ZIRCON U-PB DATING AND GEOCHEMICAL FEATURES OF CHAHANCHAHA GRANITE FROM WESTERN TIANSHAN, XINJIANG: IMPLICATIONS FOR TECTONIC EVOLUTION
-
摘要: 查汗查哈岩体出露于新疆西天山东南段,位于中天山南缘断裂北缘的那拉提-中天山侵入岩带,岩性主要为片麻状花岗闪长岩和二长花岗岩。锆石U-Pb定年结果显示,查汗查哈岩体花岗质岩石形成于421.9±6.2 Ma。岩石地球化学特征表明其属于准铝质钙碱性Ⅰ型花岗岩,并具有较典型的大陆边缘弧侵入岩的特征。这一研究结果显示,南天山洋在晚志留世已经开始向北俯冲,并在中天山南缘形成大陆边缘弧环境。Abstract: The Chahanchaha granitic body outcrops in the southeast part of the western Tianshan Mountains, Xinjiang, and it is located in the Nalati-Central Tianshan intrusive rock belt at the northern edge of the fault, south margin of the Central Tianshan. The rock type is dominated by granodiorite and monzonitic granite with weak gneissic foliation. The zircon U-Pb dating results indicate that the Chahanchaha granitic rocks formed at 421±6.2 Ma. The geochemical characteristics suggest that the granitic rocks are grouped in metaluminouscalc-alkaline Ⅰ-type granite, which exhibits typical characteristics of intrusive rocks in the continental arc. These data demonstrate that the paleo-south Tianshan ocean crust has started northward subduction at late Silurian, resulting in a continental arc upon the overriding plate.
-
Key words:
- Tianshan Mountains /
- granite /
- zircon U-Pb age /
- Silurian
-
表 1 锆石U-Pb测年结果表
Table 1. Zircons U-Pb dating results
PM02-44
测点号位置 元素含量/×10-6和比值 同位素比值 年龄/Ma 谐和度 Pb Th U Th/U 207Pb/235U 207Pb/235U 206Pb/238U 206Pb/238U rho 207Pb/235U 207Pb/235U 206Pb/238U 206Pb/238U 15 核部 17.0 172 166 1.04 0.5689 0.0291 0.0700 0.0009 0.2493 457.3 18.8 436.1 5.4 95% 14 核部 26.8 208 297 0.70 0.5433 0.0168 0.0696 0.0007 0.3317 440.6 11.1 433.5 4.3 98% 17 幔部 16.1 119 183 0.65 0.5610 0.0214 0.0691 0.0009 0.3443 452.2 13.9 431.0 5.5 95% 4 幔部 68.5 223 868 0.26 0.5408 0.0124 0.0689 0.0006 0.3690 438.9 8.2 429.4 3.5 97% 7 幔部 33.7 168 422 0.40 0.5482 0.0179 0.0686 0.0009 0.3944 443.8 11.7 427.6 5.3 96% 6 幔部 15.3 109 174 0.63 0.5049 0.0220 0.0685 0.0008 0.2804 415.0 14.8 427.0 5.1 97% 13 核部 14.0 101 163 0.62 0.5066 0.0240 0.0679 0.0008 0.2583 416.2 16.2 423.7 5.0 98% 8 核部 16.5 190 176 1.08 0.5138 0.0217 0.0670 0.0008 0.2968 421.0 14.6 417.9 5.1 99% 10 核部 18.0 179 197 0.91 0.4980 0.0211 0.0669 0.0007 0.2613 410.4 14.3 417.3 4.5 98% 3 核部 13.5 118 152 0.77 0.5315 0.0222 0.0668 0.0008 0.2881 432.8 14.7 416.9 4.9 96% 9 核部 11.4 118 123 0.97 0.5420 0.0276 0.0668 0.0010 0.3002 439.8 18.2 416.6 6.2 94% 12 核部 18.5 151 212 0.71 0.5549 0.0175 0.0667 0.0008 0.3655 448.2 11.4 416.2 4.6 92% 1 核部 9.7 83.2 115 0.73 0.5167 0.0291 0.0665 0.0010 0.2648 423.0 19.5 415.0 6.0 98% 11 核部 10.6 96 121 0.79 0.5081 0.0255 0.0654 0.0008 0.2523 417.1 17.1 408.4 5.0 97% 5 核部 100 351 1327 0.26 0.5125 0.0106 0.0650 0.0005 0.3820 420.1 7.2 406.0 3.1 96% 表 2 岩体主量(%)、微量(×10-6)及稀土(×10-6)元素化学成分表
Table 2. Major (%), trace elements (×10-6) and rare earth (×10-6) elements compositions of the granite body
