留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

新构造填图方法探索、应用与实践——以内蒙古呼勒斯太苏木图幅1:5万填图试点为例

贾丽云 叶培盛 张绪教 何泽新 杨星辰 周青硕 叶梦旎 刘晓彤 李成路 吴泽群 周维 何祥丽

贾丽云, 叶培盛, 张绪教, 等, 2017. 新构造填图方法探索、应用与实践——以内蒙古呼勒斯太苏木图幅1:5万填图试点为例. 地质力学学报, 23 (2): 189-205.
引用本文: 贾丽云, 叶培盛, 张绪教, 等, 2017. 新构造填图方法探索、应用与实践——以内蒙古呼勒斯太苏木图幅1:5万填图试点为例. 地质力学学报, 23 (2): 189-205.
JIA Li-yun, YE Pei-sheng, ZHANG Xu-jiao, et al., 2017. APPLICATION AND PRACTICE OF THE NEOTECTONIC GEOLOGICAL MAPPING METHODS——A CASE STUDY OF 1:50000 MAPPING PILOT IN HULESITAI, INNER MONGOLIA, CHINA. Journal of Geomechanics, 23 (2): 189-205.
Citation: JIA Li-yun, YE Pei-sheng, ZHANG Xu-jiao, et al., 2017. APPLICATION AND PRACTICE OF THE NEOTECTONIC GEOLOGICAL MAPPING METHODS——A CASE STUDY OF 1:50000 MAPPING PILOT IN HULESITAI, INNER MONGOLIA, CHINA. Journal of Geomechanics, 23 (2): 189-205.

新构造填图方法探索、应用与实践——以内蒙古呼勒斯太苏木图幅1:5万填图试点为例

基金项目: 

中国地质调查局特殊地质地貌区填图试点项目 DD20160060

内蒙古1:5万呼勒斯太苏木 K48E017024

4幅填图试点 12120114042101

内蒙古国土资源厅2014年地质遗迹保护专题 BSZFCG2015-HW-00403

详细信息
    作者简介:

    贾丽云(1982-),女,博士后,从事新构造运动与地貌方面的科研工作。E-mail:jialiyun8822@163.com

    通讯作者:

    叶培盛(1964-),男,博士,研究员,从事区域地质调查与大陆动力学研究工作。E-mail:yepeisheng6699@sina.com

  • 中图分类号: P546

APPLICATION AND PRACTICE OF THE NEOTECTONIC GEOLOGICAL MAPPING METHODS——A CASE STUDY OF 1:50000 MAPPING PILOT IN HULESITAI, INNER MONGOLIA, CHINA

  • 摘要: 新构造调查是研究地壳运动规律、地质灾害、环境地质和地壳稳定性评价等的基础,具有重要的理论和实际意义,是区域地质填图重点内容之一。内蒙古呼勒斯太苏木图幅1:5万填图试点区,位于阴山—河套盆地结合带,新构造活动频繁,地层结构复杂,构造地貌形态丰富,山前断裂广泛发育,是调查研究新构造运动的理想场所。本研究在前人区调方法理论基础上,针对新生代地层、断裂、构造地貌等不同的新构造填图对象,分别使用遥感解译+野外路线调查+剖面(含钻孔剖面)实测+年代学方法、遥感解译+野外追索调查+综合地球物理+地球化学+地质雷达探测+探槽揭露+三维激光扫描+年代学方法、遥感解译+野外调查实测+年代学等不同的技术方法组合进行了调查研究,并参照《区域地质调查总则》(1:50000)、《1:50000区域地质调查技术要求(暂行)》等有关技术要求,采用数字填图技术,将填图成果直观、丰富、详细的表达在地质图上,该新构造填图技术方法组合,不仅是对新构造填图方法的有效探索,也为其它地区新一轮大比例尺新构造填图提供了重要参考。

     

  • 图  1  研究区地质简图(引自文献[20])

