滇东北镇雄西部栖霞-茅口组碳酸盐岩地球化学特征及环境意义

潘明; 郝彦珍; 吕勇; 山克强; 苏光样

滇东北镇雄西部栖霞-茅口组碳酸盐岩地球化学特征及环境意义

中国地质科学院岩溶地质研究所, 桂林 541004

基金项目:

中国地质科学院岩溶地质研究所基本科研业务费项目 2015015

中国地质调查局地质调查项目 12120114042601

中国地质调查局地质调查项目 DD20160061

详细信息

作者简介:
潘明(1985-), 男, 助理研究员, 主要从事区域地质调查和碳酸盐岩方面的研究。E-mail:panming@karst.ac.cn

中图分类号: P595
计量
- 文章访问数: 291
- HTML全文浏览量: 198
- PDF下载量: 18
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2016-11-08
- 刊出日期: 2017-06-01

GEOCHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE CARBONATE ROCKS IN QIXIA-MAOKOU FORMATION IN WESTERN ZHENXIONG, NORTHEASTERN YUNNAN

Institute of Karst Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Guilin 541004, China

摘要

摘要: 镇雄县安家坝一带中二叠统栖霞组-茅口组地层出露较好，沉积连续。以此剖面为基础，连续采集碳酸盐岩样品42个，根据其显微特征、元素相关性、元素组份含量及相关元素的比值特征，探讨了研究区碳酸盐岩沉积地球化学特征与古环境意义。研究表明（1）样品中CaO与SiO₂、MgO呈现出比较明显的负相关关系，且后两者在岩石中的含量很低，说明样品在沉积和成岩过程中受陆源物质影响或改造的程度较小。（2）通过对元素含量以及相关元素比值的垂向分布特征分析，如Sr/Ba、MgO/CaO和V/V+Ni等，对不同沉积阶段进行了古水深和古氧相等方面的研究，数据表明茅口组沉积环境相比栖霞组具有较明显的差异。
- 碳酸盐岩 /
- 地球化学特征 /
- 古环境 /
- 栖霞组 /
- 茅口组
Abstract: Qixia-Maokou Formation in Middle Permain, in Anjiaba of Zhenxiong County, is well outcropped and continuously deposited. Making this section as the research object, collecting 42 samples of carbonate rocks, based on the microscopic characteristics, the elements correlation, the elements content as well as the ratio characteristics of the related elements, the geochemical characteristics and the paleo environmental significance of the carbonate rocks in the study area were discussed. Some conclusions have been drawn. Firstly there are obvious negative correlations between CaO and SiO₂, MgO in the rock samples, and the contents of the latter two in rocks are rather low, which both indicate that the samples are less affected and transformed by the terrigenous material in the process of deposition and diagenesis. Secondly, based on the analysis of the element contents and the vertical distribution characteristics of the relevant elements ratios, such as Sr/Ba, MgO/CaO and V/V+Ni etc, and the study of the paleo-water depth and the paleo-oxygenation facies in different sedimentary stages, the data show that compared with Qixia Formation, the sedimentary environment of Maokou Formation has obvious difference.
- Carbonate rocks /
- Geochemical characteristics /
- palaeoenvironment /
- Qixia Formation /
- Maokou Formation

HTML全文

图 1 研究区地理位置图(a)和研究区碳酸盐岩地层分布特征(b)

Figure 1. Location map of study area (a) and distribution characteristics of the carbonate rocks in the study area (b)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 栖霞组-茅口组地层柱状图

Figure 2. Stratigraphic column of Qixia-Maokou formation

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 碳酸盐岩显微照片(c为正交偏光+锥光, 其余为单偏光)

(a)—第14层, 微泥晶生屑灰岩; (b)—第15层, 燧石结核灰岩; (c)—第19层, 细-粉晶生物屑含硅质灰质白云岩; (d)—第22层, 藻砂屑生物屑灰岩; (e)—第24层, 亮-泥晶棘皮屑蜓屑红藻屑灰岩; (f)—第25层, 有孔虫屑红-绿藻屑灰岩

