祁漫塔格肯德可克火山岩锆石LA-ICP-MS U-Pb、<sup>40</sup>Ar/<sup>39</sup>Ar年龄及地质意义

马帅; 陈世悦; 孙娇鹏; 汪峰; 单腾飞

祁漫塔格肯德可克火山岩锆石LA-ICP-MS U-Pb、⁴⁰Ar/³⁹Ar年龄及地质意义

1.
中国石油大学(华东)地球科学与技术学院, 山东青岛 266555
2.
西北大学大陆动力学国家重点实验室, 陕西西安 710069

基金项目:

中国地质调查局项目 [2014]03-025-002

详细信息

作者简介:
马帅(1990-), 男, 博士研究生, 研究方向为沉积学与盆地动力学.E-mail:mas0302@163.com

中图分类号: P597
计量
- 文章访问数: 309
- HTML全文浏览量: 165
- PDF下载量: 12
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2016-12-31
- 刊出日期: 2017-08-28

A STUDY ON ZIRCON LA-ICP-MS U-PB AND ⁴⁰AR/³⁹AR AGES OF VOLCANIC ROCKS FROM KENDEKEKE, QIMANTAGE AND THE GEOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE

1.
College of Earth Science and Technology, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266555, Shandong, China
2.
State Key Laboratory of Continental Dynamics, Department of Geology, Northwest University, Xi'an 710069, Shaanxi, China

摘要

摘要: 通过对采集到的肯德可克上泥盆统契盖苏群火山岩样品进行锆石LA-ICP-MS U-Pb测年和⁴⁰Ar/³⁹Ar定年，结合区域地质特征，本文对祁漫塔格构造带的多旋回构造演化进行了总结分析。研究表明，契盖苏群流纹岩形成于晚泥盆世（384.9±6.0 Ma），而契盖苏群的形成时间不晚于晚泥盆世。767±15 Ma、915±18 Ma两个继承性锆石年龄证明研究区响应了Rodinia超大陆聚合—裂解。地层、沉积、变质及变形等证据不支持祁漫塔格地区存在晚古生代洋盆或裂陷槽，晚古生代祁漫塔格地区是发育在柴达木西南缘的陆表海。样品⁴⁰Ar/³⁹Ar有效坪年龄为220.3±1.7 Ma，代表研究区最后一次埋深达约8000 m。晚三叠世火山活动之后，研究区发生大规模抬升，随后叠加了印支晚期、燕山、喜山等多期构造事件导致中新生代缺少大规模沉降。陆内造山持续到32 Ma左右，随后由于库木库里盆地的伸展，祁漫塔格造山带与东昆仑造山带分离。
- 肯德可克 /
- 火山岩 /
- 锆石U-Pb年龄 /
- Ar⁴⁰/Ar³⁹年龄 /
- 地质意义
Abstract: Zircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb dating and ⁴⁰Ar/³⁹Ar dating were made on the volcanic samples of Qigaisu group from Kendekeke in upper Devonian. Combined with regional geological features, multicyclic tectonic evolution of Qimantag tectonic zone are summarized and analyzed. The results show that, rhyolites in Qigaisu group formed in late Devonian(384.9±6.0 Ma), while Qigaisu group formed no later than late Devonian. The two inherited zircon ages 767±15 Ma and 915±18 Ma certify that the study area responded to supercontinent aggregation-cracking, but evidence from stratum, sedimentation, metamorphism and deformation do not support the existence of the late Paleozoic ocean or aulacogen in Qimantag area, and Qimantag area in late Paleozoic was an epeiric sea located at the southwest margin of Qaidam. The ⁴⁰Ar/³⁹Ar effective plateau age of the samples is 220.3±1.7 Ma, which shows the latest burial depth is about 8000 m. Large-scale uplift events happened after the late Triassic volcanism, multiphase tectonic events, such as late Indosinian, Yanshanian and Himalayanian, caused the lack of large-scale settlement in Mesozoic and Cenozoic. Intra-continent orogeny lasted to 32 Ma or so. Because of the extension of Kumukuli basin afterwards, Qimantage orogenic belt separated from East Kunlun orogenic belt.
- Kendekeke /
- volcanic rock /
- zircon U-Pb age /
- ⁴⁰Ar/³⁹Ar age /
- geological significance

