JURASSIC DEFORMATION AT THE WESTERN MARGIN OF THE EAST ASIA CONTINENT: A CASE STUDY OF DUCTILE DEFORMATION IN THE CENTRAL SEGMENT OF THE BANGONG CO-NUJIANG BELT
-
摘要: 班公湖-怒江带作为羌塘地块与拉萨地块晚中生代聚合而形成巨型构造带，其形成时代与如何汇聚是构造研究关键所在。本次研究选择班公湖—怒江带中段的安多—聂荣地块发育为研究区，对地块内部基底发育的近东西走向的韧性剪切带，开展了韧性剪切变形分析与同构造年代学研究。剪切带面理和线理测量分析指示北东—南西向构造挤压，其同构造矿物40Ar/39Ar的测试分析获得年龄约为167 Ma，表明班公湖-怒江带中段形成于中侏罗世中期北东—南西向汇聚的构造背景下。结合区域构造分析，东亚大陆西缘羌塘地块与拉萨地块在中侏罗世中期以北东—南西向碰撞聚合的构造方式完成大陆拼接，为东亚大陆西缘中侏罗世变形提供了直接构造证据。Abstract: The Bangong Co-Nujiang belt resulted from the convergence and collision between the Chiangtang and Lhasa blocks in late Mesozoic. The key issue in this tectonic study is when and how the belt was formed. With the Ando-Nyainrong block of the central segment of the Bangong Co-Nujiang belt as the study area, the ductile shear belts with approximately E-W strike developed in the internal basement of the block are studied based on ductile shear deformation analysis and syntectonic geochronology. The foliation and lineation measurement and analysis of the shear belts indicate tectonic compression with NE-SW strike. Through the test analysis of 40Ar/39Ar in syntectonic minerals, the age is worked out as 167 Ma. All the evidence shows that the central segment of the Bangong Co-Nujiang belt was caused under the convergence and collision between the Chiangtang and Lhasa blocks in the middle of Middle Jurassic, which provides direct tectonic evidence for the Jurassic deformation at the western margin of the East Asian continent.
-
0. 引言
东亚大陆经历燕山运动[1~12]，受东亚汇聚作用控制，形成了以华北—华南地块为核心的陆缘造山带，即北部蒙古—鄂霍次克造山带、东部陆缘造山带和西部班公湖—怒江造山带[12]，陆内则遭受强烈的陆内造山作用[12~25]，形成分别以鄂尔多斯地块和四川地块为中心的周缘造山带[18~19]和陆内大尺度的叠加褶皱[20~25]，奠定了东亚大陆的基本构造格局[12]。
已有的研究表明，中—晚侏罗世东亚大陆几乎同时受古太平洋板块、特堤斯洋板块、西伯利亚板块汇聚作用，形成了3条陆缘造山带[12~13]。东亚大陆北部蒙古—鄂霍茨克造山带由于其两侧陆块(西伯利亚克拉通和华北克拉通)，自西向东呈“剪刀式”汇聚碰撞[3, 26~30]，其西部汇聚碰撞始于中侏罗世[29, 31~33]，东部的碰撞一直持续到侏罗纪末期或白垩纪初期(175~135 Ma)[28, 32, 34~38]，形成与大洋板块俯冲相关的侏罗纪—早白垩世的岩浆岩带[39, 40]。东亚大陆东缘造山带缘于古太平洋板块俯冲作用形成安第斯型造山带[2, 4, 41~45]，其来自陆缘增生杂岩的年龄测试表明其主要发育时间为中—晚侏罗世到早白垩世[41, 45~47]。同时大量的东亚陆缘岩浆岩与火山岩[42~44, 47~49]与下白垩统之下的区域性角度不整合[11, 50~53]，证实该带形成于中侏罗世—早白垩世期间(170~135 Ma)。
东亚大陆西缘班公湖—怒江构造带是青藏高原中部分割北侧羌塘地体和南侧拉萨地体的一条地块边界带[54~56]。已有的岩石学研究显示该带南侧拉萨地体经历中侏罗世晚期(170 Ma)和晚白垩世初期(90 Ma)两期变质事件[56~59]，但对班公湖—怒江缝合带变形时代与汇聚方向仍然缺乏直接的依据。本文通过对班公湖—怒江构造带中段安多微地块的韧性剪切带开展同构造年代学研究，获得东亚大陆西缘侏罗纪聚合方位与时限。
1. 地质构造背景
班公湖—怒江构造带是分割羌塘地块与拉萨地块的一条巨型构造带，总体走向为南东东—北西西(见图 1)，该带既构成古特提斯冈瓦纳大陆与欧亚大陆的分界线，又是三叠纪以来羌塘陆块和冈底斯陆块之间岩石圈结构和组成的重要分界线[54~55, 60~62]。该带西起阿里的班公湖，向东经日土、改则、双湖、东巧、安多、查吾拉、索县、丁青、嘉玉桥转向八宿县上林卡、在穿过左贡扎玉后沿怒江直下与沪水—龙陵结合带相连，再向南穿过滇西瑞丽江进入泰国，可能与清迈—清莱结合带和马来西亚劳勿—文冬结合带相接，中国境内长达2800 km，宽约20~160 km[63]。该带具有明显的布格重力梯度和剩余重力异常梯度，其南北两侧地壳结构、岩石圈厚度、热流值、地表位移量也存在显著差异[64]。班公湖—怒江构造带由前石炭纪变质岩系、古生界、晚三叠世确哈拉组和中—晚侏罗世木嘎岗日群深海复理石沉积岩、断续分布的晚古生代蛇绿岩、早—中侏罗世蛇绿岩以及沿构造侵位的晚三叠世、晚侏罗世—早白世世蛇绿质、泥砂质构造混杂岩组成(见图 2)。沿班公湖—怒江结合带分布有大量的蛇绿质构造混杂岩片，主要由变质橄榄岩、方(二)辉橄榄岩、辉长(绿)岩、枕状玄武岩和伴生的放射虫硅质岩组成。该带西段(班公错—那屋错—改则—色哇段)蛇绿岩呈长条状、透镜状、豆英状，以岩片形式产出，面积几平方公里，彼此间及其与确哈拉组、木嘎岗日群之间呈冲断层或剪切带接触。其中的玄武岩属拉班系列，被早白垩世阿普特—阿尔布期朗山组灰岩、东巧组角度不整合覆盖，蛇绿岩形成于早—中侏罗世(角闪石K-Ar同位素年龄179 Ma)。中段(尼玛—东巧—安多—索县段)蛇绿岩层序保存完好，超基性岩体似豆英状构造侵位于木嘎岗日群中，为早白垩世晚期东巧组不整合覆盖；硅质岩中发育晚侏罗世—早白垩世的放射虫化石，构造侵位时间为早白垩世晚期。东段(索县—巴青—丁青—八宿段)蛇绿岩呈北西西向长条状，由纯橄榄岩、斜辉橄榄岩、斜辉辉橄岩、层状辉长岩、辉绿岩、枕状玄武岩及放射虫硅质岩等岩片组成[56]，蛇绿岩形成时代为中—晚侏罗世，构造侵位于中侏罗世末期[65]。
图 1 青藏高原及其邻区构造纲要图与东亚大陆晚中生代构造简图F1—喜马拉雅主冲断层；F2—雅鲁藏布江缝合带；F3—班公湖-怒江缝合带；F4—金沙江缝合带；F5—昆仑山断裂带；F6—阿尔金断裂带；F7—海原-祁连山构造带；F8—喀喇昆仑断裂带；F9—龙门山断裂带Figure 1. Tectonic outline map of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and its adjacent areas and simplified tectonic map of the East Asia continent in late Mesozoic班公湖—怒江构造带中段(安多段)发育平面呈椭圆形的安多-聂荣基底隆起(见图 2)，基底主要为新元古代结晶基底(变质年龄为920~820 Ma)和寒武系—奥陶系(540~460 Ma)[56~57]，并被早侏罗世花岗岩侵位[66]，局部为早白垩世花岗岩侵入[67]。结晶基底以二长片麻岩和斜长片麻岩为主，夹有斜长角闪岩、英云闪长岩等透镜体，发育镁铁质高压麻粒岩相的峰期矿物组合，峰期变质的温-压条件为860~920 ℃和1.5~1.6 Gpa，变质时限为170 Ma[59, 68]，指示班公湖—怒江缝合带东段可能形成于中—晚侏罗世[56, 69]。该基底隆起北缘发育蛇绿混杂岩带，内部及边缘发育多条近东西向韧性剪切带，以发育糜棱岩征为特征(见图 2)。
2. 构造变形及其年代学
构造编图与野外调查表明，安多—聂荣地块内部及其南、北两侧均发育韧性剪切带，剪切带总体上围绕眼球状的基底隆起近东西向展布。本文主要对安多-聂荣基底隆起内部发育的多条近东西—北西向韧性剪切带开展构造变形与构造年代学研究，获得了构造变形和年代学证据。
野外调查主要对不同方向剪切带进行构造测量，结果显示剪切带面理产状变化较大，但线理产状基本一致，其方位总体上为北东—南西方向。面理和线理构造统计分析，指示安多—聂荣地块韧性剪切带的形成主要受北东—南西向挤压应力场控制(见表 1、图 3)。
表 1 安多—聂荣地块韧性剪切变形测量结果与北东—南西向挤压构造应力场Table 1. Results of ductile shear deformation analysis and the NE-SW direction compressional tectonic stress field in the Ando-Nyainrong block点号 经度(E) 纬度(N) 数据量 σ1(az°/pl°) σ2(az°/pl°) σ3(az°/pl°) R D20 92°20′01″ 32°07′16″ 19 333/41 085/22 196/39 0.7 D21 92°18′45″ 32°07′29″ 5 186/34 047/47 292/21 0.7 D22 92°17′44″ 32°06′26″ 5 153/29 248/08 353/58 0.2 D25 92°12′14″ 32°03′23″ 4 320/43 111/42 215/15 0.3 D28 92°04′05″ 31°47′32″ 4 NNE-SSW D45 93°06′34″ 31°50′10″ 9 320/18 097/65 225/15 0.1 D53 91°42′06″ 31°52′51″ 7 244/24 137/33 002/46 0.8 D55 91°41′49″ 32°06′05″ 4 063/05 157/29 323/59 0.5 D56 91°42′45″ 32°07′15″ 7 100/17 209/45 355/39 0.5 D70 91°40′56″ 32°02′05″ 5 030/15 297/11 172/70 0.4 注：σ1—最大主应力；σ2—中间主应力；σ3—最小主应力；az—倾伏向；pl—倾伏角；R=(σ2-σ3/σ1-σ3) 
