1):50~61(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7493.2004.01.004
|
[34] |
国家地震局兰州地震研究所.昌马活动断裂系[M].北京:地震出版社, 1992.1~207.
Lanzhou Institute of Seismology, SSB.Active Changma fault zone[M].Beijing:Seismological Press, 1992.1~207(in Chinese).
|
[35] |
陈汉林, 杨树锋, 肖安成, 等.酒泉盆地南缘新生代冲断带的变形特征和变形时间[J].石油与天然气地质, 2006, 27(4):488~494. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9985.2006.04.008
CHEN Han-lin, YANG Shu-feng, XIAO An-cheng, et al.Deformation characteristics and time of Cenozoic thrust belt in southern margin of Jiuquan basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology, 2006, 27(4):488~494(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9985.2006.04.008
|
[36] |
杨树锋, 陈汉林, 程晓敢, 等.祁连山北缘冲断带的特征和空间变化规律[J].地学前缘, 2007, 14(5):211~ 221. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.2007.05.021
YANG Shu-feng, CHEN Han-lin, CHENG Xiao-gan, et al.Deformation characteristics and rules of spatial change for the Northern Qilianshan thrust belt[J].Earth Science Frontiers, 2007, 14(5):211~221(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.2007.05.021
|
[37] |
徐锡伟, Tapponnier P, Woerd J V D, 等.阿尔金断裂带晚第四纪左旋走滑速率及其构造运动转换模式讨论[J].中国科学(D辑), 2003, 33(10):967~974. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgkx-cd200310007
XU Xi-wei, Tapponnier P, Woerd J V D, et al.Late Quaternary sinistral slip rate along the Altyn Tagh fault and its structural transformation model[J].Science in China (Serious D), 2003, 33(10):967~974(in Chinese). http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgkx-cd200310007
|
[38] |
陈正乐, 万景林, 王小凤, 等.阿尔金断裂带8Ma左右的快速走滑及其地质意义[J].地球学报, 2002, 23(4): 295~300. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1006-3021.2002.04.002
CHEN Zheng-le, WAN Jing-lin, WANG Xiao-feng, et al.Rapid Strike2sl ip of the Altyn Tagh Fault at 8 Ma and Its Geological Impl ications[J].ACTA Geoscientia Sinica, 2002, 23(4):295~300(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1006-3021.2002.04.002
|
[39] |
李玉龙, 候珍清, 康哲民. 中国西北陕甘宁青地震区划[M]. 甘肃人民出版社, 1986.
LI Yu-long, HOU Zhen-qing and KAN Zhe-min. Seisic zonation in Shanxi, Gansu, Ningxia and Qinghai province, northwestern China[M]. Lanzhou: Gansu People Publishing House (in Chinese), 1986.
|
[40] |
国家地震局阿尔金活动断裂课题组.阿尔金活动断裂带[M].北京:地震出版社, 1992.
Research Group on the Active Altyn Tagh Fault Zone of SSB.Active Altyn Tagh fault zone[M].Beijing:Seismological Press (in Chinese), 1992.
|
[41] |
Andrews D J, Hanks T C.Scarp degraded by linear diffusion:Inverse solution for age[J].Jour Geophys Res, 1985, 90(B12):10193~10208. doi: 10.1029/JB090iB12p10193
|
[42] |
尤惠川, 邓起东, 冉勇康.断层崖演化与古地震研究[J].地震地质, 2004, 26(1):33~45. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2004.01.004
YOU Hui-chuan, DENG Qi-dong, RAN Yong-kang.Degradation on fault scarp and paleoearthquake research[J]. Seismology and Geology, 2004, 26(1):33~45(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2004.01.004
|
[43] |
何文贵, 雷中生, 袁道阳, 等.新民堡发生7.25级地震[J].西北地震学报, 2010, 32(1):47~53. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0844.2010.01.009
HE Wen-gui, LEI Zhong-sheng, YUAN Dao-yang, et al.Disaster characteristics of Huihuipu earthquake in 1785 in Yumen, Gansu province, and discussion on its seismogenic structure[J].Northwestern Seismological Journal, 2010, 32(1):47~53(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0844.2010.01.009
|