Analysis of in-situ stress field characteristics and tectonic stability in the Motuo key area of the eastern Himalayan syntaxis

ZHANG Bin; SUN Yao; MA Xiumin; PENG Hua; JIANG Jingjie; MAO Jiarui; ZHANG Wenhui; ZHAI Yudong

doi:10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.20232908

Volume 29 Issue 3

Jun. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of Geomechanics > 2023 > 29(3): 388-401

WANG Lianjie, WANG Wei, ZHANG Lirong, et al., 1999. FUNDAMENTAL EQUATION AND FINITE ELEMENT MODELING FOR OIL AND GAS MIGRATION DRIVED BY CRUSTAL STRESS. Journal of Geomechanics, 5 (1): 29-34.

Citation:

ZHANG B，SUN Y，MA X M，et al.，2023. Analysis of in-situ stress field characteristics and tectonic stability in the Motuo key area of the eastern Himalayan syntaxis[J]. Journal of Geomechanics，29（3）：388−401 doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.20232908

WANG Lianjie, WANG Wei, ZHANG Lirong, et al., 1999. FUNDAMENTAL EQUATION AND FINITE ELEMENT MODELING FOR OIL AND GAS MIGRATION DRIVED BY CRUSTAL STRESS. Journal of Geomechanics, 5 (1): 29-34.

Citation:

PDF( 7738 KB)

Analysis of in-situ stress field characteristics and tectonic stability in the Motuo key area of the eastern Himalayan syntaxis

doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.20232908

ZHANG Bin^{1, 2, 3
,},
SUN Yao^{1, 2, 3
,
,},
MA Xiumin^{1, 2, 3, 4},
PENG Hua^{1, 2, 3},
JIANG Jingjie^{1, 2, 3},
MAO Jiarui^{1, 2, 3},
ZHANG Wenhui^{1, 5},
ZHAI Yudong¹

1.
Institute of Geomechanics, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
2.
Observation and Research Station of Crustal Stress and Strain in Beijing, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100081, China
3.
Key Laboratory of Active Tectonics and Geological Safety, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100081, China
4.
School of Civil and Resources Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
5.
School of Engineering, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan 430074, Hubei, China

Funds: This research is financially supported by the China Geological Survey Project (Grants DD20230249, DD20221644 and DD20230014) and the Basic Research Fund of the Institute of Geomechanics, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences (Grant DZLXS202106).

More Information

Abstract

Abstract

In order to obtain the in-situ stress field characteristics and analyze tectonic stability in the Motuo key area of the eastern Himalayan syntaxis, the in-situ stress measurement of one in-situ stress hole and 11 test sections of the Xirang section of the Motuo fault zone were carried out by the hydraulic fracturing method. The results show that the maximum and minimum horizontal principal stress values (S_H, S_h) in the test section of 61.43−121.34 m are 3.05−14.50 MPa and 2.16−9.87 MPa, respectively, and the vertical principal stress values (S_v) are 1.63−3.31 MPa, namely, S_H>S_h>S_v. The in-situ stress field at the measuring point is dominated by horizontal compression, and all of them belong to the in-situ stress state of reverse fault. The principal stress values gradually increase with the increase of depth, and the dominant direction of the maximum principal stress is NEE. In the whole range of in-situ stress depth, the lateral pressure coefficients (K_av) are 1.39−4.38, the maximum horizontal stress coefficients (K_Hv) are greater than 1, and the ratio increases with the increase of depth. The regional stress field of this key area is dominated by horizontal stress and it is highly directional. The horizontal stress coefficients (K_Hh) of all test sections are 1.23−1.66, which are similar to the calculation results of in-situ stress characteristic parameters in Linzhi−Tongmai section. The horizontal tectonic stress of the shallow level at 98 m is relatively small, and the stress accumulation level is low. The friction coefficient required to maintain fault stability is smaller than the critical friction coefficient of actual fault, and the tectonic environment is relatively stable. When the depth exceeds 98 m, the friction coefficient required to maintain fault stability is close to the critical friction coefficient value of the actual fault due to the dominant role of horizontal tectonic stress, and there is a small risk of fault instability slip. The superposition of the Coulomb stress change in the sinistral strike-slip direction and the thrust direction caused by the strong regional earthquakes on the fault plane of the Motuo fault zone in the study area are all negative numbers, which inhibits fault slip and does not increase the risk of fault activity in the study area.
- eastern Himalayan syntaxis,
- hydraulic fracturing,
- in-situ stress measurements,
- in-situ stress field characteristics,
- tectonic stability

