THE MAJOR ACTIVE FAULTS AND REGIONAL CRUSTAL STABILITY ASSESSMENT IN THE AREA OF CITY GROUP IN CENTRAL YUNNAN
-
摘要: 结合前人资料的系统梳理、遥感解译及地表调查结果，对滇中城市群地区的活动断裂进行活动程度分级，得到该区“5纵2横”13条主要活动断裂的构造体系分布格局。按断裂活动强弱程度对城镇及重要工程的影响不同，对滇中城市群地区城镇和“十三五”及中长期规划的重大工程开展活动断裂影响调查研究，表明活动断裂是影响和制约该区城镇规划及重大工程建设的主要地质因素。综合考虑活动断裂活动程度、岩性特征和地形变化3因素进行的区域地壳稳定性评价初步结果表明，该区的“极不稳定区”、“不稳定区”和“次不稳定区”约占全区面积三分之一。Abstract: Combining previous data, active fault remote sensing interpretation and geological field survey, we classify the active faults into four classes according the fault activity in city group of central Yunan. They are faults with very high activity rate, faults with high activity rate, faults with moderate activity rate and faults with low activity rate. It shows that there are thirteen main active faults zone in the study area, with an image of "5 longitudinal and 2 lateral" fault zones. The study of the active fault affection on the main project reveals that the active faults are the key geological factor that restricts the layout of the cities and the main projects. The regional crustal stability assessment is calculated by the three factors of faults, rocks and slopes. The result suggests that most areas of the city group of central Yunnan is "unstable", one-third of the city group area is "extremely unstable region", "unstable region" or "sub unstable region".
-
图 2 滇中城市群地区M≥6.0级地震及地震烈度分布
Figure 2. Distribution of the earthquakes with M≥6.0 and the seismic intensity in the city group area of central Yunnan
图 3 滇中城市群地区活动断裂分布图
(镶嵌图为滇中城市群地区所处的青藏高原东南缘弧形构造体[77]中的位置)
Figure 3. A map showing the distribution of the active faults in the city group area in central Yunnan
图 4 滇中城市群地区基于90 m分辨率的DEM提取的坡度线性特征
Figure 4. A map showing the linear characters of slopes derived from DEM with 90 m resolution in city group areas in central Yunnan
图 5 滇中城市群地区主要城镇、交通、电网及石油天然气管道规划布局
(据云南“十三五”规划)与活动断裂分布
Figure 5. A map showing the main cities, the planning layout of the traffic, power grid, and oil and natural gas pipeline and the distribution of active faults in city group area in central Yunan
图 6 滇中城市群地区主要城镇、引水工程、重大水利工程、水运规划及骨干光缆规划布局
(据云南“十三五”规划)与活动断裂分布
Figure 6. A map showing the main cities, the planning layout of the diversion project, water conservancy engineering, water transport, main optical cable and the distribution of active faults in city group area in central Yunan
图 7 滇中城市群地区地壳稳定性综合评价初步结果
0.8＜α(i)≤0.1为极不稳定区；0.6＜α(i)≤0.8为不稳定区；0.4＜α(i)≤0.6为次不稳定区；0.2＜α(i)≤0.4为次稳定区”；α(i)≤0.2为稳定区
Figure 7. A map showing preliminary result of regional crustal stability assessment in city group of central Yunnan
表 1 滇中城市群M≥6级地震一览表
Table 1. Earthquakes with M≥6 in the city group area of central Yunnan
序号 发震时间 经度/(°) 纬度/(°) 深度/km 震级 发震断层 1 1500-01-13 103.1 24.9 0 7.00 小江断裂东支 2 1571-09-19 102.8 24.1 0 6.25 小江断裂西支 3 1680-09-09 101.6 25.0 0 6.75 南华-楚门断裂 4 1713-02-26 103.3 25.6 0 6.75 小江断裂东支 5 1725-01-08 103.1 25.1 0 6.75 小江断裂西支 6 1733-08-02 103.1 26.3 0 7.75 小江断裂东支 7 1750-09-15 102.9 24.7 0 6.25 小江断裂东支 8 1755-01-27 102.2 24.7 0 6.50 会理—易门断裂 9 1761-05-23 102.6 24.4 0 6.25 小江断裂西支 10 1763-12-30 102.8 24.2 0 6.50 小江断裂西支 11 1789-06-07 102.9 24.2 0 7.00 小江断裂东支 12 1833-09-06 103.0 25.0 0 8.00 小江断裂西支 13 1909-05-11 103.0 24.4 0 6.00 小江断裂西支 14 1909-05-11 103.0 24.4 0 6.50 小江断裂东支 15 1913-12-21 102.5 24.2 0 7.00 峨山断裂 16 1913-12-22 102.5 24.2 0 6.00 峨山断裂 17 1927-03-15 103.0 26.0 0 6.00 18 1962-06-24 101.2 25.2 0 6.20 南华—楚雄断裂 19 1966-02-05 103.1 26.1 0 6.50 小江断裂西支 20 1966-02-13 103.1 26.1 0 6.20 小江断裂西支 21 1970-01-05 102.7 24.2 13 7.80 峨山断裂 22 1985-04-18 102.9 25.9 5 6.20 23 1995-10-24 102.2 25.9 0 6.50 会理—易门断裂 24 2000-01-15 101.1 25.5 0 6.50 25 2003-07-21 101.2 26.0 0 6.20 26 2003-10-16 101.3 26.0 0 6.10 27 2009-07-09 101.0 25.6 6 6.30 地震数据来源：中国地震信息网 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 不同强度活动断裂影响区域的分值取值标准一览表
