XU C G,DU X F,PANG X J,et al.,2022. The source-sink system and its control on large-area lithologic reservoirs of the lower Minghuazhen Formation in the southern Bohai Sea[J]. Journal of Geomechanics,28(5):728−742 doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.20222813
Citation: XU C G,DU X F,PANG X J,et al.,2022. The source-sink system and its control on large-area lithologic reservoirs of the lower Minghuazhen Formation in the southern Bohai Sea[J]. Journal of Geomechanics,28(5):728−742 doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.20222813

The source-sink system and its control on large-area lithologic reservoirs of the lower Minghuazhen Formation in the southern Bohai Sea

doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.20222813
Funds:  This research is financially supported by the Major Project of National Science and Technology (Grant 2016ZX05024-003)
More Information
  • In recent years, a large number of large-area sand bodies have been drilled in the Neogene in the southern Bohai Sea, and several 100-million-ton oilfields have been discovered, indicating that the lower member of the Minghuazhen Formation has enormous exploration potential. The source-sink elements of the development of such sand bodies are unclear, which seriously restricts the exploration of lithologic reservoirs in the lower member of the Minghuazhen Formation. Using paleontology, heavy minerals, seismic, drilling and other data, this paper explores the source-sink system and its control on large-area lithologic reservoirs in the lower member of the Minghuazhen Formation of the southern Bohai Sea. The results show that: The Yanshan-Liaoxi uplift, the Liaodong uplift, the Luxi uplift and the Jiaodong uplift mainly develop source-sink systems in four directions in the study area’s lower member of the Minghuazhen Formation. Next, the Luxi uplift and the Jiaodong uplift are relatively close. The Luxi uplift and the Liaodong uplift significantly impact the source-sink system in the study area’s lower part of the Minghuazhen Formation. In contrast, the Yanshan-Liaoxi uplift has a weaker impact on the source-sink system. Three sedimentary systems, including rivers, river-lake interactions and lakes, are mainly developed in the study area’s lower member of the Minghuazhen Formation. Among them, the sand bodies formed by river-lake interactions and lake shallow water deltas are larger. The study area’s lower member of the Minghuazhen Formation has favorable source-sink conditions for creating large-scale sand bodies. Among them, temperate-subtropical climate, sufficient rainfall, developed paleo-water system, felsic metamorphic rocks and magmatic parent rocks, and frequent expansion and shrinkage of lakes are beneficial to the development of large-area sand bodies. The connection of channel sand–sheet sand–channel sand leads to the development of large-scale lithologic traps in the study area’s lower member of the Minghuazhen Formation. Compared with channel sand alone, river-lake interactions and shallow water deltas have the potential to form large-area lithologic reservoirs. This understanding can help explore large Neogene oil and gas reservoirs in the Bohai Sea.

     

  • Full-text Translaiton by iFLYTEK

    The full translation of the current issue may be delayed. If you encounter a 404 page, please try again later.
  • 本期为李四光地质科学奖获奖者研究成果专辑(第三辑),共刊登了8篇论文,其中6篇是关于稀土、金、油气资源研究与勘查成果和相关基础地质研究成果;另外2篇是关于重要经济区带区域稳定性以及高山峡谷区重大滑坡灾害问题。

    何宏平等的《风化壳型稀土矿床中稀土元素的活化与迁移》,以稀土元素的活化和迁移这两个关键过程为切入点,总结近年来取得的最新研究成果,并对未来的研究方向提出展望,以加深对风化壳型稀土矿床形成机制的认识和理解。文章明确指出,风化壳型稀土矿床中稀土元素的活化和迁移机制主要受化学风化和生物风化过程控制,是无机和有机共同作用的结果,但其对该类矿床形成的贡献尚待定量评估。

    谢玉玲等的《中国伴生稀土元素资源类型及资源潜力》一文,对中国伴生REE矿床类型、资源潜力进行了深入分析和总结。中国伴生的REE资源巨大,加强伴生REE资源的评价和综合利用水平,充分利用生产矿山中伴生的REE资源,特别是磷矿床和铝土矿床,可以有效缓解中国HREE资源供应压力。

    焦家式金矿类型的发现与勘探,对我国金矿找矿做出了重大贡献。周明岭等的《焦家式金矿勘查与研究》一文,总结了上世纪60年代在胶东西北部发现新的金矿类型以来,地质勘探部门通过多年勘探、研究和总结,建立了焦家式金矿类型,并对这个金矿类型的主要矿床地质特征进行了总结,以指导全国相同类型金矿的找矿勘探。