Full-text Translaiton by iFLYTEK

The full translation of the current issue may be delayed. If you encounter a 404 page, please try again later.

FullText(HTML)

References(58)

References

[1]	CHANG L J, FLESCH L M, WANG C Y, et al. , 2015. Vertical coherence of deformation in lithosphere in the eastern Himalayan syntaxis using GPS, Quaternary fault slip rates, and shear wave splitting data[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 42(14): 5813-5819. doi: 10.1002/2015GL064568
[2]	CHEN Q C, SUN D S, CUI J J, et al. , 2019. Hydraulic fracturing stress measurements in Xuefengshan deep borehole and its significance[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 25(5): 853-865. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	DONG H W, XU Z Q, CAO H, et al. , 2018. Comparison of eastern and western boundary faults of eastern Himalayan syntaxis, and its tectonic evolution[J]. Earth Science, 43(4): 933-951. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	EVANS K, ENGELDER T, 1989. Some problems in estimating horizontal stress magnitudes in "thrust" regimes[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 26(6): 647-660.
[5]	FENG C J, ZHANG P, MENG J, et al. , 2017. In situ stress measurement at deep boreholes along the Tanlu fault zone and its seismologicaland geological significance[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 32(3): 946-967. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	FENG C J, LI B, LI H, et al. , 2022. Estimation of in-situ stress field surrounding the Namcha Barwa region and discussion on the tectonicstability[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 28(6): 919-937. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	GUO C B, WU R A, JIANG L W, et al. , 2021. Typical geohazards and engineering geological problems along the Ya'an-Linzhi section of the Sichuan-Tibet railway, China[J]. Geoscience, 35(1): 1-17. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	HAIMSON B C, CORNET F H, 2003. ISRM suggested methods for rock stress estimation-part 3: hydraulic fracturing (HF) and/or hydraulic testing of pre-existing fractures (HTPF)[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 40(7-8): 1011-1020. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2003.08.002
[9]	HARRIS R A, 1998. Introduction to special section: stress triggers, stress shadows, and implications for seismic hazard[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 103(B10): 24347-24358. doi: 10.1029/98JB01576
[10]	HARRIS R A, SIMPSON RW, 1992. Changes in static stress on southern California faults after the 1992 Landers earthquake[J]. Nature, 360(6401): 251-254. doi: 10.1038/360251a0
[11]	HUANG C Y, CHANG L J, DING Z F, 2021. Crustal anisotropy in the eastern Himalayan syntaxis and adjacent areas[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 64(11): 3970-3982. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	HUANG Y D, YAO L K, TAN L, et al. , 2020. Engineering effect of the Himalayan orogen and engineering geological zoning of China-Nepal railway[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 28(2): 421-430. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	HUANGY D, PAN Q, YAO L K, et al. , 2021. Characteristics of measured stress and route selection strategy under high in-situ stress risk controlalong Lalin section of Sichuan-Tibet Railway[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 29(2): 375-382. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	JAEGER J C, COOK N G W, ZIMMERMAN R, 2009. Fundamentals of rock mechanics[M]. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
[15]	KING G C P, STEIN R S, LIN J, 1994. Static stress changes and the triggering of earthquakes[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 84(3): 935-953.
