汶川5.12地震引起的库仑应力变化及其对周边地震活动的影响

王连捷; 周春景; 孙东生; 吴珍汉; 王薇

汶川5.12地震引起的库仑应力变化及其对周边地震活动的影响

国土资源部新构造运动与地质灾害重点实验室, 中国地质科学院地质力学研究所, 北京 100081

基金项目:

中国地质科学院基本科研业务费专项 Ywf060717

地质力学所基本科研业务费 DZLXJK200705

详细信息

作者简介:
王连捷(1933-), 男, 研究员, 从事地质灾害、地应力测量、应力场数值分析及应用研究。E-mail:wanglj01@sina.com

中图分类号: P315.72⁺7
计量
- 文章访问数: 137
- HTML全文浏览量: 49
- PDF下载量: 5
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2008-09-28
- 刊出日期: 2008-09-28

COULOMB STRESS CHANGES CAUSED BY WENCHUAN EARTHQUAKE AND ITS INFLUENCE ON SEISMIC ACTIVITY IN THE ADJACENT AREAS

Institute of Geomechanics, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China

摘要

摘要: 汶川"5.12"8.0级特大地震, 造成重大人员伤亡和财产损失。地震对周围地区断层活动性的影响和余震发展方向是人们关心的一个问题。根据汶川地震同震静态位移我们计算了周围地区一些断层的库仑应力变化, 并据此评价了震后周围地区断层和地震的活动性。计算结果表明, 龙门山断裂带东北段, 包括北川、青川、宁强等地, 为库仑应力增强区, 有利于地震的发生。较大的余震分布与库仑应力增强区有较好的对应关系。鲜水河断裂带主要为库仑应力下降区, 只有一小段为增高区, 鲜水河断裂带总体上不利于地震活动。成都地区的西北部库仑应力增强, 东南部应力下降。库仑应力变化的研究对大震后地震趋势的分析有重要意义。
- 汶川地震 /
- 库仑应力变化 /
- 龙门山断裂带 /
- 有限元
Abstract: On 12 May 2008, M8.0 Wenchuan earthquake occurred along the Longmenshan fault belt in Sichuan Province of China, causing enormous losses and thousands death, and the rearrangement of crustal stress commonly leads to damaging aftershocks.Coulomb stress changes caused by the Wenchuan earthquake are calculated and earthquake activity is evaluated using finite element method for some faults around the area.Results show that Coulomb stress displays a greater changes in northeast part of Longmeshan fault belt, including Beichuan, Qingchuan, Ningqiang areas and so on.Most of aftershocks of Wenchuan earthquake occurred in the area where the Coulomb stress change is increased. Coulomb stress gets weaker in most parts of Xianshueihe fault (b-1, b-2, b-4)except for some parts (b-3).It shows an increase to northwest of Chengdu, but a decrease to southeast of Chengdu.Coulomb stress increases can bring faults to failure, with delays ranging from seconds to decades.
- Wenchuan earthquake /
- Coulomb stress change /
- Longmenshan fault /
- finite element
注释:
编者按:
本文根据汶川地震同震静态位移计算了周围地区一些断层的库仑应力变化, 并据此评价了震后周围地区断层和地震的活动性, 结果表明较大的余震分布与库仑应力增强区有较好的对应关系。从力学的角度深入解释了余震的发生机理, 对研究汶川大震后地震的发展趋势有重要意义, 值得一读。

HTML全文

图 1 简化的活动断裂分布

Figure 1. A sketch showing distribution of active faults

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 有限元网格划分

Figure 2. Division of finite element mesh for calculation

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 地震位错模型(沿断层面的位移) ^①

Figure 3. Model of displacement of Wenchuan earthquake^①

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 沿断层走向的地表位移(正值表示沿断层向NE方向位移, 负值表示沿断层向SW方向位移)

Figure 4. Surface displacement along strike of Longmenshan fault from Wenchuan earthquake (positive shows northeast displacement, negative shows southwest displacement)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 垂直断层走向的位移(正值表示垂直于断层向NW方向位移, 负值表示垂直于断层向SE方向位移)

Figure 5. Surface Displacement perpendicular to strike of Longmenshan fault from Wenchuan earthquake (positive shows northwest displacement, negative shows southeast displacement)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 垂向位移(正值表示向上, 负值表示向下)