    1—上元古界渣尔泰群阿古鲁沟组:灰黑色炭质板岩,炭质结晶灰岩,绢云石英片岩,板岩;2—中下侏罗统石拐群:灰绿色长石砂岩夹粉细砂岩;3—上新统泥岩夹粉砂岩;4—中晚更新世黄灰色、灰绿色粉砂、粉砂质粘土5—全新世冲洪积物、风积物、湖积物;6—全新世冲湖积物;7—华力西晚期暗红色黑云花岗岩;8—闪长、闪长玢岩脉;9—河流、湖泊;10—正断层;11—隐伏断层

    Figure  1.  Geological sketch of the research area

    图  2  新构造调查及填图方法组合

    Figure  2.  Inverstigation methods combination for the neotectonic mapping

    图  3  研究区部分地质成果草图

    Figure  3.  Partial geological sketch map of the research area

    图  4  研究区部分地貌成果草图

    Figure  4.  Partial geomorphic sketch map of the research area

    图  5  山前台地地层剖面实测图

    1—0~1.5 m,为河流相砂砾石层,粒径0.5~2 cm不等,中等磨圆,分选较好;2—1.5~6.5 m,为红黄色粘土质粉砂;3—6.5~7.5 m为黄红色砾石层,以花岗岩与砂岩为主,粒径3~8 cm,砾石呈扁平状,磨圆度中等;4—7.5~8.3 m,为黄红色砂砾石层,粗砂夹细砾,砾石成分以石英、长石类矿物为主;5—8.3~10.3 m,为红白色粗砂层,厚约3 m,砂层具斜纹理,层理产状:20°∠28°;6—10.3~16.1 m,为粘土质粉砂层与含碳粉砂质粘土层互层,厚约5 m,其中有4期旋回;7—16.1~16.9 m,为灰白色粗砂夹细砾,厚约1 m,砾石成分以石英为主,含花岗岩风化碎屑,粒径约0.5~1 cm;8—16.9~19.9 m,为砂砾岩,成分为粗砂夹细砾岩,砖红色,细砾以石英、长石类矿物为主;9—19.9~21.7 m,为砾岩,砾石以花岗岩与砂岩为主;10—21.7~22 m,为红色砂岩,具斜层理;11—22~22.4 m,红色砂岩,水平层理;12—22.4~23 m,为红色砾岩,砾石磨圆中等,分选较好;13—23~26 m,棕红色粗砂岩

    Figure  5.  Measured stratum section of the piedmont platform

    图  6  色尔腾山山前断裂及错段地貌特征解译[24]

    Figure  6.  Remote sensing interpretation of the faults and dislocation landforms in front of Seerteng Mountain

    图  7  150线高频大地电磁测深(AMT)反演剖面

    Figure  7.  High-frequency magnetotelluric sounding inversion section of the 150 cross section

    图  8  地质雷达探测隐伏断裂图像

    Figure  8.  Image of buried faults detected by the geological penetrating radar(GPR)

    图  9  色尔腾山段敖勒盖图北西探槽剖面素描图

    (1)—黄红色含砂砾石层:砾石磨圆较差,次棱-棱,粒径1~5 cm,个别10~13 cm,以砂岩、花岗岩为主;(2)—砂砾石层:砾石磨圆以次棱居多,粒径0.5~2 cm不等,成分以砂岩、花岗岩为主;(3)—砾石层:粒径较大,5~20 cm,磨圆差,棱状为主,成为以砂岩、花岗岩为主;(4)—断层碎屑:以砂砾石为主,沿断层破碎带分布,定向性较好;(5)—黑灰色粉砂,含砾;(6)—坡积砂砾石,粒径大小不一,成分以砂岩、花岗岩为主

    Figure  9.  Paleoearthquake trench sketch at the Aolegaitu section in front of Seerteng Mountain

    图  10  山麓台地遥感解译与剖面实测图[19]