Table 2. Assignment in different regions along the different active faults
断裂类型 与断裂的距离/km 原始分值 权重分值(权重0.6) 极强活动断裂 0~10 1.35 0.81 10~20 1.2 0.72 20~50 1.0 0.60 中强活动断裂 0~5 1.2 0.72 5~10 1.0 0.60 10~30 0.8 0.48 中等活动断裂 0~2.5 0.8 0.48 2.5~5 0.6 0.36 5~15 0.5 0.30 弱活动断裂 0~1 0.6 0.36 1~2 0.5 0.30 2~5 0.2 0.12
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 不同坡度范围的分值取值标准一览表
Table 3. Assignment for the different areas with different slopes
坡度范围/(°) 原始分值 权重分值(权重0.3) ≥45 0.5 0.15 25~45 0.6 0.18 10~25 0.2 0.06 5~10 0.1 0.03 ＜5 0 0
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 不同岩土体性质分值取值标准一览表
Table 4. Assignment for different rocks
岩性范围 原始分值 权重分值(权重0.1) 新近世以来的沉积物N+Q 0.1 0.01 老地层 0 0 岩体(侵入岩和老变质岩) -0.2 -0.02
下载: 导出CSV
表 5 滇中城市群13条重要活动断裂带及其主要影响的城镇一览表
Table 5. Main 13 active faults and main cities affected by these active faults in city group area in central Yunnan
断裂带
编号断裂带
名称主要断裂名称 长度/
km走向 运动
性质活动性 ≥6级
地震/个最大活动速率/
(mm·a-1)活动强弱
程度分级最新活动
时代主要受影响
城镇F1 曲靖—陆良断裂 三岔河断裂(F1-1)；
曲靖断裂(F1-2)160 近南北 左旋
兼正断较显著 — —
—中等
中等全新世 曲靖市，沾益县，陆良县 F2 小江断裂带 小江断裂北段(F2-1) 8.6 强烈 小江断裂带西支 嵩明断裂(F2-2)
澄江断裂(F2-3)
江川断裂(F2-4)
路居断裂(F2-5)270 近南北 左旋走滑 显著 6≤M＜7：2
7≤M＜8：39.5 强烈(澄江断裂和
江川断裂
为中强)全新世 寻甸县，宜良县，华宁县 小江断裂带东支 东川断裂(F2-6)
通甸断裂(F2-7)
宜良断裂(F2-8)
华宁断裂西支(F2-9)
盘溪断裂(F2-10)270 近南北 左旋走滑 显著 6≤M＜7：5
7≤M＜8：1
M≥8：18 强烈 全新世 嵩明县，澄江县，川江县 F3 普渡河
断裂带普渡河断裂(F3-1)
玉溪断裂(F3-2)230 近南北 左旋走滑 较显著 6≤M＜7：1 — 中等 全新世 昆明市，普宁县，玉溪市 F4 会理—易门断裂带 会理—易门断裂 220 近南北 左旋走滑 较显著 6≤M＜7：2 — 中等 全新世 易门县 F5 元谋—绿汁江
断裂带元谋断裂(F5-1)
平浪断裂(F5-2)
绿汁江断裂(F5-3)149 近南北 左旋走滑 较显著 — — 中强
中等
中等全新世 元谋县 F6 红河断裂带 红河断裂带 230 北西 右旋走滑 较显著 — ＜2 中等 全新世 F7 南华—楚雄断裂 南华—楚雄断裂 140 北西 右旋走滑 显著 6≤M＜7：2 — 中等 全新世 南华县，楚雄市 F8 石屏断裂 石屏断裂 50 北西 右旋走滑 显著 — 3.5 中强 全新世 南华县，楚雄市 F9 牟定断裂 牟定断裂 北西 — — 弱 姚安县，牟定县 F10 峨山断裂 峨山断裂 106 北西 右旋走滑 显著 6≤M＜7:1
7≤M＜8:13.2 中强 全新世 F11 会泽断裂 会泽断裂 100 北东 右旋走滑 较显著 — — 弱 更新世 会泽县 F12 寻甸—宣威断裂 寻甸—宣威断裂 160 北东 右旋走滑 较显著 — — 弱 更新世 寻甸，宣威 F13 弥勒—富源断裂 弥勒—富源断裂 150 北东 右旋走滑 较显著 — — 中等-弱 更新世 富源县
下载: 导出CSV
表 6 滇中城市群地区在建及规划主要铁路及其受活动断裂影响统计表
Table 6. The main under construction and planning rail affected by active faults in city group of central Yunnan
铁路名称 线路长度/
km活动断裂
数量/条受影响程度
(断裂数量/累计受影响长度)累计受影响长度占比/% 严重 中等 轻 严重 中等 轻度 小计 中缅铁路通道 85 6 0 1/54 5/19 0 63.5 22.4 85.9 中老泰铁路通道 216 18 2/65 2/38 14/45 30.1 20.1 23.8 74.0 云桂铁路 75 14 3/38 4/5 7/15 50.7 6.7 20 77.3 中越铁路通道 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 南昆铁路 228 22 4/36 10/25 8/6 15.8 11.0 2.6 29.4 渝昆铁路 242 19 2/89 1/18 16/55 36.8 7.4 22.73 66.9 沪昆高铁 184 17 5/34 3/20 9/34 18.5 10.9 18.5 47.8 成昆铁路 252 16 0 4/37 12/60 0 14.7 23.8 38.5 总计 1282 112 16/262 15/197 71/234 20.4 15.4 18.3 54.1 注：中等影响累计长度，不计在严重影响区内的长度；轻度影响累计长度，不计在在严重影响区内和中等影响区中的长度；中越铁路通道在滇中城市群地区内与云桂铁路为同一段，不再重复计算
下载: 导出CSV
表 7 滇中引水工程受活动断裂影响统计表
Table 7. The central Yunnan diversion project affected by active faults in city group of central Yunnan
工程名称 工程长度/
km直接产生
影响的活动
断裂数量/条受影响程度(断裂数量/
累计受影响长度)累计受影响长度占比/% 严重 中等 轻 严重 中等 轻 总 楚雄段(万家—罗茨) 141 7 0 2/11 5/18 0 7.8 12.8 20.6 昆明段(罗茨—新庄) 115 20 1/20 3/29 16/34 17.4 25.2 29.6 72.2 玉溪红河段(新庄新坡背) 85 13 2/26 2/11 9/8 30.6 13.0 9.4 52.9 合计 341 40 3/46 7/51 30/60 13.5 15.0 17.6 46.1 注：表中相应统计项的含义与表 6相同
下载: 导出CSV
表 8 骨干光缆工程受活动断裂影响程度统计表
Table 8. The main optical cable project affected by active faults in city group of central Yunnan
光缆名称 光缆长度/
km直接产生
影响的活动
断裂数量/条受影响程度
