GEOCHRONOLOGY, GEOCHEMISTRY AND HF ISOTOPES OF VOLCANIC ROCKS IN PINGXIANG AREA, SOUTHWEST GUANGXI: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE LATEST STAGE OF PALEO-TETHYAN OCEAN NORTHWARD SUBDUCTION
-
摘要: 华南西南缘凭祥地区位于特提斯构造域东端,华南与印支陆块碰撞缝合带的北部,该区出露的三叠纪中酸性火山岩是古特提斯洋俯冲过程中在华南陆块边缘形成的大陆弧产物,这些火山岩同时携带的大量来自华南陆块基底的捕获锆石为华南陆块的构造热事件研究将提供重要的信息。对凭祥地区三叠系北泗组英安岩进行了同位素年代学、地球化学及锆石Hf同位素研究,获得了一个英安岩样品的加权平均年龄为(227.8±1)Ma,这些英安岩具有高SiO2、K2O含量,极低的MgO、MnO和CaO含量,富集大离子亲石元素(Rb、Ba、Th和U)和亏损高场强元素(Nb、Ta)的特点,显示了典型的岛弧岩浆作用特征,代表古特提斯洋向北俯冲至华南陆块之下形成的大陆弧产物。其余两个英安岩样品中的70粒锆石主要为来自华南陆块基底的捕获锆石,其年龄数据变化区间较大,为1010~231 Ma,这些捕获锆石U-Pb年龄频谱分布主要集中在四个区间:11010~800 Ma(峰值900 Ma),其锆石的εHf(t)值为4.5~15.1,响应扬子和华夏陆块之间聚合-裂解-再聚合的构造演化事件,反应了其幔源岩浆的广泛参与;2720~620 Ma(峰值680 Ma)响应南华纪已拼合的扬子-华夏陆块的再次发生裂解;3490~400 Ma(峰值450 Ma),其锆石的εHf(t)值为2.2~-7.8,响应华南早古生代加里东运动有关的壳-幔相互作用岩浆事件;4280~230 Ma(峰值250 Ma),其锆石εHf(t)值为-13.6~-16.5,地壳模式年龄为2.3~2.1 Ga,代表了印支与华南陆块之间古特提斯洋俯冲闭合的岩浆事件。文章的研究结果揭示了凭祥北泗组英安岩与华南陆块的亲缘性,其结晶年龄限定了华南与印支陆块之间的古特提斯洋俯冲结束、陆-陆开始碰撞的最晚时限为中-晚三叠纪。Abstract: Pingxiang area located in the southwest margin of Souch China Block (SCB) and north side of the collision zone between the South China and Indochina plate, tectonically belongs to the eastern part of the Tethyan tectonic domain. The Triassic intermediate-acid volcanics exposed in the Pingxiang area are continental arcs formed during the subduction of the Paleo-Tethysan ocean. They carried a large number of captured zircons sourced from the basement of SCB, which provided important information for the tectono-thermal events in SCB. In this paper, the geochronology, geochemistry and zircon Hf isotope studies were carried out on the dacites from Triassic Beisi Formation in Pingxiang area, and a weighted average age yeild 227.8±1.3 Ma from one dacite sample was obtained, representing its crystallization age. Geochemically, the dacites have high contents of SiO2, K2O, and low MgO, MnO and CaO contents, enriched in LILEs (Rb, Ba, Th and U) and depleted in HFSEs (Nb, Ta), which shows a typical characteristics of island arc magma, representing the continental arc products formed by the northward subduction of the Paleo-Tethysan ocean. The U-Pb age frequency distribution of captured zircons from another two dacite samples is mainly concentrated in (1)1010~800 Ma (peak 900 Ma), and the zircon εHf(t) value is 4.5~15.1, responding to the tectonic evolution events of the convergence-rifting-reconvergence between the Yangtze and Cathaysia blocks and the participation of the mantle-derived magma; (2) 720~620 Ma (peak 680 Ma), responding to the re-rifting of the Yangtze-Cathaysia blocks; (3) 490~400 Ma (peak 450 Ma), the zircon εHf(t) value is 2.2~-7.8, responding to the tectono-magmatic event of crust-mantle interaction related to the Caledonian movement in Early Paleozoic in SCB; (4) 280~230 Ma (peak 250 Ma), the zircon εHf(t) value is -13.6~-16.5, and the crustal model age is 2.3~2.1 Ga, which represents the magmatic event of the Paleo-Tethysan Ocean final subduction to closure between Indochina and South China. The study results reveal the dacites from Beisi formation have an intimate affinity with SCB, and its crystallization age constrains the latest time of the Paleo-Tethysan Ocean subduction ending to closure between SCB and Indochina block at least last to Middle to Late Triassic.