    A-台地面遥感解译;B-实测剖面图

    Figure  10.  Remote-sensing interpretation and measured sectional mapping of the piedmont plateau

    图  11  研究区河流阶地遥感解译图与实测剖面图

    A-千里庙沟河流阶地遥感解译图;B-查干敖勒盖塔拉河流阶地遥感解译图;C-千里庙沟河流阶地横剖面图;D-查干敖勒盖塔拉河谷横剖面图[16]

    Figure  11.  Remote-sensing interpretation and measured sectional mapping of the river terrace in the research area

    图  12  研究区冲洪积扇解译图[28]

    Figure  12.  Remote-sensing interpretation of the alluvial-proluvial fans in the research area

    图  13  断裂地貌照片

    A-西柳树泉子段断层;B-宏丰北上新世与晚更新世地层断层接触带;C-呼勒斯太段断层地表破裂;D-王二栓圪旦水系错动

    Figure  13.  Photos of the rupture topography

    图  14  阴山山前碱各素照弯断层剖面素描图[9]

    Figure  14.  Fault profile sketch at Jiangesuzhaowan in front of Yin Mountains

    图  15  呼勒斯太幅古河道调查区11 m以浅三维结构模型

    沉积相:RB-河道亚相;FP-泛滥平原相;NL-天然堤微相;地层+时代+成因;Qhdsal-全新统滴哨沟湾组冲积物

    Figure  15.  Stratum three dimension(3D)structure model of the ancient course investigation area in Hulusitai

    表  1  色尔腾山山前断裂位移速率

    Table  1.   Displacement rates of the faults in fornt of the Seerteng Montain

    断裂位移距离与速率呼勒斯太段敖勒盖图段西柳树泉子段奋斗村段王二栓圪旦东北段(测区外)
    垂直位移/m6.5~174.511.5
    水平位移/m2.5~212.5~7 3~3.54~29.510.68
    垂直位移速率/(mm/a)1.2~1.70.41~0.820.87~1.880.14~0.15
    水平滑动速率/(mm/a)0.48~0.720.68~0.880.63~1.350.13~0.14
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 周飞飞, 杨健. 现代地质填图, 走向特殊地质地貌区[N]. 中国国土资源报, 2016-01-27(006).ZHOU Fei-fei,

    YANG Jian. Modern geological mapping, to the special geological features area[N]. China Land and Resources Reported, 2016-01-27(006).
    [2] 程绍平, 杨桂枝. 国外新构造研究进展述评[J]. 地震地质, 2008, 30(1):31~43. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZDZ200801003.htm

    CHENG Shao-ping, YANG Gui-zhi. Current advance of overseas research on neotectonics:a review and comments[J]. Seismology and Geology, 2008, 30(1):31~43. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZDZ200801003.htm
    [3] 李祥根. 中国新构造运动概论[M]. 北京:地震出版社, 2003.

    LI Xiang-gen. Introduction to China Neotectonics[M]. Beijing:Seismological Press, 2003.
    [4] 刘光勋. 新构造学研究趋势的展望[J]. 地学前缘, 1995, 2(1/2):203~211. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY502.015.htm

    LIU Guang-xun. The trend in research of neotectonics[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 1995, 2(1/2):203~211. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY502.015.htm
    [5] 胡道功. 探索适合我国地质特点的地质填图新方法[N]. 中国国土资源报, 2014-07-24(005).