样品号 PM01-21 PM01-55 D0200 D1180 D1247 D3730 2-44 D1540A 2-30 D7777 PM20-1 BD3506 BD3507-1 PM20-10 岩性 花岗闪长岩 二长花岗岩 似斑状二长花岗岩 主量元素含量 SiO2 60.36 65.7 65.08 58.52 58.52 58.45 64.12 64.69 69.86 63.3 68.66 70.92 68.78 62.04 TiO2 0.73 0.4 0.49 0.88 0.88 0.83 0.97 0.6 0.32 0.39 0.21 0.22 0.28 0.66 Al2O3 15.52 16.87 13.43 15.51 13.56 15.25 14.84 13.85 13.72 14.46 15.27 13.33 14.28 14.19 Fe2O3 0.9 1.7 1.58 1.5 2.37 3.46 0.5 1.78 0.4 1.46 0.5 0.65 0.6 2.38 FeO 5.13 2.43 3.42 5.85 6.01 4.59 4.86 3.8 3.06 2.11 2.16 2.11 2.34 4.23 MnO 0.09 0.06 0.091 0.17 0.148 0.145 0.08 0.092 0.06 0.083 0.034 0.04 0.03 0.123 MgO 3.12 1.29 2.03 2.93 4.1 3.27 2.34 2.5 0.63 1.11 0.83 0.37 0.82 2.67 CaO 5.5 4.35 3.74 4.59 6.18 6.35 3.54 4.43 1.55 6.39 2.88 1.52 2.52 5.07 Na2O 3.47 4.02 2.92 3.79 2.25 2.63 3.31 2.4 3.84 4.32 6.88 3.27 2.82 2.62 K2O 1.84 1.5 4.02 1.73 3.7 2.23 2.76 3.9 3.73 1.72 0.71 4.51 4.47 2.45 P2O5 0.19 0.16 0.19 0.26 0.3 0.22 0.26 0.22 0.21 0.16 0.15 0.1 0.15 0.17 LOI 1.25 0.93 1.38 3.13 0.6 1.85 0.93 0.81 0.77 3.57 1.26 0.79 0.29 2.38 总量 98.21 99.5 98.39 98.86 98.61 99.25 98.51 99.07 98.17 99.06 99.53 97.83 97.39 98.97 A/CNK 0.88 1.04 0.84 0.94 0.71 0.83 1.00 0.85 1.04 0.70 0.88 1.02 1.01 0.88 A/NK 2.01 2.05 1.47 1.91 1.76 2.26 1.76 1.69 1.32 1.61 1.26 1.30 1.50 2.04 Na2O+K2O 5.31 5.53 6.94 5.52 5.95 4.85 6.08 6.3 7.58 6.03 7.58 7.78 7.28 5.07 Na2O/K2O 1.89 2.68 0.73 2.19 0.61 1.18 1.2 0.62 1.03 2.52 9.71 0.73 0.63 1.07 TFeO 5.94 3.96 4.84 7.2 8.13 7.7 5.31 5.4 3.42 3.42 2.61 2.7 2.88 6.37 微量元素含量 Rb 76 43 152 104 126 113 112 162 170 67 35 179 144 94 Sr 480.80 530.30 305.30 314.60 320.60 334.10 299.50 292.90 153.80 509.00 546.30 176.50 384.10 267.00 Ba 502 530 1769 472 1234 502 731 1093 518 795 270 596 1757 663 Th 7.24 6.21 21.14 6.95 3.99 11.7 13.81 22.9 15.2 4.92 2.15 14.97 21.7 15.7 U 1.13 0.58 1.5 2.05 2.26 3.56 1.73 2.83 2.96 0.81 0.91 3.05 1.97 4.36 Nb 8.69 5.04 11.07 9.02 12.46 9.68 13.28 13.15 12.95 6.26 3.46 9.32 7.03 9.5 Ta 0.54 0.3 0.76 0.97 0.96 0.78 0.99 1.14 1.55 0.39 0.4 1.08 0.79 1.1 Zr 72 95 157 162 195 155 242 186 181 140 98 167 228 150 Hf 1.81 2.5 4.36 4.14 5.41 4.2 6.87 5.22 5.51 3.83 2.82 5.05 6.92 4.26 P 931 717 847 1115 1304 953 1136 977 928 700 641 432 683 741 Cr 54.54 14.24 100.1 63.13 108.6 88.05 45.28 80.46 14.89 26.77 44.44 30.74 15.05 95.69 Co 15.07 6.13 12.06 15.45 22.58 19.84 12.27 13.93 2.93 5.44 5.05 2.76 4.69 17.2 Ni 25.18 4.86 22.73 44.84 24.43 32.22 22.75 18.69 5.94 9.21 19.85 12.41 5.77 21.9 Ga 19.73 18.66 17.84 21.41 20.65 21.91 20.47 18.51 19.53 18.38 18.79 16.66 15.81 17.88 Rb/Sr 0.16 0.08 0.5 0.33 0.39 0.34 0.38 0.55 1.1 0.13 0.06 1.01 0.37 0.35 U/Th 0.16 0.09 0.07 0.29 0.57 0.3 0.12 0.12 0.19 0.16 0.42 0.2 0.09 0.28 Zr/Hf 39.86 38.12 35.94 39.22 36.09 36.87 35.28 35.69 32.74 36.41 34.92 33.03 32.88 35.15 Ba/Sr 1.04 1 5.79 1.5 3.85 1.5 2.44 3.73 3.37 1.56 0.49 3.38 4.57 2.48 Rb/Ba 0.15 0.08 0.09 0.22 0.1 0.23 0.15 0.15 0.33 0.08 0.13 0.3 0.08 0.14 稀土元素含量 La 24.42 30.51 20.8 21.09 