-
Key words:
- southwest margin of South China /
- volcanic rocks /
- continental arc /
- Paleo-Tethysan Ocean
-
表 1 凭祥英安90岩主量元素(%)和微量元素(×10-6)含量表
Table 1. Major (%) and rare (×10-6) elements content of dacites in Pingxiang
样号 PX-01 PX-02 PX-03 PX-04 PX-05 PX-06 主量元素 SiO2 71.77 71.01 69.79 69.12 71.09 70.85 TiO2 0.40 0.37 0.38 0.38 0.39 0.38 Al2O3 14.33 13.60 13.65 13.58 13.43 13.72 Fe2O3 2.39 2.58 1.78 2.66 2.48 2.57 MnO 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.02 MgO 0.74 0.33 0.60 0.35 0.75 0.75 CaO 1.77 1.31 3.04 2.45 1.34 1.41 Na2O 2.35 2.33 2.30 2.14 2.38 2.21 K2O 4.71 5.18 4.59 4.89 4.64 4.68 P2O5 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.14 LOI 0.87 2.67 3.17 3.29 4.33 4.25 Total 99.49 99.51 99.44 99.00 100.98 100.98 微量元素 V 24.22 22.17 25.78 25.42 24.67 24.20 Cr 13.39 12.19 14.16 12.78 14.19 12.88 Co 4.02 4.22 3.81 4.45 3.95 3.73 Ni 6.07 6.33 6.02 6.98 7.26 5.37 Cu 6.21 5.93 6.95 7.45 6.34 5.88 Zn 41.00 38.51 51.76 43.44 42.49 44.40 Ga 17.05 19.09 20.82 21.40 17.02 16.47 Rb 174.4 191.9 146.3 165.2 201.8 205.9 Ba 758.6 816.1 900.5 935.9 780.6 753.3 Th 8.68 8.59 8.70 8.78 9.06 8.99 U 2.18 2.18 2.18 2.19 2.18 2.18 Nb 11.38 10.75 10.69 11.02 11.54 11.25 Ta 1.02 0.99 0.96 0.99 1.03 1.02 La 39.75 33.45 38.52 37.06 39.25 41.41 Ce 87.0 73.1 84.6 81.3 85.3 88.9 Pb 25.56 24.19 20.52 26.85 28.34 29.11 Pr 9.83 8.25 9.28 9.09 9.61 9.95 Sr 100.2 151.2 123.5 127.8 103.6 96.0 Nd 34.91 29.58 33.05 32.37 34.26 35.53 Zr 392.9 389.3 388.5 382.2 331.0 335.7 Hf 9.70 9.40 9.27 9.21 8.79 8.85 Sm 7.09 6.07 6.69 6.62 7.06 7.20 Eu 1.09 0.95 1.07 1.13 1.02 1.08 Gd 4.69 4.43 4.64 4.58 4.67 4.72 Tb 1.04 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.03 Dy 6.02 5.43 5.72 5.87 6.11 6.21 Y 33.66 31.00 32.91 32.78 34.06 34.54 Ho 1.33 1.24 1.26 1.30 1.35 1.37 Er 3.20 3.05 3.07 3.20 3.27 3.25 Tm 0.50 0.48 0.48 0.50 0.52 0.52 Yb 3.03 2.85 2.95 2.96 3.07 3.08 Lu 0.48 0.45 0.46 0.46 0.47 0.48 Eu* 0.19 0.18 0.19 0.20 0.18 0.19 (La/Yb)N 9.40 8.43 9.37 8.97 9.17 9.63 表 2 凭祥英安岩锆石LA-ICP-MS U-Pb年代学数据表
Table 2. LA-ICP-MS zircon analytical data of dacite in Pinxiang
样号 Th/×10-6 U/×10-6 Th/U 207Pb/206Pb 207Pb/235U 206Pb/238U 207Pb/235U 206Pb/238U Ratio σ Ratio σ Ratio σ Age/Ma σe/Ma Age/Ma σe/Ma PX-01-01 496 991 0.50 0.0565 0.0014 0.549 0.013 0.0705 0.0011 444 9 439 7 PX-01-02 11523 3244 3.55 0.069 0.0025 1.398 0.049 0.1471 0.0026 888 21 885 15 PX-01-03 21000 7323 2.87 0.0692 0.0012 1.448 0.025 0.1518 0.0021 909 11 911 12 PX-01-04 23753 4637 5.12 0.0703 0.0023 1.483 0.047 0.1531 0.0027 924 19 918 15 PX-01-05 14563 3956 3.68 0.0701 0.0009 1.465 0.018 0.1515 0.002 916 7 909 11 PX-01-06 19101 6362 3.00 0.0699 0.0015 1.425 0.029 0.1478 0.0022 900 12 889 12 PX-01-07 1294 523 2.48 0.0704 0.0015 1.499 0.031 0.1545 0.0025 930 13 926 14 PX-01-08 767 502 1.53 0.0678 0.0028 1.310 0.052 0.1402 0.0027 850 23 846 15 PX-01-09 143 685 0.21 0.0697 0.0015 1.447 0.030 0.1505 0.0022 909 12 904 12 PX-01-10 428 218 1.96 0.0707 0.0019 1.554 0.039 0.1595 0.0025 952 16 954 14 PX-01-11 22772 5737 3.97 0.0712 0.0012 1.482 0.025 0.151 0.0021 923 10 906 12 PX-01-12 12677 3349 3.79 0.0518 0.0008 0.289 0.005 0.0404 0.0006 258 4 255 3 PX-01-13 15071 3007 5.01 0.0528 0.0009 0.286 0.005 0.0393 0.0006 255 4 248 3 PX-01-14 12172 3948 3.08 0.0737 0.001 1.723 0.028 0.1696 0.0024 1017 11 1010 13 PX-01-15 10739 5139 2.09 0.0559 0.0016 0.557 0.015 0.0722 0.0011 449 10 450 7 PX-01-16 9244 4683 1.97 0.0565 0.0008 0.557 0.008 0.0715 0.001 450 5 445 6 PX-01-17 9333 2963 3.15 0.0565 0.0011 0.555 0.010 0.0713 0.001 448 7 444 6 PX-01-18 18679 8841 2.11 0.056 0.0011 0.551 0.010 0.0714 0.001 446 7 444 6 PX-01-19 7820 2092 3.74 0.0559 0.001 0.539 0.009 0.07 0.001 438 6 436 6 PX-01-20 162 370 0.44 0.0719 0.0008 1.661 0.024 0.1678 0.0023 994 9 1000 12 PX-01-21 733 805 0.91 0.0672 0.0009 1.247 0.019 0.1347 