(断裂数量/累计受影响长度)累计受影响长度占比/% 严重 中等 轻 严重 中等 轻 总计 国干光缆 1116 71 8/140 16/232 47/199 12.5 20.8 17.8 51.2 省干光缆 774 75 5/171 13/158 57/302 22.1 20.4 39.0 81.5 合计 1890 146 13/311 29/390 104/501 16.5 20.6 26.5 63.6 注：表中相应统计项的含义与表 6相同
下载: 导出CSV
表 9 主要石油天然气管道工程受活动断裂影响程度统计表
Table 9. the main Oil and natural gas pipeline affected by active faults in city group of central Yunnan
管道名称 管道工程
长度/km直接产生
影响的活动
断裂数量/条受影响程度(断裂数量/
累计受影响长度)累计受影响长度占比/% 严重 中等 轻度 严重 中等 轻度 总计 中缅原油管道 155 8 0 2/16 6/24 0 10.3 15.5 25.8 已建成品油管道 928 57 4/107 9/227 44/236 11.5 24.5 25.4 61.4 已建中缅天然气支干线 362 26 2/38 4/82 20/109 10.5 22.7 30.1 63.3 省内已建及在建天然气支线 223 30 4/72 8/40 18/49 32.3 17.9 21.9 72.1 省内规划建设天然气支线 550 31 2/41 6/78 23/101 7.5 14.2 18.4 40.0 合计 2218 152 12/258 29/443 111/519 11.6 20.0 23.4 55.0 注：表中相应统计项的含义与表 6相同
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 云南省地质矿产局.云南省区域地质志[M].北京:地质出版社, 1990Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources of Yunnan Province. Regional geology of Yunnan Province[M]. Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 1990. [2] 毛玉平, 韩新民.云南地区强震(M≥6) 研究[M].昆明:云南科技出版社, 2003MAO Yu-ping, HAN Xin-min. The study on the M≥6 earthquakes in Yunnan Province[M]. Kunming:Yunnan Science & Technology Press, 2003. [3] Armijo R, Tapponnier P, Han T. Late Cenozoic right-lateral strike-slip faulting in southern Tibet[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1989, 94:2787~2838. doi: 10.1029/JB094iB03p02787 [4] Armijo R, Tapponnier P, Mercier J L, et al. Quaternary extension in southern Tibet:Field observations and tectonic implication[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1986, 91:13803~13872. doi: 10.1029/JB091iB14p13803 [5] Avouac J P, Tapponnier P. Kinematic model of active deformation in central Asia[J]. Geophys. Res. Lett., 1993, 20:895~898. doi: 10.1029/93GL00128 [6] Burchfiel B C, Royden L H. Tectonics of Asia 50 years after the death of Emile Argand[J]. Ecol. Geol. Helv., 1991, 84:599~629. doi: 10.1007/BF02899843 [7] England P, Molnar P. Right-lateral shear and rotation as the explanation for strike-slip faulting in eastern Tibet[J]. Nature, 1990, 344:140~142. doi: 10.1038/344140a0 [8] Kidd W S F, Molnar P. Quaternary and active faulting observed on the 1985 Academia Sinica-Royal Society Geotraverse of Tibet[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A, 1988, 327(1594):337~363. doi: 10.1098/rsta.1988.0133 [9] Molnar P, Tapponnier P. Cenozoic tectonics of Asia:Effects of continental collision[J]. Science, 1975, 189:419~425. doi: 10.1126/science.189.4201.419 [10] Patriat P, Achache J. India-Eurasia collision chronology has implications for crustal shortening and driving mechanism of plates[J]. Nature, 1984, 311:615~621. doi: 10.1038/311615a0 [11] Rowley D B. Age of initiation of collision between India and Asia:A review of stratigraphic data[J]. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 1996, 145:1~13. doi: 10.1016/S0012-821X(96)00201-4 [12] Rowley D B, Currie B S. Palaeo-altimetry of the Late Eocene to Miocene Lunpola Basin, central Tibet[J]. Nature, 2006, 439:677~681. doi: 10.1038/nature04506 [13] Royden L H, Burchfiel B C, King R W, et al. Surface deformation and lower crustal flow in eastern Tibet[J]. Science, 1997, 276:788~790. doi: 10.1126/science.276.5313.788 [14] Shen Z K, LÜ J, Wang M, et al. Contemporary crustal deformation around the southeast borderland of the Tibetan plateau[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2005, 110:B11409. doi: 10.1029/2004JB003421/abstract [15] Tapponnier P, Mercier J L, Armijo R, et al. Field evidence for active normal faulting in Tibet[J]. Nature, 1981, 294:410~414. doi: 10.1038/294410a0 [16] Tapponnier P, Xu Z, Roger F, et al. Oblique stepwise rise and growth of Tibet Plateau[J]. Science, 2001, 294:1671~1677. doi: 10.1126/science.105978 [17] Tapponnier P, Mercier J L, Proust F, et al. The Tibetan side of the India Eurasia collision[J]. Nature, 1981, 294:405~410. doi: 10.1038/294405a0 [18] Tapponnier P, Peltzer G, Le Dain A Y, et al. Propaging extrusion tectonics in Asia:New insights from simple experiments with plastcine[J]. Geology, 1982, 10:611~616. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(1982)10<611:PETIAN>2.0.CO;2 [19] Wang E C, Burchfiel B C, Royden L H, et al. Late Cenozoic Xianshuihe-Xiaojiang, Red River, and Dali fault systems of south-western Sichuan and central Yunnan, China[J]. Geological Society of America Special Paper, 1998, 327:108. http://www.citeulike.org/user/CSG/article/224402 [20] Yin A, Harrison M T. Geological evolution of the Himalayan-Tibetan orogen[J]. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 2000, 28:211~280. doi: 10.1146/annurev.earth.28.1.211 [21] Zhang P, Shen Z, Wang M, et al. Continuous deformation of the Tibetan Plateau from global positioning system data[J]. Geology, 2004, 32:809~812. doi: 10.1130/G20554.1 [22] Yeats R S, Sieh K, Allen C R. The geology of earthquake[M]. New York:Oxford University Press, 1997. [23] Slemmons D B, McKinney R. Definition of active fault[M]. Vicksburg Miss:Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, 1977. [24] Slemmons D B, Defolo C. Evaluation of active faulting and associated hazards[C]//Active tectonics:Impact on society. The National Academies Press, 1986:45~48. https://www.nap.edu/read/624/chapter/6 [25] Machette M N. Active, capable, and potentially active faults:A paleoseismic perspective[J]. Journal of Geodynamics, 2000, 29(3):387~392. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264370799000605 [26] 吴中海, 张岳桥, 胡道功.新构造、活动构造与地震地质[J].地质通报, 2014, 33(4):391~402 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD201404001.htmWU Zhong-hai, ZHANG Yue-qiao, HU Dao-gong. Neotectonics, active tectonics and earthquake geology[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2014, 33(4):391~402. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD201404001.htm [27] 吴中海, 周春景, 谭成轩, 等.长江经济带地区的活动构造与区域地壳稳定性[J].地质力学学报, 2016, 22(3):379~411 http://journal.geomech.ac.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20160301&flag=1WU Zhong-hai, ZHOU Chun-jing, TAN Cheng-xuan, et al. The active tectonics and the regional crustal stability in the Yangtze River economic belt[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 2016, 22(3):379~411. http://journal.geomech.ac.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20160301&flag=1 [28] 吴中海, 龙长兴, 范桃园, 等.青藏高原东南缘弧形旋扭活动构造体系及其动力学特征与机制[J].地质通报, 2015, 34(1):1~31 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD201501002.htmWU Zhong-hai, LONG Chang-xing, FAN Tao-yuan, et al. The arc rotational-shear active tectonic system on the southeastern margin of Tibetan Plateau and its dynamic characteristics and mechanism[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2015, 34(1):1~31. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD201501002.htm [29] 邓起东, 冉永康, 杨晓平, 等.中国活动构造图[M].北京:地震出版社, 2007DENG Qi-dong, RAN Yong-kang, YANG Xiao-ping, et al. Active tectonics map of China[M]. Beijing:Seismological Press, 2007. [30] 虢顺民, 李祥根, 向宏发, 等. 云南红河走滑断裂尾端拉张区的运动学模式[C]//国家地震局地质研究所. 现代地壳运动研究. 