Figure 6. Vertical displacement from Wenchuan earthquake (positive shows displacement up, negative shows displacement down)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 四川及其他地区库仑应力的变化和汶川地震后5级以上余震分布

1.断层; 2.5级以上余震; 3.库仑应力增加区; 4.库仑应力变化不明显地区(< 0.01 MPa); 5.库仑应力降低区; 6.震中

Figure 7. Coulomb stress changes and distribution of aftershocks (more then M5) in Sichuan and other areas after the Wenchuan earthquake

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 沿断层面库仑应力变化的分布(库仑应力变化单位MPa)

Figure 8. Distribution of Coulomb stress changes along fault plane after Wenchuan earthquake

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

参考文献(17)

[1]	张永双, 雷伟志, 石菊松, 等.四川5.12地震次生地质灾害的基本特征初析[J].地质力学学报, 2008, 14(2):109~116. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6616.2008.02.002
[2]	Harris R A.Introduction to special section:Stress triggers, stress shadows, and implications for seismic hazard[J].GeophysRes, 1998, 103:24347~24358. doi: 10.1029-98JB01576/
[3]	Stein R S, Barka A A, Dieterich J H.Progressive failure on the North Anatolian fault since 1939 by earthquake stress triggering[J].Geophys J Int, 1997, 128:594~604. doi: 10.1111/gji.1997.128.issue-3
[4]	Deng J, Sykes L R.Evolution of the stress field in southern California and triggering of moderate-size earthquakes:A 2002 yearperspective[J].J Geophys Res, 1997, 102:9859~9886. doi: 10.1029/96JB03897
[5]	Reasenberg P A, Simpson R W.Response of regional seismicity to the static stress change produced by the Loma Prieta earthquake[J].Science, 1992, 255:1687~1690. doi: 10.1126/science.255.5052.1687
[6]	Hardebeck J L, Nazareth J J, Hauksson E.The static stress change triggering model:Constraints from two southern Californiaaftershock sequences[J].J Geophys Res, 1998, 98:4461~4472.
[7]	Toda S.Stress transferred by the 1995M_W=6.9 Kobe, Japan, shock:Effect on aftershocks and future earthquake probabilities[J].J Geophys Res, 1998, 103:24543~24565. doi: 10.1029/98JB00765
[8]	刘桂萍, 傅征祥.1973年炉霍大地震(M_S=7.6)最大余震(M_S=6.3)的库仑破裂应力触发[J].中国地震, 2002, 18(2):175~182. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4683.2002.02.007
[9]	Parsons T.Global Omori law decay of triggered earthquakes:Large aftershocks outside the classical aftershock zone[J].GeophysRes, 2002, 107:doi: 10.1029/2001JB000646.
[10]	King G C P, Stein R S, Lin J.Static stress changes and the triggering of earthquakes[J].Bull Seism Soc Amer, 1994, 84:935~953. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dqkx-e201001004
[11]	Stein R S, Barka A A, Dieterich J H.Progressive failure on the North Anatolian fault since 1939 by earthquake static stresstriggering[J].Geophys J Int, 1997, 128:594~604. doi: 10.1111/gji.1997.128.issue-3
[12]	Okada Y.Internal deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half2space[J].Bull Seism Soc Amer, 1992, 82:1018-1040.
[13]	王琼, 聂晓红, 唐丽华.北天山西段中强地震应力触发作用初步研究[J].内陆地震, 2007, 21(2):119~128. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8956.2007.02.004
[14]	郝平, 傅征祥, 田勤俭, 等.昆仑山口西8.1级地震强余震库仑破裂应力触发研究[J].地震学报, 2004, 26(1):30~37. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-3782.2004.01.004
[15]	万永革, 沈正康, 曾跃华, 等.青藏高原东北部的库仑应力积累演化对大地震发生的影响[J].地震学报, 2007, 29(2):116~129. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dizhen200702001
[16]	叶裕明, 刘春山, 沈火明, 等.ANSYS土木工程应用[M].北京:中国水利电力出版社, 2005.
[17]	邓起东, 冉勇康, 杨晓平, 等.中国活动构造图[M].北京:中国地震出版社, 2007.