0.0018 822 9 814 10 PX-01-22 309 431 0.72 0.0513 0.0012 0.280 0.007 0.0396 0.0006 251 5 250 4 PX-01-23 333 1826 0.18 0.0546 0.0018 0.301 0.010 0.04 0.0007 267 8 253 4 PX-01-24 608 694 0.88 0.0528 0.0027 0.288 0.014 0.0395 0.0006 257 11 250 4 PX-01-25 85 55 1.55 0.0756 0.001 1.681 0.026 0.1619 0.0021 1001 10 968 12 PX-01-26 440 234 1.88 0.053 0.0013 0.295 0.008 0.0404 0.0006 262 6 255 4 PX-01-27 463 812 0.57 0.0531 0.0014 0.286 0.008 0.0391 0.0006 256 6 247 4 PX-01-28 309 735 0.42 0.0565 0.0007 0.549 0.007 0.0705 0.001 445 5 439 6 PX-01-29 7100 2319 3.06 0.0699 0.0014 1.430 0.027 0.1485 0.0021 902 11 892 12 PX-01-30 1311 4111 0.32 0.0656 0.0009 1.234 0.020 0.1365 0.0018 816 9 825 10 PX-01-31 15688 6985 2.25 0.0505 0.0007 0.284 0.004 0.0407 0.0006 254 3 257 3 PX-01-32 21399 5716 3.74 0.0672 0.0012 1.229 0.021 0.1328 0.0019 814 10 804 11 PX-01-33 15307 6410 2.39 0.056 0.0009 0.535 0.009 0.0694 0.001 435 6 432 6 PX-01-34 18526 9264 2.00 0.0568 0.0018 0.535 0.016 0.0683 0.0011 435 11 426 7 PX-01-35 203 3147 0.06 0.0512 0.0012 0.306 0.007 0.0433 0.0006 271 5 273 4 PX-02-01 248 1077 0.23 0.056 0.0016 0.492 0.012 0.0633 0.0005 406 8 396 3 PX-02-02 551 1055 0.52 0.0666 0.0013 1.271 0.025 0.138 0.001 833 11 834 6 PX-02-03 235 701 0.34 0.0523 0.0019 0.284 0.010 0.0395 0.0005 254 8 250 3 PX-02-04 1202 828 1.45 0.0646 0.0024 0.917 0.027 0.1015 0.0017 661 14 623 10 PX-02-05 784 759 1.03 0.0594 0.0022 0.904 0.030 0.1083 0.0022 654 16 663 13 PX-02-06 1096 846 1.30 0.0622 0.0022 0.931 0.021 0.1081 0.0012 668 11 662 7 PX-02-07 390 935 0.42 0.0614 0.002 0.579 0.018 0.0674 0.0012 464 12 420 7 PX-02-08 1445 2154 0.67 0.0589 0.0021 0.619 0.011 0.0766 0.0007 489 7 476 4 PX-02-09 317 623 0.51 0.0556 0.0019 0.542 0.018 0.07 0.0009 440 12 436 6 PX-02-10 342 632 0.54 0.0547 0.0019 0.531 0.017 0.0705 0.0009 433 11 439 5 PX-02-11 540 933 0.58 0.0544 0.0014 0.524 0.014 0.07 0.0008 428 9 436 5 PX-02-12 749 1224 0.61 0.0586 0.0019 0.568 0.015 0.0701 0.0009 457 10 437 5 PX-02-13 563 846 0.67 0.0549 0.0016 0.530 0.015 0.0702 0.0008 432 10 437 5 PX-02-14 509 996 0.51 0.052 0.0015 0.508 0.015 0.0703 0.0011 417 10 438 7 PX-02-15 231 416 0.56 0.0544 0.0022 0.425 0.017 0.0567 0.0007 360 12 356 4 PX-02-16 1590 2146 0.74 0.0618 0.002 0.335 0.008 0.0395 0.0006 293 6 250 4 PX-02-17 229 1163 0.20 0.079 0.002 1.301 0.042 0.1217 0.0031 846 19 741 18 PX-02-18 629 1146 0.55 0.0572 0.0018 0.549 0.014 0.0699 0.0008 445 9 436 5 PX-02-19 405 702 0.58 0.1022 0.0049 1.083 0.049 0.0758 0.0012 745 24 471 7 PX-02-20 153 272 0.56 0.0588 0.0038 0.369 0.024 0.0456 0.0008 319 18 287 5 PX-02-21 4132 3842 1.08 0.0531 0.0011 0.316 0.007 0.0432 0.0005 279 6 272 3 PX-02-22 1241 1761 0.70 0.0584 0.002 0.603 0.014 0.0751 0.0008 479 9 467 5 PX-02-23 412 872 0.47 0.0554 0.0021 0.538 0.014 0.0706 0.0008 437 9 440 5 PX-02-24 2369 2513 0.94 0.0593 0.0012 0.300 0.007 0.0366 0.0004 266 5 232 2 PX-02-25 1004 915 1.10 0.057 0.0015 0.414 0.012 0.0525 0.0006 352 9 330 4 PX-02-26 52 151 0.34 0.0649 0.0041 0.693 0.046 0.0788 0.0015 535 28 489 9 PX-02-27 1185 1572 0.75 0.0535 0.0015 0.484 0.011 0.0655 0.0006 401 8 409 4 PX-02-28 1234 1804 0.68 0.0552 0.0015 0.508 0.011 0.0667 0.0007 417 8 417 4 PX-02-29 1165 3189 0.37 0.0542 0.0011 0.323 0.008 0.0431 0.0005 285 6 272 3 PX-02-30 1193 1427 0.84 0.0655 0.002 0.633 0.015 0.0701 0.0008 498 10 437 5 PX-02-31 618 1453 0.43 0.0546 0.0014 0.530 0.012 0.0699 0.0007 432 8 436 4 PX-02-32 666 1239 0.54 0.0564 0.0012 0.536 0.012 0.0689 0.0007 436 8 430 4 PX-02-33 845 1494 0.57 0.0518 0.002 0.520 0.012 0.0722 0.001 425 8 449 6 PX-02-34 587 680 0.86 0.0674 0.0009 1.268 0.020 0.1365 0.0019 831 9 825 11 PX-02-35 233 322 0.72 0.0609 0.005 0.582 0.047 0.0692 0.0011 465 30 431 7 PX-03-01 208 733 0.28 0.0516 0.0018 0.267 0.010 0.0376 0.0005 240 8 238 3 PX-03-02 214 832 0.26 0.0502 0.0015 0.256 0.008 