北京: 地震出版社, 1991: 1~12 http://www.doc88.com/p-9522135483906.htmlGUO Shun-min, LI Xiang-gen, XIANG Hong-fa, et al. Kinematic model of Honghe strike-slip fault in Yunnan[C]//Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration. Study on modern crust movement. Beijing:Seismological Press, 1991:1~12. http://www.doc88.com/p-9522135483906.html [31] 虢顺民, 向宏发, 计凤桔, 等.红河断裂带第四纪右旋走滑与尾端拉张转换关系研究[J].地震地质, 1996, 18(4):301~309 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZDZ604.001.htmGUO Shun-min, XIANG Hong-fa, JI Feng-ju, et al. A study on the relation between Quaternary right-lateral slip and tip extension along the Honghe fault[J]. Seismology and Geology, 1996, 18(4):301~309. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZDZ604.001.htm [32] 向宏发, 韩竹军, 虢顺民, 等.红河断裂带大型右旋走滑运动与伴生构造地貌变形[J].地震地质, 2004, 26(4):597~610 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZDZ200404005.htmXIANG Hong-fa, HAN Zhu-jun, GUO Shun-min, et al. Large-scale dextral strike-slip movement and associated tectonic deformation along the Red River fault zone[J]. Seismology and Geology, 2004, 26(4):597~610. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZDZ200404005.htm [33] 国家地震局西南烈度队.川滇强震区地震地质调查汇编[M].北京:地震出版社, 1979Southwest Intensity Team of National Seismological Bureau. Compilation of seismic and geological survey of strong earthquake areas in Sichuan and Yunnan[M]. Beijing:Seismological Press, 1979. [34] 李玶.鲜水河-小江断裂带[M].北京:地震出版社, 1993LI Ping. The Xianshuihe-Xiaojiang fault zone[M]. Beijing:Seismological Press, 1993. [35] 宋方敏, 汪一鹏, 俞维贤, 等.小江活动断裂带[M].北京:地震出版社, 1998SONG Fang-min, WANG Yi-peng, YU Wei-xian, et al. The Xiaojiang active fault zone[M]. Beijing:Seismological Press, 1998. [36] Allen C R, 韩源, Sich K E, 等.红河断裂的第四纪活动研究(一):现代活动概貌和活动断裂证据[J].地震研究.1984, 7(1):39~51. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZYJ198401004.htmAllen C R, HAN Yuan, Sich K E, et al. 1984. Study of the Quaternary activities of the Red River Fault (Ⅰ):General survey of its contemporary activities and evidence of the active faulting[J]. Journal of Seismological Research, 1984, 7(1):39~51. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZYJ198401004.htm [37] Allen C R, 韩源, Sich K E, 等.红河断裂的第四纪活动研究(二):断裂活动特征、滑动速率与地震重复间隔探讨[J].地震研究, 1984, 7(2):171~186. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZYJ198402006.htmAllen C R, HAN Yuan, Sich K E, et al. 1984. study of the Quaternary Activities of the Red River Fault (Ⅱ)-its Features of Activity, Slip Rate and Recurrence Intervals of Earthquakes[J]. Journal of Seismological Research, 1984, 7(2):171~186. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZYJ198402006.htm [38] 虢顺民, 计凤桔, 向宏发, 等.红河活动断裂带[M].北京:海洋出版社, 2001GUO Shun-min, JI Feng-ju, XIANG Hong-fa, et al. Red-river fault zone[M]. Beijing:China Ocean Press, 2001. [39] 向宏发, 虢顺民, 张晚霞, 等. 红河断裂带南段断裂活动性转换的地质特征研究[C]//邓起东, 汪一鹏, 张培震, 等. 活动断裂研究(4). 北京: 地震出版社, 1995: 38~45 http://manu39.magtech.com.cn/Geophy/CN/abstract/abstract12977.shtmlXIANG Hong-fa, GUO Shun-min, ZHANG Wan-xia, et al. Geologic characteristics of the transition of fault activity on the southern segment of the Honghe Fault zone[C]//DENG Qi-dong, WANG Yi-peng, ZHANG Pei-zhen, et al. Research on active fault(4). Beijing:Seismological Press, 1995:38~45. http://manu39.magtech.com.cn/Geophy/CN/abstract/abstract12977.shtml [40] Duong C, Feigl K L. Geodetic measurement of horizontal strain across the Red River Fault near Thac Ba, Vietnam[J]. J. Geod., 1999, 73:298~310. doi: 10.1007/s001900050247 [41] Feigl K L, Duong C, Becker M, et al. Insignificant horizontal strain across the Red River Fault near Thac Ba, Vietnam from GPS measurements 1994-2000[M]. Geophys. Res. Abst., 2003, Abstract 04707. [42] 向宏发, 虢顺民, 张晚霞, 等.