[16]	LEE M Y, HAIMSON B C, 1989. Statistical evaluation of hydraulic fracturing stress measurement parameters[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 26(6): 447-456.
[17]	LIN W R, SAITO S, SANADA Y, et al. , 2011. Principal horizontal stress orientations prior to the 2011 M_W9.0 Tohoku-Oki, Japan, earthquake in its source area[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 38(7): L00G10.
[18]	LIN W R, CONIN M, MOORE J C, et al. , 2013. Stress state in the largest displacement area of the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake[J]. Science, 339(6120): 687-690. doi: 10.1126/science.1229379
[19]	MCGARR A, ZOBACK M D, HANKS T C, 1982. Implications of an elastic analysis of in situ stress measurements near the San Andreas fault[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 87(B9): 7797-7806. doi: 10.1029/JB087iB09p07797
[20]	QIN X H, ZHANG P, FENG C J, et al. , 2014. In-situ stress measurements and slip stability of major faults in Beijing region, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 57(7): 2165-2180,doi: 10.6038/cjg20140712. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	STEIN R S, KINGG C P, LIN J, 1992. Change in failure stress on the southern San Andreas fault system caused by the 1992 magnitude = 7.4 landers earthquake[J]. Science, 258(5086): 1328-1332. doi: 10.1126/science.258.5086.1328
[22]	STOCK J M, HEALY J H, HICKMAN S H, et al. , 1985. Hydraulic fracturing stress measurements at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, and relationship to the regional stress field[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 90(B10): 8691-8706. doi: 10.1029/JB090iB10p08691
[23]	TODA S, STEIN R S, SEVILGEN V, et al. , 2011. Coulomb 3.3 Graphic-rich deformation and stress-change software for earthquake, tectonic, and volcano research and teaching—user guide[R]. US Geological Survey Open-File Report, 2011-1060: 63.
[24]	WAN Y G, 2010. Contemporary tectonic stress field in China[J]. Earthquake Science, 23(4): 377-386. doi: 10.1007/s11589-010-0735-5
[25]	WANG B, QIN X H, CHEN Q C, et al. , 2020. Measurement results of in-situ stress in Guyuan area of Ningxia on the southwest margin of Ordos block and its causation analysis[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 39(7): 983-994. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	WANG C H, GAO G Y, YANG S X, et al. , 2019. Analysis and prediction of stress fields of Sichuan-Tibet railway area based on contemporary tectonic stress field zoning in Western China[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 38(11): 2242-2253. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]	WANG C H, GAO G Y, WANG H, et al. , 2020. Integrated determination of principal stress and tensile strength of rock based on the laboratory and field hydraulic fracturing tests[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 26(2): 167-174. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]	WANG K Y, CHANG L J, DING Z F, 2021. Upper crustal anisotropy in the eastern Himalayan syntaxis[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 43(2): 168-179. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]	WELLS D L, COPPERSMITH K J, 1994. New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 84(4): 974-1002.