25.37 31.33 49.89 40.85 34.87 23.64 5.23 31.17 57.49 32.39 Ce 48.87 48.97 35.08 51.07 72.49 61.3 97.29 83.98 67.23 39.89 8.62 58.88 99.52 54.49 Pr 5.84 6.01 4.05 5.59 10.46 7.32 11.56 9.69 7.86 4.49 1.18 6.75 10.29 6.44 Nd 22.63 21.58 15.49 22.92 44.57 28.21 42.77 36.22 28.53 16.42 5.12 24.06 32.26 24.33 Sm 4.54 3.15 2.75 4.97 8.98 5.53 7.57 6.4 5.66 2.58 1.25 4.5 4.15 4.65 Eu 1.01 1.1 0.93 1.23 1.95 1.41 1.65 1.5 0.91 1.04 0.57 0.89 1.03 1.28 Gd 3.89 2.68 2.53 4.35 7.07 4.71 6.74 5.34 5.21 2.27 1.05 3.86 3.61 4.06 Tb 0.57 0.35 0.45 0.76 1.12 0.77 0.99 0.8 0.83 0.31 0.18 0.54 0.38 0.66 Dy 2.99 1.69 3.23 4.42 6.11 4.34 5.33 4.28 4.51 1.59 1.02 2.5 1.56 3.88 Ho 0.56 0.32 0.78 0.84 1.17 0.83 0.99 0.82 0.78 0.3 0.2 0.42 0.27 0.77 Er 1.53 0.91 2.58 2.35 3.34 2.37 2.79 2.39 2.16 0.89 0.58 1.18 0.83 2.21 Tm 0.22 0.13 0.43 0.33 0.48 0.35 0.38 0.35 0.29 0.12 0.09 0.17 0.1 0.33 Yb 1.41 0.8 2.89 2.15 3.08 2.27 2.29 2.33 1.79 0.79 0.57 1.08 0.68 2.24 Lu 0.22 0.12 0.48 0.32 0.47 0.35 0.35 0.36 0.28 0.12 0.09 0.17 0.12 0.35 Y 15.97 9.29 21.97 24.46 34.29 24.43 24.99 24.18 22.19 9.28 5.99 11.19 7.14 22.73 ΣREE 118.7 118.3 92.46 122.4 186.7 151.1 230.6 195.3 160.9 94.48 25.74 136.2 212.3 138.1 LREE/HREE 9.43 15.9 5.92 6.88 7.18 8.45 10.62 10.71 9.15 13.74 5.82 12.73 27.12 8.53 LaN/YbN 12.45 27.39 5.16 7.03 5.92 9.91 15.65 12.59 13.94 21.36 6.53 20.72 60.29 10.38 δEu 0.72 1.13 1.06 0.79 0.72 0.82 0.69 0.76 0.51 1.28 1.48 0.64 0.79 0.88 δCe 0.97 0.83 0.88 1.13 1.09 0.96 0.96 1 0.96 0.89 0.82 0.95 0.93 0.87 表 3 岩体标准矿物含量及特征参数表
Table 3. Standard mineral contents and characteristic parameters of the granite body
样品号 PM01-21 PM01-55 D0200 D1180 D1247 D3730 2-44 D1540A 2-30 D7777 PM20-1 BD3506 BD3507-1 PM20-10 岩性 花岗闪长岩 二长花岗岩 似斑状二长花岗岩 (CIPW)
标准矿物含量
/%Q 15.24 24.8 22.1 13.3 12.15 15.85 21.23 22.56 28.05 19.91 18.79 30.65 28.39 22.47 An 22.05 20.88 12.01 21.08 16.28 23.87 16.25 15.78 6.5 15.72 8.86 7.07 11.86 20.4 Ab 30.33 34.56 25.49 33.52 19.47 22.85 28.74 20.68 33.39 38.26 59.21 28.52 24.53 22.97 Or 11.2 9.02 24.51 10.69 22.28 13.52 16.73 23.44 22.65 10.62 4.26 27.45 27.18 14.98 C 0 1.11 0 0 0 0 0.6 0 1.06 0 0 0.57 0.61 0 Di 4.03 0 4.8 0.82 10.69 5.75 0 4.18 0 11.01 3.95 0 0 3.66 Hy 13.93 6.22 7.31 15.96 13.22 11.95 13.21 9.05 6.63 0 3.45 4.08 5.61 10.29 Wo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.25 0 0 0 0 Il 1.42 0.76 0.97 1.75 1.71 1.61 1.88 1.16 0.62 0.77 0.4 0.44 0.55 1.29 Mt 1.35 2.27 2.36 2.27 3.5 4.1 0.74 2.62 0.59 2.07 0.74 0.98 0.9 3.53 Ap 0.45 0.37 0.46 0.62 0.71 0.52 0.62 0.53 0.5 0.39 0.35 0.24 0.37 0.41 DI 56.77 68.38 72.1 57.51 53.9 52.22 66.7 66.68 84.09 68.79 82.26 86.62 80.1 60.42 SI 21.61 11.8 14.53 18.55 22.25 20.29 17 17.36 5.42 10.4 7.49 3.4 7.46 18.63 AR 1.68 1.7 2.03 1.76 1.59 1.58 1.99 1.71 2.97 1.81 2.44 2.58 2.01 1.72 σ43 1.55 1.33 2.13 1.84 2.21 1.46 1.71 1.8 2.11 1.71 2.22 2.14 2.02 1.3 A/MF 0.95 1.9 1.12 0.88 0.62 0.79 1.1 0.99 2.13 1.89 2.63 2.79 2.31 0.9 C/MF 0.61 0.89 0.57 0.47 0.51 0.6 0.48 0.58 0.44 1.51 0.9 0.58 0.74 0.58 -