0.0371 0.0004 232 7 235 3 PX-03-03 249 904 0.28 0.0506 0.0018 0.258 0.010 0.0369 0.0005 233 8 234 3 PX-03-04 178 1148 0.15 0.0517 0.0015 0.252 0.008 0.0353 0.0005 228 6 224 3 PX-03-05 186 691 0.27 0.0514 0.0023 0.251 0.011 0.0358 0.0005 228 9 227 3 PX-03-06 222 705 0.32 0.055 0.0021 0.269 0.012 0.0353 0.0005 242 9 223 3 PX-03-07 309 785 0.39 0.0516 0.002 0.250 0.010 0.0353 0.0005 227 8 224 3 PX-03-08 353 1169 0.30 0.0511 0.0015 0.247 0.007 0.0352 0.0004 224 6 223 3 PX-03-09 320 1387 0.23 0.0507 0.0016 0.245 0.008 0.0351 0.0004 222 6 222 3 PX-03-10 83 640 0.13 0.0514 0.002 0.250 0.010 0.0353 0.0004 227 8 224 3 PX-03-11 257 794 0.32 0.0507 0.0017 0.247 0.009 0.0353 0.0004 224 7 224 3 PX-03-12 278 1002 0.28 0.0502 0.0019 0.242 0.009 0.0351 0.0004 220 7 223 3 PX-03-13 286 916 0.31 0.0522 0.0018 0.253 0.009 0.0352 0.0004 229 7 223 3 PX-03-14 194 693 0.28 0.0498 0.002 0.240 0.010 0.0351 0.0005 219 8 222 3 PX-03-15 363 1046 0.35 0.0495 0.0015 0.242 0.007 0.0356 0.0004 220 6 225 3 PX-03-16 400 1234 0.32 0.052 0.0015 0.257 0.008 0.0358 0.0004 232 7 227 3 PX-03-17 136 571 0.24 0.0517 0.0022 0.254 0.010 0.036 0.0005 230 8 228 3 PX-03-18 274 762 0.36 0.0506 0.0021 0.249 0.011 0.0358 0.0005 226 9 227 3 PX-03-19 673 1353 0.50 0.0495 0.0014 0.248 0.008 0.0362 0.0004 225 6 229 3 PX-03-20 318 1196 0.27 0.053 0.0017 0.265 0.009 0.0361 0.0004 239 7 229 2 PX-03-21 409 1329 0.31 0.0506 0.0014 0.252 0.007 0.0359 0.0005 228 6 228 3 PX-03-22 543 1127 0.48 0.0542 0.0019 0.271 0.010 0.0361 0.0005 244 8 228 3 PX-03-23 253 1276 0.20 0.0503 0.0016 0.249 0.008 0.0359 0.0004 226 7 227 3 PX-03-24 229 875 0.26 0.0487 0.0017 0.240 0.009 0.0358 0.0005 219 7 227 3 PX-03-25 222 860 0.26 0.0508 0.0017 0.253 0.009 0.0362 0.0004 229 7 229 3 PX-03-26 375 1318 0.28 0.0512 0.0013 0.253 0.007 0.0358 0.0004 229 5 227 3 PX-03-27 149 571 0.26 0.0504 0.0022 0.247 0.011 0.0358 0.0005 224 9 227 3 PX-03-28 139 830 0.17 0.0516 0.0019 0.255 0.009 0.0362 0.0005 231 7 229 3 PX-03-29 245 1120 0.22 0.0519 0.0016 0.259 0.008 0.0364 0.0005 234 6 230 3 PX-03-30 244 1069 0.23 0.0523 0.0015 0.262 0.008 0.0364 0.0005 236 6 231 3 PX-03-31 219 880 0.25 0.0537 0.0018 0.268 0.010 0.0364 0.0006 241 8 231 4 PX-03-32 293 961 0.31 0.0531 0.002 0.266 0.010 0.0367 0.0006 240 8 232 4 PX-03-33 296 1650 0.18 0.0554 0.0015 0.286 0.010 0.0373 0.0007 255 8 236 4 PX-03-34 150 755 0.20 0.0512 0.002 0.255 0.010 0.0365 0.0006 231 8 231 4 PX-03-35 393 1029 0.38 0.0502 0.0019 0.251 0.009 0.0367 0.0006 227 7 232 4 PX-03-36 336 1290 0.26 0.0507 0.0013 0.265 0.008 0.0379 0.0006 239 7 240 4 PX-03-37 298 715 0.42 0.0532 0.0018 0.271 0.011 0.0369 0.0007 244 9 234 4 PX-03-38 155 733 0.21 0.0515 0.0017 0.261 0.009 0.0369 0.0006 235 7 234 4 PX-03-39 265 1205 0.22 0.0499 0.0014 0.249 0.008 0.0364 0.0006 226 6 230 4 PX-03-40 220 998 0.22 0.0512 0.0018 0.255 0.010 0.0361 0.0006 231 8 228 4 PX-03-41 223 848 0.26 0.0488 0.0015 0.244 0.008 0.0363 0.0005 222 7 230 3 表 3 凭祥英安岩锆石Lu-Hf同位素数据表
Table 3. Zircon Lu-Hf isotopic data of dacites in Pingxiang
样号 age/Ma 176Hf/177Hf σ 176Lu/177Hf σ 176Yb/177Hf σ eHf present eHf (T) TDM TDMC fs PX-01-01 439 0.282573 0.000024 0.001281 0.000035 0.035012 0.000842 -7 2.2 968 1276 -0.96 PX-01-02 885 0.282622 0.00002 0.000746 0.000012 0.024693 0.000265 -5.3 13.9 886 886 -0.98 PX-01-03 911 0.282625 0.000026 0.001172 0.000031 0.030277 0.000783 -5.2 14.3 891 879 -0.96 PX-01-04 918 0.282598 0.000022 0.000793 0.00001 0.026132 0.000349 -6.2 13.7 921 922 -0.98 PX-01-05 909 0.282605 0.000023 0.001024 0.000008 0.033749 0.000182 -5.9 13.6 917 922 -0.97 PX-01-06 889 0.282567 0.000025 0.001234 0.000018 0.038016 0.000268 -7.2 11.7 975 1026 -0.96 PX-01-07 926 0.28258 0.000023 0.000828 0.000011 0.02659 0.00028 -6.8 13.2 947 960 -0.98 PX-01-08 846 0.282557 0.000029 0.000756 0.000013 0.022969 0.000223 -7.6 10.7 977 1057 -0.98 PX-01-09 