[30]	XIE C, YANG X P, HUANG X N, et al. , 2016. Geological evidences of late quaternary activity of Motuo fault in eastern Himalayan syntaxis[J]. Seismology and Geology, 38(4): 1095-1106. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31]	XU J R, ZHAO Z X, 2006. Characteristics of the regional stress field and tectonic movement on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and in its surrounding areas[J]. Geology in China, 33(2): 275-285. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[32]	XU Z H, 2001. A present-day tectonic stress map for eastern Asia region[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 23(5): 492-501. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33]	YAN J, HE C, JIANG B, et al. , 2019. Inoculation and characters of rockbursts in extra-long and deep-lying tunnels located on Yarlung Zangbo suture[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 38(4): 769-781. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[34]	ZHANG C Y, DU S H, HE M C, et al. , 2022. Characteristics of in-situ stresses on the western margin of the eastern Himalayan syntaxis and its influence on stability of tunnel surrounding rock[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 41(5): 954-968. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[35]	ZHANG H, SHI G, WU H, et al. , 2020. In-situ stress measurement in the shallow basement of the Shanghai area and its structural geological significance[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 26(4): 583-594. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[36]	ZOBACK M D, HICKMAN S, 1982. In situ study of the physical mechanisms controlling induced seismicity at Monticello Reservoir, South Carolina[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 87(B8): 6959-6974. doi: 10.1029/JB087iB08p06959
[37]	ZOBACK M D, HEALY J H, 1992. In situ stress measurements to 3.5 km depth in the Cajon Pass Scientific Research Borehole: Implicationsfor the mechanics of crustal faulting[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 97(B4): 5039-5057. doi: 10.1029/91JB02175
[38]	ZOBACK M D, TOWNEND J, 2001. Implications of hydrostatic pore pressures and high crustal strength for the deformation of intraplate lithosphere[J]. Tectonophysics, 336(1-4): 19-30. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1951(01)00091-9
[39]	ZOBACK M D, 2007. Reservoir geomechanics[M]. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[40]	陈群策, 孙东生, 崔建军, 等, 2019. 雪峰山深孔水压致裂地应力测量及其意义[J]. 地质力学学报, 25(5): 853-865.
[41]	董汉文, 许志琴, 曹汇, 等, 2018. 东喜马拉雅构造结东、西边界断裂对比及其构造演化过程[J]. 地球科学, 43(4): 933-951.
[42]	丰成君, 张鹏, 孟静, 等, 2017. 郯庐断裂带及邻区深孔地应力测量与地震地质意义[J]. 地球物理学进展, 32(3): 946-967.
[43]	丰成君, 李滨, 李惠, 等, 2022. 南迦巴瓦地区地应力场估算与构造稳定性探讨[J]. 地质力学学报, 28(6): 919-937.
[44]	郭长宝, 吴瑞安, 蒋良文, 等, 2021. 川藏铁路雅安-林芝段典型地质灾害与工程地质问题[J]. 现代地质, 35(1): 1-17.
[45]	黄臣宇, 常利军, 丁志峰, 2021. 喜马拉雅东构造结及周边地区地壳各向异性特征[J]. 地球物理学报, 64(11): 3970-3982.
[46]	黄艺丹, 姚令侃, 谭礼, 等, 2020. 喜马拉雅造山带工程效应及中尼铁路工程地质分区[J]. 工程地质学报, 28(2): 421-430.
[47]	黄艺丹, 潘前, 姚令侃, 等, 2021. 川藏铁路拉林段地应力特征及高地应力风险调控选线策略[J]. 工程地质学报, 29(2): 375-382.
[48]	秦向辉, 张鹏, 丰成君, 等, 2014. 北京地区地应力测量与主要断裂稳定性分析[J]. 地球物理学报, 57(7): 2165-2180,doi: 10.6038/cjg20140712.
[49]	王斌, 秦向辉, 陈群策, 等, 2020. 鄂尔多斯地块西南缘宁夏固原地区原位地应力测量结果及其成因[J]. 地质通报, 39(7): 983-994.
[50]	王成虎, 高桂云, 杨树新, 等, 2019. 基于中国西部构造应力分区的川藏铁路沿线地应力的状态分析与预估[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 38(11): 2242-2253.
[51]	王成虎, 高桂云, 王洪, 等, 2020. 利用室内和现场水压致裂试验联合确定地应力与岩石抗拉强度[J]. 地质力学学报, 26(2): 167-174.
[52]	王凯悦, 常利军, 丁志峰, 2021. 喜马拉雅东构造结上地壳各向异性特征[J]. 地震学报, 43(2): 168-179.
[53]	谢超, 杨晓平, 黄雄南, 等, 2016. 东喜马拉雅构造结墨脱断裂晚第四纪活动地质证据的发现[J]. 地震地质, 38(4): 1095-1106.
[54]	徐纪人, 赵志新, 2006. 青藏高原及其周围地区区域应力场与构造运动特征[J]. 中国地质, 33(2): 275-285.
[55]	许忠淮, 2001. 东亚地区现今构造应力图的编制[J]. 地震学报, 23(5): 492-501.
[56]	严健, 何川, 汪波, 等, 2019. 雅鲁藏布江缝合带深埋长大隧道群岩爆孕育及特征[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 38(4): 769-781.
[57]	张重远, 杜世回, 何满潮, 等, 2022. 喜马拉雅东构造结西缘地应力特征及其对隧道围岩稳定性的影响[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 41(5): 954-968.
[58]	张浩, 施刚, 巫虹, 等, 2020. 上海地区浅部地应力测量及其构造地质意义分析[J]. 地质力学学报, 26(4): 583-594.