图 3 安多—聂荣地块韧性剪切带北东—南西向构造应力场特征(下半球等角投影(吴氏网))Figure 3. The characteristics of the NE-SW direction tectonic stress field of the ductile shear belts in the Ando-Nyainrong block在位于安多—聂荣微地块西南缘的观测点D53(见图 3)，英云闪长岩内发育北东—南西走向的糜棱岩带，沿糜棱面理，黑云母与钾长石呈定向排列，形成矿物线理。糜棱面理总体倾向为北东东向，线理倾伏向为北东向或西南向，旋转碎斑指示剪切方向由南西转向北东。剪切变应力分析指示为北东—南西向挤压(见图 4)。鉴于该点位于眼球状安多—聂荣基底隆起区的西缘，且剪切方向由南向北，可能指示该基底块体南缘在挤压和缩短过程中，主要受其南侧地层仰冲影响。对该点糜棱岩中的同变形矿物钾长石和黑云母进行40Ar/39Ar年代学研究，获得一个白云母的坪年龄为167.1±1.8 Ma(见图 4、表 2)。尽管黑云母的40Ar/39Ar年代学测试结果没有形成一个统一的坪年龄，但这些视年龄范围介于160 Ma和168 Ma之间，与钾长石测试结果基本一致。一般认为，钾长石和黑云母的40Ar/39Ar封闭温度介于350 ℃和150 ℃之间[72]。这表明，目前暴露在安多—聂荣微地块西南缘的剪切带的形成深度大约为5~10 km，时间为中—晚侏罗世。
图 4 安多—聂荣地块西南缘韧性剪切带(观测点D53)40Ar/39Ar坪年龄与等时线年龄Figure 4. 40Ar/39Ar plateau age and isochron age of the ductile shear belts at the southwest margin of the Ando-Nyainrong block(Site D53)表 2 安多—聂荣地块西南缘韧性剪切带(观测点D53)40Ar/39Ar坪年龄与等时线年龄Table 2. 40Ar/39Ar plateau age and isochron age of the ductile shear belts at the southwest margin of the Ando-Nyainrong block(Site D53)T/℃ (40Ar/ 39Ar) m (36Ar/ 39Ar) m (37Ar 0/ 39Ar) m (38Ar/ 39Ar) m 40Ar/% F 39Ar/10 -14mol 39Ar(Cum.)/% Age/Ma ±1σ/Ma D53-1钾长石 W=27.71 mg J=0.002684 Total age=161.0Ma 700 165.8118 0.1561 0.7508 0.0540 72.22 119.8151 0.06 0.33 503.0 5.9 800 31.5490 0.0041 0.0206 0.0137 96.14 30.3332 1.28 6.84 141.2 1.4 860 28.0541 0.0010 0.0474 0.0129 98.90 27.7466 0.80 10.93 129.6 1.3 920 28.3819 0.0031 0.1538 0.0141 96.81 27.4801 0.62 14.06 128.4 1.3 980 28.7767 0.0015 0.1156 0.0130 98.46 28.3349 0.35 15.83 132.2 1.4 1040 30.5556 0.0048 0.0293 0.0139 95.30 29.1211 0.64 19.07 135.8 1.4 1100 34.8159 0.0072 0.0410 0.0148 93.85 32.6757 1.03 24.32 151.6 1.5 1160 37.8379 0.0090 0.0237 0.0147 92.95 35.1694 1.65 32.70 162.7 1.6 1210 38.8774 0.0080 0.0170 0.0147 93.90 36.5066 3.23 49.13 168.6 1.6 1260 38.2769 0.0067 0.0052 0.0142 94.83 36.2989 6.82 83.80 167.7 1.6 1290 37.4411 0.0059 0.0204 0.0141 95.33 35.6945 2.62 97.10 165.0 1.6 1330 37.8766 0.0080 0.1179 0.0146 93.74 35.5089 0.43 99.27 164.2 1.7 1400 40.3533 0.0196 0.3614 0.0165 85.72 34.5995 0.14 100.00 160.2 2.4 D56-1黑云母 W=33.07 mg J=0.002735 Total age=165.6Ma 700 56.7666 0.1419 1.2378 0.0440 26.28 14.9359 0.06 0.37 72.2 5.2 760 36.0626 0.0190 0.1219 0.0169 84.48 30.4678 1.00 6.30 144.4 1.4 800 36.3997 0.0037 0.0783 0.0139 96.99 35.3058 1.61 15.86 166.3 1.6 840 36.1519 0.0021 0.0000 0.0133 98.24 35.5169 1.64 25.62 167.3 1.6 880 36.0022 0.0024 0.1252 0.0138 98.05 35.3049 1.15 32.45 166.3 1.6 920 36.0515 0.0017 0.0771 0.0134 98.59 35.5449 1.15 39.31 167.4 1.6 960 36.0165 0.0019 0.1006 0.0134 98.47 35.4710 1.13 46.01 167.0 1.6 1000 36.2395 0.0019 0.0167 0.0131 98.46 35.6825 1.13 52.75 168.0 1.6 1040 35.9673 0.0014 0.0470 0.0134 98.82 35.5425 2.20 65.84 167.4 1.6 1080 36.0125 0.0015 0.0312 0.0133 98.78 35.5726 2.63 81.46 167.5 1.6 1200 36.1565 0.0014 0.0076 0.0130 98.88 35.7507 2.96 99.05 168.3 1.6 1400 39.5904 0.0179 0.7467 0.0179 86.78 34.3776 0.16 100.00 162.1 2.3 注：表中下标m代表样品中测定的同位素比值，F=40Ar*/39Ar, is the ratio of radiogenic Argon40 and Argon39 在安多—聂荣微地块西北缘(观测点D56)，其结晶基底发育北东东走向韧性剪切带，糜棱面理主体倾向东，石英脉剪切变形特征指示由北东向南西剪切。结合该观测点位置，可以大致确定安多-聂荣地块北缘的变形以由北向南仰冲为特征。对糜棱面理上发生定向排列的黑云母进行了单矿物分离和40Ar/39Ar年代学测试，获得的坪年龄为167.1±1.1 Ma，等时线年龄为167.8±2.1 Ma，与反等时线年龄在误差范围内一致(见图 5、表 2)，表明这期构造事件发生在中—晚侏罗世(大约167 Ma)。
图 5 安多—聂荣地块西北缘韧性剪切带(观测点D56)40Ar/39Ar坪年龄与等时线年龄Figure 5. 40Ar/39Ar plateau age and isochron age of the ductile shear belts at the northwest margin of the Ando-Nyainrong block(Site D56)上述对安多—聂荣地块同构造年代学结果表明，班公湖-怒江缝合带中段构造变形主要受北东—南西向构造挤压作用控制，变形方式在浅表以安多—聂荣微地块为中心，两侧地壳同时向地块仰冲缩短，其变形时代发生于中侏罗世中期(大约167 Ma)。
3. 讨论
大量的研究表明，班公湖—怒江带作为中特提斯洋闭合界线[60]，是拉萨地块与羌塘地块于侏罗纪—白垩纪汇聚结果[56~58, 73]。但实际上班公湖—怒江带的闭合过程并非有统一时限，越来越多的研究表明，班公湖—怒江古大洋可能经历了呈剪刀式的东早西晚的穿时闭合过程[74~75]，在班公湖—怒江带东段北北西走向的鲜水河断裂带，断裂带西侧发育170 Ma的同构造淡色花岗岩。且其构造解析结果显示，其变形时代为中侏罗世[76]。而班公湖—怒江带西段一般在早白垩世晚期闭合[56~57, 77]，在改则地区至少在早白垩世晚期(大约106 Ma)地壳仍然正在生长[78]。在班公湖—怒江带中段，该带南侧拉萨地体经历中侏罗世晚期(170 Ma)和晚白垩世初期(90 Ma)两期变质事件[56~58]，内部安多—聂荣陆块也记录侏罗纪变质事件，出现镁铁质高压麻粒岩的峰期矿物组合(单斜辉石+石榴石+石英+金红石)，峰期变质的温-压条件为860~920 ℃和1.5~1.6 Gpa，变质时间为170 Ma[59, 68]。拉萨地块发育早白垩世(140~120 Ma)过铝质和强过铝质(S型)花岗岩[56, 69]，这可能与拉萨地体和羌塘地体的碰撞(J3—K1)引起地壳增厚之后的减压熔融有关，这次汇聚导致在拉萨地块的南部和北部至少持续缩短约187 km[79]。前文对班公湖-怒江带中段分析表明，该段以北东—南西向汇聚为主，变形特征在地壳浅部表现为以安多—聂荣地块为中心，南北两侧分别向该地块仰冲，深部则可能表现为该地块南北两侧的中特提斯洋壳向南北的双向俯冲[80]。
已有的班公湖—怒江带的研究为其形成演化提供了大量岩石学和深部信息，本次研究选取班公湖—怒江带中段安多—聂荣地块，其韧性剪切带的构造测量与同构造年代学研究表明，班公湖—怒江缝合带形成于中—晚侏罗世羌塘地块与拉萨地块近南北向汇聚碰撞构造背景下，为恢复东亚大陆西缘侏罗纪构造提供了依据。这些侏罗纪构造变形过程可能与班公湖—怒江缝合带两侧的拉萨地块和羌塘地块之间的碰撞有关。虽然其具体特征还需要进一步的深入研究和验证，但上述构造和年代学资料无疑具有一定的借鉴意义。
4. 结论
本文通过安多—聂荣地块韧性剪切带的构造测量与同构造年代学研究，获得以下结论：(1) 班公湖—怒江带中段形成于中侏罗世中期(167 Ma)；(2) 班公湖—怒江带中段形成于羌塘地块与拉萨地块北东—南西向汇聚碰撞的构造背景下。这一研究为重建东亚大陆西缘侏罗纪构造格局提供了关键构造证据。