904 0.282622 0.000034 0.0015 0.000105 0.042225 0.002476 -5.3 13.8 905 905 -0.95 PX-01-10 954 0.282618 0.000022 0.000877 0.000008 0.028426 0.000318 -5.4 15.1 894 858 -0.97 PX-01-11 906 0.282638 0.000024 0.000989 0.000013 0.033024 0.000668 -4.7 14.7 869 847 -0.97 PX-01-12 255 0.282234 0.000023 0.001209 0.000026 0.037345 0.000412 -19 -13.6 1444 2132 -0.96 PX-01-13 248 0.282165 0.000078 0.002692 0.000086 0.079642 0.001972 -21.5 -16.5 1603 2302 -0.92 PX-01-14 1010 0.282287 0.000018 0.000975 0.000029 0.03366 0.00114 -17.2 4.5 1361 1570 -0.97 PX-01-15 450 0.282287 0.000025 0.001703 0.00004 0.056724 0.000628 -17.2 -7.8 1388 1914 -0.95 PX-01-16 445 0.282336 0.000023 0.001138 0.000007 0.033856 0.000134 -15.4 -6 1298 1797 -0.97 PX-01-17 444 0.282389 0.000028 0.00161 0.000035 0.053194 0.001075 -13.6 -4.3 1240 1690 -0.95 PX-01-19 436 0.282493 0.000059 0.002601 0.000055 0.0815 0.00165 -9.9 -1 1121 1481 -0.92 -
[1] 舒良树.华南构造演化的基本特征[J].地质通报, 2012, 31(7):1035-1053. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgqydz201207003SHU Liangshu. An analysis of principal features of tectonic evolution in South China Block[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2012, 31(7):1035-1053. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgqydz201207003 [2] SHU L S, FAURE M, WANG B, et al. Late Paleozoic-Early Mesozoic geological features of South China:response to the Indosinian collision events in Southeast Asia[J]. Comptes Rendus Geoscience, 2008, 340(2-3):151-165. doi: 10.1016/j.crte.2007.10.010 [3] 舒良树.华南前泥盆纪构造演化:从华夏地块到加里东期造山带[J].高校地质学报, 2006, 12(4):418-431. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/gxdzxb200604002SHU Liangshu. Predevonian tectonic evolution of South China:from Cathaysian Block to Caledonian period folded orogenic belt[J]. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2006, 12(4):418-431. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/gxdzxb200604002 [4] SHU L S, DENG P, YU J H, et al. The age and tectonic environment of the rhyolitic rocks on the western side of Wuyi Mountain, South China[J]. Science in China Series D:Earth Sciences, 2008, 51(8):1053-1063. doi: 10.1007/s11430-008-0078-4 [5] WANG Y J, FAN W M, SUN M, et al. Geochronological, geochemical and geothermal constraints on petrogenesis of the Indosinian peraluminous granites in the South China Block:a case study in the Hunan Province[J]. Lithos, 2007, 96(3-4):475-502. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2006.11.010 [6] CHEN Z C, LIN W, FAURE M, et al. Geochronology and isotope analysis of the Late Paleozoic to Mesozoic granitoids from Northeastern Vietnam and implications for the evolution of the South China block[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2014, 86:131-150. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2013.07.039 [7] LIU J L, TRAN M D, TANG Y, et al. Permo-Triassic granitoids in the northern part of the Truong Son belt, NW Vietnam:geochronology, geochemistry and tectonic implications[J]. Gondwana Research, 2012, 22(2):628-644. doi: 10.1016/j.gr.2011.10.011 [8] CAI J X, ZHANG K J. A new model for the Indochina and South China collision during the Late Permian to the Middle Triassic[J]. Tectonophysics, 2009, 467(1-4):35-43. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2008.12.003 [9] QIN X F, WANG Z Q, ZHANG Y L, et al. Geochemistry of Permian mafic igneous rocks from the Napo-Qinzhou tectonic belt in southwest Guangxi, Southwest China:Implications for arc-back arc basin magmatic evolution[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica (English Edition), 2012, 86(5):1182-1199. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-6724.2012.00740.x [10] CARTER A, CLIFT P D. Was the Indosinian orogeny a Triassic mountain building or a thermotectonic reactivation event?