Relative Articles

	ZHU Mingde, WANG Zhaoya, ZHANG Yuezheng, LI Wenguang, HOU Kuikui, JI Hongguang, YIN Yantian, FU Zhen, HAO Yingjie. 2023: In-situ stress measurement and inversion analysis of the deep shaft project area in Sanshan Island based on hydraulic fracturing method. Journal of Geomechanics, 29(3): 430-441. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.20232911
	FENG Chengjun, LI Bin, LI Hui, ZHOU Minghui, ZHANG Peng, ZHU Siyu, REN Yazhe, QI Bangshen, WANG Miaomiao, TAN Chengxuan, CHEN Qunce. 2022: Estimation of in-situ stress field surrounding the Namcha Barwa region and discussion on the tectonic stability. Journal of Geomechanics, 28(6): 919-937. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.20222820
	LI Bin, YIN Yueping, TAN Chengxuan, GAO Yang, WAN Jiawei, FENG Chengjun, LIU Jian, WANG Dongbing. 2022: Geo-safety challenges against the site selection of engineering projects in the eastern Himalayan syntaxis area. Journal of Geomechanics, 28(6): 907-918. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.20222819
	WANG Chenghu, GAO Guiyun, WANG Hong, WANG Pu. 2020: Integrated determination of principal stress and tensile strength of rock based on the laboratory and field hydraulic fracturing tests. Journal of Geomechanics, 26(2): 167-174. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2020.26.02.016
	CHEN Qunce, SUN Dongsheng, CUI Jianjun, QIN Xianghui, ZHANG Chongyuan, MENG Wen, LI Awei, YANG Yuehui. 2019: HYDRAULIC FRACTURING STRESS MEASUREMENTS IN XUEFENGSHAN DEEP BOREHOLE AND ITS SIGNIFICANCE. Journal of Geomechanics, 25(5): 853-865. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2019.25.05.070
	NIU Linlin, FENG Chengjun, ZHANG Peng, CHEN Qunce, TAN Chengxuan. 2018: IN-SITU MEASUREMENTS IN THE SOUTHERN MARGIN OF THE ORDOS BLOCK. Journal of Geomechanics, 24(1): 25-34. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2018.24.01.003
	ZHANG Peng, SUN Zhiguo, WANG Qiuning, FENG Chengjun, SUN Mingqian, TAN Chengxuan, WU Yongdong, GAN Weiping. 2017: IN-SITU STRESS MEASUREMENT AND STABILITY ANALYSIS OF SURROUNDING ROCKS IN THE NORTH SECTION OF DEEP BURIED TUNNEL IN MUZHAILING. Journal of Geomechanics, 23(6): 893-903.
	ZHAO Wei-hua, SUN Dong-sheng, WANG Hong-cai, LIANG Jun-yi, WANG Ping, ZHANG Jun-hong, WANG Jun. 2008: MEASUREMENT OF ROCK STRESS OF HONGLING COAL MINE. Journal of Geomechanics, 14(3): 286-291.
