FEATURES OF PRESENT STRUCTURAL STRESS FIELD AND STRUCTURAL PATTERN IN HAIAN DEPRESSION, JIANGSU OILFIELD
-
摘要: 通过对苏北盆地海安凹陷T40反射层现今构造应力场、次级凹陷边界二级断裂和次级凹陷内三、四级断裂力学性质及其构造活动样式等分析研究认为:海安凹陷现今最大主应力方向为NE 70°左右;现今最大主应力为50 MPa左右,现今最小主应力为30 MPa左右。海安凹陷内次级凹陷边界二级断裂现今主要表现为张性或张扭性活动特征,张扭性活动方式既有顺扭也有反扭,并且同一断裂不同部位活动性质存在差异;海安凹陷内次级凹陷三、四级断裂现今也主要表现为张性或张扭性活动特征,张扭性活动方式既有顺扭也有反扭,个别表现为压性和压扭性活动,并且同一断裂不同部位活动性质存在差异。Abstract: In this paper, the present structural stress field of T40 reflection layer, the mechanic characteristics and structural active patterns of the second-level fault at the boundary of sub-depression and the third-and forth-level faults within sub-depression in Haian depression were analyzed. The direction of the present maximum principal stress is about NE 70°. The present maximum principal stress is about 50 MPa and the present minimum principal stress is about 30 MPa. By the present structural stress field finite element numerical modeling, we found that the second-level faults at the boundary of sub-depression are characteristic of tensile activity or tensile-shear activity which is in both clockwise and counter-clockwise, and that the activity features vary along the different part of a fault. The third-and forth-level faults within sub-depression have the same activity features as the second-level faults. In addition, some third-and forth-level faults also have compressive or compressive-shearing activity features.
-
Key words:
- present structural stress field /
- structural pattern /
- Haian depression /
- Subei Basin
-
表 1 海安凹陷T40反射层二级断裂力学性质及其构造活动样式
Table 1. Mechanical feature and structural pattern of the second-level faults of seismic T40 reflection layer in Haian depression
表 2 海安凹陷T40反射层三、四级断裂力学性质及其构造活动样式
Table 2. Mechanical feature and structural pattern of the third-and forth-level faults of seismic T40 reflection layer in Haian depression
-
[1] 王连捷.地应力与油气运移[J].地质力学学报, 1996, 2(2):1~10. http://journal.geomech.ac.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=19960214&flag=1WANG Lian-jie. Crustal stress and oil and gas migration[J]. Journal of Geomechanics[J]. 1996, 2(2):1~10. http://journal.geomech.ac.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=19960214&flag=1 [2] 谭成轩, 王连捷, 孙宝珊, 等.含油气盆地三维构造应力场数值摸拟方法[J].地质力学学报, 1997, 3(1):71~80. http://journal.geomech.ac.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=19970110&flag=1TAN Cheng-xuan, WANG Lian-jie, SUN Bao-shan, et al. An approach to numerical simulation of 3D tectonic stress field of the oil and gas bearing basin[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 1997, 3(1):71~80. http://journal.geomech.ac.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=19970110&flag=1 [3] 郝芳, 邹华耀, 姜建群.油气成藏动力学及其研究进展[J].地学前缘, 2000, 7(3):11~21. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY200003001.htmHAO Fang, ZOU Hua-yao, JIANG Jian-qun. Dynamics of petroleum accumulation and its advances[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2000, 7(3):11~21. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY200003001.htm [4] 张明利, 万天丰.含油气盆地构造应力场研究新进展[J].地球科学进展, 1998, 13(1):38~43. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXJZ801.007.htmZHANG Ming-li, WAN Tian-feng. The new research development of tectonics stress field in oil and gas basin[J]. Advance in Earth Sciences, 1998, 13(1):38~43. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXJZ801.007.htm [5] 邓俊国, 刘泽容.油气藏成藏期构造应力场与油气聚集[J].地质论评, 1993, 39(4):336~342. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP199304008.htmDENG Jun-guo, LIU Ze-rong. The tectonic stress field during the formation of oil and gas accumulations and the accumulation of oil and gas[J]. Geological Review, 1993, 39(4):336~342. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP199304008.htm [6] Fisher A T, Zwart G. Relation between permeability and effective stress along a plate boundary fault, Barnados accretionary complex[J]. Geology, 1996, 24(4):307~310. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(1996)024<0307:RBPAES>2.3.CO;2 [7] Prabhakara R P. Overburden stress gradient and stress ratio (S & K factors) of East Geodavari Sub-basin (onshore) and its information pressure and fracture gradient estimates[J]. Bulletin of the Oil and Natural Gas Commission, 1987, 24(2):133~153. [8] TAN Cheng-xuan, JIN Zhi-jun, ZHANG Ming-li, et al. An approach to the present-day three-dimensional (3-D) stress field and its application to hydrocarbon migration and accumulation in the Zhangqiang depression, Lioahe field, China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2001, 18(9):983~994. doi: 10.1016/S0264-8172(01)00040-X [9] Thomas Finkbeiner. Stress, pore pressure, and dynamically constrained hydrocarbon columns in the South Eugene Island 330 field, north Gulf of Mexico[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2001, 85(6):1007~1031. [10] Warpinski N R, Teufel L W. Determination of the effective-stress law for permeability and deformation in low-permeability rocks[J]. SPE Formation Evaluation, 1992, 7(2):123~131. doi: 10.2118/20572-PA [11] Yassir N A. Overpressures, fluid flow and stress regimes in the Jeanne d'Arc Basin, Canada[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 1993, 30(7):1209~1213. doi: 10.1016/0148-9062(93)90096-V [12] 邱旭明.