Figure 3. Hand specimens and photomicrographs of the carbonates with plane polarized light

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 元素相关性及分布情况

Figure 4. The correlation and distribution of the elements

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 常量元素和微量元素分布特征

Figure 5. Variation curves of major elements(%)and trace elements(×10^-6)of carbonate rocks

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 栖霞-茅口组碳酸盐岩主量(%)和微量(×10^-6)分析结果

Table 1. The analysis results of the major elements (%) and trace elements (×10^-6) of the carbonate rocks in Qixia-Maokou formation

样品号	岩性	SiO₂	Al₂O₃	CaO	MgO	Sr	Ba	V	Ni	Ti	Mg	MgO/CaO	Sr/Ba	Ni/V	V/V+Ni
Y1	泥晶生物屑灰岩	1.29	0.22	54.55	0.53	196.00	5.35	18.30	0.05	40.20	0.32	0.010	36.64	0.00	1.00
Y2	泥晶生物屑灰岩	0.83	0.09	54.99	0.62	304.00	3.11	3.65	0.05	13.70	0.37	0.011	97.75	0.01	0.99
Y3	微—泥晶生物屑灰岩	0.87	0.22	54.54	0.71	284.00	9.45	5.98	0.05	36.20	0.43	0.013	30.05	0.01	0.99
Y4	生物屑微—泥晶灰岩	0.69	0.14	54.96	0.55	383.00	4.40	12.80	0.05	22.10	0.33	0.010	87.05	0.00	1.00
Y5	微—泥晶生物屑灰岩	0.39	0.15	54.72	0.54	776.00	10.80	22.40	8.25	27.00	0.32	0.010	71.85	0.37	0.73
Y6	微—泥晶生物屑灰岩	0.40	0.11	54.75	0.63	631.00	8.17	21.80	7.62	23.00	0.38	0.012	77.23	0.35	0.74
Y7	微—泥晶生物屑灰岩	0.87	0.10	54.54	0.63	1322.00	11.50	12.30	9.43	20.00	0.38	0.012	114.96	0.77	0.57
Y8	亮—泥晶含藻砂屑生物屑灰岩	1.00	0.04	51.47	0.46	528.00	1.38	2.33	9.06	13.50	0.28	0.009	382.61	3.89	0.20
Y9	微—泥晶生物屑灰岩	1.59	0.06	54.83	0.38	594.00	1.75	3.98	6.54	6.63	0.23	0.007	339.43	1.64	0.38
Y10	微—泥晶含藻砂屑生物屑灰岩	1.57	0.05	55.00	0.38	347.00	1.39	2.90	0.05	8.20	0.23	0.007	249.64	0.02	0.98
Y11	微—泥晶含藻砂屑生物屑灰岩	0.01	0.04	55.95	0.30	233.00	2.06	1.25	3.45	6.47	0.18	0.005	113.11	2.76	0.27
Y12	泥晶生物屑灰岩	0.28	0.13	52.77	2.48	384.00	2.28	11.80	19.10	32.70	1.49	0.047	168.42	1.62	0.38
Y13	瘤状生物屑微—泥晶灰岩	1.79	0.07	53.98	0.66	543.00	2.02	12.10	16.00	12.90	0.40	0.012	268.81	1.32	0.43
Y14	含硅质含灰质生物屑细—粉晶白云岩	12.66	0.25	49.42	7.97	410.00	7.32	21.10	4.21	63.90	4.78	0.161	56.01	0.20	0.83
Y15	介屑有孔虫屑微—泥晶灰岩	0.78	0.08	55.21	0.49	912.00	2.92	12.10	7.58	19.30	0.29	0.009	312.33	0.63	0.61
Y16	泥晶绿藻屑灰岩	1.27	0.08	54.11	0.74	479.00	1.97	5.40	0.53	12.90	0.44	0.014	243.15	0.10	0.91
Y17	微—泥晶生物屑灰岩	1.82	0.05	53.99	0.80	556.00	2.74	19.20	2.24	18.60	0.48	0.015	202.92	0.12	0.90
Y18	泥晶绿藻屑灰岩	1.26	0.07	54.28	0.88	540.00	3.06	13.60	9.48	16.80	0.53	0.016	176.47	0.70	0.59