[1] 韩宝福, 何国琦, 吴泰然, 等.天山早古生代花岗岩锆石U-Pb定年、岩石地球化学特征及其大地构造意义[J].新疆地质, 2004, 22(1):4~11. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=xjdz200401002HAN Baofu, HE Guoqi, WU Tairan, et al. Zircon U-Pb dating and geochemical features of early paleozoic granites from Tianshan, Xinjiang:Implications for tectonic evolution[J]. Xinjiang Geology, 2004, 22(1):4~11. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=xjdz200401002 [2] 杨天南, 李锦轶, 孙桂华, 等.中天山早泥盆世陆弧:来自花岗质糜棱岩地球化学及SHRIMP-U/Pb定年的证据[J].岩石学报, 2006, 22(1):41~48. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_ysxb98200601004.aspxYANG Tiannan, LI Jinyi, SUN Guihua, et al. Earlier Devonian active continental arc in central Tianshan:Evidence of geochemical analyses and Zircon SHRIMP dating on mylonitized granitic rock[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2006, 22(1):41~48. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_ysxb98200601004.aspx [3] 朱志新, 王克卓, 李锦轶, 等.新疆西天山巴音布鲁克组火山岩地质特征及构造意义[J].新疆地质, 2006, 24(1):9~12. http://cpfd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CPFDTOTAL-ZGDJ200611002017.htmZHU Zhixin, WANG Kezhuo, LI Jinyi, et al. The igneous rock petrochemisty character of bayinbuluke formation in the western Tianshan, Xinjiang and the geological implication[J]. Xinjiang Geology, 2006, 24(1):9~12. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://cpfd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CPFDTOTAL-ZGDJ200611002017.htm [4] 朱志新, 王克卓, 郑玉洁, 等.新疆伊犁地块南缘志留纪和泥盆纪花岗质侵入体锆石SHRIMP定年及其形成时构造背景的初步探讨[J].岩石学报, 2006, 22(5):1193~1200. http://www.oalib.com/paper/4573375ZHU Zhixin, WANG Kezhuo, ZHENG Yujie, et al. Zircon SHRIMP dating of Silurian and Devonian granitic intrusions in the southern Yili block, Xinjiang and preliminary discussion on their tectonic setting[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2006, 22(5):1193~1200. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.oalib.com/paper/4573375 [5] 查显锋, 陈锐明, 辜平阳, 等.西南天山乌什北山地区逆冲推覆构造的识别及大地构造意义[J].地质力学学报, 2017, 23(2):243~252. http://journal.geomech.ac.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?flag=1&file_no=20170207&journal_id=dzlxxbZHA Xianfeng, CHEN Ruiming, GU Pingyangy, et al. The recognition of thrust Nappe structure and its tectonic Significance in Beishan Area, Wushi County, Southwestern Tianshan[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 2017, 23(2):243~252. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://journal.geomech.ac.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?flag=1&file_no=20170207&journal_id=dzlxxb [6] 汤耀庆, 赵民. 中国天山板块构造演化[A]. 肖序常, 汤耀庆. 古中亚复合巨型缝合带南缘构造演化[M]. 北京: 北京科学技术出版社, 1991, 109~122.TANG Yaoqing, ZHAO Min. The evolution of the Tianshan plate tectonic[A]. XIAO Xuchang, TANG Yaoqing. Structural Evolution of the Southern Margin of the Paleo-Asia Composite Megasuture[C]. Beijing: Beijing Science and Technology Press, 1991, 109~122. (in Chinese) [7] 朱志新, 李锦轶, 董连慧, 等.