红河断裂带南段中新世以来大型右旋位错量的定量研究[J].地震地质, 2007, 29(1):34~50 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZDZ200701002.htmXIANG Hong-fa, GUO Shun-min, ZHANG Wan-xia, et al. Quantitative study on the large scale dextral strike slip offset in the southern segment of the Red River Fault since Miocene[J]. Seismology and Geology, 2007, 29(1):34~50. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZDZ200701002.htm [43] 杨振宇, 孙知明, 马醒华, 等.红河断裂两侧早第三纪古地磁研究及其地质意义[J].地质学报, 2001, 75(1):35~44 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE200101006.htmYANG Zhen-yu, SUN Zhi-ming, MA Xing-hua, et al. Palaeomagnetic study of the Early Tertiary on both sides of the Red River Fault and its geological implications[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2001, 75(1):35~44. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE200101006.htm [44] 徐锡伟, 程国良, 于贵华, 等.川滇菱形块体顺时针转动的构造学与古地磁学证据[J].地震地质, 2003, 25(1):61~69 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZDZ200301006.htmXU Xi-wei, CHENG Guo-liang, YU Gui-hua, et al. Tectonic and paleomagnetic evidence for the clockwise rotation of the Sichuan-Yunnan rhombic block[J]. Seismology and Geology, 2003, 25(1):61~69. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZDZ200301006.htm [45] 李仕虎, 黄宝春, 朱日祥.青藏高原东南缘构造旋转的古地磁学证据[J].地球物理学报, 2012, 55(1):76~94 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX201201009.htmLI Shi-hu, HUANG Bao-chun, ZHU Ri-xiang. Paleomagnetic constraints on the tectonic rotation of the southeastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2012, 55(1):76~94. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX201201009.htm [46] 谷德振.地质构造与工程建设[J].科学通报, 1963, 8(10):18~23 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXTB196310004.htmGU De-zhen. Geological structure and engineering construction[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 1963, 8(10):18~23. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXTB196310004.htm [47] 谷德振.岩体工程地质力学基础[M].北京:科学出版社, 1979GU De-zhen. Foundations of rock engineering geomechanics[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 1979. [48] 李四光.关于地震地质问题[J].中国地质, 1965, 12:1~7 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI196512002.htmLI Si-guang. Some problems on seismo-geologic research[J]. Geology in China, 1965, 12:1~7. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI196512002.htm [49] 李四光.地震地质[M].北京:科学出版社, 1973LI Si-guang. Seismology and geology[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 1973. [50] 李四光.地质力学概论[M].北京:科学出版社, 1973LI Si-guang. Introduction to geological mechanics[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 1973. [51] 刘国昌.地质力学及其在水文地质工程地质方面的应用[M].北京:地质出版社, 1979LIU Guo-chang. Geomechanics and its application in hydrological and engineering geology[M]. Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 1979. [52] 刘国昌.中国工程地质发展的回顾、反思和展望[J].河北地质学院学报, 1988, 11(3):1~8 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HBDX198803000.htmLIU Guo-chang. Review, rethink and prospect on the development of engineering geology in China[J]. Journal of Hebei Geology College, 1988, 11(3):1~8. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HBDX198803000.htm [53] 陈庆宣, 孙叶, 邵云惠. 中国构造体系的现今活动性[C]//国际交流地质学术论文集(1). 北京: 地质出版社, 1980: 69~78CHEN Qing-xuan, SUN Ye, SHAO Yun-hui. The present activity of the tectonic system in China[C]//Proceedings of international exchange geology(1). Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 1980:69~78. [54] 陈庆宣, 孙叶, 王治顺. 运用地质力学方法研究区域地壳稳定性[C]//地质力学文集(第九集). 