EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON TENSILE STRENGTH OF UNDISTUBED Q2 LOESS FROM YANAN SHANNXI, CHINA
-
摘要: 对陕西延安新宝塔山隧道Q2原状黄土进行了不同加载速率的无侧限抗压与贯入抗拉试验, 研究了Q2原状黄土抗压与抗拉强度的影响因素。结果表明:加载速率对宝塔山Q2原状黄土抗压和抗拉强度影响较大, 抗压强度与抗拉强度随加载速率增大而增大; 高径比对抗拉强度也有较大影响, 试验时当高径比控制在1.0左右时, 高径比对宝塔山Q2原状黄土的抗拉强度影响相对较小, 因此采用轴向压裂法测量黄土的抗拉强度时, 高径比宜控制在1.0;在试验加载速率范围内, 加载速率对宝塔山Q2原状黄土的压拉比影响不大, 其压拉比在9.88~13.68范围内变化。Abstract: The unconfined compressive and penetration tensile tests were conducted with different loading rates on undisturbed Q2 loess from Baotashan Tunnel in Yan'an, Shanxi, and the impacts on the unconfined compressive strength and tensile strength were studied. It shows that the loading rates have a great impact on the compressive strength and tensile strength, which all increase with the increase of loading speed. The ratios of height to diameter have a great influence on the tensile strength of the Q2 loess, when the ratio of height to diameter of the samples is about 1.0, the impact on the tensile strength tends to be relatively small. Therefore, when the tensile strength of loess is to be measured by axial unconfined penetration test, the ratio of height to diameter of the samples should be 1.0. Within the scope of the test loading rates, the loading rates have little effect on the ratios of compressive strength to tensile ratio for the undisturbed Q2 loess in Baotashan tunnel, which vary between 9.88 and 13.68.
-
表 1 试验用Q2黄土的物性指标
Table 1. Physical parameters of Q2 loess
w/% ρ/(g·cm-3) ds wL/% wp/% e αv/MPa-1 19.64 2.01 2.638 29.2 13.25 0.597 0.09 注:w—含水量;ρ—湿密度;ds—比重;wL—液限;wp—塑限;e—孔隙比;αv—压缩系数 -
[1] 党进谦, 李靖, 张伯平.黄土单轴拉裂特性的研究[J].水力发电学报, 2001, 7(4):44~47. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SFXB200104006.htmDANG Jin-qian, LI Jing, ZHANG Bo-ping. Uniaxial tension crack characteristics of loess[J]. Journal of Engineering, 2001, 7(4): 44~47. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SFXB200104006.htm [2] Fang H Y, Daniels J. Introductory geotechnical engineering: An environmental perspective[M]. London and New York: Taylor & Francis, 2006. [3] 骆亚生, 邢义川.黄土的抗拉强度[J].陕西水利发电, 1998, 14(4):6~10. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKQB201702032.htmLUO Ya-sheng, XING Yi-chuan. Tensile strength characteristics of loess[J]. Journal of Shaanxi Water Power, 1998, 14(4): 6~10. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKQB201702032.htm [4] 邢义川, 骆亚生, 李振.黄土的断裂破坏强度[J].水力发电学报, 1999, (4):36~44. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SFXB199904003.htmXING Yi-chuan, LUO Ya-sheng, LI Zhen. The rupture failure strength of loess[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 1999, (4): 36~44. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SFXB199904003.htm [5] 党进谦, 郝月清, 李靖.非饱和黄土抗拉强度的研究[J].河海大学学报, 2001, 29(6):106~108. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HHDX200106024.htmDANG Jin-qian, HAO Yue-qing, LI Jing. Study on tensile strength of unsaturated loess[J]. Journal of Hehai University, 2001, 29(6): 106~108. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HHDX200106024.htm [6] 孙萍, 彭建兵, 殷跃平, 等.黄土拉伸试验及其破裂过程仿真分析[J].岩土力学, 2010, 31(2):633~637. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201002060.htmSUN Ping, PENG Jian-bing, YIN Yue-ping, et al. Tensile test and simulation analysis of fracture process of loess [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(2): 633~637. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201002060.htm [7] 李保雄, 牛永红, 苗天德.兰州马兰黄土的物理力学特性[J].岩土力学, 2007, 28(6):1077~1896. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX200706002.htmLI Bao-xiong, NIU Yong-hong, MIAO Tian-de. Physico-mechanical characteristics of Malan loess in Lanzhou region[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2007, 28(6): 1077~1082. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX200706002.htm [8] 沈忠言, 彭万巍, 刘永智.冻结黄土抗拉强度的试验研究[J].冰川冻土, 1995, 17(4):315~321. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BCDT504.006.htmSHEN Zhong-yan, PENG Wan-wei, LIU Yong-zhi. Tensile strength of frozen saturated loess [J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 1995, 17(4): 315~321. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BCDT504.006.htm [9] 铁道部第一勘察设计院.铁路工程土工试验规程[M].北京:中国铁道出版社, 2004.First Survey and Design Institute. Test methods of soils for railway engineering[M]. Beijing: China Railway Publishing House, 2004. [10] 吴绵拔.加载速率对岩石抗压和抗拉强度的影响[J].岩土工程学报, 1982, 4(2):97~106. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC198202009.htmWU Mian-ba. The effect of loading rate on the compressive and tensile strength of rock [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1982, 4(2): 97~106. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC198202009.htm [11] 杨圣奇, 苏承东, 徐卫亚.岩石材料尺寸效应的试验和理论研究[J].工程力学, 2005, 22(4):112~118. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCLX200504021.htmYANG Sheng-qi, SU Cheng-dong, XU Wei-ya. Experimental and theoretical study of size effect of rock material[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2005, 22(4): 112~118. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCLX200504021.htm [12] 张明, 卢裕杰, 介玉新, 等.不同加载条件下岩石强度尺寸效应的数值模拟[J].水力发电学报, 2011, 30(4):147~153. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SFXB201104022.htmZHANG Ming, LU Yu-jie, JIE Yu-xin, et al. Numerical simulation of strength size effect of rocks under different loading[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2011, 30(4): 147~153. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SFXB201104022.htm [13] 梁庆国, 赵磊, 安亚芳, 等.兰州Q4黄土各向异性的初步研究[J].岩土力学, 2012, 33(1):17~23. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ytlx201201003LIANG Qing-guo, ZHAO Lei, AN Ya-fang, et al. Preliminary study of anisotropy of Q4 loess in Lanzhou[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2012, 33(1): 17~23. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ytlx201201003