    柳建新等的《湘东北白沙窝稀有金属矿床电性特征与找矿预测研究》一文涉及到目前矿产资源勘查的两个重要方面,即国家急需的战略性稀有金属矿产资源和深部矿产资源勘查问题。本文以湖南白沙窝伟晶岩型矿床为例,开展伟晶岩型矿床的深部电性结构特征调查,探讨稀有金属成矿模型及赋矿载体的空间分布,阐明矿脉就位关系,为稀有金属找矿预测提供依据。

    支东明等的《准噶尔盆地东部二叠系富烃凹陷全油气系统勘探前景》一文,对二叠系烃源岩进行了系统评价,在沉积相、储层特征和油气成藏等方面进行综合研究,优选石树沟凹陷南斜坡、吉南凹陷芦草沟组作为准东地区未来探索的重要勘探区带。

    朱锦旗等的《苏州—无锡—常州地区地面沉降及地裂缝防控研究》总结了苏锡常地区地面沉降以及因差异沉降诱发地裂缝灾害的勘查与监测预警体系建设工作。作者认为苏锡常地区地面沉降经历了发生、快速发展、趋缓、滞后、反弹5个阶段。成功实现了三维复杂地质环境条件下地层形变特征及地裂缝生成和扩展的力学机制模拟,为地面沉降、地裂缝易发区精准圈定与防控提供了解决路径。

    张世殊等的《西部高山峡谷区重大滑坡成生规律及灾变演化机理研究进展》,分析总结了我国西部高山峡谷区滑坡类型以牵引式滑坡、推移式滑坡、复合式滑坡为主的堆积层滑坡以及以顺层岩质滑坡、溃屈型岩质滑坡、反倾岩质滑坡和座落式滑坡为主的岩质滑坡。研究成果将对西部高山峡谷区的滑坡识别、监测、预警以及防治具有一定的指导意义。

    王秉璋等的《东昆仑印支晚期埃达克质花岗岩的成因和地质意义》一文报道了东昆仑小南川地区新发现的三叠纪埃达克质花岗岩。研究表明,东昆仑造山带在晚三叠世处于碰撞和碰撞后阶段,而碰撞后阶段的岩浆活动可以进一步划分为晚三叠世早期和晚三叠世晚期—早侏罗世初期2个阶段。

    总之,本专辑展示出新一届李四光奖获得者们长期持续关注国家大宗战略性紧缺资源、稀有稀土资源以及重大环境工程等方面的需求,大部分文章都是作者团队几十年的研究、勘察积累,具有较高的理论水平与实际参考价值。