北京: 地质出版社, 1989CHEN Qing-xuan, SUN Ye, WANG Zhi-shun. Study on the regional crustal stability applying geomechanism[C]//The collection of geomechanism. Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 1989. [55] 胡海涛.广东核电站规划选址区域地壳稳定性分析与评价[M].北京:中国档案出版社, 1988HU Hai-tao. Analysis and evaluation of regional crustal stability in nuclear power plant site selection in Guangdong[M]. Beijing:China Archives Press, 1988. [56] 胡海涛, 贾加麟, 殷跃平. 区域地壳稳定性研究的理论与发展[C]//第五届国际工程地质大会论文集. 北京: 地质出版社, 1987HU Hai-tao, JIA Jia-lin, YIN Yue-ping. The theory of studying on regional crustal stability and its development[C]//Proceedings of the IAEG 5th Congress. Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 1987. [57] 孙叶, 谭成轩, 李开善, 等.区域地壳稳定性定量化评价[M].北京:地质出版社, 1998SUN Ye, TAN Cheng-xuan, LI Kai-shan, et al. Quantitative evaluation of regional crustal stability[M]. Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 1998. [58] 刘传正, 胡海涛.工程选址的"安全岛"多级逼近与优选理论[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报, 1993, 4(1):28~37 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGDH199301004.htmLIU Chuan-zheng, HU Hai-tao. The multi-scale approaching to "safety island" and optimization theory in engineering site selection[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 1993, 4(1):28~37. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGDH199301004.htm [59] 刘传正.环境工程地质学导论[M].北京:地质出版社, 1995LIU Chuan-zheng. Introduction to environmental engineering geology[M]. Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 1995. [60] 孙广忠.岩体结构力学[M].北京:科学出版社, 1988SUN Guang-zhong. Rockmass structural mechanism[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 1988. [61] 王思敬, 黄鼎成.攀西地区环境工程地质[M].北京:海洋出版社, 1990WANG Si-jing, HUANG Ding-cheng. Environmental engineering geology problems in Panxi Region[M]. Beijing:China Ocean Press, 1990. [62] 王思敬, 牛宏建.东秦岭-大别山造山带大型推覆构造的物理机制及动力学分析[M].北京:地震出版社, 1995WANG Si-jing, Niu Hong-jian. Physical mechanism and dynamic analysis on large nappe structure in East Qinling-Dabieshan orogenic belt[M]. Beijing:Seismological Press, 1995. [63] 张卓元.工程地质勘探[M].北京:地质出版社, 1981ZHANG Zhuo-yuan. Engineering geological exploration[M]. Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 1981. [64] 殷跃平.区域地壳稳定性研究的专家知识结构模型[J].水文地质工程地质, 1990, 18(2):8~15 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SWDG199002009.htmYIN Yue-pin. Expert knowledge structure model of regional crustal stability studies[J]. Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology, 1990, 18(2):8~15. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SWDG199002009.htm [65] 殷跃平, 胡海涛, 康宏达.重大工程选址区域地壳稳定性评价专家系统[M].北京:地震出版社, 1992YIN Yue-ping, HU Hai-tao, KANG Hong-da. Expert system of regional crustal stability assessment in important engineering site selection[M]. Beijing:Seismological Press, 1992. [66] 吴树仁.清江流域地壳稳定性工程地质研究[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社, 1995WU Shu-ren. The engineering geology study on the crustal stability of Qingjiang River basin[M]. Wuhan:China University of Geosciences Press, 1995. [67] 易明初.中国区域地壳稳定性图[M].北京:地质出版社, 1997YI Ming-chu. Map on regional crustal stability in China[M]. Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 1997. [68] 彭建兵, 毛彦龙, 范文, 等.区域稳定性动力学研究[M].北京:科学出版社, 2001PENG Jian-bing, MAO Yan-long, FAN Wen, et al. Researches on the dynamics of region stability[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2001. [69] 吴珍汉, 周春景, 王薇, 等.青藏铁路沿线构造活动性评价和工程稳定性区划[J].