新疆西天山古生代侵入岩的地质特征及构造意义[J].地学前缘, 2011, 18(2):170~179. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE200601020.htmZHU Zhixin, LI Jinyi, DONG Lianhui, et al. Geological characteristics and tectonic significance of Paleozoic intrusive rocks in Western Tianshan of Xinjiang Province[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2011, 18(2):170~179. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE200601020.htm [8] Hu Z C, Gao S, Liu Y S, et al. Signal enhancement in laser ablation ICP-MS by addition of nitrogen in the central channel gas[J]. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2008, 23(8):1093~1101. doi: 10.1039/b804760j [9] Hu Z C, Liu Y S, Gao S, et al. A "wire" signal smoothing device for laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry analysis[J]. Spectrochimica Acta Part B:Atomic Spectroscopy, 2012, 78:50~57. doi: 10.1016/j.sab.2012.09.007 [10] Liu Y S, Zong K Q, Kelemen P B, et al. Geochemistry and magmatic history of eclogites and ultramafic rocks from the Chinese continental scientific drill hole:Subduction and ultrahigh-pressure metamorphism of lower crustal cumulates[J]. Chemical Geology, 2008, 247(1~2):133~153. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009254107004457 [11] Liu Y S, Hu Z C, Zong K Q, et al. Reappraisement and refinement of zircon U-Pb isotope and trace element analyses by LA-ICP-MS[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2010, 55(15):1535~1546. doi: 10.1007/s11434-010-3052-4 [12] Liu Y S, Gao S, Hu Z C, et al. Continental and oceanic crust recycling-induced melt-peridotite interactions in the Trans-North China Orogen:U-Pb dating, Hf isotopes and trace elements in zircons from mantle xenoliths[J]. Journal of Petrology, 2010, 51(1~2):537~571. https://academic.oup.com/petrology/article/51/1-2/537/1463381 [13] Wiedenbeck M, Allé P, Corfu F, et al. Three natural zircon standards for U-Th-Pb, Lu-Hf, trace element and REE analyses[J]. Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research, 1995, 19(1):1~23. doi: 10.1111/ggr.1995.19.issue-1 [14] Ludwig K R. ISOPLOT 3. 00: A geochronological toolkit for microsoft excel[R]. Berkeley: Berkeley Geochronology Center, 2003, 39. [15] 吴元保, 郑永飞.锆石成因矿物学研究及其对U-Pb年龄解释的制约[J].科学通报, 2004, 49(16):1589~1604. http://mall.cnki.net/magazine/Article/KXTB200416001.htmWU Yuanbao, ZHENG Yongfei. Genesis of zircon and its constraints on interpretation of U-Pb age[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2004, 49(15):1554~1569. http://mall.cnki.net/magazine/Article/KXTB200416001.htm [16] Compston W, Williams I S, Kirschvink J L, et al. Zircon U-Pb ages for the Early Cambrian time-scale[J]. Journal of the Geological Society, 1992, 149(2):171~184. doi: 10.1144/gsjgs.149.2.0171 [17] Rickwood P C. Boundary lines within petrologic diagrams which use oxides of major and minor elements[J]. Lithos, 1989, 22(4):247~263. doi: 10.1016/0024-4937(89)90028-5 [18] Peccerillo A, Taylor S R. Geochemistry of eocene calc-alkaline volcanic rocks from the Kastamonu area, northern Turkey[J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 1976, 58(1):63~81. doi: 10.1007/BF00384745 [19] 吴才来, 杨经绥, 姚尚志, 等.北阿尔金巴什考供盆地南缘花岗杂岩体特征及锆石SHRIMP定年[J].岩石学报, 2005, 21(3):846~858. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXTB200416013.htmWU Cailai, YANG Jingsui, YAO Shangzhi, et al. Characteristics of the granitoid complex and its zircon SHRIMP dating at the south margin of the Bashikaogong Basin, North Altun, NW China[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2005, 21(3):846~858. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXTB200416013.htm [20] Taylor S R, McLennan S M. The continental crust:Its composition and evolution[M]. Oxford:Blackwell, 1985. [21] 张旗, 王焰, 潘国强, 等.花岗岩源岩问题——关于花岗岩研究的思考之四[J].岩石学报, 2008, 24(6):1193~1204. http://www.ysxb.ac.cn/ysxb/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20080604&journal_id=ysxbZHANG Qi, WANG Yan, PAN Guoqiang, et al. Sources of granites:Some crucial questions on granite study (4)[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2008, 24(6):1193~1204. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.ysxb.ac.cn/ysxb/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20080604&journal_id=ysxb [22] 刘昊, 杨欣德, 郝彬, 等.内蒙古赤峰北部晚侏罗世花岗岩地球化学特征及构造背景[J].地质力学学报, 2011, 17(3):286~294. http://journal.geomech.ac.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?flag=1&file_no=20110308&journal_id=dzlxxbLIU Hao, YANG Xinde, HAO Bin, et al. Geochemical characteristics and tectonic setting of upper Jurassic Granite from northern Chifeng, Inner Mongolia[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 2011, 17(3):286~294. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://journal.geomech.ac.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?flag=1&file_no=20110308&journal_id=dzlxxb [23] Whalen J B, Currie K L, Chappell B W. A-type granites:geochemical characteristics, discrimination and petrogenesis[J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 1987, 95(4):407~419. doi: 10.1007/BF00402202 [24] 朱志新, 董连慧, 王克卓, 等.西天山造山带构造单元划分与构造演化[J].地质通报, 2013, 32(2~3):297~306. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZQYD2013Z1008.htmZHU Zhixin, DONG Lianhui, WANG Kezhuo, et al. Tectonic division and regional tectonic evolution of West Tianshan organic belt[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2013, 32(2~3):297~306. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZQYD2013Z1008.htm [25] 肖庆辉, 邓晋福, 马大栓, 等.花岗岩研究思维与方法[M].北京:地质出版社, 2002.XIAO Qinghui, DENG Jinfu, MA Dashuan, et al. The ways of investigation on granitoids[M]. Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 2002. (in Chinese)