  • CAO Y C, XU Q S, WANG J, 2018. Progress in “Source-to-Sink” system research[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 25(4): 116-131. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2018.5.30
    CARACCIOLO L, 2020. Sediment generation and sediment routing systems from a quantitative provenance analysis perspective: review, application and future development[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 209: 103226. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103226
    CHEN J, ZHANG W Y, JIANG Z X, et al. , 2020. Characteristics and control factors of the source-to-sink system in the Erlangjian-Heimahe area on the south bank of Qinghai lake[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 41(7): 821-834. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    CHEN R T, WANG Q B, WANG F L, et al. , 2017. Application of heavy minerals multivariate statistic analysis to provenance studies: a case of Huanghekou depression[J]. Xinjiang Oil & Gas, 13(2): 1-5, 107. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    DU X F, PANG X J, WANG Q B, et al. , 2017. Restoration of the Paleo-provenance of the Es12 in the eastern of Shijiutuo uplift and its control on reservoir[J]. Earth Science, 42(11): 1897-1909. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    DUAN Y J, DONG Y X, JIANG X Y, et al. , 2019. Sedimentary characteristics of the meandering river and recognition of abandoned river in the lower reaches of Minghua town in Raoyang[J]. Bulletin of Science and Technology, 35(4): 21-26. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    GRAFTON R Q, PITTOCK J, DAVIS R, et al. , 2013. Global insights into water resources, climate change and governance[J]. Nature Climate Change, 3(4): 315-321. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1746
    HAO J, ZHANG H H, LI C R, et al. , 2021. Petroleum exploration history and enlightenment in Bohai sea[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 42(3): 328-336. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    HU H W, LI H Y, YU H B, et al. , 2020. Quantitative analysis of source-to-sink system controls on sand-body distribution of the Paleogene in Chengbei low uplift and surrounding areas, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography (Chinese Edition), 22(2): 266-277. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    KANG H L, LIN C S, NIU C M, 2021. Ancient landform of the Dongying formation in the Shadongnan structural zone, western Bohai Sea area and its control on the sedimentation[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 27(1): 19-30. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    LI L N, ZHAO Z G, CUI Y C, et al. , 2022. “Source-to-sink” analysis of turbidite deposits in the upper cretaceous-Eocene Rajang group in southern South China Sea[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography (Chinese Edition), 24(1): 61-72. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    LI Y T, WANG W Q, WANG G, et al. , 2019. Neotectonism and its control on hydrocarbon accumulation in Huanghua depression of the Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 43(6): 94-104. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    LIU L, STOCKLI D F, LAWTON T F, et al. , 2022. Reconstructing source-to-sink systems from detrital zircon core and rim ages[J]. Geology, 50(6): 691-696. doi: 10.1130/G49904.1
    LYSTER S J, WHITTAKER A C, HAMPSON G J, et al. , 2021. Reconstructing the morphologies and hydrodynamics of ancient rivers from source to sink: Cretaceous Western Interior Basin, Utah, USA[J]. Sedimentology, 68(6): 2854-2886. doi: 10.1111/sed.12877
    NIU B, ZHAO J H, FU P, et al. , 2019. Trend judgment of abandoned channels and fine architecture characterization in meandering river reservoirs: a case study of Neogene Minhuazhen formation NmⅢ2 layer in Shijiutuo bulge, Chengning uplift, Bohai Bay Basin, East China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 46(5): 891-901. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    SEPTAMA E, BENTLEY SR S J, 2017. Source-to-sink sediment delivery in the Gulf of Papua from scanning electron microscopy and mineral liberation analysis–aided provenance analysis of deep-sea turbidite sands[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 101(6): 907-936. doi: 10.1306/09021615184