HTML全文

图 1 肯德可克地区地质简图

Figure 1. Geological sketch of Kendekeke area

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 测试样品QH-09-83流纹岩中的霏细结构

Figure 2. Felsitic texture in the rhyolite from testing sample QH-09-83

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 肯德可克流纹岩的典型锆石阴极发光图像

Figure 3. CL images of typical zircons of rhyolites from Kendekeke area

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 样品QH-09-83锆石U-Pb年龄谐和图

Figure 4. Zircon U-Pb concordia plot of sample QH-09-83

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 样品QH-09-83⁴⁰Ar/³⁹Ar阶段升温年龄谱与等时线

Figure 5. ⁴⁰Ar/³⁹Ar stepwise incremental heating age spectra and isochron of sample QH-09-83

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 样品QH-09-83锆石LA-ICPMS U-Pb测年结果表

Table 1. Zircon LA-ICPMS U-Pb dating results of sample QH-09-83

分析点	含量/×10^-6		U/Th	同位素比值						年龄/Ma
分析点	Th	U	U/Th	²⁰⁷Pb/ ²⁰⁶Pb	1σ	²⁰⁷Pb/ ²³⁵U	1σ	²⁰⁶Pb/ ²³⁸U	1σ	²⁰⁷Pb/ ²⁰⁶Pb	1σ	²⁰⁷Pb/ ²³⁵U	1σ	²⁰⁶Pb/ ²³⁸U	1σ
QH-09-83-01	140.6	180.0	1.28	0.0656	0.0025	0.6052	0.0180	0.0669	0.0014	793	77	481	11	418	9
QH-09-83-02	169.3	199.3	1.18	0.0557	0.0023	0.4843	0.0164	0.0631	0.0014	439	89	401	11	394	8
QH-09-83-03	173.2	311.6	1.80	0.0584	0.0021	0.5077	0.0138	0.0631	0.0013	544	75	417	9	394	8
QH-09-83-04	101.4	350.7	3.46	0.0925	0.0031	1.6114	0.0399	0.1263	0.0026	1478	62	975	16	767	15
QH-09-83-05	410.2	471.7	1.15	0.0607	0.0020	0.5124	0.0127	0.0612	0.0013	628	70	420	8	383	8
QH-09-83-06	277.0	318.2	1.15	0.0605	0.0021	0.4964	0.0131	0.0595	0.0012	622	73	409	9	373	8
QH-09-83-07	175.5	304.9	1.74	0.0558	0.0020	0.4524	0.0129	0.0588	0.0012	443	79	379	9	369	8
QH-09-83-08	139.0	186.4	1.34	0.0763	0.0031	0.6512	0.0213	0.0619	0.0014	1102	78	509	13	387	8
QH-09-83-09	233.6	362.3	1.55	0.0559	0.0019	0.4915	0.0125	0.0637	0.0013	450	74	406	9	398	8
QH-09-83-10	149.6	244.3	1.63	0.0589	0.0021	0.5096	0.0141	0.0628	0.0013	561	76	418	9	393	8
QH-09-83-11	207.1	324.2	1.57	0.0817	0.0028	0.7106	0.0189	0.0631	0.0013	1237	67	545	11	395	8
QH-09-83-12	214.8	351.3	1.64	0.0618	0.0022	0.5399	0.0146	0.0633	0.0013	669	73	438	10	396	8
QH-09-83-13	212.0	256.0	1.21	0.0610	0.0021	0.5292	0.0142	0.0629	0.0013	641	73	431	9	393	8
QH-09-83-14	105.0	163.0	1.55	0.0798	0.0028	0.6822	0.0188	0.0620	0.0013	1192	69	528	11	388	8
QH-09-83-15	265.8	394.6	1.48	0.0542	0.0019	0.4626	0.0122	0.0620	0.0013	377	76	386	8	388	8
QH-09-83-16	110.5	184.9	1.67	0.0582	0.0022	0.4974	0.0146	0.0620	0.0013	538	79	410	10	388	8
QH-09-83-17	279.6	354.1	1.27	0.1292	0.0045	1.1017	0.0295	0.0619	0.0013	2086	60	754	14	387	8
QH-09-83-18	140.9	220.5	1.57	0.0566	0.0021	0.4842	0.0139	0.0621	0.0013	474	79	401	10	388	8
QH-09-83-19	139.6	234.2	1.68	0.0537	0.0021	0.4673	0.0145	0.0631	0.0014	357	84	389	10	395	8
QH-09-83-20	110.5	206.8	1.87	0.0564	0.0024	0.4497	0.0161	0.0578	0.0013	468	92	377	11	362	8
QH-09-83-21	123.0	183.5	1.49	0.0618	0.0025	0.5221	0.0173	0.0613	0.0013	667	83	427	12	383	8
QH-09-83-23	102.9	170.7	1.66	0.0542	0.0022	0.4533	0.0155	0.0607	0.0013	378	89	380	11	380	8
QH-09-83-24	153.3	254.8	1.66	0.0547	0.0020	0.4936	0.0145	0.0654	0.0014	401	80	407	10	408	8
QH-09-83-25	258.5	384.2	1.49	0.0585	0.0021	0.4982	0.0143	0.0618	0.0013	547	77	411	10	387	8
QH-09-83-26	159.2	240.8	1.51	0.0684	0.0024	1.4374	0.0404	0.1524	0.0033	880	72	905	17	915	18
QH-09-83-27	182.2	312.5	1.72	0.0554	0.0022	0.4463	0.0142	0.0584	0.0013	429	84	375	10	366	8
QH-09-83-28	842.7	1052.5	1.25	0.0730	0.0026	0.5386	0.0152	0.0535	0.0011	1015	71	438	10	336	7
QH-09-83-29	332.5	438.4	1.32	0.0550	0.0021	0.4715	0.0143	0.0622	0.0013	412	81	392	10	389	8
QH-09-83-30	288.6	398.1	1.38	0.0550	0.0021	0.4962	0.0150	0.0654	0.0014	412	81	409	10	409	9