[J]. Comptes Rendus Geoscience, 2008, 340(2-3):83-93. doi: 10.1016/j.crte.2007.08.011 [11] FAURE M, LEPVRIER C, VAN NGUYEN V, et al. The South China block-Indochina collision:Where, when, and how?[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2014, 79:260-274. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2013.09.022 [12] 曾允孚, 刘文均, 陈洪德, 等.华南右江复合盆地的沉积构造演化[J].地质学报, 1995, 69(2):113-124. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK199500063473ZENG Yunfu, LIU Wenjun, CHEN Hongde, et al. Evolution of sedimentation and tectonics of the Youjiang Composite Basin, South China[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 1995, 69(2):113-124. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK199500063473 [13] 吴浩若.晚古生代-三叠纪南盘江海的构造古地理问题[J].古地理学报, 2003, 5(1):63-76. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/gdlxb200301006WU Haoruo. A discussion on the tectonic palaeogeography of the Nanpanjiang sea in Late Palaeozoic and Triassic[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2003, 5(1):63-76. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/gdlxb200301006 [14] 秦建华, 吴应林, 颜仰基, 等.南盘江盆地海西-印支期沉积构造演化[J].地质学报, 1996, 70(2):99-107. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK199600066083QIN Jianhua, WU Yinglin, YAN Yangji, et al. Hercynian-Indosinian Sedimentary-tectonic evolution of the Nanpanjiang Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 1996, 70(2):99-107. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK199600066083 [15] LEHRMANN D J, PAYNE J L, HONG D H, et al. Record of the end-Permian extinction and Triassic biotic recovery in the Chongzuo-Pingguo platform, southern Nanpanjiang basin, Guangxi, South China[J]. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 2007, 252(1-2):200-217. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2006.11.044 [16] FAN W M, ZHANG C H, WANG Y J, et al. Geochronology and geochemistry of Permian basalts in western Guangxi Province, Southwest China:Evidence for plume-lithosphere interaction[J]. Lithos, 2008, 102(1-2):218-236. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2007.09.019 [17] 覃小锋, 王宗起, 张英利, 等.桂西南早中生代酸性火山岩年代学和地球化学:对钦-杭结合带西南段构造演化的约束[J].岩石学报, 2011, 27(3):794-808. doi: 10.1002-bies.200900122/QIN Xiaofeng, WANG Zongqi, ZHANG Yingli, et al. Geochronology and geochemistry of Early Mesozoic acid volcanic rocks from Southwest Guangxi:Constraints on tectonic evolution of the southwestern segment of Qinzhou-Hangzhou joint belt[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2011, 27(3):794-808. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.1002-bies.200900122/ [18] 王文宝, 李建华, 辛宇佳, 等.华南大容山-十万大山花岗岩体LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb定年、地球化学特征及地质意义[J].地球学报, 2018, 39(2):179-188. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dqxb201802006WANG Wenbao, LI Jianhua, XIN Yujia, et al. Zircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb dating and geochemical analysis of the Darongshan-Shiwandashan Granitoids in Southwestern South China and their geological implications[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2018, 39(2):179-188. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dqxb201802006 [19] 李献华, 刘颖, 涂湘林, 等.硅酸盐岩石化学组成的ICP-AES和ICP-MS准确测定:酸溶与碱熔分解样品方法的对比[J].地球化学, 2002, 31(3):289-294. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dqhx200203010LI Xianhua, LIU Ying, TU Xianglin, et al. Precise determination of chemical compositions in silicate rocks using ICP AES and ICP MS:A comparative study of sample digestion techniques of alkali fusion and acid dissolution[J]. Geochimica, 2002, 31(3):289-294. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dqhx200203010 [20] 刘颖, 刘海臣, 李献华.用ICP-MS准确测定岩石样品中的40余种微量元素[J].