Y19	介屑(绿)藻屑微—泥晶灰岩	0.60	0.06	54.73	0.74	682.00	3.22	10.80	5.11	11.10	0.44	0.014	211.80	0.47	0.68
Y20	微—隐晶硅质岩或燧石	88.97	0.29	40.38	0.07	174.00	6.70	8.89	4.89	28.20	0.04	0.002	25.97	0.55	0.65
Y21	绿藻屑泥晶灰岩	1.59	0.07	54.39	0.61	760.00	2.68	4.77	8.39	12.70	0.37	0.011	283.58	1.76	0.36
Y22	泥晶绿藻屑灰岩	1.21	0.04	54.41	0.77	710.00	2.47	14.00	8.66	10.60	0.46	0.014	287.45	0.62	0.62
Y23	微—泥晶含藻砂屑生物屑灰岩	1.41	0.04	54.81	0.47	495.00	1.68	5.58	1.42	7.14	0.28	0.009	294.64	0.25	0.80
Y24	微—泥晶藻砂屑生物屑灰岩	1.31	0.03	54.74	0.40	662.00	4.00	5.50	0.05	4.34	0.24	0.007	165.50	0.01	0.99
Y25	微—泥晶生物屑灰岩	0.22	0.05	55.53	0.38	376.00	2.88	20.50	7.59	7.10	0.23	0.007	130.56	0.37	0.73
Y26	微—泥晶生物屑灰岩	1.58	0.09	54.53	0.56	335.00	3.60	8.31	17.20	21.50	0.34	0.010	93.06	2.07	0.33
Y27	微—泥晶含藻砂屑生物屑灰岩	0.86	0.08	54.78	0.68	327.00	3.17	7.85	3.20	22.90	0.41	0.012	103.15	0.41	0.71
Y28	生物屑泥晶灰岩	6.24	0.11	51.13	0.57	324.00	3.58	9.05	13.30	21.40	0.34	0.011	90.50	1.47	0.40
Y29	生物屑泥晶灰岩	0.02	0.03	55.77	0.40	498.00	3.00	3.11	22.30	8.38	0.24	0.007	166.00	7.17	0.12
Y30	生物屑泥晶灰岩	5.50	0.03	52.47	0.42	468.00	2.25	5.72	15.30	5.19	0.25	0.008	208.00	2.67	0.27
Y31	微—泥晶棘皮屑红藻屑含白云质灰岩	0.03	0.03	50.19	2.01	376.00	3.42	5.26	20.50	4.24	1.21	0.040	109.94	3.90	0.20
Y32	亮—泥晶含藻砂屑棘皮屑红藻屑灰岩	0.01	0.02	55.67	0.38	465.00	3.90	2.35	12.40	3.39	0.23	0.007	119.23	5.28	0.16
Y33	亮—泥晶含藻砂屑棘皮屑红藻屑灰岩	0.01	0.03	55.68	0.32	379.00	4.16	0.91	8.68	3.35	0.19	0.006	91.11	9.54	0.09
Y34	亮—泥晶棘皮屑蜓屑红藻屑灰岩	0.01	0.03	55.26	0.31	427.00	4.53	0.83	22.00	8.03	0.19	0.006	94.26	13.51	0.04
Y35	亮—泥晶蜓屑棘皮屑红藻屑灰岩	0.01	0.02	55.83	0.31	395.00	3.94	2.30	12.00	8.53	0.19	0.006	100.25	5.22	0.16
Y36	生物屑泥晶灰岩	0.08	0.07	55.95	0.40	461.00	1.56	2.57	20.40	10.60	0.24	0.007	295.51	7.94	0.11
Y37	微—泥晶红藻屑棘皮屑灰岩	0.12	0.06	55.59	0.46	315.00	2.21	5.81	14.00	10.10	0.28	0.008	142.53	2.41	0.29
Y38	微—泥晶有孔虫屑红—绿藻屑灰岩	0.06	0.07	55.11	0.78	441.00	1.98	10.20	15.50	11.00	0.47	0.014	222.73	1.52	0.40
Y39	泥晶介屑红—绿藻屑灰岩	0.20	0.16	54.81	0.54	1398.00	8.34	29.10	26.20	55.00	0.32	0.010	167.63	0.90	0.53
Y40	亮—泥晶有孔虫屑红—绿藻屑灰岩	0.22	0.05	55.29	0.55	563.00	2.62	2.68	16.60	13.80	0.33	0.010	214.89	6.19	0.14
Y41	红—绿藻屑泥晶生物屑灰岩	0.15	0.13	55.08	0.54	652.00	4.58	31.90	13.50	34.90	0.32	0.010	142.36	0.42	0.70
Y42	亮—泥晶红藻砂屑生物屑灰岩	0.16	0.06	55.70	0.44	520.00	3.07	2.86	21.10	15.20	0.26	0.008	169.38	7.38	0.12