	WANG Hui-ming, WANG Zhu-jie, DAI Bing-guo. 2008: COMPREHENSIVE TESTS AND APPLIED STUDIES OF HYDRAULIC FRACTURING IN THE ROCK MASS OF THE YANGJIANG PUMPING STORAGE POWER STATION. Journal of Geomechanics, 14(2): 168-175.
	WANG Cheng-hu, ZHANG Yan-shan, XIONG Yu-zhen, KONG De-hu. 2008: TECTONIC STABILITY ANALYSIS OF THE KAX RIVER HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT AREA. Journal of Geomechanics, 14(2): 135-140.
	WU Man-lu, LI Guo-jun, LIAO Chun-ting, DONG Cheng. 2006: MEASUREMENTS OF IN-SITU STRESS IN THE PUSHIHE HYDROPOWER STATION, LIAONING. Journal of Geomechanics, 12(2): 191-196.
	TAN Cheng-xuan, SUN Ye, WANG Lian-jie. 2003: SOME PROBLEMS OF IN-SITU CRUSTAL STRESS MEASUREMENTS. Journal of Geomechanics, 9(3): 275-280,260.
	DONG Cheng, WANG Lian-jie, YANG Xiao-cong, WANG Hong-cai, WANG Wei. 2001: STRESS MEASUREMENT OF ANQING COPER MINING. Journal of Geomechanics, 7(3): 259-264.
	CHEN Qun-ce, LI Fang-quan, MAO Ji-zhen. 2001: APPLICATION STUDY OF THREE DIMENSIONAL GEO-STRESS MEASUREMENTS BY USE OF HYDRAULIC FRACTURING METHOD. Journal of Geomechanics, 7(1): 69-78.
	WANG Xue-chao, GUO Qi-liang, ZHANG Hui, LIU Zhen-hong. 2000: CRUSTAL STRESS MEASUREMENT IN NORTHEASTERN QINGZANG PLATEAU BY HYDROFRACTURING. Journal of Geomechanics, 6(2): 64-70.
	YONG Xiao-cong, WANG Lian-jie. 2000: ERROR PROCESSING AND PRECISION ESTIMATION FOR ROCK STRESS MEASUREMENT. Journal of Geomechanics, 6(2): 53-63.
	WU Man-lu, LIAO Chun-ting. 2000: STRESS MEASUREMENTS AND STUDY OF STABILITY OF THE DAMAO TUNNEL. Journal of Geomechanics, 6(2): 71-76.
	Chen Qunce, An Meijian, Li Fangquan. 1998: THEORETICAL DISCUSSION ON 3-D HYDRAULIC FRACTURING IN SITU STRESS MEASUREMTNT. Journal of Geomechanics, 4(1): 37-44.
	Zhang Fan, Pan Lizhou. 1996: NUMERICAL TREATMENT OF MEASURING GROUND STRESS BY THE BOREHOLE DEFORMATION METHOD USING PRE-PRESSED PROBES OF CONTACT TYPE. Journal of Geomechanics, 2(2): 75-82.
	Wang Lianjie, Ding Yuanchen, Liu Qisheng, Shao Zhaogang, Tan Chengxuan, Wang Wei, Chert Guizhong. 1996: ROCK STRESS MEASUREMENTS IN A PLANNED TUNNEL FOR DIVERSION OF WATER FROM THE YELLOW RIVER. Journal of Geomechanics, 2(1): 62-69.

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(3)

1.	张国文，张梦珂. 盆山演化的拱形构造动力模型. 甘肃地质. 2024(03): 1-6 .
2.	李洪超，刘轩泽，付俊，李社，吴灿萍，梁瑞. 藏北多龙矿集区某金铜矿地应力特征及断裂稳定性分析. 安全与环境学报. 2024(12): 4659-4668 .
3.	王刚，方慧. 墨脱断裂带波东-西让段电性结构及其地震意义. 地球物理学进展. 2023(06): 2430-2439 .

Other cited types(1)

Proportional views

Proportional views

Figures(8) / Tables(5)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article Metrics

Article views (938) PDF downloads(163)