地球化学, 1996, 25(6):552-558.LIU Ying, LIU Haichen, LI Xianhua. Simultaneous and precise determination of 40 trace elements in rock samples using ICP-MS[J]. Geochimica, 1996, 25(6):552-558. (in Chinese with English abstract) [21] LIU Y S, GAO S, HU Z C, et al. Continental and oceanic crust recycling-induced melt-peridotite interactions in the Trans-North China Orogen:U-Pb dating, Hf isotopes and trace elements in zircons from mantle xenoliths[J]. Journal of Petrology, 2010, 51(1-2):537-571. doi: 10.1093/petrology/egp082 [22] GRIFFIN W L, PEARSON N J, BELOUSOVA E, et al. The Hf isotope composition of cratonic mantle:LAM-MC-ICPMS analysis of zircon megacrysts in kimberlites[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2000, 64(1):133-147. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7037(99)00343-9 [23] GRIFFIN W L, WANG X, JACKSON S E, et al. Zircon chemistry and magma mixing, SE China:in-situ analysis of Hf isotopes, Tonglu and Pingtan igneous complexes[J]. Lithos, 2002, 61(3-4):237-269. doi: 10.1016/S0024-4937(02)00082-8 [24] 刘翠, 邓晋福, 刘俊来, 等.哀牢山构造岩浆带晚二叠世-早三叠世火山岩特征及其构造环境[J].岩石学报, 2011, 27(12):3590-3602. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98201112007LIU Cui, DENG Jinfu, LIU Junlai, et al. Characteristics of volcanic rocks from Late Permian to Early Traissic in Ailaoshan tectono-magmatic belt and implications for tectonic settings[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2011, 27(12):3590-3602. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98201112007 [25] WINCHESTER J A, FLOYD P A. Geochemical discrimination of different magma series and their differentiation products using immobile elements[J]. Chemical Geology, 1977, 20:325-343. doi: 10.1016/0009-2541(77)90057-2 [26] ROLLINSON H R. Using geochemical data:evaluation, presentation, interpretation[M]. England:Pearson Education Limited, 1993:1-56. [27] SUN S S, MCDONOUGH W F. Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts:implications for mantle composition and processes[J]. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 1989, 42(1):313-345. doi: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1989.042.01.19 [28] MCDONOUGH W F, SUN S S. The composition of the earth[J]. Chemical Geology, 1995, 120(3-4):223-253. doi: 10.1016/0009-2541(94)00140-4 [29] TAYLOR S R, MCLENNAN S M. The continental crust:its composition and evolution[M]. Oxford:Blackwell, 1985:1-312. [30] 李政林, 刘希军, 许继峰, 等.右江盆地基性岩的地球化学演化特征及其区域构造意义[J].桂林理工大学学报, 2015, 35(4):727-735. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9057.2015.04.010LI Zhenglin, LIU Xijun, XU Jifeng, et al. Geochemical evolution characteristics and regional tectonic significance of mafic rocks from Youjiang Basin[J]. Journal of Guilin University of Technology, 2015, 35(4):727-735. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9057.2015.04.010 [31] PEARCE J A, HARRIS N B W, TINDLE A G. Trace element discrimination diagrams for the tectonic interpretation of granitic rocks[J]. Journal of Petrology, 1984, 25(4):956-983. doi: 10.1093/petrology/25.4.956 [32] LAI C K, MEFFRE S, CRAWFORD A J, et al. The Central Ailaoshan ophiolite and modern analogs[J]. Gondwana Research, 2014, 26(1):75-88. doi: 10.1016/j.gr.2013.03.004 [33] 陈泽超, 林伟, FAURE M, 等.越南东北部早中生代构造事件的年代学约束[J].岩石学报, 2013, 29(5):1825-1840. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Conference/8159404CHEN Zechao, LIN Wei, FAURE M, et al. Geochronological constraint of Early Mesozoic tectonic event at Northeast Vietnam[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2013, 29(5):1825-1840. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Conference/8159404 [34] JIAN P J, LIU D Y, KRÖNER A, et al. Devonian to Permian plate tectonic cycle of the Paleo-Tethys Orogen in southwest China (II):insights from zircon ages of ophiolites, arc/back-arc assemblages and within-plate igneous rocks and generation of the Emeishan CFB province[J]. Lithos, 2009, 113(3-4):767-784. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2009.04.006 [35] SHI M F, LIN F C, FAN W Y, et al. Zircon U-Pb ages and geochemistry of granitoids in the Truong Son terrane, Vietnam:Tectonic and metallogenic implications[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2015, 101:101-120. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2015.02.001 [36] LIU H C, PENG T P, GUO X F. Geochronological and geochemical constraints on the coexistent N-MORB-and SSZ-type ophiolites in Babu area (SW China) and tectonic implications[J]. Journal of the Geological Society, 2018, 175(4):667-678. doi: 10.1144/jgs2017-121 [37] ZHANG R Y, LO C H, CHUNG S L, et al. Origin and tectonic implication of ophiolite and eclogite in the Song Ma suture zone between the South China and Indochina blocks[J]. Journal of Metamorphic Geology, 2013, 31(1):49-62. doi: 10.1111/jmg.12012 [38] ZHANG R Y, LO C H, LI X H, et al. U-Pb dating and tectonic implication of ophiolite and metabasite from the Song Ma suture zone, northern Vietnam[J]. American Journal of Science, 2014, 314(2):649-678. doi: 10.2475/02.2014.07 [39] 杜远生, 徐亚军.华南加里东运动初探[J].地质科技情报, 2012, 31(5):43-49. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/kjtb201211011DU Yuansheng, XU Yajun. A preliminary study on Caledonian event in South China[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2012, 31(5):43-49. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/kjtb201211011 [40] 宋昊, 徐争启, 倪师军, 等.广西摩天岭岩体对江南造山带西南段构造演化的响应:来自新元古代花岗岩锆石U-Pb年代学证据[J].大地构造与成矿学, 2015, 39(6):1156-1175. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ddgzyckx201506015SONG Hao, XU Zhengqi, NI Shijun, et al. Response of the motianling granitic pluton in North Guangxi to the tectonic evolution in the southwestern section of the Jiangnan Orogenic Belt:Constraints from neoproterozoic zircon geochronology[J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 2015, 39(6):1156-1175. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ddgzyckx201506015 [41] 王敏, 戴传固, 陈建书, 等.贵州省梵净山区新元古代岩浆活动的年代学格架及其大地构造意义[J].中国地质, 2016, 43(3):843-856. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgdizhi201603011WANG Min, DAI Chuangu, CHEN Jianshu, et al. Neoproterozoic geochronologic framework of magmatism in Fanjingshan area and its tectonic implications[J]. Geology in China, 2016, 43(3):843-856. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgdizhi201603011 [42] 周继彬, 李献华, 葛文春, 等.桂北元宝山地区超镁铁岩的年代、源区及其地质意义[J].地质科技情报, 2007, 26(1):11-18. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dzkjqb200701002ZHOU Jibin, LI Xianhua, GE Wenchun, et al. Geochronology, mantle source and geological implications of neoproterozoic ultramafic rocks from Yuanbaoshan area of Northern Guangxi[J]. Geological Science & Technology Information, 2007, 26(1):11-18. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dzkjqb200701002 [43] 王永磊, 王登红, 张长青, 等.广西钦甲花岗岩体单颗粒锆石LA-ICP-MS U-Pb定年及其地质意义[J].地质学报, 2011, 85(4):475-481. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dizhixb201104003WANG Yonglei, WANG Denghong, ZHANG Changqing, et al. LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb dating of the Qinjia granite in Guangxi province and its geologic significance[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2011, 85(4):475-481. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dizhixb201104003 [44] 王永磊, 张长青, 王成辉, 等.广西德保铜矿钦甲岩体Hf同位素特征及其对壳幔相互作用的指示[J].大地构造与成矿学, 2012, 36(3):377-383. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ddgzyckx201203009WANG Yonglei, ZHANG Changqing, WANG Chenghui, et al. Hf isotopic composition of the Qinjia granites from the Debao Cu Deposit, Guangxi:Implications for crust-mantle interaction[J]. Geotectonica Et Metallogenia, 2012, 36(3):377-383. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ddgzyckx201203009