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(23)

[1]	施春华, 黄秋, 颜佳新.广西来宾栖霞组缺氧沉积环境的地球化学特征[J].沉积与特提斯地质, 2001, 21(2):72~77. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TTSD200102008.htm SHI Chun-hua, HUANG Qiu, YAN Jia-xin. Geochemistry of the dysaerobic sedimentary environments of the Qixia Formation in Laibing, Guangxi[J]. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 2001, 21(2):72~77. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TTSD200102008.htm
[2]	舒晓辉, 张军涛, 李国蓉, 等.四川盆地北部栖霞组-茅口组热液白云岩特征与成因[J].石油与天然气地质, 2012, 33(3):442~448, 458. doi: 10.11743/ogg20120314 SHU Xiao-hui, ZHANG Jun-tao, LI Guo-rong, et al. Characteristics and genesis of hydrothermal dolomites of Qixia and Maokou Formations in northern Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2012, 33(3):442~448, 458. doi: 10.11743/ogg20120314
[3]	周新平, 何幼斌, 罗进雄, 等.川东地区二叠系结核状、条带状及团块状硅岩成因[J].古地理学报, 2012, 14(2):143~154. doi: 10.7605/gdlxb.2012.02.001 ZHOU Xin-ping, HE You-bin, LUO Jin-xiong, et al. Origin of the Permian nodular, striped and lump siliceous rock in eastern Sichuan Province[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2012, 14(2):143~154. doi: 10.7605/gdlxb.2012.02.001
[4]	邓宝柱, 余黎雪, 王永标, 等.湖北赤壁二叠纪-三叠纪之交古海洋沉积环境演化[J].地球科学-中国地质大学学报, 2015, 40(2):317~326. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX201502011.htm DENG Bao-zhu, YU Li-xue, WANG Yong-biao, et al. Evolution of marine conditions and sedimentation during the Permian-Triassic transition in Chibi of Hubei Province[J]. Earth Science-Journal of China University Geosciences, 2015, 40(2):317~326. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX201502011.htm
[5]	刘采, 房强, 景秀春.四川盆地中东部二叠系瓜德鲁普统茅口组牙形刺生物地层及色变指标研究[J].微体古生物学报, 2016, 33(1):9~20. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WSGT201601002.htm LIU Cai, FANG Qiang, JING Xiu-chun. Study of the conodont biostratigraphy and color alternation index in the Permian Maokou formation from the mid-eastern Sichuan Basin, Southwest China[J]. Acta Micropalaeontologica Sinica, 2016, 33(1):9~20. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WSGT201601002.htm
[6]	周新平, 何幼斌, 杜红权, 等.四川宣汉地区二叠系硅岩地球化学特征及成因研究[J].古地理学报, 2009, 11(6):670~680. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GDLX200906011.htm ZHOU Xin-ping, HE You-bin, DU Hong-quan, et al. Geochemical characteristics and origin of the Permian siliceous rocks in Xuanhan region of Sichuan Province[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2009, 11(6):670~680. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GDLX200906011.htm
[7]	汪凯明, 罗顺社.碳酸盐岩地球化学特征与沉积环境判别意义——以冀北坳陷长城系高于庄组为例[J].石油与天然气地质, 2009, 30(3):343~349. doi: 10.11743/ogg20090314 WANG Kai-ming, LUO Shun-she. Geochemical characters of carbonates and indicative significance of sedimentary environment——an example from the Gaoyuzhuang Formation of the Changcheng System in the northern Hebei Depression[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2009, 30(3):343~349. doi: 10.11743/ogg20090314
[8]	Newton R J, Pevitt E L, Wignall P B, et al. Large shifts in the isotopic composition of seawater sulphate across the Permo-Triassic boundary in northern Italy[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2004, 218(3/4):331~345. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012821X03006769
[9]	Bai X, Luo G M, Wu X, et al. Carbon isotope records indicative of paleoceanographical events at the Latest Permian Dalong Formation at Shangsi, Northeast Sichuan, China[J]. Journal of China University of Geosciences, 2008, 19(5):481~487. doi: 10.1016/S1002-0705(08)60053-9
[10]	施春华, 胡瑞忠, 颜佳新.栖霞组沉积地球化学特征及其环境意义[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2004, 23(2):144~148. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KYDH200402011.htm SHI Chun-hua, HU Rui-zhong, YAN Jia-xin. Sedimentary geochemistry of the Qixia formation and its environmental implication[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 2004, 23(2):144~148. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KYDH200402011.htm
[11]	颜佳新.华南地区二叠纪栖霞组碳酸盐岩成因研究及其地质意义[J].沉积学报, 2004, 22(4):579~587. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB200404004.htm YAN Jia-xin. Origin of Permian Chihsian carbonates from South China and its geological implications[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2004, 22(4):579~587. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB200404004.htm
[12]	田洋, 赵小明, 王令占, 等.重庆石柱二叠纪栖霞组地球化学特征及其环境意义[J].沉积学报, 2014, 32(6):1035~1045. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB201406005.htm TIAN Yang, ZHAO Xiao-ming, WANG Ling-zhan, et al. Geochemical characteristics and its Paleoenvironmental implication of Permian Qixia Formation in Shizhu, Chongqing[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2014, 32(6):1035~1045. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB201406005.htm
[13]	张运波, 王根厚, 余正伟, 等.四川盆地中二叠统茅口组米兰科维奇旋回及高频层序[J].古地理学报, 2013, 15(6):777~786. doi: 10.7605/gdlxb.2013.06.064 ZHANG Yun-bo, WANG GEN-hou, YU ZHENG-wei, et al. Milankovitch cycles and high-frequency sequences of the Middle Permian Maokou Formation in Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2013, 15(6):777~786. doi: 10.7605/gdlxb.2013.06.064
[14]	王长城, 施泽进, 胡修权, 等.川东南茅口组缝洞型储层地球物理响应特征及形成机制研究[J].地球物理学进展, 2011, 26(5):1683~1689. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWJ201105025.htm WANG Chang-cheng, SHI Ze-jin, HU Xiu-quan, et al. Geophysical response and formation mechanism analysis of fractured-vuggy reservoir in Maokou formation in southeast Sichuan[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2011, 26(5):1683~1689. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWJ201105025.htm
[15]	肖笛, 谭秀成, 山述娇, 等.四川盆地南部中二叠统茅口组二段沉积微相研究[J].沉积学报, 2015, 33(6):1182~1191. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB201506011.htm XIAO Di, TAN Xiu-cheng, SHAN Shu-Jiao, et al. Sedimentary microfacies of the second member in Maokou Formation, Middle Permian, South Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2015, 33(6):1182~1191. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB201506011.htm
[16]	贵州省地质矿产局区域地质调查大队.贵州岩相古地理图集[M].贵阳:贵州科技出版社, 1992, 67~70. Regional Geological Surveying Team Guizhou Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources. Atlas of lithofacies and paleogeography of Guizhou[M]. Guiyang:Guizhou Science and Technology Publishing House Co. Ltd, 1992, 67~70.
[17]	胡明毅.塔北柯坪奥陶系碳酸盐岩地球化学特征及环境意义[J].石油与天然气地质, 1994, 15(2):158~163. doi: 10.11743/ogg19940208 HU Ming-yi. Geochemical characters and environmental significance of Ordovician carbonate rocks in Keping Area, Tarim Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 1994, 15(2):158~163. doi: 10.11743/ogg19940208
[18]	汪凯明, 罗顺社.燕山地区中元古界高于庄组和杨庄组地球化学特征及环境意义[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2009, 28(4):356~364. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KYDH200904007.htm WANG Kai-ming, LUO Shun-she. Geochemical characteristics and environmental significance of Gaoyuzhuang and Yangzhuang formations in Yanshan region[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 2009, 28(4):356~364. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KYDH200904007.htm
[19]	熊小辉, 肖加飞.沉积环境的地球化学示踪[J].地球与环境, 2011, 39(3):405~414. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZDQ201103021.htm XING Xiao-hui, XIAO Jia-fei. Geochemical indicators of sedimentary environments-a summary[J]. Earth and Environment, 2011, 39(3):405~414. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZDQ201103021.htm
[20]	马素萍, 夏燕青, 田春桃, 等.南襄盆地泌阳凹陷湖相碳酸盐岩烃源岩沉积环境的元素地球化学标志[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2013, 32(4):456~462. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KYDH201304010.htm MA Su-ping, XIA Yan-qing, TIAN Chun-tao, et al. Elemental geochemical indicators for sedimentary environment in lacustrine carbonate source rocks of the Biyang depression, Nanxiang basin[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 2013, 32(4):456~462. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KYDH201304010.htm
[21]	王随继, 黄杏珍, 妥进才, 等.泌阳凹陷核桃园组微量元素演化特征及其古气候意义[J].沉积学报, 1997, 15(1):65~70. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB701.011.htm WANG Sui-ji, HUANG Xing-zhen, TUO Jin-cai, et al. Evolutional characteristics and their paleoclimate significance of trace elements in the Hetaoyuan formation, Biyang depression[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1997, 15(1):65~70. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB701.011.htm
[22]	何宏, 彭苏萍, 邵龙义.巴楚寒武-奥陶系碳酸盐岩微量元素及沉积环境[J].新疆石油地质, 2004, 25(6):631~633. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD200406014.htm HE Hong, PENG Su-ping, SHAO Long-yi. Trace elements and sedimentary settings of Cambrian-Ordovician carbonates in Bachu Area, Tarim Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2004, 25(6):631~633. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD200406014.htm
[23]	毛玲玲, 伊海生, 季长军, 等.柴达木盆地新生代湖相碳酸盐岩岩石学及碳氧同位素特征[J].地质科技情报, 2014, 33(1):41~48. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201401007.htm MAO Ling-ling, YI Hai-sheng, JI Chang-jun, et al. Petrography and carbon-oxygen isotope characteristics of the Cenozoic lacustrine carbonate rocks in Qaidam Basin[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2014, 33(1):41~48. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201401007.htm