    HU Dao-gong. Explore new method of geological mapping for geological characteristics in China[N]. China Land and Resources News, 2014-07-24(005).
    [6] 王涛, 计文化, 胡健民, 等. 专题地质填图及有关问题讨论[J]. 地质通报, 2016, 35(5):633~641. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD201605001.htm

    WANG Tao, JI Wen-hua, HU Jian-min, et al. Geological mapping forspecial issues and a discussion on related topics[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2016, 35(5):633~641. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD201605001.htm
    [7] 赵希涛, 胡道功, 吴中海. 晚新生代地质填图理论与方法的新探索[J]. 地质通报, 2009, 28(10):1419~1429. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2009.10.008

    ZHAO Xi-tao, HU Dao-gong, WU Zhong-hai. An exploration to the theory and methodology of Late Cenozoic geological mapping[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2009, 28(10):1419~1429. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2009.10.008
    [8] 张振法. 阴山山链隆起机制及有关问题探讨[J]. 内蒙古地质, 1995, (S):17~35. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NMGZ5Z1.002.htm

    ZHANG Zhen-fa. Approach to the mechanism and relative problems of Yinshan chain uplift[J].Geology of Inner Mangolia, 1995, (S):17~35. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NMGZ5Z1.002.htm
    [9] 贾丽云. 内蒙古阴山西段新构造运动与地貌响应[D]. 北京:中国地质大学(北京), 2015.

    JIA Li-yun. Neotectonics and geomorphic response in western Yin mountains area, Inner Mongolia, northern China[D]. Beijing:China University of Geosciences, 2015.
    [10] 潘博. 河套断陷带北缘主要活动断裂带地震危险性研究[D]. 北京:中国地质大学(北京), 2012.

    PAN Bo. Research on seismic hazard evaluation of active faults on the north boundary of the Hetao fault-depression zone[D]. Beijing:China University of Geosciences, 2012.
    [11] 国家地震局《鄂尔多斯周缘活动断裂系》课题组. 鄂尔多斯周缘活动断裂系[M].北京:地震出版社, 1988.

    Research Group of Active Fault System around the Ordos Massif. Active Fault System Around Ordos Massif[M]. Beijing:Seismological Press, 1988.
    [12] 江娃利. 内蒙狼山-色尔腾山山前活动断裂古地震事件识别及同震垂直位移[J]. 地壳构造与地壳应力文集, 2003:45~52. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SEIS200300005.htm

    JIANG Wa-li. Paleo-earthquake event and co-seismic vertical deformation recognition along the Langshan-Sertenshan pediment fault, Inner Mongolia[J]. Bulletin of the Institute of Crustal Dynamics, 2003:45~52. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SEIS200300005.htm
    [13] 聂宗笙, 吴卫民, 许桂林, 等. 内蒙古狼山-色尔腾山山前活动断裂带地质图(1:50000)[M].北京:地震出版社, 2013.

    NIE Zong-sheng, WU Wei-min, XU Gui-lin, et al. Geological Map(1:50000) of the Langshan-Sertenshan Pediment Fault, Inner Mongolia[M]. Beijing:Seismological Press, 2013.
    [14] 杨晓平, 冉勇康, 胡博, 等. 内蒙古色尔腾山山前断裂带乌加河段古地震活动日[J]. 地震学报, 2003, 25(1):62~71. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXB200301007.htm

    YANG Xiao-ping, RAN Yong-kang, HU Bo, et al. Paleoseismic activity on Wujiahe segment of Serteng piedmont fault, Inner Mongolia[J]. ActaSeismologicaSinica, 2003, 25(1):62~71. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXB200301007.htm
    [15] Jia L Y, Zhang X J, He Z X, et al. Late Quaternary climatic and tectonic mechanisms driving river terrace development in an area of mountain uplift:a case study in the Langshan area, Inner Mongolia, northern China[J]. Geomorphology, 2015, 234:109~121. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.12.043
    [16] 贾丽云, 张绪教, 叶培盛, 等. 阴山西段河流阶地发育的年代序列及其对构造隆升的指示意义[J]. 地质学报, 2017, 91(1):249~265. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE201701015.htm