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 样品QH-09-83钾长石⁴⁰Ar/³⁹Ar阶段升温分析结果

Table 2. ⁴⁰Ar/³⁹Ar stepwise incremental heating results of potash feldspar in sample QH-09-83

T/℃	(⁴⁰Ar/³⁹Ar)_m	(³⁶Ar/ ³⁹Ar) _m	(³⁷Ar/ ³⁹Ar) _m	(³⁸Ar/ ³⁹Ar) _m	⁴⁰Ar/%	F	³⁹Ar/×10 ^-14mol	³⁹Ar(Cum.)/%	Age/Ma	±1 s/Ma
700	56.1874	0.1349	0	0.0407	29.02	16.3067	0.37	0.95	245.5	3.1
800	22.208	0.0234	0.0671	0.0172	68.88	15.298	8.99	24.11	231.2	2.2
850	15.8355	0.0031	0	0.0128	94.14	14.9069	6.19	40.07	225.6	2.1
900	15.6058	0.0036	0.0057	0.0131	93.18	14.5409	5.89	55.26	220.4	2.1
950	15.7663	0.0047	0	0.0135	91.13	14.3677	5.01	68.18	218	2.1
1000	16.2629	0.0064	0.0259	0.0141	88.43	14.3816	4.98	81.02	218.2	2.1
1050	16.9776	0.0081	0	0.0144	85.87	14.5794	2.13	86.52	221	2.1
1120	17.0973	0.0085	0.0311	0.0143	85.36	14.5953	2.43	92.79	221.2	2.1
1200	16.1227	0.0047	0.0169	0.014	91.45	14.7438	1.89	97.68	223.3	2.2
1280	17.8253	0.0068	0	0.0141	88.76	15.8225	0.42	98.77	238.6	4.7
1400	55.0893	0.0239	0.8873	0.0234	87.27	48.1131	0.48	100	645.3	5.8

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(33)