致谢: 本论文野外工作得到中国地质科学院研究生陆露和赵珍的大力协助，中国地质科学院地质研究所完成了40Ar/39Ar年龄测试，在此深表感谢。 -
图 1 青藏高原及其邻区构造纲要图与东亚大陆晚中生代构造简图
F1—喜马拉雅主冲断层；F2—雅鲁藏布江缝合带；F3—班公湖-怒江缝合带；F4—金沙江缝合带；F5—昆仑山断裂带；F6—阿尔金断裂带；F7—海原-祁连山构造带；F8—喀喇昆仑断裂带；F9—龙门山断裂带
Figure 1. Tectonic outline map of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and its adjacent areas and simplified tectonic map of the East Asia continent in late Mesozoic
图 3 安多—聂荣地块韧性剪切带北东—南西向构造应力场特征(下半球等角投影(吴氏网))
Figure 3. The characteristics of the NE-SW direction tectonic stress field of the ductile shear belts in the Ando-Nyainrong block
图 4 安多—聂荣地块西南缘韧性剪切带(观测点D53)40Ar/39Ar坪年龄与等时线年龄
Figure 4. 40Ar/39Ar plateau age and isochron age of the ductile shear belts at the southwest margin of the Ando-Nyainrong block(Site D53)
图 5 安多—聂荣地块西北缘韧性剪切带(观测点D56)40Ar/39Ar坪年龄与等时线年龄
Figure 5. 40Ar/39Ar plateau age and isochron age of the ductile shear belts at the northwest margin of the Ando-Nyainrong block(Site D56)
表 1 安多—聂荣地块韧性剪切变形测量结果与北东—南西向挤压构造应力场
Table 1. Results of ductile shear deformation analysis and the NE-SW direction compressional tectonic stress field in the Ando-Nyainrong block
点号 经度(E) 纬度(N) 数据量 σ1(az°/pl°) σ2(az°/pl°) σ3(az°/pl°) R D20 92°20′01″ 32°07′16″ 19 333/41 085/22 196/39 0.7 D21 92°18′45″ 32°07′29″ 5 186/34 047/47 292/21 0.7 D22 92°17′44″ 32°06′26″ 5 153/29 248/08 353/58 0.2 D25 92°12′14″ 32°03′23″ 4 320/43 111/42 215/15 0.3 D28 92°04′05″ 31°47′32″ 4 NNE-SSW D45 93°06′34″ 31°50′10″ 9 320/18 097/65 225/15 0.1 D53 91°42′06″ 31°52′51″ 7 244/24 137/33 002/46 0.8 D55 91°41′49″ 32°06′05″ 4 063/05 157/29 323/59 0.5 D56 91°42′45″ 32°07′15″ 7 100/17 209/45 355/39 0.5 D70 91°40′56″ 32°02′05″ 5 030/15 297/11 172/70 0.4 注：σ1—最大主应力；σ2—中间主应力；σ3—最小主应力；az—倾伏向；pl—倾伏角；R=(σ2-σ3/σ1-σ3) 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 安多—聂荣地块西南缘韧性剪切带(观测点D53)40Ar/39Ar坪年龄与等时线年龄
Table 2. 40Ar/39Ar plateau age and isochron age of the ductile shear belts at the southwest margin of the Ando-Nyainrong block(Site D53)
T/℃ (40Ar/ 39Ar) m (36Ar/ 39Ar) m (37Ar 0/ 39Ar) m (38Ar/ 39Ar) m 40Ar/% F 39Ar/10 -14mol 39Ar(Cum.)/% Age/Ma ±1σ/Ma D53-1钾长石 W=27.71 mg J=0.002684 Total age=161.0Ma 700 165.8118 0.1561 0.7508 0.0540 72.22 119.8151 0.06 0.33 503.0 5.9 800 31.5490 0.0041 0.0206 0.0137 96.14 30.3332 1.28 6.84 141.2 1.4 860 28.0541 0.0010 0.0474 0.0129 98.90 27.7466 0.80 10.93 129.6 1.3 920 28.3819 0.0031 0.1538 0.0141 96.81 27.4801 0.62 14.06 128.4 1.3 980 28.7767 0.0015 0.1156 0.0130 98.46 28.3349 0.35 15.83 132.2 1.4 1040 30.5556 0.0048 0.0293 0.0139 95.30 29.1211 0.64 19.07 135.8 1.4 1100 34.8159 0.0072 0.0410 0.0148 93.85 32.6757 1.03 24.32 151.6 1.5 1160 37.8379 0.0090 0.0237 0.0147 92.95 35.1694 1.65 32.70 162.7 1.6 1210 38.8774 0.0080 0.0170 0.0147 93.90 36.5066 3.23 49.13 168.6 1.6 1260 38.2769 0.0067 0.0052 0.0142 94.83 36.2989 6.82 83.80 167.7 1.6 1290 37.4411 0.0059 0.0204 0.0141 95.33 35.6945 2.62 97.10 165.0 1.6 1330 37.8766 0.0080 0.1179 0.0146 93.74 35.5089 0.43 99.27 164.2 1.7 1400 40.3533 0.0196 0.3614 0.0165 85.72 34.5995 0.14 100.00 160.2 2.4 D56-1黑云母 W=33.07 mg J=0.002735 Total age=165.6Ma 700 56.7666 0.1419 1.2378 0.0440 26.28 14.9359 0.06 0.37 72.2 5.2 760 36.0626 0.0190 0.1219 0.0169 84.48 30.4678 1.00 6.30 144.4 1.4 800 36.3997 0.0037 0.0783 0.0139 96.99 35.3058 1.61 15.86 166.3 1.6 840 36.1519 0.0021 0.0000 0.0133 98.24 35.5169 1.64 25.62 167.3 1.6 880 36.0022 0.0024 0.1252 0.0138 98.05 35.3049 1.15 32.45 166.3 1.6 920 36.0515 0.0017 0.0771 0.0134 98.59 35.5449 1.15 39.31 167.4 1.6 960 36.0165 0.0019 0.1006 0.0134 98.47 35.4710 1.13 46.01 167.0 1.6 1000 36.2395 0.0019 0.0167 0.0131 98.46 35.6825 1.13 52.75 168.0 1.6 1040 35.9673 0.0014 0.0470 0.0134 98.82 35.5425 2.20 65.84 167.4 1.6 1080 36.0125 0.0015 0.0312 0.0133 98.78 35.5726 2.63 81.46 167.5 1.6 1200 36.1565 0.0014 0.0076 0.0130 98.88 35.7507 2.96 99.05 168.3 1.6 1400 39.5904 0.0179 0.7467 0.0179 86.78 34.3776 0.16 100.00 162.1 2.3 注：表中下标m代表样品中测定的同位素比值，F=40Ar*/39Ar, is the ratio of radiogenic Argon40 and Argon39
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] Wong W H. The Mesozoic orogenic movement in eastern China[J]. Bulletin of the Geological Society of China, 1929, 8(1): 33~44. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-6724.1929.mp8001004.x/pdf [2] Jahn B M, Chen P Y, Yen T P. Rb-Sr ages of granitic rocks in southeastern China and their tectonic significance[J]. GSA Bulletin, 1976, 87(5): 763~776. doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(1976)87<763:RAOGRI>2.0.CO;2 [3] Zhao X X, Coe R S, Zhou Y X, et al. New paleomagnetic results from northern China: collision and suturing with Siberia and Kazakhstan[J]. Tectonophysics, 1990, 181(1/4): 43~81. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990Tectp.181...43X [4] 赵越, 杨振宇, 马醒华.东亚大地构造发展的重要转折[J].地质科学, 1994, 29(2): 105~119. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKX402.000.htmZHAO Yue, YANG Zhenyu, MA Xinghua. Geotectonic transition from Paleoasian system and Paleotethyan system to Paleopacific active continental margin in eastern Asia[J]. Scientia Geologica Sinica, 1994, 29(2): 105~119. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKX402.000.htm [5] Davis G A, Darby B J, Zheng Y D, et al. Geometric and temporal evolution of an extensional detachment fault, Hohhot metamorphic core complex, Inner Mongolia, China[J]. Geology, 2002, 30(11): 1003~1006. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(2002)030<1003:GATEOA>2.0.CO;2 [6] Yin A, Nie S Y. A Phanerozoic palinspastic reconstruction of China and its neighbouring regions[A]. Yin A, Harrison T M. The Tectonic Evolution of Asia[M].Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, 442~485. [7] 董树文, 吴锡浩, 吴珍汉, 等.论东亚大陆的构造翘变——燕山运动的全球意义[J].地质论评, 2000, 46(1): 8~13. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP200001001.htmDONG Shuwen, WU Xihao, WU Zhenhan, et al. On tectonic seesawing of the East Asia continent-global implication of the Yanshanian Movement[J]. Geological Review, 2000, 46(1): 8~13. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP200001001.htm [8] 董树文, 张岳桥, 陈宣华, 等.晚侏罗世东亚多向汇聚构造体系的形成与变形特征[J].地球学报, 2008, 29(3): 306~317. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQXB200803006.htmDONG Shuwen, ZHANG Yueqiao, CHEN Xuanhua, et al. The formation and deformational characteristics of East Asia multi-direction convergent tectonic system in Late Jurassic[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2008, 29(3): 306~317. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQXB200803006.htm [9] 董树文, 张岳桥, 龙长兴, 等.中国侏罗纪构造变革与燕山运动新诠释[J].地质学报, 2007, 81(11): 1449~1461. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5717.2007.11.001DONG Shuwen, ZHANG Yueqiao, LONG Changxing, et al. Jurassic tectonic revolution in china and new interpretation of the Yanshan Movement[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2007, 81(11): 1449~1461. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5717.2007.11.001 [10] Deng J F, Su S G, Mo X X, et al. The sequence of magmatic-tectonic events and orogenic processes of the Yanshan belt, North China[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica (English Edition), 2004, 78(1): 260~266. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-6724.2004.tb00698.x/full [11] 张宏仁, 张永康, 蔡向民, 等.燕山运动的"绪动"——燕山事件[J].地质学报, 2013, 87(12): 1779~1790. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE201312001.htmZHANG Hongren, ZHANG Yongkang, CAI Xiangmin, et al. The triggering of Yanshan Movement: Yanshan event[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2013, 87(12): 1779~1790. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE201312001.htm [12] Dong S W, Zhang Y Q, Zhang F Q, et al. Late Jurassic-Early Cretaceous continental convergence and intracontinental orogenesis in East Asia: a synthesis of the Yanshan Revolution[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2015, 114: 750~770. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2015.08.011 [13] 李三忠, 张国伟, 周立宏, 等.中、新生代超级汇聚背景下的陆内差异变形:华北伸展裂解和华南挤压逆冲[J].地学前缘, 2011, 18(3): 79~107. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201103012.htmLI Sanzhong, ZHANG Guowei, ZHOU Lihong, et al. The opposite Meso-Cenozoic intracontinental deformations under the superconvergence: rifting and extension in the North China Craton and shortening and thrusting in the South China Craton[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2011, 18(3): 79~107. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201103012.htm [14] 张长厚, 吴淦国, 徐德斌, 等.燕山板内造山带中段中生代构造格局与构造演化[J].地质通报, 2004, 23(9): 864~875. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD2004Z2006.htmZHANG Changhou, WU Ganguo, XU Debin, et al. Mesozoic tectonic framework and evolution in the central segment of the intraplate Yanshan orogenic belt[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2004, 23(9): 864~875. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD2004Z2006.htm [15] 崔盛芹, 马寅生, 吴珍汉, 等.燕山陆内造山带造山过程及动力机制[M].北京:地震出版社, 2006, 1~280.CUI Shengqin, MA Yinsheng, WU Zhenhan, et al. Orogenic process and dynamic mechanism of the Yanshan intracontinental orogenic belt[M]. Beijing: Seismological Press, 2006, 1~280. [16] 董树文, 胡健民, 施炜, 等.大巴山侏罗纪叠加褶皱与侏罗纪前陆[J].地球学报, 2006, 27(5): 403~410. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQXB200605003.htmDONG Shuwen, HU Jianmin, SHI Wei, et al. Jurassic superposed folding and Jurassic foreland in the Daba mountain, Central China[J]. Acta Geoscientia Sinica, 2006, 27(5): 403~410. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQXB200605003.htm [17] Dong S W, Gao R, Yin A, et al. What drove continued continent-continent convergence after ocean closure? Insights from high-resolution seismic-reflection profiling across the Daba Shan in central China[J]. Geology, 2013, 41(6): 671~674. doi: 10.1130/G34161.1 [18] 张岳桥, 董树文, 赵越, 等.华北侏罗纪大地构造:综评与新认识[J].地质学报, 2007, 81(11): 1462~1480. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5717.2007.11.002ZHANG Yueqiao, DONG Shuwen, ZHAO Yue, et al. Jurassic tectonics of North China: a synthetic view[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2007, 81(11): 1462~1480. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5717.2007.11.002 [19] 张岳桥, 廖昌珍, 施炜, 等.论鄂尔多斯盆地及其周缘侏罗纪变形[J].地学前缘, 2007, 14(2): 182~196. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY200702014.htmZHANG Yueqiao, LIAO Changzhen, SHI Wei, et al. On the Jurassic deformation in and around the Ordos Basin, North China[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2007, 14(2): 182~196. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY200702014.htm [20] 张岳桥, 董树文, 李建华, 等.中生代多向挤压构造作用与四川盆地的形成和改造[J].中国地质, 2011, 38(2): 233~250. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI201102002.htmZHANG Yueqiao, DONG Shuwen, LI Jianhua, et al. Mesozoic multi-directional compressional tectonics and formation-reformation of Sichuan basin[J]. Geology in China, 2011, 38(2): 233~250. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI201102002.htm [21] Shi W, Zhang Y Q, Dong S W, et al. Intra-continental Dabashan orocline, southwestern Qinling, Central China[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2012, 46: 20~38. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2011.10.005 [22] Shi W, Dong S W, Li J H, et al. Formation of the Moping dome in the Xuefengshan orocline, central China and its tectonic significance[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica (English Edition), 2013, 87(3): 720~729. doi: 10.1111/acgs.2013.87.issue-3 [23] Shi W, Dong S W, Ratschbacher L, et al. Meso-Cenozoic tectonic evolution of the Dangyang Basin, north-central Yangtze craton, central China[J]. International Geology Review, 2013, 55(3): 382~396. doi: 10.1080/00206814.2012.715732 [24] Shi W, Dong S W, Zhang Y Q, et al. The typical large-scale superposed folds in the central South China: implications for Mesozoic intracontinental deformation of the South China Block[J]. Tectonophysics, 2015, 664: 50~66. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2015.08.039 [25] Huang X F, Shi W, Chen P, et al. Superposed deformation in the Helanshan Structural Belt: implications for Mesozoic intracontinental deformation of the North China Plate[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2015, 114: 140~154. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2015.05.027 [26] Scotese C R. Jurassic and Cretaceous plate tectonic reconstructions[J]. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 1991, 87(1/4): 493~501. http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=5542144 [27] Delvaux D, Moeys R, Stapel G, et al. Palaeostress reconstructions and geodynamics of the Baikal region, Central Asia, Part I. Palaeozoic and Mesozoic pre-rift evolution[J]. Tectonophysics, 1995, 252(1/4): 61~101. [28] Kravchinsky V A, Cogné J P, Harbert W P, et al. Evolution of the Mongol-Okhotsk Ocean as constrained by new palaeomagnetic data from the Mongol-Okhotsk suture zone, Siberia[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2002, 148(1): 34~57. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-246x.2002.01557.x [29] Tomurtogoo O, Windley B F, Kröner A, et al. Zircon age and occurrence of the Adaatsag ophiolite and Muron shear zone, central Mongolia: constraints on the evolution of the Mongol-Okhotsk Ocean, suture and orogen[J]. Journal of the Geological Society, 2005, 162(1): 125~134. doi: 10.1144/0016-764903-146 [30] Xiao W J, Kusky T. Geodynamic processes and metallogenesis of the Central Asian and related orogenic belts: introduction[J]. Gondwana Research, 2009, 16(2): 167~169. doi: 10.1016/j.gr.2009.05.001 [31] Zorin Y A. Geodynamics of the western part of the Mongolia-Okhotsk collisional belt, Trans-Baikal region (Russia) and Mongolia[J]. Tectonophysics, 1999, 306(1): 33~56. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1951(99)00042-6 [32] Parfenov L M, Popeko L I, Tomurtogoo O. Problems of tectonics of the Mongol-Okhotsk orogenic belt[J]. Geology of the Pacific Ocean, 2001, 16(5): 797~830. https://www.intechopen.com/books/statistics/updates-in-volcanology-a-comprehensive-approach-to-volcanological-problems/bimodal-volcano-plutonic-complexes-in-the-frame-of-eastern-member-of-mongol-okhotsk-orogenic-belt-as [33] Sun D Y, Gou J, Wang T H, et al. Geochronological and geochemical constraints on the Erguna massif basement, NE China-subduction history of the Mongo-Okhotsk oceanic crust[J]. International Geology Review, 2013, 55(14): 1801~1816. doi: 10.1080/00206814.2013.804664 [34] Cogné J P, Kravchinsky V A, Halim N, et al. Late Jurassic-Early Cretaceous closure of the Mongol-Okhotsk ocean demonstrated by new Mesozoic palaeomagnetic results from the Trans-Baïkal area (SE Siberia)[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2005, 163(2): 813~832. doi: 10.1111/gji.2005.163.issue-2 [35] Metelkin D V, Vernikovsky V A, Kazansky A Y, et al. Late Mesozoic tectonics of Central Asia based on paleomagnetic evidence[J]. Gondwana Research, 2010, 18(2/3): 400~419. [36] Pei J L, Sun Z M, Liu J, et al. A paleomagnetic study from the Late Jurassic volcanics (155 Ma), North China: implications for the width of Mongol-Okhotsk Ocean[J]. Tectonophysics, 2011, 510(3/4): 370~380. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011Tectp.510..370J [37] 马寅生.燕山东段—下辽河地区中新生代盆山构造演化[J].地质力学学报, 2001, 7(1): 79~91. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-DZLX200101011.htmMA Yinsheng. The evolution of Mesozoic-Cenozoic basin-mountain structure in the east Yanshan area and Xialiaohe basin[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 2001, 7(1): 79~91. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-DZLX200101011.htm [38] 崔盛芹, 吴珍汉, 马寅生, 等.北京地区中新生代陆内造山过程——以十三陵—龙庆峡—八达岭路线观察为基础[J].地质力学学报, 2003, 9(3): 201~219. http://mall.cnki.net/magazine/Article/DZLX200303002.htmCUI Shengqin, WU Zhenhan, MA YinSheng, et al. Meso-Cenozoic intracontinental orogenic process in the Beijing area-a case study based on geological observations from the Ming tombs to Badaling mountain[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 2003, 9(3): 201~219. http://mall.cnki.net/magazine/Article/DZLX200303002.htm [39] Daoudene Y, Ruffet G, Cocherie A, et al. Timing of exhumation of the Ereendavaa metamorphic core complex (north-eastern Mongolia)-U-Pb and 40Ar/39Ar constraints[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2013, 62: 98~116. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2011.04.009 [40] Berzina A P, Berzina A N, Gimon V O. Geochemical and Sr-Pb-Nd isotopic characteristics of the Shakhtama porphyry Mo-Cu system (Eastern Transbaikalia, Russia)[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2014, 79: 655~665. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2013.07.028 [41] Isozaki Y. Jurassic accretion tectonics of Japan[J]. Island Arc, 1997, 6(1): 25~51. doi: 10.1111/iar.1997.6.issue-1 [42] Zhou X M, Li W X. Origin of Late Mesozoic igneous rocks in Southeastern China: implications for lithosphere subduction and underplating of mafic magmas[J]. Tectonophysics, 2000, 326(3/4): 269~287. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000Tectp.326..269Z [43] Li X H, Li Z X, Li W X, et al. U-Pb zircon, geochemical and Sr-Nd-Hf isotopic constraints on age and origin of Jurassic I-and A-type granites from central Guangdong, SE China: a major igneous event in response to foundering of a subducted flat-slab?[J]. Lithos, 2007, 96(1/2): 186~204. [44] Cui J J, Zhang Y Q, Dong S W, et al. Zircon U-Pb geochronology of the Mesozoic metamorphic rocks and granitoids in the coastal tectonic zone of SE China: constraints on the timing of Late Mesozoic orogeny[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2013, 62: 237~252. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2012.09.014 [45] Safonova I Y, Santosh M. Accretionary complexes in the Asia-Pacific region: tracing archives of ocean plate stratigraphy and tracking mantle plumes[J]. Gondwana Research, 2014, 25(1): 126~158. doi: 10.1016/j.gr.2012.10.008 [46] Maruyama S. Pacific-type orogeny revisited: Miyashiro-type orogeny proposed[J]. Island Arc, 1997, 6(1): 91~120. doi: 10.1111/iar.1997.6.issue-1 [47] Wu F Y, Han R H, Yang J H, et al. Initial constraints on the timing of granitic magmatism in North Korea using U-Pb zircon geochronology[J]. Chemical Geology, 2007, 238(3/4): 232~248. [48] Wu F Y, Lin J Q, Wilde S A, et al. Nature and significance of the Early Cretaceous giant igneous event in eastern China[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2005, 233(1/2): 103~119. [49] Wu F Y, Yang J H, Wilde S A, et al. Geochronology, petrogenesis and tectonic implications of Jurassic granites in the Liaodong Peninsula, NE China[J]. Chemical Geology, 2005, 221(1/2): 127~156. [50] Lim C, Cho M. Two-phase contractional deformation of the Jurassic Daebo Orogeny, Chungnam Basin, Korea, and its correlation with the early Yanshanian movement of China[J]. Tectonics, 2012, 31(1): TC1004. [51] Li J H, Zhang Y Q, Dong S W, et al. Cretaceous tectonic evolution of South China: a preliminary synthesis[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2014, 134: 98~136. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.03.008 [52] 李海龙, 张宏仁, 渠洪杰, 等.燕山运动"绪动/A幕"的本意及其锆石U-Pb年代学制约[J].地质论评, 2014, 60(5): 1026~1042. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP201405008.htmLI Hailong, ZHANG Hongren, QU Hongjie, et al. Initiation, the first stage of the Yanshan (Yenshan) movement in western hills, constraints from zircon U-Pb dating[J]. Geological Review, 2014, 60(5): 1026~1042. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP201405008.htm [53] 黄迪颖.燕辽生物群和燕山运动[J].古生物学报, 2015, 54(4): 501~546. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GSWX201504008.htmHUANG Diying. Yanliao biota and Yanshan movement[J]. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 2015, 54(4): 501~546. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GSWX201504008.htm [54] Yin A, Harrison T M. Geologic evolution of the Himalayan-Tibetan orogen[J]. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 2000, 28: 211~280. doi: 10.1146/annurev.earth.28.1.211 [55] Chu M F, Chung S L, Song B, et al. Zircon U-Pb and Hf isotope constraints on the Mesozoic tectonics and crustal evolution of southern Tibet[J]. Geology, 2006, 34(9): 745~748. doi: 10.1130/G22725.1 [56] Zhu D C, Zhao Z D, Niu Y L, et al. The Lhasa Terrane: record of a microcontinent and its histories of drift and growth[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2011, 301(1/2): 241~255. [57] Kapp J L D, Harrison T M, Kapp P, et al. Nyainqentanglha Shan: a window into the tectonic, Thermal, and geochemical evolution of the Lhasa block, southern Tibet[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2005, 110(B8): B08413. [58] 潘桂棠, 莫宣学, 侯增谦, 等.冈底斯造山带的时空结构及演化[J].岩石学报, 2006, 22(3): 521~533. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200603001.htmPAN Guitang, MO Xuanxue, HOU Zengqian, et al. Spatial-temporal framework of the Gangdese orogenic belt and its evolution[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2006, 22(3): 521~533. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200603001.htm [59] Zhang Z M, Dong X, Santosh M, et al. Metamorphism and tectonic evolution of the Lhasa terrane, Central Tibet[J]. Gondwana Research, 2014, 25(1): 170~189. doi: 10.1016/j.gr.2012.08.024 [60] 王鸿祯.试论西藏地质构造分区问题[J].地球科学—武汉地质学院学报, 1983, (1): 1~8.WANG Hongzhen. On the Geotectonic units of Xizang (Tibet) region[J]. Earth Science-Journal of Wuhan College of Geology, 1983, (1): 1~8. [61] 黄汲清, 陈炳蔚.中国及邻区特提斯海的演化[M].北京:地质出版社, 1987, 1~78.HUANG Jiqing, CHEN Bingwei. The evolution of the Tethys in China and adjacent regions[M]. Beijing: Geologic Publishing House, 1987, 1~78. [62] 赵文津, 刘葵, 蒋忠惕, 等.西藏班公湖-怒江缝合带:深部地球物理结构给出的启示[J].地质通报, 2004, 23(7): 623~635. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD200407000.htmZHAO Wenjin, LIU Kui, JIANG Zhongti, et al. Bangong Co-Nujiang suture zone, Tibet-a suggestion given by deep geophysical structure[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2004, 23(7): 623~635. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD200407000.htm [63] Wang Q, Wyman D A, Xu J F, et al. Triassic Nb-enriched basalts, magnesian andesites, and adakites of the Qiangtang terrane (central Tibet): Evidence for metasomatism by slab-derived melts in the mantle wedge[J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 2008, 155(4): 473~490. doi: 10.1007/s00410-007-0253-1 [64] Zhang Z J, Deng Y F, Teng J W, et al. An overview of the crustal structure of the Tibetan plateau after 35 years of deep seismic soundings[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2011, 40(4): 977~989. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.03.010 [65] 王希斌, 鲍佩声, 邓万明, 等.西藏蛇绿岩[M].北京:地质出版社, 1987.WANG Xibin, BAO Peisheng, DENG Wanming, et al. Xizang (Tibet) Ophiolite[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 1987. [66] 刘敏, 赵志丹, 管琪, 等.西藏聂荣微陆块早侏罗世中期花岗岩及其包体的岩浆混合成因:锆石LA-ICP-MS U-Pb定年和Hf同位素证据[J].岩石学报, 2011, 27(7): 1931~1937. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201107003.htmLIU Min, ZHAO Zhidan, GUAN Qi, et al. Tracing magma mixing genesis of the middle Early-Jurassic host granites and enclaves in Nyainrong microcontinent, Tibet from zircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb dating and Hf isotopes[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2011, 27(7): 1931~1937. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201107003.htm [67] 李奋其, 刘伟, 耿全如.西藏冈底斯带那曲地区中生代火山岩的LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb年龄和地质意义[J].地球学报, 2010, 31(6): 781~790. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQXB201006003.htmLI Fenqi, LIU Wei, GENG Quanru. Zircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb ages of the Mesozoic volcanic rocks in Nagqu area of Gangdise in Tibet and their geological significance[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2010, 31(6): 781~790. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQXB201006003.htm [68] Guynn J H, Kapp P, Pullen A, et al. Tibetan basement rocks near Amdo reveal "missing" Mesozoic tectonism along the Bangong suture, central Tibet[J]. Geology, 2006, 34(6): 505~508. doi: 10.1130/G22453.1 [69] Harris N B W, Inger S, Xu R H. Cretaceous plutonism in central Tibet: an example of post-collision magmatism?[J]. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 1990, 44(1/2): 21~32. [70] 中国地质大学地质调查研究院. 1: 25万安多县幅地质图[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2004.Geological Survey Academy of China University of Geosciences (Beijing) (AGSC). Regional geological map of Ando (1:250000)[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2004. [71] 西藏自治区地质调查院. 1: 25万那曲县幅地质图[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2004.Geological Survey Academy of Xizang (AGSXZ). Regional geological map of Nagqu (1:250000)[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2004. [72] Dallmeyer R D, VanBreeman O. Rb-Sr whole-rock and 40Ar/39Ar mineral ages of the Togus and Hallowell quartz monzonite and Three Mile Pond granodiorite plutons, South-Central Maine: their bearing on post-Acadian cooling history[J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 1981, 78(1): 61~73. doi: 10.1007/BF00371144 [73] Dewey J F, Shackelton R M, Chang C, et al. The tectonic evolution of the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 1988, 327(1594): 379~413. doi: 10.1098/rsta.1988.0135 [74] 邱瑞照, 周肃, 邓晋福, 等.西藏班公湖-怒江西段舍马拉沟蛇绿岩中辉长岩年龄测定——兼论班公湖-怒江蛇绿岩带形成时代[J].中国地质, 2004, 31(3): 262~268. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI200403003.htmQIU Ruizhao, ZHOU Su, DENG Jinfu, et al. Dating of gabbro in the Shemalagou ophiolite in the western segment of the Bangong Co-Nujiang ophiolite belt, Tibet-with a discussion of the age of the Bangong Co-Nujiang ophiolite belt[J]. Geology in China, 2004, 31(3): 262~268. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI200403003.htm [75] 黄强太, 李建峰, 夏斌, 等.西藏班公湖-怒江缝合带中段江错蛇绿岩岩石学、地球化学、年代学及地质意义[J].地球科学—中国地质大学学报, 2015, 40(1): 34~48. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX201501003.htmHUANG Qiangtai, LI Jianfeng, XIA Bin, et al. Petrology, geochemistry, chronology and geological significance of Jiang Tso ophiolite in middle segment of Bangonghu-Nujiang Suture zone, Tibet[J]. Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences, 2015, 40(1): 34~48. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX201501003.htm [76] Li H L, Zhang Y Q, Zhang C H, et al. Middle Jurassic syn-kinematic magmatism, anatexis and metamorphism in the Zheduo-Gonggar massif, implication for the deformation of the Xianshuihe fault zone, East Tibet[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2015, 107: 35~52. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2015.03.038 [77] Yuan Y J, Yin Z X, Liu W L, et al. Tectonic evolution of the Meso-Tethys in the western segment of Bangonghu-Nujiang suture zone: insights from geochemistry and geochronology of the Lagkor Tso ophiolite[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica (English Edition), 2015, 89(2): 369~388. doi: 10.1111/1755-6724.12436 [78] 董瀚, 苟国宁, 齐玥, 等.拉萨地块北缘早白垩世晚期地壳生长:来自改则亚多~106 Ma侵入岩的证据[J].大地构造与成矿学, 2016, 40(6): 1226~1238. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGYK201606010.htmDONG Han, GOU Guoning, QI Yue, et al. Late Early cretaceous crustal growth in northern Lhasa block: evidence from ca. 106 Ma intrusive rocks in the Yaduo Area, Gerze county[J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 2016, 40(6): 1226~1238. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGYK201606010.htm [79] Murphy M A, Yin A, Harrison T M, et al. Did the indo-Asian collision alone create the Tibetan plateau?[J]. Geology, 1997, 25(8): 719~722. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(1997)025<0719:DTIACA>2.3.CO;2 [80] 许荣科, 郑有业, 赵平甲, 等.西藏东巧北尕苍见岛弧的厘定及地质意义[J].中国地质, 2007, 34(5): 768~777. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI200705002.htmXU Rongke, ZHENG Youye, ZHAO Pingjia, et al. Definition and geological significance of the Gacangjian volcanic arc north of Dongqiao, Tibet[J]. Geology in China, 2007, 34(5): 768~777. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI200705002.htm -
下载:
下载:
图(5) / 表(2)
计量
- 文章访问数: 375
- HTML全文浏览量: 153
- PDF下载量: 23
- 被引次数: 0