地质通报, 2005, 24(5):401~410 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD200505002.htmWU Zhen-han, ZHOU Chun-jing, WANG Wei, et al. Assessment on tectonic activity and divisions of engineering stability along the Golmud-Lhasa Railway[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2005, 24(5):401~410. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD200505002.htm [70] 周春景, 吴珍汉, 石广仁.BP人工神经网络在青藏铁路南段地壳稳性定量评价中的应用[J].地质科技情报, 2007, 26(3):79~85 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ200703016.htmZHOU Chun-jing, WU Zhen-han, SHI Guang-ren. Applicatin of BP artificial neural network to quantitative assessment on crust stability along the Golmud-Lhasa Railway across South Tibetan Plateau[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2007, 26(3):79~85. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ200703016.htm [71] 姚鑫, 李凌婧, 张永双, 等.青藏高原东缘区域地壳稳定性评价[J].地质通报, 2015, 34(1):32~44 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD201501003.htmYAO Xin, LI Ling-jing, ZHANG Yong-shuang, et al. Regional crustal stability assessment of the eastern margin of Tibetan Plateau[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2015, 34(1):32~44. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD201501003.htm [72] 胡道功, 吴中海, 吴珍汉, 等.东昆仑断裂带库赛湖段晚第四纪古地震研究[J].第四纪研究, 2007, 27(1):27~34 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DSJJ200701003.htmHU Dao-gong, WU Zhong-hai, WU Zhen-han, et al. Late Quaternary paleoseismic history on the Kusai Lake segment of East Kunlun fault zone in northern Tibet[J]. Quaternary Sciences, 2007, 27(1):27~34. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DSJJ200701003.htm [73] 胡道功, 叶培盛, 吴珍汉, 等.东昆仑断裂带西大滩段全新世古地震研究[J].第四纪研究, 2006, 26(6):1012~1020 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DSJJ200606018.htmHU Dao-gong, YE Pei-sheng, WU Zhen-han, et al. Research on Holocene Paleoearthquakes on the Xidatan Segment of the East Kunlun fault zone in northern Tibet[J]. Quaternary Sciences, 2006, 26(6):1012~1020. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DSJJ200606018.htm [74] 吴中海, 周春景, 冯卉, 等.青海玉树地区第四纪活动断裂与地震[J].地质通报, 2014, 32(4):419~469 http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-82501-1011152758.htmWU Zhong-hai, ZHOU Chun-jing, FENG Hui, et al. Active faults and earthquake around Yushu in eastern Tibetan Plateau[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2014, 32(4):419~469. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-82501-1011152758.htm [75] 周春景. 巴颜喀拉块体边界应力场变化及其对强震发生的影响[D]. 北京: 中国地质科学院, 2014 http://cpfd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CPFDTOTAL-ZGDW201410012021.htmZHOU Chun-jing. The stress field changes near the boundary fault zones in the Bayanhar Block and their effect on the large earthquake[D]. Beijing:Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, 2014. http://cpfd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CPFDTOTAL-ZGDW201410012021.htm [76] 李陈侠. 东昆仑断裂带东段(玛沁-玛曲)晚第四纪长期滑动习性研究[D]. 北京: 中国地震局地质研究所, 2009 https://www.cnki.com.cn/lunwen-2011012459.htmlLI Chen-xia. The long-term faulting behavior of the eastern segment (Maqin-Maqu) of the East Kunlun Fault since the Late Quaternary[D]. Beijing:Institute of Geology of China Earthquake Administration, 2009:101~117. https://www.cnki.com.cn/lunwen-2011012459.html [77] 吴中海, 周春景. 中国及西南地区活动构造体系格局[C]//杨振宇, 范桃园, 吴中海, 等. 西南地区活动构造与应力场模拟成果报告. 2011WU Zhong-hai, ZHOU Chun-jing. The active tectonic system in China and its southwest region[C]//YANG Zhen-yu, FAN Tao-yuan, WU Zhong-hai, et al. the Report to the active tectonic in the southwest of China and its structural stress modeling results. 2011. -
下载:
图(7) / 表(9)
计量
- 文章访问数: 276
- HTML全文浏览量: 133
- PDF下载量: 30
- 被引次数: 0