[1]	孟繁聪, 崔美慧, 吴祥珂, 等.东昆仑祁漫塔格花岗片麻岩记录的岩浆和变质事件[J].岩石学报, 2013, 29(6): 2107~2122. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201306019.htm MENG Fancong, CUI Meihui, WU Xiangke, et al. Magmatic and metamorphic events recorded in granitic gneisses from the Qimantag, East Kunlun Mountains, Northwest China[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2013, 29(6): 2107~2122. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201306019.htm
[2]	马文, 丁玉进, 李社宏, 等.祁漫塔格中部元古代高钾(变质)侵入岩体的发现及其地质意义[J].西北地质, 2013, 46(1): 32~39. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBDI201301008.htm MA Wen, DING Yujin, LI Shehong, et al. The discovery and geological significance of Proterozoic intrusive rock with High-K in the central of Qimantage Area[J]. Northwestern Geology, 2013, 46(1): 32~39. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBDI201301008.htm
[3]	谌宏伟, 罗照华, 莫宣学, 等.东昆仑喀雅克登塔格杂岩体的SHRIMP年龄及其地质意义[J].岩石矿物学杂志, 2006, 25(1): 25~32. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSKW200601002.htm CHEN Hongwei, LUO Zhaohua, MO Xuanxue, et al. SHRIMP ages of Kayakedengtage complex in the East Kunlun Mountains and their geological implications[J]. Acta Petrologica et Mineralogica, 2006, 25(1): 25~32. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSKW200601002.htm
[4]	马永寿, 拜永山, 何皎, 等.祁漫塔格地区泛非期二长花岗岩的发现及意义[J].青海大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 28(5): 56~60. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QHXZ201005013.htm MA Yongshou, BAI Yongshan, HE Jiao, et al. Discovery of erchang granite in Qimantage rigion in Pan-African period and its significance[J]. Journal of Qinghai University (Natural Science), 2010, 28(5): 56~60. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QHXZ201005013.htm
[5]	崔美慧, 孟繁聪, 吴祥珂.东昆仑祁漫塔格早奥陶世岛弧:中基性火成岩地球化学、Sm-Nd同位素及年代学证据[J].岩石学报, 2011, 27(11): 3365~3379. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201111017.htm CUI Meihui, MENG Fancong, WU Xiangke. Early Ordovician island arc of Qimantag Mountain, eastern Kunlun: Evidences from geochemistry, Sm-Nd isotope and geochronology of intermediate-basic igneous rocks[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2011, 27(11): 3365~3379. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201111017.htm
[6]	李国臣, 丰成友, 王瑞江, 等.新疆白干湖钨锡矿田东北部花岗岩锆石SIMS U-Pb年龄、地球化学特征及构造意义[J].地球学报, 2012, 33(2): 216~226. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQXB201202015.htm LI Guochen, FENG Chengyou, WANG Ruijiang, et al. SIMS zircon U-Pb Age, petrochemistry and tectonic implications of granitoids in northeastern Baiganhue W-Sn orefield, Xinjiang[J]. Acta Geoscientia Sinica, 2012, 33(2): 216~226. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQXB201202015.htm
[7]	王秉璋, 罗照华, 李怀毅, 等.东昆仑祁漫塔格走廊域晚古生代—早中生代侵入岩岩石组合及时空格架[J].中国地质, 2009, 36(4): 769~782. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI200904004.htm WANG Bingzhang, LUO Zhaohua, LI Huaiyi, et al. Petrotectonic assemblages and temporal-spatial framework of the Late Paleozoic-Early Mesozoic intrusions in the Qimantage Corridor of the East Kunlun belt[J]. Geology in China, 2009, 36(4): 769~782. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI200904004.htm
[8]	刘栋梁, 李海兵, 孙知明, 等.青藏高原祁漫塔格古生代以来主要岩浆活动及其意义[J].地质通报, 2016, 35(12): 2014~2026. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2016.12.009 LIU Dongliang, LI Haibing, SUN Zhiming, et al. The major magmatic events in the Qimantag Mountain of Tibeatan Plateau since Paleozoic and its implications[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2016, 35(12): 2014~2026. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2016.12.009
[9]	王秉璋. 祁漫塔格地质走廊域古生代—中生代火成岩岩石构造组合研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2012. WANG Bingzhang. The study and investigation on the assembly and coupling Petrotectonic assemblage during Paleozoic-Mesozoic period at Qimantage geological corridor domain[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences (Beijing), 2012.