    SHANG X F, LI M, LIU J L, et al. , 2022. Source-sink system based sand body distribution prediction and 3D geological modeling: a case study of the 2nd Member of Xujiahe Formation in Xinchang structural belt of Western Sichuan Depression, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 42(1): 62-72. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    SHI X Q, 2018. Evolution of global typical river runoff under climate change[D]. Beijing: China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    SINCLAIR H D, STUART F M, MUDD S M, et al. , 2019. Detrital cosmogenic 21Ne records decoupling of source-to-sink signals by sediment storage and recycling in Miocene to present rivers of the Great Plains, Nebraska, USA[J]. Geology, 47(1): 3-6. doi: 10.1130/G45391.1
    SUN Y, ZHAO D, YU L M, et al. , 2015. Sandbody distribution and sedimentary model in shallow lacustrine fluvial-dominated delta front: a case study from Putaohua oil layer of Yongle area in Songliao basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 33(3): 439-447. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    TAN M X, ZHU X M, ZHANG Z L, et al. , 2020a. Fluvial sequence pattern and its response of geomorphy in depression phase of rift basin: a case study of the lower member of Neogene Minghuazhen Formation in Shaleitian Uplift area, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography (Chinese Edition), 22(3): 428-439. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    TAN M X, ZHU X M, ZHANG Z L, et al. , 2020b. Summary of sedimentological issues and fundamental approaches in terms of ancient “Source-to-Sink” systems[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 41(5): 1107-1118. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    TIAN P P, LIN C Y, ZHANG X G, et al. , 2018. Flow characteristics and remaining oil distribution of flow unit in fluvial reservoir: a case study of fluvial Minghuazhen formation of Yangerzhuang oilfield in Neogene Huanghua depression[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 42(2): 11-22. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    WANG J G, JIANG C J, CHANG S, et al. , 2017. Structural trend surface conversion method for micro-amplitude paleotopographic restoration of cratonic basins[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 38(1): 77-83, 104. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    WANG K, ZHAI S K, 2020. Geochemical methods for identification of sedimentary provenance[J]. Marine Sciences, 44(12): 132-143. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    WANG L L, NIU C M, YANG H F, et al. , 2022. Evolution of channel patterns and its geological significance for oil and gas exploration in the Lower Member of Minghuazhen Formation in Laibei low uplift, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 43(3): 364-375. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    XU C G, DU X F, XU W, et al. , 2017. New advances of the "Source-to-Sink" system research in sedimentary basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 38(1): 1-11. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    XU C G, YANG H F, WANG D Y, et al. , 2021. Formation conditions of Neogene large-scale high-abundance lithologic reservoir in the Laibei low uplift, Bohai Sea, East China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 48(1): 12-25. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    XU M M, WEI X C, YANG R, et al. , 2021. Research progress of provenance tracing method for heavy mineral analysis[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 36(2): 154-171. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    YANG C, ZHU H T, NIU C M, et al. , 2021. Characteristics and models of shallow-water environmental river-lake interaction in continental basins[J]. Earth Science, 46(5): 1771-1782. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    YANG R C, LI J B, FAN A P, et al. , 2013. Research progress and development tendency of provenance analysis on terrigenous sedimentary rocks[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 31(1): 99-107. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    ZENG Z W, ZHU H T, 2022. Modern Dryland source-to-sink system segments and coupling relationships from digital elevation model analysis: a case study from the Mongolian Altai[J]. Remote Sensing, 14(5): 1202. doi: 10.3390/rs14051202
    ZHANG X Q, WU Z P, ZHOU X H, et al. , 2017. Cenozoic tectonic characteristics and evolution of the southern Bohai Sea[J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 41(1): 50-60. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    ZHAO H Q, ZHANG J M, LI S B, et al. , 2017. Sedimentary characteristics and evolution models of lower part of Minghuazhen Formation in Neogene system in oilfield A, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 47(4): 1021-1029, 1046. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    ZHU H T, XU C G, ZHU X M, et al. , 2017. Advances of the source-to-sink units and coupling model research in continental basin[J]. Earth Science, 42(11): 1851-1870. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    操应长, 徐琦松, 王健, 2018. 沉积盆地“源-汇”系统研究进展[J]. 地学前缘, 25(4): 116-131. doi: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2018.5.30
    陈骥, 张万益, 姜在兴, 等, 2020. 青海湖南岸二郎剑—黑马河地区源-汇体系特征及控制因素[J]. 石油学报, 41(7): 821-834. doi: 10.7623/syxb202007004
    陈容涛, 王清斌, 王飞龙, 等, 2017. 重矿物多元统计分析在物源研究中的应用: 以黄河口凹陷为例[J]. 新疆石油天然气, 13(2): 1-5, 107.
    杜晓峰, 庞小军, 王清斌, 等, 2017. 石臼坨凸起东段围区沙一二段古物源恢复及其对储层的控制[J]. 地球科学, 42(11): 1897-1909.
    段雅君, 董运晓, 姜新雨, 等, 2019. 饶阳凹陷明化镇组下段曲流河沉积特征及废弃河道识别[J]. 科技通报, 35(4): 21-26. doi: 10.13774/j.cnki.kjtb.2019.04.005
    郝婧, 张厚和, 李春荣, 等, 2021. 渤海海域油气勘探历程与启示[J]. 新疆石油地质, 42(3): 328-336.
    胡贺伟, 李慧勇, 于海波, 等, 2020. 渤海湾盆地埕北低凸起及围区古近系“源-汇”系统控砂原理定量分析[J]. 古地理学报, 22(2): 266-277. doi: 10.7605/gdlxb.2020.10.238
    康海亮, 林畅松, 牛成民, 2021. 渤海西部沙东南构造带东营组古地貌特征及对沉积的控制作用[J]. 地质力学学报, 27(1): 19-30. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2021.27.01.003
    李莉妮, 赵志刚, 崔宇驰, 等, 2022. 南海南部上白垩统—始新统Rajang群浊流沉积物源-汇对比分析[J]. 古地理学报, 24(1): 61-72. doi: 10.7605/gdlxb.2022.01.005
    李岳桐, 王文庆, 王刚, 等, 2019. 渤海湾盆地黄骅坳陷新构造运动特征及其控藏作用[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 43(6): 94-104.
    牛博, 赵家宏, 付平, 等, 2019. 曲流河废弃河道走向判定与单砂体构型表征: 以渤海湾盆地埕宁隆起石臼坨凸起西部新近系明化镇组下段为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 46(5): 891-901. doi: 10.11698/PED.2019.05.08
    商晓飞, 李蒙, 刘君龙, 等, 2022. 基于源-汇系统的砂体分布预测与三维地质建模: 以四川盆地川西坳陷新场构造带须二段为例[J]. 天然气工业, 42(1): 62-72.
    石晓晴, 2018. 气候变化背景下全球典型江河径流演变规律[D]. 北京: 中国水利水电科学研究院.
    孙雨, 赵丹, 于利民, 等, 2015. 浅水湖盆河控三角洲前缘砂体分布特征与沉积模式探讨: 以松辽盆地北部永乐地区葡萄花油层为例[J]. 沉积学报, 33(3): 439-447.
    谈明轩, 朱筱敏, 张自力, 等, 2020a. 断陷盆地拗陷期河流层序样式及其地貌响应: 以渤海湾盆地沙垒田凸起区新近系明化镇组下段为例[J]. 古地理学报, 22(3): 428-439.
    谈明轩, 朱筱敏, 张自力, 等, 2020b. 古“源-汇”系统沉积学问题及基本研究方法简述[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 41(5): 1107-1118.
    田盼盼, 林承焰, 张宪国, 等, 2018. 河流相流动单元渗流特征及剩余油分布: 以黄骅坳陷羊二庄油田新近系明化镇组河流相储层为例[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 42(2): 11-22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4107.2018.02.002
    王建国, 蒋传杰, 常森, 等, 2017. 克拉通盆地微古地貌恢复的构造趋势面转换法[J]. 石油学报, 38(1): 77-83, 104. doi: 10.7623/syxb201701008
    王轲, 翟世奎, 2020. 沉积物源判别的地球化学方法[J]. 海洋科学, 44(12): 132-143.
    王利良, 牛成民, 杨海风, 等, 2022. 渤海湾盆地莱北低凸起明化镇组下段河道类型演化及其油气地质意义[J]. 石油学报, 43(3): 364-375.
    徐长贵, 杜晓峰, 徐伟, 等, 2017. 沉积盆地“源-汇”系统研究新进展[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 38(1): 1-11. doi: 10.11743/ogg20170101
    徐长贵, 杨海风, 王德英, 等, 2021. 渤海海域莱北低凸起新近系大面积高丰度岩性油藏形成条件[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 48(1): 12-25. doi: 10.11698/PED.2021.01.02
    许苗苗, 魏晓椿, 杨蓉, 等, 2021. 重矿物分析物源示踪方法研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 36(2): 154-171. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2021.021
    杨超, 朱红涛, 牛成民, 等, 2021. 陆相盆地浅水背景河湖交互特征及其模式[J]. 地球科学, 46(5): 1771-1782.
    杨仁超, 李进步, 樊爱萍, 等, 2013. 陆源沉积岩物源分析研究进展与发展趋势[J]. 沉积学报, 31(1): 99-107. doi: 10.14027/j.cnki.cjxb.2013.01.018
    张晓庆, 吴智平, 周心怀, 等, 2017. 渤海南部新生代构造发育与演化特征[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 41(1): 50-60. doi: 10.16539/j.ddgzyckx.2017.01.004
    赵汉卿, 张建民, 李栓豹, 等, 2017. 渤海湾盆地A油田新近系明下段沉积特征及演化模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 47(4): 1021-1029, 1046. doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201704105
    朱红涛, 徐长贵, 朱筱敏, 等, 2017. 陆相盆地源-汇系统要素耦合研究进展[J]. 地球科学, 42(11): 1851-1870.
  • Relative Articles

    CUI Runze, WEI Chunjing. 2023: Evolution of metamorphic processes in the Neoarchean mafic granulites of the Qingyuan Terrane in northern Liaoning, North China Craton. Journal of Geomechanics, 29(5): 736-756. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2023049
    CHEN Yunfei, ZHANG Peng, HUANG Bolin, QIN Panpan, LI Qiuwang. 2022: Failure process and long-term stability analysis of typical unstable rock mass in the Three Gorges Reservoir area considering rock mass deterioration. Journal of Geomechanics, 28(6): 938-947. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.20222821
    JI Quanwei, WANG Wenlei, LIU Zhibo, ZHU Maoqiang, YUAN Changjiang. 2021: A machine learning-based lithologic mapping method. Journal of Geomechanics, 27(3): 339-349. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2021.27.03.031
    PANG Xiongqi, LIN Huixi, ZHENG Dingye, LI Huili, ZOU Huayao, PANG Hong, HU Tao, GUO Fangxin, LI Hongyu. 2020: Basic characteristics, dynamic mechanism and development direction of the formation and distribution of deep and ultra-deep carbonate reservoirs in China. Journal of Geomechanics, 26(5): 673-695. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2020.26.05.057
    ZHENG Guanggao, CUI Jianjun, LIU Xiaochun, CHEN Shaofeng, QU Wei, QIAO Jianxin, CHEN Longyao, ZHAO Wenping, LI Miao, LIU Lin. 2019: ZIRCON U-PB AGE AND SOURCE CHARACTERISTICS OF NEOPROTEROZOIC GABBRO AND DYKES IN LONGWANGTANG REGION OF XIXIANG COUNTY, SHAANXI PROVINCE. Journal of Geomechanics, 25(4): 574-589. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2019.25.04.056
    ZU Kewei, CHENG Xiushen, LUO Zhouliang, YIN Nanxin, WANG Kai. 2018: THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT METHODS FOR FRACTURE PREDICTION IN COMPLEX CARBONATE ROCK RESERVOIR. Journal of Geomechanics, 24(4): 465-473. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2018.24.04.048
    ZHAO Juan, ZENG Deming, LIANG Feng, FAN Ling, HOU Fu, SONG Linke, WANG Jiashu, TENG Yiwei. 2018: THE GENESIS OF THE DOLOMITIC RESERVOIRS OF THE LOWER PERMIAN QIXIA FORMATION IN THE SOUTH CENTRAL SICHUAN BASIN. Journal of Geomechanics, 24(2): 212-219. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2018.24.02.022
    ZHAO Zeng-yu, WANG Wei, LI Xiang-qian, CHENG Yu, GUO Gang, ZHANG Xiang-yun, JIAO Fei-xiang. 2017: MODEL BUILDING OF SURFICIAL DEPOSITS IN PLANE AREA——A CASE STUDY OF 1:50000 MAPPINGOF SHENGCITANG TOWN. Journal of Geomechanics, 23(2): 182-188.
    MENG Peng-yan, SUN Jie, YU Chang-chun, MU Chao, SHUAI Shuang, XIE Fei, MENG Dan. 2016: LITHOLOGICAL INFORMATION EXTRACTION IN MOUNTAIN CANYON REGION BASED ON MULTI-SOURCE REMOTE SENSING DATA: A CASE STUDY OF 1: 50000 PILOT GEOLOGICAL MAPPING IN BEISHAN AREA IN WUSHI, XINJIGAN. Journal of Geomechanics, 22(4): 907-920.
    LIANG Xing-ru, ZHANG Feng, LI Sheng-li, Huang Jie, LIANG Guan-zhong, SUN Ting-ting, YU Ren-jiang, CAO Bin. 2016: DISTRIBUTION OF HYDROCARBON RESERVOIRS AND PETROLEUM ACCUMULATION PATTERNS IN THE SHAHEJIE FORMATION ON SLOPE OF SHULU DEPRESSION, NORTH CHINA. Journal of Geomechanics, 22(1): 66-75.
    XIE Fei, WU Zhi-ping, YAN Shi-yong, HE Min, SONG Jia. 2015: RESERVOIR-FORMING PATTERN OF THE SOUTH UPLIFT IN ENPING SAG. Journal of Geomechanics, 21(4): 481-491.
    GAO Wan-li, ZHANG Xu-jiao, WANG Zhi-gang, ZHANG Zhi-cheng, ZHANG Yao-ling. 2010: EXTRACTION OF LITHOLOGIC INFORMATION FROM THE EAST KULUN OROGENIC BELT USING ASTER REMOTE SENSING IMAGE. Journal of Geomechanics, 16(1): 59-69.
    SUN Hai-ning, XIA Jing-sheng, ZHONG Jian-hua, WANG Zhi-kun. 2008: THE CONDITION AND PATTERN OF TURBIDITE FAN RESERVOIR FORMATION IN EASTERN DONGYING DEPRESSION, SHANDONG PROVINCE. Journal of Geomechanics, 14(3): 221-230.
    ZHAO Guo-lian, ZHA Chen-lin, YE Lian-jun. 2005: SEDIMENTARY SYSTEM OF “FOUR FANS AND ONE CHANNEL” IN THE BOHAI GULF BASIN AND ITS SIGNIFICANCE FOR PETROLEUM EXPLORATION. Journal of Geomechanics, 11(3): 245-258.
    HU Hui. 2005: FORMATION CONDITIONS AND DISTRIBUTION CHARACTE-RISTICS OF LITHOLOGICAL RESERVOIRS IN THE QIANJIANG SUBBASIN. