新疆哈尔里克早石炭世A型花岗岩的岩石成因及构造意义

王良玉; 廖群安; 肖典; 罗婷; 赵浩; 刘鸿飞; 王国灿

新疆哈尔里克早石炭世A型花岗岩的岩石成因及构造意义

王良玉^{1, 2,},
廖群安^1, ,,
肖典^{1, 3},
罗婷¹,
赵浩¹,
刘鸿飞¹,
王国灿¹

1.
中国地质大学(武汉)地球科学学院, 武汉 430074
2.
核工业二四三大队, 内蒙古赤峰 024006
3.
四川省地调院, 成都 610081

基金项目:

中国地质调查局“特殊地质地貌区填图试点”项目 DD20160060

中国地质调查局“特殊地质地貌区填图试点”项目 12120114042801

详细信息

作者简介:
王良玉(1990-), 男, 硕士, 矿物学、岩石学、矿床学专业。E-mail:532434457@qq.com

通讯作者:
廖群安(1959-), 男, 博士, 教授, 主要从事岩石学及岩石地球化学研究。E-mail:qanliao@cug.edu.cn

中图分类号: P588.1;P597
计量
- 文章访问数: 516
- HTML全文浏览量: 204
- PDF下载量: 6
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2016-09-15
- 刊出日期: 2016-12-01

PETROGENESIS AND TECTONIC SIGNIFICANCE OF EARLY CARBONIFEROUS A-TYPE GRAINTE IN HARLIK, XINJIANG

WANG Liang-yu^{1, 2
,},
LIAO Qun-an^{1
, ,},
XIAO Dian^{1, 3},
LUO Ting¹,
ZHAO Hao¹,
LIU Hong-fei¹,
WANG Guo-can¹

1.
School of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
2.
No. 243 Geological Party of Nuclear Industry, CNNC, Chifeng 024006, Inner Mongolia, China
3.
Sichuan Geological Survey, Chengdu 610081, China

摘要

摘要: 对出露在哈尔里克山西段小白杨沟-南山口一带的早石炭世花岗岩进行了锆石LA-ICP-MS U-Pb定年，结果为331.3±1.9 Ma，属早石炭世晚期。其岩石组合为碱长花岗岩、碱性花岗岩，暗色矿物以黑云母为主，见钠质角闪石，具富碱、贫钙镁和低铝铁的特征，微量元素明显富集Rb、Th、K等大离子亲石元素和Zr、Hf等高场强元素而强烈亏损Ba、Sr、Eu等元素，10000 Ga/Al值变化于2.93~3.80之间，表明该碱性花岗岩属于典型的A型花岗岩，具板内花岗岩特征，并非前人认为的岛弧花岗岩，其正εNd（t）值（+5.66~+6.12）和年轻的Nd模式年龄（T_DM2=0.60~0.62 Ga）显示岩浆来源于新生年轻地壳。从本次1：50000区调研究成果看，博格达自早石炭世开始伸展，早石炭世晚期进入闭合阶段，哈儿里克山早石炭世晚期岩体应处于博格达裂谷晚期阶段，并非前人所说的后碰撞和岛弧环境。
- A型花岗岩 /
- 早石炭世晚期 /
- 裂谷 /
- 哈尔里克
Abstract: The alkali-feldspar granite is located at the area of Nanshankou, western part of the Harlik Mountain. Its LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb age is 331.3±1.9 Ma. Therefore, the granite is formed in the late stage of Early Carboniferous. The dark minerals in the rock are mainly biotite, with litte Na amphibolite. This type of granite is riched in alkali elements, poor in calsium, magnesium, and has low content of aluminum and iron oxide. The rock is riched in large ion lithosphile elements, such as Rb, Th and K. It has abundant HFSE elements and depleted in Ba, Sr and Eu. The 10000 Ga/Al value is varied from 2.93~3.80. It indicates that the rock is A-type granite, formed in intraplate tectonic settings, instead of the previous island arc environment. Its εNd(t) values range from 5.66 to 6.12, the Nd model ages are 600~620 Ma. It tells that the magma may originate from the young crust. Based on the results of the 1:50000 regional geological survey, the Bogada rift was extended during Early Carboniferous, and closed at the late stage of Early Carboniferous. The Late Early Carboniferous alkali-feldspar granites should formed in the rift environment, instead of coming from the previous post-collisional or arc tectonic setting.
- A-type granites /
- late Early Carboniferous /
- rift /
- Harlik

HTML全文

图 1 新疆地质构造单元简图^[18~19]

Figure 1. The geological tectonic sketch of Xinjiang

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 研究区哈尔里克山岩体地质图(据1:50000地质图改编)

Figure 2. Geological map of the Harlik pluton

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 早石炭晚期碱性花岗岩的野外接触关系

Figure 3. Field contact relationship of the alkaline granites in late Early Carboniferous

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 早石炭晚期碱性花岗岩与晚石炭二长花岗岩实测剖面(PM44)

Figure 4. Section of late Early Carboniferous alkaline granite and Late Carboniferous monzonitic granite

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 早石炭世晚期碱性花岗岩及碱长花岗岩结构特征

a—碱长花岗岩中显微文象结构(+); b—花岗岩中钠铁闪石, 边部见棕闪石, 碱性长石为条纹长石, 中见析离条纹, 钾长石黏土化为褐色(-); c—花岗岩中棕闪石(-); d—花岗岩中钠铁闪石, 蚀变析离出不透明矿物, 但仍可见部分光性特征(-); Rie—钠质角闪石; Bar—棕闪石; Af—碱性长石; Q—石英

Figure 5. Petrological characteristics of late Early Carboniferous granite

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 南山口西侧碱性花岗岩锆石U-Pb年龄谐和图及CL图像

Figure 6. U-Pb age concordia plots and CL image from the zircon of alkaline granite in western Nanshankou

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 哈尔里克山南山口早石炭晚期岩体主量元素特征

Figure 7. Major element characteristics of late Early Carboniferous granite in Nanshankou, Harlik

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 南山口早石炭世晚期花岗岩类稀土元素配分曲线^[39]及微量元素蛛网图

Figure 8. REE distribution curve and Trace elements spider diagram from the alkaline granite from Nanshankou

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 早石炭晚期花岗岩成因类型判别图

(a)—(e)底图据Whalen等^[35]; I、S、M和A分别代表Ⅰ型、S型、M型和A型花岗岩; OGT代表未分异的I、S和M型花岗岩区; FG代表分异Ⅰ型花岗岩区; (f)底图据Sylvester^[50]

Figure 9. Various chemical discrimination diagram of the late Early Carboniferous granites

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 碱性花岗岩源区同位素特征(据文献[37])及A型花岗岩构造环境判别(据文献[49])

Figure 10. Isotopic characteristics of alkaline granite and tectonic environment discrimination of A-type granite

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 花岗岩形成环境判别图^[61~62]

Figure 11. Tectonic environment discrimination of granite

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 南山口碱性花岗岩(44-4) LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb同位素分析结果

Table 1. LA-ICP-MS U-Pb zircon analysis results for the alkaline granitic rocks from Nanshankou

测点	含量/10^-6			Th/U	比值						年龄/Ma
测点	^TotPb	²³²Th	²³⁸U	Th/U	²⁰⁷Pb/²⁰⁶Pb	1σ	²⁰⁷Pb/²³⁵U	1σ	²⁰⁶Pb/²³⁸U	1σ	²⁰⁷Pb/²³⁵U	1σ	²⁰⁶Pb/²³⁸U	1σ
4-1	110	350	620	0.56	0.0513	0.0015	0.3764	0.0112	0.0531	0.0007	324	8.3	334	4.2
4-2	325	488	1097	0.44	0.1079	0.0085	0.744	0.0612	0.0492	0.0005	565	35.6	310	3.3
4-3	155	298	551	0.54	0.1012	0.0098	0.9349	0.1369	0.0525	0.0013	670	71.8	330	8.2
4-4	227	214	472	0.45	0.1369	0.0164	1.7978	0.3039	0.0618	0.0023	1045	110	387	14.3
4-5	442	998	1628	0.61	0.0887	0.0051	0.6854	0.0471	0.0523	0.0007	530	28.4	328	4.2
4-6	275	867	1294	0.67	0.063	0.0032	0.4443	0.0212	0.0509	0.0005	373	14.9	320	3.2
4-7	207	671	1142	0.59	0.0552	0.0016	0.4041	0.012	0.0524	0.0006	345	8.7	329	3.6
4-8	116	320	677	0.47	0.0656	0.0035	0.4589	0.0277	0.0491	0.0007	384	19.3	309	4.3
4-9	139	430	821	0.52	0.0575	0.0016	0.4231	0.0119	0.0528	0.0006	358	8.5	332	3.6
4-10	77	237	560	0.42	0.0528	0.0015	0.3856	0.011	0.0526	0.0006	331	8.1	330	3.5
4-11	106	336	616	0.54	0.055	0.0017	0.4019	0.0128	0.0526	0.0006	343	9.3	330	3.5
4-12	103	312	699	0.45	0.057	0.0018	0.4066	0.0126	0.0515	0.0005	346	9.1	324	3.0
4-13	78	246	497	0.5	0.0512	0.0018	0.3721	0.0131	0.0526	0.0005	321	9.7	331	3.2
4-14	102	311	614	0.51	0.0522	0.0017	0.3875	0.0131	0.0535	0.0006	333	9.6	336	3.8
4-15	104	337	589	0.57	0.0543	0.0018	0.3954	0.0132	0.0526	0.0005	338	9.6	331	3.0
4-16	512	994	1406	0.71	0.1293	0.0092	1.146	0.0961	0.0571	0.0009	775	45.5	358	5.7
4-17	101	339	542	0.63	0.0563	0.0019	0.4125	0.0142	0.0529	0.0006	351	10.2	332	3.9
4-18	92	290	631	0.46	0.0541	0.0015	0.3966	0.011	0.0531	0.0005	339	8.0	334	3.4
4-19	67	206	413	0.50	0.0518	0.0017	0.3795	0.0127	0.0531	0.0006	327	9.3	333	3.8
4-20	164	541	1039	0.52	0.0517	0.0012	0.3825	0.009	0.0534	0.0005	329	6.6	335	3.2
注: ^TotPb表示锆石总Pb含量, 测点样号省略"PM44-"

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 南山口早石炭世晚期侵入岩全岩主量元素(%)、微量元素和稀土元素(10^-6)分析结果

Table 2. Whole-rock major elements and trace elements of late Early Carboniferous granite

元素	44 +	44-6	44-13	44-17	44-20	44-25	44-28	44-31	44-34	45-12-2	45-12-3	45-17-3	45 -17-6
SiO₂	79. 58	75.6	75.2	75.5	75.4	75.5	74.4	76.1	76.3	75.3	74.4	77.1	75.7
TiO₂	0.07	0.12	0.18	0.21	0.18	0.18	0.22	0.17	0.20	0.30	0.28	0.12	0.16
Al₂O₃	10.60	11.70	12.20	12.15	12.20	12.35	12.65	12.45	12.30	12.45	12.55	11.55	12.15
F₂O₃t	1.52	1.75	2.04	2.01	1.94	1.67	1.86	1.61	1.70	1.91	2.06	1.76	1.86
WnO	0.03	0.03	0.04	0.04	0.03	0.03	0.03	0.02	0.02	0.06	0.05	0.04	0.04
MgO	0.08	0.09	0.12	0.16	0.15	0.17	0.29	0.17	0.21	0.26	0.23	0.05	0.12
CaO	0.09	0.61	0.33	0.53	0.55	0.41	0.75	0.37	0.48	0.39	0.31	0.27	0.32
Na2O	3.46	3.61	3.86	3.96	3.55	3.86	3.64	3.67	3.67	3.88	3.78	3.80	3.90
K2O	3. 98	4.88	4.87	4.73	5.09	4.71	4.77	5.25	4.84	4.55	4.79	4.69	4.81
P₂O₅	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.02	0.01	0.01	0.03	0.01	0.02	0.02	0.02	0.01	0.01
LOI	0.35	0.66	0.25	0.19	0.36	0.27	0.44	0.31	0.51	0.47	0.51	0.18	0.36
FeOt	1.37	1.57	1.84	1.81	1.75	1.50	1.67	1.45	1.53	1.72	1.85	1.58	1.67
Mg#	9.4	9.2	10.4	13.6	13.3	16.8	23.6	17.3	19.7	21.2	18.1	5.3	11.3
A/CNK	1.04	0.95	1.00	0.96	0.99	1.01	1.01	1.00	1.01	1.04	1.05	0.98	1.00
A/NK	1.06	1.04	1.05	1.04	1.07	1.08	1.13	1.06	1.09	1.10	1.10	1.02	1.05
V	10	20	28	21	28	25	11	5	5	37	20	23	11
Cr	20	10	10	10	10	10	20	20	10	10	10	10	10
Ga	21.2	21.3	21.8	20.8	20.5	21.3	21.3	19.3	20.4	21.9	22.1	23.2	22.3
Rb	112.5	134.0	126.0	111.0	134.5	145.0	142.5	171.0	166.0	98.4	110.5	144.0	136.0
Sr	13.9	20.4	37.5	35.2	53.2	50.0	88.5	41.9	44.4	42.5	51.5	14.1	24.8
Y	41.8	42.8	47.6	41.1	51.7	44.1	48.1	48.1	48.7	73.5	66.0	51.0	49.3
Zr	207	328	387	388	336	260.0	257	235	240	384	385	339	347
Nb	11.8	12.4	14.5	11.1	15.0	16.4	14.8	14.4	15.1	25.5	25.1	12.6	17.2
Cs	0.85	1.71	1.24	1.63	1.13	1.24	0.75	1.54	1.90	1.13	1.30	3.24	2.52
Ba	35.0	51.8	83.8	127.0	135.0	138.5	231.0	178.5	157.0	231.0	242.0	33.8	74.7
Hf	5.2	8.0	9.7	9.0	9.2	8.4	7.2	7.1	7.3	11.6	10.7	9.0	9.6
Ta	1.0	1.1	1.2	1.0	1.4	1.9	1.4	1.3	1.4	1.9	1.7	1.0	1.5
Th	14.80	18.05	18.90	13.05	20.50	21.90	20.20	20.70	21.50	16.75	17.40	17.00	19.20
U	3.09	4.31	4.33	3.15	5.54	5.01	4.61	3.06	3.31	1.94	2.26	3.21	5.04
La	42.6	61.2	57.1	43.8	49.1	42.6	50.5	52.2	53.2	52.5	56.3	53.1	44.1
Ce	89.9	129.5	125.0	96.3	106.0	92.8	104.5	109.0	107.5	124.5	128.5	114.0	94.0
Pr	10.15	14.30	13.65	10.65	11.50	9.87	11.25	11.50	12.15	15.20	15.30	12.60	10.85
Nd	35.5	48.4	47.3	37.3	38.8	33.7	37.3	39.4	41.2	54.3	54.7	45.1	38.2
Sm	7.56	9.28	9.59	7.78	8.15	7.29	7.62	8.28	8.28	11.90	11.85	9.21	7.82
Eu	0.17	0.25	0.37	0.52	0.34	0.33	0.54	0.35	0.38	0.85	0.88	0.20	0.33
Gd	6.44	7.83	8.65	7.17	7.98	6.40	7.11	7.20	7.73	11.25	10.10	8.49	7.86
Tb	0.99	1.20	1.32	1.18	1.35	1.12	1.23	1.27	1.25	2.00	1.77	1.41	1.39
Dy	6.08	7.59	8.50	7.41	8.66	7.25	7.63	7.80	8.01	13.45	11.85	9.02	9.13
Ho	1.31	1.60	1.74	1.51	1.83	1.53	1.65	1.73	1.63	2.78	2.33	1.85	1.79
Er	3.93	4.60	5.25	4.47	5.36	4.88	4.69	4.99	4.80	7.78	6.83	5.47	5.79
Tm	0.60	0.69	0.80	0.65	0.85	0.78	0.75	0.74	0.80	1.11	0.99	0.80	0.86
Yb	3.99	5.01	5.29	4.52	5.79	5.42	5.07	5.25	5.32	6.95	6.07	5.17	5.81
Lu	0.61	0.82	0.87	0.73	0.93	0.83	0.76	0.80	0.78	1.02	0.93	0.87	0.92
REE	209.8	292.3	285.4	224.0	246.6	214.8	240.6	250.5	253.0	305.6	308.4	267.3	228.9
δEu	0.07	0.09	0.12	0.21	0.13	0.15	0.22	0.14	0.15	0.22	0.25	0.07	0.13
(La/Yb)_N	7.66	8.76	7.74	6.95	6.08	5.64	7.14	7.13	7.17	5.42	6.65	7.37	5.44
T_Zr	819	847	869	864	853	832	829	821	824	872	873	855	858
注：样品号均省略“PM”；样品岩性均为碱性花岗岩；Mg# = molar 100 × MgO/(MgO + F_eOt); A/CNK = Al₂O₃/ (CaO +Na₂O + K₂O)分子比；A/NK = Al₂O₃/(Na₂O+ K₂O)分子比；T_Zr代表使用Watson和Harrison等公式计算的温度，℃

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 南山口碱性花岗岩Sr-Nd同位素分析结果

Table 3. Sr-Nd isotopes analysis results for the alkaline granitic rocks from Nanshankou

样号	岩性	年龄/ Ma	⁸⁷Rb/⁸⁶Sr	⁸⁷Sr/⁸⁶Sr	¹⁴⁷Sm/¹⁴⁴Nd	¹⁴³Nd/¹⁴⁴Nd	f_Sm/Nd	I_Sr	εNd(t)	T_DM1/Ma	T_DM2/Ma	F_x1	F_x2
44-6	碱性花岗岩	331	19.16	0.793567 ±5	0. 1159	0.512753 ±5	-0.41	0.7033	+ 5.66	620	630	0.87	0.93
45-17	碱性花岗岩	331	29.91	0.833196 ±7	0.1235	0.512793 ±3	-0.37	0.6923	+6.12	600	590	0.90	0.95
注：⁸⁷Rb/⁸⁶Sr、¹⁴⁷Sm/¹⁴⁴Nd通过全岩Rb、Sr、Sm、Nd含量计算；t采用岩体锆石年龄；I_Sr代表⁸⁷Sr/⁸⁶Sr初始值，I_Sr =⁸⁷Sr/⁸⁶Sr-⁸⁷Rb/⁸⁶Sr×(e^0.0142t-1); εNd(t) = [(¹⁴³Nd/¹⁴⁴Nd)(t)/(¹⁴³Nd/¹⁴⁴Nd)_CHUR(t)-1]×10⁴; f_Sm/Nd、T_DM1、T_DM2计算见文献(Li，2003)，参与式中计算的（¹⁴³Nd/¹⁴⁴Nd)_CHUR = 0.51263，(¹⁴⁷Sm/¹⁴⁴Nd)_CHUR = 0.1967, (¹⁴³Nd/¹⁴⁴Nd)_DM = 0.51315, (¹⁴⁷Sm/¹⁴⁴Nd)_DM = 0. 2136；F_x1 = (ε^c1 -ε^r)Nd_cl/[ ε^r(Ndm-Ndc₁) -(ε^mNd_m-ε^c1Nd_c1)]; F_x2 = (ε^c2-ε^r)Nd_c2)/[ε^r(Ndm-Ndc₂) -(ε^mNd_m-ε^e2Nd_c2)]; F_x1代表幔源组分（以玄武岩为代表）与地壳混合所占的百分含量；F_x2代表幔源组分（以玄武岩为代表）与大洋沉积物混合所占的百分含量；ε^c1、ε^c2、ε^r、ε^m，分别代表地壳、大洋沉积物、所测岩体、地幔同位素组分；Nd_c1、Nd_c2、Nd_m分别代表地壳、大洋沉积物、地幔中Nd的含量，其中地壳端元（据文献^[39]) ε^c1 = -4, Nd_c1 =25×10^-6; 地幔端元以玄武岩为代表（据文献^[39])，ε^m=-4, Nd_m=15;大洋沉积物拟用现今大西洋大洋沉积物（据White^[40])

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(62)

[1]	韩宝福, 何国琦, 王式洸, 等.新疆北部后碰撞幔源岩浆活动与陆壳纵向生长[J].地质论评, 1998, 44(4):396~404. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP199804008.htm HAN Bao-fu, HE Guo-qi, WANG Shi-guang, et al. Postcollisional Mantle-Derived Magmatism and Vertical Growth of the Continental Crust in North Xin jiang[J]. Geological Review, 1998, 44(4):396~404. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP199804008.htm
[2]	WU F, SUN D, LI H, et al. A-type granites in northeastern China:age and geochemical constraints on their petrogenesis[J]. Chemical Geology, 2002, 187(1/2):143~173.
[3]	WU F, JAHN B, WILDE S, et al. Phanerozoic crustal growth:U-Pb and Sr-Nd isotopic evidence from the granites in northeastern China[J]. Tectonophysics, 2000, 328(1/2):89~113.
[4]	JAHN B, WU F, CAPDEVILA R, et al. Highly evolved juvenile granites with tetrad REE patterns:The Woduhe and Baerzhe granites from the Great Xing'an Mountains in NE China[J]. Lithos, 2001, 59(4):171~198. doi: 10.1016/S0024-4937(01)00066-4
[5]	王宗秀. 博格达山链的造山活动与山体形成演化[D]. 北京: 中国地震局地质研究所, 2003. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-85402-2004096211.htm WANG Zong-xiu. Orogeny, Formation and evolution in the Bogeda Mountain Chains, Northwestern China[D] Beijing:Institute of Geology, Seismological Bureau of China, 2003. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-85402-2004096211.htm
[6]	XIAO W J. Paleozoic accretionary and collisional tectonics of the eastern Tianshan (China):Implications for the continental growth of central Asia[J]. American Journal of Science, 2004, 304(4):370~395. doi: 10.2475/ajs.304.4.370
[7]	李锦轶, 何国琦, 徐新, 等.新疆北部及邻区地壳构造格架及其形成过程的初步探讨[J].地质学报, 2006, 80(1):148~168. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE200601020.htm LI Jin-yi, HE Guo-qi, XU Xin, et al. Crustal Tectonic Framework of Northern Xinjiang and Adjacent Regions and Its Formation[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2006, 80(1):148~168. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE200601020.htm
[8]	李锦轶, 张进, 杨天南, 等.北亚造山区南部及其毗邻地区地壳构造分区与构造演化[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版, 2009, 39(4):584~605. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ200904002.htm LI Jin-yi, ZHANG Jin, YANG Tian-nan, et al. Crustal Tectonic Division and Evolution of the Southern Part of the North Asian Orogenic Region and Its Adjacent Areas[J]. Journal of Jilin University:Earth Science Edition, 2009, 39(4):584~605. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ200904002.htm
[9]	孙桂华. 新疆哈尔里克山古生代以来构造变形及构造演化[D]. 北京: 中国地质科学院, 2007. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-82501-2007213366.htm SUN Gui-hua. Structural Deformation and Tectonic Evolution of Harlik Mountain, in Xinjiang since the Paleozoic[D]. Beijing:Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, 2007. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-82501-2007213366.htm
[10]	王京彬, 徐新.新疆北部后碰撞构造演化与成矿[J].地质学报, 2006, 80(1):23~31. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE200601002.htm WANG Jing-bin, XU Xin, et al. Post-collisional Tectonic Evolution and Metallogenesis in Northern Xinjiang, China[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2006, 80(1):23~31. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE200601002.htm
[11]	夏林圻, 夏祖春, 徐学义, 等.天山古生代洋陆转化特点的几点思考[J].西北地质, 2002, 35(4):9~20. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBDI200204001.htm XIA Lin-qi, XIA Zu-chun, XU Xue-yi, et al. Some thoughts on the characteristics of Paleozoic ocean-continent transition from Tian shan mountoins[J]. Northwestern Geology, 2002, 35(4):9~20. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBDI200204001.htm
[12]	夏林圻, 夏祖春, 徐学义, 等.天山及邻区石炭纪-早二叠世裂谷火山岩岩石成因[J].西北地质, 2008, 41(4):1~68. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBDI200804002.htm XIA Lin-qi, XIA Zu-chun, XU Xue-yi, et al. Petrogenesis of Caboniferous-Early Permian Rift-Related Volcanic Rocks in the Tianshan and its Neighboring Areas, Northwestern China[J]. Northwestern Geology, 2008, 41(4):1~68. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBDI200804002.htm
[13]	夏林圻, 李向民, 夏祖春, 等. 天山石炭-二叠纪大火成岩省裂谷火山作用与地幔柱[J]. 西北地质, 2006, 39(1): 1~49. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBDI200601001.htm XIA Lin-qi, LI Xiang-min, XIA Zu-chun, XU Xue-yi, et al. Carboniferous-Permian Rift-Related Volcanism and Mantle Plume in the Tian shan, Northwestern China[J]. Northwestern Geology, 2006, 39(1):1~49. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBDI200601001.htm
[14]	顾连兴, 胡受奚, 于春水, 等.论博格达俯冲撕裂型裂谷的形成与演化[J].岩石学报, 2001, 17(4):585~597. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200104008.htm GU Lian-xing, HU Shou-xi, YU Chun-shui, et al. Initiation and evolution of the Bogda subduction-torn-type rift[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2001, 17(4):585~597. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200104008.htm
[15]	王银喜, 顾连兴, 张遵忠, 等.博格达裂谷双峰式火山岩地质年代学与Nd-Sr-Pb同位素地球化学特征[J].岩石学报, 2006, 22(5):1215~1224. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200605013.htm WANG Yin-xi, GU Lian-xing, ZHANG Zun-zhong, et al. Geochronology and Nd-Sr-Pb isotope of the bimodal volcanic rocks of the Bogda rift[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2006, 22(5):1215~1224. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200605013.htm
[16]	顾连兴, 胡受奚, 于春水, 等.东天山博格达造山带石炭纪火山岩及其形成地质环境[J].岩石学报, 2000, 16(3):305~316. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200003000.htm GU Lian-xing, HU Shou-xi, YU Chun-shui, et al. Carbonif erous volcanites in the Bogda orogenic belt of eastern Tianshan:their tectonic implications[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2000, 16(3):305~316. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200003000.htm
[17]	李锦轶, 王克卓, 孙桂华, 等.东天山吐哈盆地南缘古生代活动陆缘残片:中亚地区古亚洲洋板块俯冲的地质记录[J].岩石学报, 2006, 22(5):1087~1102. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200605004.htm LI Jin-yi, WANG Ke-zhuo, SUN Gui-hua, et al. Paleozoie active margin slices in the southern Turfan-Hami basin:geologlcal records of subduction of the Paleo-Asian Ocean Plate in central Asian regions[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2006, 22(5):1087~1102. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200605004.htm
[18]	XIAO W, HAN C, YUAN C, et al. Middle Cambrian to Permian subduction-related accretionary orogenesis of Northern Xinjiang, NW China:Implications for the tectonic evolution of central Asia[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2008, 32(2/4):102~117.
[19]	JAHN B M. The Central Asian Orogenic Belt and growth of the continental crust in the Phanerozoic[J]. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2004, 226(1):73~100. doi: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2004.226.01.05
[20]	新疆省地质矿产局. 中华人民共和国区域地质调查报告——口门子(K46E005015) 幅(1: 5万). 2016.
[21]	Creaser R A, 杨庚. A型花岗岩回顾——对残留源区模式的评价[J].地质科学译丛, 1992, (1):21~26. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BSHB199201007.htm
[22]	LIU Y, HU Z, ZONG K, et al. Reappraisement and refinement of zircon U-Pb isotope and trace element analyses by LA-ICP-MS[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2010, 55(15):1535~1546. doi: 10.1007/s11434-010-3052-4
[23]	LIU Y, HU Z, GAO S, et al. In situ analysis of major and trace elements of anhydrous minerals by LA-ICP-MS without applying an internal standard[J]. Chemical Geology, 2008, 257(1/2):34~43.
[24]	LUDWIG K R. Mathematical-Statistical Treatment of Data and Errors for 230Th/U Geochronology[J]. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 2003, 52(1):631~656. doi: 10.2113/0520631
[25]	ANDERSEN T. Correction of common lead in U-Pb analyses that do not report ²⁰⁴Pb[J]. Chemical Geology, 2002, 192(1/2):59~79.
[26]	GAO S, RUDNICK R L, YUAN H, et al. Recycling lower continental crust in the North China craton[J]. Nature, 2004, 432(7019):892~897. doi: 10.1038/nature03162
[27]	HOSKIN P W O, BLACK L P. Metamorphic zircon formation by solid-state recrystallization of protolith igneous zircon[J]. Journal of Metamorphic Geology, 2000, 18(4):423~439.
[28]	HOSKIN P W O. The Composition of Zircon and Igneous and Metamorphic Petrogenesis[J]. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 2003, 53(1):27~62. doi: 10.2113/0530027
[29]	吴元保, 郑永飞.锆石成因矿物学研究及其对U-Pb年龄解释的制约[J].科学通报, 2004, 49(16):1589~1604. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXTB200416001.htm WU Yuan-bao, ZHENG Yong-fei, et al. Genesis of zircon and its constraints on interpretation of U-Pb age[J]. Science Bulletin, 2004, 49(15):1589~1604. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXTB200416001.htm
[30]	路风香, 桑隆康.岩石学[M].北京:地质出版社, 2007. LU Feng-xiang, SANG Long-kang. Petrology[M]. Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 2007.
[31]	FROST C D, FROST B R. On ferroan (A-type) granitoids:Their compositional variability and modes of origin[J]. Journal of Petrology, 2010, 52(1):39~53.
[32]	SHAND S J. Eruptive rocks[M]. Murby London, 1927.
[33]	De la ROCHE H, LETERRIER J, GRANDCLAUDE P, et al. A classification of volcanic and plutonic rocks using R1-R2 diagram and major-element analyses:Its relationships with current nomenclature[J]. Chemical Geology, 1980, 29(1/4):183~210.
[34]	苏玉平, 唐红峰. A型花岗岩的微量元素地球化学[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2005, 24(3):245~251. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KYDH200503012.htm SU Yu-ping, TANG Hong-feng, et al. Trace Element Geochemistry of A-Type Granites[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 2005, 24(3):245~251. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KYDH200503012.htm
[35]	WHALEN J B. A-type granites:geochemical characteristics, discrimination and petrogenesis[J]. Contrib Mineral Petrol, 1987, 95(4):407~419. doi: 10.1007/BF00402202
[36]	WU F, SUN D, GE W, et al. Geochronology of the Phanerozoic granitoids in northeastern China[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2011, 41(1):1~30. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.11.014
[37]	HAN B, WANG S, JAHN B, et al. Depleted-mantle source for the Ulungur River A-type granites from North Xinjiang, China:geochemistry and Nd-Sr isotopic evidence, and implications for Phanerozoic crustal growth[J]. Chemical Geology, 1997, 138(3/4):135~159.
[38]	李献华. Sm-Nd模式年龄和等时线年龄的适用性与局限性[J].地质科学, 1996, 31(1):97~104. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKX601.010.htm LI Xian-hua. Li X H, A discussion on the model and isochron ages of Sm-Nd isotopic systematics:Suitability and limitation[J].Scientia Geologica Sinica, 1996, 31(1):97~104. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKX601.010.htm
[39]	SUN S S, MCDONOUGH W F. Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts:implications for mantle composition and processes[J]. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 1989, 42(1):313~345. doi: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1989.042.01.19
[40]	JAHN B, WU F, HONG D. Important crustal growth in the Phanerozoic:Isotopic evidence of granitoids from east-central Asia[J]. Journal of Earth System Science, 2000, 109(1):5~20. doi: 10.1007/BF02719146
[41]	WHITE W M, DUPRÉ B, VIDAL P. Isotope and trace element geochemistry of sediments from the Barbados Ridge-Demerara Plain region, Atlantic Ocean[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1985, 49(9):1875~1886. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(85)90082-1
[42]	WHITE B W C A. I-and S-type granites in the Lachlan Fold Belt[J]. GSA Special Papers, 1992, 272:1~26. doi: 10.1130/SPE272
[43]	LOISELLE M C W D R. Characteristics and origin of anorogenic granites[J]. California:San Diego, 1979:468.
[44]	吴福元, 李献华, 杨进辉, 等.花岗岩成因研究的若干问题[J].岩石学报, 2007, 23(6):1217~1238. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HBDK199001002.htm WU Fu-yuan, LI Xian-hua, YANG Jin-hui, et al. Discussions on the petrogenesis of granites[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2007, 23(6):1217~1238. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HBDK199001002.htm
[45]	CHAPPELL B W. Aluminium saturation in I-and S-type granites and the characterization of fractionated haplogranites[J]. Lithos, 1999, 46(3):535~551. doi: 10.1016/S0024-4937(98)00086-3
[46]	李小伟, 莫宣学, 赵志丹, 等.关于A型花岗岩判别过程中若干问题的讨论[J].地质通报, 2010, (Z1):278~285. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD2010Z1013.htm LI Xiao-wei, MO Xuan-xue, ZHAO Zhi-dan, et al. A discussion on how to discriminate A-type granite[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2010, (Z1):278~285. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD2010Z1013.htm
[47]	KING P L. Characterization and origin of aluminous A-type granites from the Lachlan Fold Belt, southeastern Australia[J]. Journal of Petrology, 1997, 38(3):371~391. doi: 10.1093/petroj/38.3.371
[48]	顾连兴. A型花岗岩的特征、成因及成矿[J].地质科技情报, 1990, (1):25~31. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ199001006.htm GU Lian-xing. Geological features, petrogenesis and metallogeny of A-type granites[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 1990, (1):25~31. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ199001006.htm
[49]	EBY N G. Chemical subdivision of the A-type granitoids:Petrogenetic and tectonic implications[J]. Geology, 1992, 7(20):641~644.
[50]	SYLVESTER P J. Post-Collisional Alkaline Granites[J]. The Journal of Geology, 1989, 97(3):261~280. doi: 10.1086/629302
[51]	刘红涛, 孙世华, 刘建明, 等.华北克拉通北缘中生代高锶花岗岩类:地球化学与源区性质[J].岩石学报, 2002, 18(3):257~274. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200203000.htm LlU Hong-tao, SUN Shi-hua, LlU Jian-ming, et al. The Mesozoic high-Sr granitoids in the northern marginal region of North China Craton geochemistry and source region[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2002, 18(3):257~274. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200203000.htm
[52]	贾小辉, 王强, 唐功建. A型花岗岩的研究进展及意义[J].大地构造与成矿学, 2009, 33(3):465~480. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGYK200903020.htm JIA Xiao-hui, WANG Qian, TANG Gong-jian, et al. A-type granites:Research progress and implications[J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 2009, 33(3):465~480. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGYK200903020.htm
[53]	BONIN B. A-type granites and related rocks:Evolution of a concept, problems and prospects[J]. Lithos, 2007, 97(1/2):1~29.
[54]	童英, 王涛, 洪大卫, 等.北疆及邻区石炭-二叠纪花岗岩时空分布特征及其构造意义[J].岩石矿物学杂志, 2010, 29(6):619~641. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSKW201006003.htm TONG Ying, WANG Tao, HONG Da-wei, et al. Spatial and temporal distribution of the Carboniferous-Permian granitoidsin northern Xinjiang and its adjacent areas, and its tectonic significance[J]. Acta Petrologica Et Mineralogica, 2010, 29(6):619~641. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSKW201006003.htm
[55]	田健. 东准噶尔卡拉麦里地区早石炭世侵入岩的岩石学特征及其地质意义[D]. 武汉: 中国地质大学, 2014. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10491-1014340953.htm TIAN Jian. The petrologic characteristics and tectonic implications for Early Carboniferous intrusions from the area of Karamaili in eastern Junggar[D]. Wuhan:China University of Geosciences, 2014. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10491-1014340953.htm
[56]	黄伟. 东天山哈密地区石炭-二叠纪碱性花岗岩年代学、地球化学及成因[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学, 2014. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-11415-1014238306.htm HUANG Wei. Geochoronology, Geochemistry and Origin of Carboniferous-Permian Alkali Granites inEastern Tianshan Hami, NW China[D]. Beijing:China University of Geosciences, 2014. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-11415-1014238306.htm
[57]	郑建平, 王方正, 成中梅, 等.拼合的准噶尔盆地基底:基底火山岩Sr-Nd同位素证据[J].地球科学. 2000(02):179~185. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-2383.2000.02.013 ZHENG Jian-ping, WANG Fang-zheng, CHENG Zhong-mei, et al. Nature and evolution of amalgamated basement of Junggar Basin, northwestern China:Sr-Nd isotope evidences of basement igneous rock[J]. Earth Science. 2000(02):179~185. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-2383.2000.02.013
[58]	田黎萍, 王金荣, 汤中立, 等.新疆博格达山东段早石炭世火山岩地球化学特征及其构造意义[J].兰州大学学报:自然科学版, 2010, 46(4):30~36. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LDZK201004007.htm TIAN Li-ping, WANG Jin-rong, TANG Zhong-li, et al. Geochemical characteristic and tectonic significance of the early carboniferous volcanic rocks in eastern Bogda mountains of Xinjiang region[J]. Journal of Lanzhou University:Natural Science, 2010, 46(4):30~36. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LDZK201004007.htm
[59]	易鹏飞. 东天山博格达-巴里坤塔格石炭纪-早二叠世陆内裂谷演化特征[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2013. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10710-1014023313.htm YI Peng-fei. Evolution characteristics of Bogda-Balkun intracontinental rift in Carboniferous-Early Permian[D]. Xi'an:Chang'an University, 2013. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10710-1014023313.htm
[60]	王银喜, 顾连兴, 张遵忠, 等.东天山晚石炭世大石头群流纹岩Sr-Nd-Pb同位素地球化学研究[J].岩石学报, 2007, 23(7):1749~1755. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200707019.htm WANG Yin-xi, GU Lian-xing, ZHANG Zun-zhi, et al. Sr-Nd-Pb isotope geochemistry of Rhyolite of the Late Carboniferous Dashitou group in eastern Tianshan[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2007, 23(7):1749~1755. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200707019.htm
[61]	张旗, 潘国强, 李承东, 等.花岗岩构造环境问题:关于花岗岩研究的思考之三[J].岩石学报, 2007, 23(11):2683~2698. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0569.2007.11.002 ZHANG Qi, PAN Guoqiang, Li Chengdong, et al. Are discrimination diagrams always indicative of correct tectonic settings of granites? Some crucial questions on granite study (3)[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2007, 23(11):2683~2698. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0569.2007.11.002
[62]	PEARCE J A, LIPPARD S J, ROBERTS S. Characteristics and tectonic significance of supra-subduction zone ophiolites[J]. Geological Society, London, Special Publications. 1984, 16(1):77~94. doi: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1984.016.01.06