[10]	丰成友, 王松, 李国臣, 等.青海祁漫塔格中晚三叠世花岗岩:年代学、地球化学及成矿意义[J].岩石学报, 2012, 28(2): 665~678. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201202025.htm FENG Chengyou, WANG Song, LI Guochen, et al. Middle to Late Triassic granitoids in the Qimantage area, Qinghai Province, China: Chronology, geochemistry and metallogenic significances[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2012, 28(2): 665~678. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201202025.htm
[11]	于淼, 丰成友, 何书跃, 等.祁漫塔格造山带—青藏高原北部地壳演化窥探[J].地质学报, 2017, 91(4): 703~723. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE201704002.htm YU Miao, FENG Chengyou, HE Shuyue, et al. The Qiman Tagh Orogen as a window to the crustal evolution of the northern Tibetan Plateau[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2017, 91(4): 703~723. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE201704002.htm
[12]	姚磊, 吕志成, 于晓飞, 等.青海祁漫塔格地区矽卡岩型矿床花岗质岩石矿物学及地质意义[J].岩石学报, 2015, 31(8): 2294~2306. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201508012.htm YAO Lei, LV Zhicheng, YU Xiaofei, et al. Mineral characteristics of granitic rocks from Skarn deposits, Qimantag area, Qinghai Province, East Kunlun, and its geological significance[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2015, 31(8): 2294~2306. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201508012.htm
[13]	高晓峰, 校培喜, 谢从瑞, 等.祁漫塔格地区构造-岩浆作用与成矿[J].西北地质, 2010, 43(4): 119~123. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBDI201004018.htm GAO Xiaofeng, XIAO Peixi, XIE Congrui, et al. Discussion on tectonic-magmatic process and mineralization in the Qimantage region[J]. Northwestern Geology, 2010, 43(4): 119~123. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBDI201004018.htm
[14]	齐瑞荣.中祁连西段巴嘎德尔基岩体LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb年龄及地质意义[J].沉积与特提斯地质, 2012, 32(4): 86~93. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TTSD201204013.htm QI Ruirong. LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb ages and geological implications for the Bagadeerji granitic plutons in the central Qilian Mountains, Gansu[J]. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 2012, 32(4): 86~93. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TTSD201204013.htm
[15]	彭智敏, 耿全如, 张璋, 等.羌塘盆地变质岩锆石SHRIMP U-Pb年龄及其地质意义[J].沉积与特提斯地质, 2011, 31(4): 97~103. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD201311002.htm PENG Zhimin, GENG Quanru, ZHANG Zhang, et al. SHRIMP zircon U-Pb ages and their geological implications for the metamorphic rocks in the Qiangtang Basin[J]. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 2011, 31(4): 97~103. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD201311002.htm
[16]	张彦, 陈文, 陈克龙, 等.成岩混层(I/S)Ar-Ar年龄谱型及³⁹Ar核反冲丢失机理研究—以浙江长兴地区P-T界线粘土岩为例[J].地质论评, 2006, 52(4): 556~561. ZHANG Yan, CHEN Wen, CHEN Kelong, et al. Study on the Ar-Ar age spectrum of diagenetic I/S and the mechanism of ³⁹Ar recoil loss—Examples from the clay minerals of P-T boundary in Changxing, Zhejiang Province[J]. Geological Review, 2006, 52(4): 556~561.
[17]	郝娜娜, 袁万明, 张爱奎, 等.东昆仑祁漫塔格晚志留世—早泥盆世花岗岩:年代学、地球化学及形成环境[J].地质论评, 2014, 60(1): 201~215. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP201401021.htm HAO Nana, YUAN Wanming, ZHANG Aikui, et al. Late Silurian to Early Devonian granitoids in the Qimantage area, East Kunlun Mountains: LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb ages, geochemical features and geological setting[J]. Geological Review, 2014, 60(1): 201~215. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP201401021.htm