    JIA Li-yun, ZHANG Xu-jiao, YE Pei-sheng, et al. Chronology sequence of the river terraces development in western Yinshan Mountains, China:implications for the tectonic uplifting[J]. ActaGeologicaSinica, 2017, 91(1):249~265. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE201701015.htm
    [17] 程绍平, 李传友, 杨桂枝, 等. 内蒙古狼山-色尔腾山的剥蚀面序列和景观发育的控制因素[J]. 第四纪研究, 2006, 26(1):99~107. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DSJJ200601012.htm

    CHENG Shao-ping, LI Chuan-you, YANG Gui-zhi, et al. The denudational-surface sequence and controls on the landscapte development in the Langshan Mountains-Seertengshan Mountains, Inner-Mongolia[J]. Quaternary Sciences,2006, 26(1):99~107. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DSJJ200601012.htm
    [18] 何泽新, 张绪教, 贾丽云, 等. 内蒙古狼山山前台地成因及其新构造运动意义[J]. 现代地质, 2014, 28(1):98~108. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ201401010.htm

    HE Ze-xin, ZHANG Xu-jiao, JIA Li-yun, et al. Genesis of piedmont terraces and its Neotectonic Movement significance in Langshan Mountain area, Inner Mongolia[J]. Geoscience, 2014, 28(1):98~108. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ201401010.htm
    [19] 徐步, 李焕康, 吴之理, 等. 中华人民共和国乌拉特后旗K-48-(24)、临河县幅1:20万区域地质调查报告[R]. 白彦花:内蒙古自治区第一区域地质调查队, 1982.

    Jia L Y, Zhang X J, Ye P S, et al. Development of the alluvial and lacustrine terraces on the northern margin of the Hetao Basin, Inner Mongolia, China:implications for the evolution of the Yellow River in the Hetao area since the late Pleistocene[J]. Geomorphology, 2016, 263:87~98.
    [20] XU Bu, LI Huan-kang, WU Zhi-li, et al. The 1:200000 geological Survey report of Wulatehouqi K-48-(24), Linhexian K-48-(30)[R]. Baiyanhua:No. 1 Regional Geological Survey Team, Inner Mongolia, China, 1982.
    [21] Darby B J, Ritts B D. Mesozoic structural architecture of the Lang Shan, North-Central China:intraplate contraction, extension, and synorogenic sedimentation[J]. Journal of Structural Geology, 2007, 29(12):2006~2016. doi: 10.1016/j.jsg.2007.06.011
    [22] 张岳桥, 廖昌珍. 晚中生代-新生代构造体制转换与鄂尔多斯盆地改造[J]. 中国地质, 2006, 33(1):28~40. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI200601002.htm

    ZHANG Yue-qiao, LIAO Chang-zhen. Transition of the Late Mesozoic-Cenozoic tectonic regimes and modification of the Ordos basin[J]. Geology in China, 2006, 33(1):28~40. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI200601002.htm
    [23] 汪良谋, 董瑞树, 张裕明, 等. 河套地区新生代地质构造和地震活动的某些特点-兼谈鄂尔多斯周边新生代断陷盆地的形成机制田[J].华北地震科学, 1984, 2(4):8~16. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HDKD198404001.htm

    WANG Liang-mou, DONG Rui-shu, ZHANG Yu-ming, et al. Characteristics of the Hetao area Cenozoic geological structure and earthquake activity:formation mechanism of Cenozoic faulted basins in Erdos surrounding[J]. North China Earthquake Sciences, 1984, 2(4):8~16. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HDKD198404001.htm
    [24] 叶梦旎, 张绪教, 叶培盛, 等. SPOT-6与无人机航测技术在第四纪地质及活动构造填图中的应用-以内蒙古1:50000呼勒斯太苏木等四幅填图试点为例[J]. 地质力学学报, 2016, 22(2):366~378. http://journal.geomech.ac.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20160216&flag=1