苏北盆地断块圈闭分类及油气藏特征[J].石油天然气地质, 2003, 24(4):371~374. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT200304012.htmQIU Xu-ming. Classification of fault-block traps and characteristics of petroleum reservoiring in Subei basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2003, 24(4):371~374. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT200304012.htm [13] 刘玉瑞, 王建.苏北盆地复杂断块油气藏勘探及技术[J].江苏地质, 2003, 27(4):193~198. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSDZ200304000.htmLIU Yu-rui, WANG Jian. Exploration and technology of complex fault block reservoir[J]. Jiangsu Geology. 2003, 27(4):193~198. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSDZ200304000.htm [14] 练铭祥, 薛冰, 杨盛良.苏北新生代盆地断陷和坳陷的形成机理[J].石油实验地质, 2001, 23(3):256~260. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200103256LIAN Ming-xiang, XUE Bing, YANG Sheng-liang. Formation mechanism of depression and rifts in the Cenozoic basin of North Jiangsu Province[J]. Experimental Petroleum Geology, 2001, 23(3):256~260. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200103256 [15] 邱海峻, 许志琴, 乔德武.苏北盆地构造演化研究进展[J].地质通报, 2006, 25(9~10):1117~1120. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD2006Z2022.htmQIU Hai-jun, XU Zhi-qin, QIAO De-wu. Progress in the study of the tectonic evolution of the Subei basin, Jiangsu, China[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2006, 25(9~10):1117~1120. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD2006Z2022.htm [16] 刘玉瑞, 刘启东, 杨小兰.苏北盆地走滑断层特征与油气聚集关系[J].石油与天然气地质, 2004, 25(3):279~283. doi: 10.11743/ogg20040308LIU Yu-rui, LIU Qi-dong, YANG Xiao-lan. Relation between features of strike-slip faults and hydrocarbon accumulation in Subei basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2004, 25(3):279~283. doi: 10.11743/ogg20040308 [17] 邱旭明.扭动作用在苏北盆地构造体系中的表现及其意义[J].江汉石油学院学报, 2002, 24(2):5~7. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JHSX200202001.htmQIU Xu-ming. Representation of torsional action in tectonic system of Subei basin and its significance[J]. Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute, 2002, 24(2):5~7. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JHSX200202001.htm [18] 邱旭明.苏北盆地扭动构造油气藏[J].石油勘探与开发, 2004, 31(3):26~29. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK200403006.htmQIU Xu-ming. Strike-sliding structure traps in the Subei basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2004, 31(3):26~29. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK200403006.htm [19] 陆英.海安凹陷油气成藏的主控因素研究[J].小型油气藏, 2006, 11(4):15~18. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10425-2008199513.htmLU Ying. Study on the major controlling factors of oil-gas reservoir formation in Haian sag[J].Small Hydrocarbon Reservoirs, 2006, 11(4):15~18. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10425-2008199513.htm [20] 李亚辉, 徐健.高邮凹陷构造转换带控油机制研究与实践[J].石油天然气学报, 2006, 28(5):21~23. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JHSX200605005.htmLI Ya-hui, XU jian. Research and implementation of oil-control mechanism in the transition section of Gaoyou depression[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2006, 28(5):21~23. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JHSX200605005.htm [21] 陈安定.苏北箕状断陷形成的动力学机制[J].高校地质学报, 2001, 7(4):408~418. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXDX200104004.htmCHEN An-ding. Dynamic mechanism of formation of dustpan subsidence, northern Jiangsu[J]. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2001, 7(4):408~418. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXDX200104004.htm [22] 马立桥, 陈汉林, 董庸, 等.苏北-南黄海南部叠合盆地构造演化与海相油气勘探潜力[J].石油与天然气地质, 2007, 28(1):35~42. doi: 10.11743/ogg20070105MA Li-qiao, CHEN Han-lin, DONG Yong, et al. Tectonic evolution of Subei-south Nanhuanghai superimposed basin from the late Mesozoic to the Cenozoic and marine petroleum potential[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2007, 28(1):35~42. doi: 10.11743/ogg20070105 [23] 张培震, 王琪, 马宗晋.中国大陆现今构造运动的GPS速度场与活动地块[J].地学前缘, 2002, 9(2):430~441. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY200202034.htmZHANG Pei-zhen, WANG Qi, MA Zong-jin. GPS velocity field and active crustal blocks of contemporary tectonic deformation in continental China[J]. Earth Science Frontier, 2002, 9(2):430~441. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY200202034.htm [24] 中国地震局地壳应力研究所. 中国大陆地壳应力环境基础数据库[DB]. http://www.eq-icd.cn/webgis/.The Institute of Crustal Dynamics, China Earthquake Administration. Fundamental database of crustal stress environment in continental China[DB]. http://www.eq-icd.cn/webgis/.