[18]	陈隽璐, 黎敦朋, 李新林, 等.东昆仑祁漫塔格山南缘黑山蛇绿岩的发现及其特征[J].陕西地质, 2004, 22(2): 35~46. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXDY200402004.htm CHEN Juanlu, LI Dunpeng, LI Xinlin, et al. The discovery and the features of the Heishan ophiolite in the south margin of Qimantage Mountain, Eastern Kunlun[J]. Geology of Shaanxi, 2004, 22(2): 35~46. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXDY200402004.htm
[19]	郭通珍, 刘荣, 陈发彬, 等.青海祁漫塔格山乌兰乌珠尔斑状正长花岗岩LA-MC-ICPMS锆石U-Pb定年及地质意义[J].地质通报, 2011, 30(8): 1203~1211. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD201108004.htm GUO Tongzhen, LIU Rong, CHEN Fabin, et al. LA-MC-ICPMS zircon U-Pb dating of Wulanwuzhuer porphyritic syenite granite in the Qimantag Mountain of Qinghai and its geological significance[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2011, 30(8): 1203~1211. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD201108004.htm
[20]	祁生胜, 邓晋福, 叶占福, 等.青海祁漫塔格地区晚泥盆世辉绿岩墙群LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb年龄及其构造意义[J].地质通报, 2013, 32(9): 1385~1393. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD201309007.htm QI Shengsheng, DENG Jinfu, YE Zhanfu, et al. LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb dating of Late Devonian diabase dike swarms in Qimantag area[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2013, 32(9): 1385~1393. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD201309007.htm
[21]	周春景, 胡道功, Barosh P J, 等.东昆仑三道湾流纹英安斑岩锆石U-Pb年龄及其地质意义[J].地质力学学报, 2010, 16(1): 28~35. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFQ&dbname=CJFD2010&filename=DZLX201001005&v=MjUyNDYyZmJ1Um1GeXZoV3J6QklUZkhkckc0SDlITXJvOUZZWVI4ZVgxTHV4WVM3RGgxVDNxVHJXTTFGckNVUkw= ZHOU Chunjing, HU Daogong, Barosh P J, et al. Zircon U-Pb dating of the rhyolite-dacite porphyry in the Sandaowan of East Kunlun Mountains and its geological significance[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 2010, 16(1): 28~35. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFQ&dbname=CJFD2010&filename=DZLX201001005&v=MjUyNDYyZmJ1Um1GeXZoV3J6QklUZkhkckc0SDlITXJvOUZZWVI4ZVgxTHV4WVM3RGgxVDNxVHJXTTFGckNVUkw=
[22]	彭渊, 马寅生, 刘成林, 等.东昆仑大干沟火山岩SHRIMP锆石U-Pb测年及其地质意义[J].地质通报, 2016, 35(2/3): 356~363. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD2016Z1018.htm PENG Yuan, MA Yinsheng, LIU Chenglin, et al. SHRIMP zircon ages of the Dagangou volcanic rocks in the Eastern Kunlun orogenic belt and their implications[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2016, 35(2/3): 356~363. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD2016Z1018.htm
[23]	杨超, 陈清华, 王冠民, 等.柴达木地区晚古生代沉积构造演化[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 34(5): 38~43, 49. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDX201005009.htm YANG Chao, CHEN Qinghua, WANG Guanmin, et al. Sedimentary and tectonic evolution of Qaidam areas in Late Paleozoic[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum, 2010, 34(5): 38~43, 49. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDX201005009.htm
[24]	孙娇鹏, 陈世悦, 庄毓凯, 等.柴东北缘上古生界砂砾岩碎屑组分特征及其物源构造属性[J].地质力学学报, 2015, 21(4): 463~472. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFQ&dbname=CJFDLAST2016&filename=DZLX201504002&v=MjI0MzlNSVRmSGRyRzRIOVRNcTQ5RlpvUjhlWDFMdXhZUzdEaDFUM3FUcldNMUZyQ1VSTDJmYnVSbUZ5dmhXcjc= SUN Jiaopeng, CHEN Shiyue, ZHUANG Yukai, et al. The clastic composition characteristics of upper Palaeozoic glutenite in northeast Qaidam edge and the structural attributes of source area[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 2015, 21(4): 463~472. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFQ&dbname=CJFDLAST2016&filename=DZLX201504002&v=MjI0MzlNSVRmSGRyRzRIOVRNcTQ5RlpvUjhlWDFMdXhZUzdEaDFUM3FUcldNMUZyQ1VSTDJmYnVSbUZ5dmhXcjc=
[25]	刘晓康, 曹世泰, 路超.青海省祁漫塔格地区晚志留世后碰撞侵入岩的发现及意义[J].青海科技, 2011, (5): 91~96. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QKKJ201105029.htm LIU Xiaokang, CAO Shitai, LU Chao. New discovery of Late Silurian Collision intrusive rock in the Qimantage porphyry copper depositeQinghaiand its geological significance[J]. Qinghai Science and Technology, 2011, (5): 91~96. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QKKJ201105029.htm
[26]	王向利, 高小平, 刘幼骐, 等.东昆仑西段祁漫塔格群的重新厘定[J].西北地质, 2010, 43(4): 168~178. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBDI201004026.htm WANG Xiangli, GAO Xiaoping, LIU Youqi, et al. Revision of the Qimantage group in west part of East Kunlun[J]. Northwestern Geology, 2010, 43(4): 168~178. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBDI201004026.htm
[27]	邹华耀, 吴智勇.镜质体反射率在重建盆地古地温中的应用——中国东部、西部中、新生代沉积盆地古地温特征[J].沉积学报, 1998, 16(1): 112~119. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB199801019.htm ZOU Huayao, WU Zhiyong. Application of vitrinite reflectance in reconstruction of paleotemperature: evolution of paleotemperature in the eastern and western Mesozoic-Cenozoic sedimentary basins, China[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1998, 16(1): 112~119. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB199801019.htm
[28]	郭通珍, 谈生祥, 常革红, 等.祁漫塔格韧性剪切带中绢云母⁴⁰Ar-³⁹Ar定年及地质意义[J].西北地质, 2012, 45(1): 94~101. GUO Tongzhen, TAN Shengxiang, CHANG Gehong, et al. ⁴⁰Ar-³⁹Ar dating of the muscovite in the sericite of the Qimantage ductile shear zone and its geological significance[J]. Northwestern Geology, 2012, 45(1): 94~101.
[29]	沈远超, 杨金中, 王岳军, 等.新疆东昆仑祁漫塔格地区上三叠统火山岩岩石成因初探[J].大地构造与成矿学, 1999, 23(1): 50~58. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGYK199901006.htm SHEN Yuanchao, YANG Jinzhong, WAWNG Yuejun, et al. Petrologic characteristics and tectonic setting of volcanic rocks from Upper Triassic system in the Qimantage region in East Kunlun orogenic belt, Xinjiang[J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 1999, 23(1): 50~58. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGYK199901006.htm
[30]	吴祥珂, 孟繁聪, 许虹, 等.青海祁漫塔格玛兴大坂晚三叠世花岗岩年代学、地球化学及Nd-Hf同位素组成[J].岩石学报, 2011, 27(11): 3380~3394. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201111018.htm WU Xiangke, MENG Fancong, XU Hong, et al. Zircon U-Pb dating, geochemistry and Nd-Hf isotopic compositions of the Maxingdaban Late Triassic granitic pluton from Qimantag in the Eastern Kunlun[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2011, 27(11): 3380~3394. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201111018.htm
[31]	陈丹玲, 刘良, 车自成, 等.祁漫塔格印支期铝质A型花岗岩的确定及初步研究[J].地球化学, 2001, 30(6): 540~546. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQHX200106005.htm CHEN Danling, LIU Liang, CHE Zicheng, et al. Determination and preliminary study of Indosinian aluminous A-type granites in the Qimantag area, southeastern Xinjiang[J]. Geochimica, 2001, 30(6): 540~546. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQHX200106005.htm
[32]	尹成明, 田丽艳, 任收麦, 等.东昆仑山北缘山前构造带的特征及其对油气成藏的意义[J].地质通报, 2011, 30(8): 1275~1282. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD201108014.htm YIN Chengming, TIAN Liyan, REN Shoumai, et al. Structural characteristics of the northern foreland belt of East Kunlun Mountains and their significance for oil and gas accumulation[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2011, 30(8): 1275~1282. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD201108014.htm
[33]	陈孝雄, 王友胜, 黄潜生.大地电磁测深在库木库里盆地结构研究中的应用[J].石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报), 2007, 29(6): 78~81. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JHSX200706017.htm CHEN Xiaoxiong, WANG Yousheng, HUANG Qiansheng. Application of MT in structural study of Kumukuli Basin[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology (Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute), 2007, 29(6): 78~81. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JHSX200706017.htm