    YE Meng-ni, ZHANG Xu-jiao, YE Pei-sheng, et al. Application of spot-6 and the UAV aerial technology in quaternary geology and tectonic mapping:taking the 1:50000 mapping pilot of the Hulesitai area, Inner Mongolia as an example[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 2016, 22(2):366~378. http://journal.geomech.ac.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20160216&flag=1
    [25] 徐锡伟, 计凤桔, 于贵华, 等. 用钻孔地层剖面记录恢复古地震序列:河北夏垫断裂古地震研究[J]. 地震地质, 2000, 22(1):9~19. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZDZ200001001.htm

    XU Xi-wei, JI Feng-ju, YU Gui-hua, et al. Reconstruction of paleoearthouake sequence using stratigraphic records from drill logs:a study at the Xiadian fault, Beijing[J]. Seismology and Geology, 2000, 22(1):9~19. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZDZ200001001.htm
    [26] 江娃利. 北京平原夏垫断裂潘各庄钻孔晚更新世晚期以来古地震事件分析[A]. 中国地震局地质研究所. 活动断裂研究[M]. 北京:地震出版社, 2001, 140~147.

    JIANG Wa-li. Pleoearthquake analysis on the Pangezhuang drill of Xiadianfalut in Beijing plain[A]. Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration.Research of the Active Falut[M]. Beijing:Seismological Press, 2001, 140~147.
    [27] 邓起东, 徐锡伟, 张先康, 等. 城市活动断裂探测的方法和技术[J]. 地学前缘, 2003, 10(1):93~104. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY200301019.htm

    DENG Qi-dong, XU Xi-wei, ZHANG Xian-kang, et al. Methods and techniques for surveying and prospecting active faults in urban areas[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2003, 10(1):93~104. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY200301019.htm
    [28] 叶培盛, 张绪教, 贾丽云, 等. 内蒙古1:5万呼勒斯太苏木、塔尔湖、复兴城、吉尔嘎郎图填图试点区调报告[R]. 北京:中国地质科学院地质力学研究所, 2017.

    YE Pei-sheng, ZHANG Xu-jiao, JIA Li-yun, et al. Report of the 1:50, 000 pilot mapping of Hulesitaisumu (K48E017024), Taerhuzhen (K48E018024), Fuxingcheng (K48E019024), and Jiergalangtuxiang (K48E020024)[R]. Beijing:Institute of Geomechanics, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, 2017.
    [29] 梁兴中, 陈继镛,冯家岷. α石英E'心断代零点研究[J]. 核技术, 1993, 16(4):213~216. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HJSU199304004.htm

    LIANG Xing-zhong,CHEN Ji-yong, FENG Jia-min. A study on resetting for E' centre dating of α-quartz[J]. Nuclear Techniques 1993, 16(4):213~216. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HJSU199304004.htm
    [30] 梁兴中, 高钧成. 断裂成矿年龄的α石英ESR研究[J]. 矿物岩石, 1999, 19(2):69~71. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KWYS902.014.htm

    LIANG Xing-zhong, GAO Jun-cheng. Study on the α-quartz dating of fault-related ore mineralization[J].Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology,1999, 19(2):69~71. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KWYS902.014.htm
    [31] 梁兴中, 庹先国. 断层最新活动年龄的ESR年代学研究及初步应用[J]. 物理, 1998, (2):114~116. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WLZZ802.011.htm

    LIANG Xing-zhong, TUO Xian-guo. Electron spin resonance dating method research and its application on the latest geology fault activity age[J]. Physics, 1998, (2):114~116. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WLZZ802.011.htm
    [32] 程维明, 周成虎. 多尺度数字地貌等级分类方法[J]. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(1):23~33. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.01.003

    CHENG Wei-ming, ZHOU Cheng-hu. Methodology on hierarchical classification of multi-scale digital geomorphology[J]. Progress in Geography, 2014, 33(1):23~33. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.01.003
  • 加载中
图(15) / 表(1)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  95
  • HTML全文浏览量:  53
  • PDF下载量:  17
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2016-10-03
  • 刊出日期:  2017-04-28

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回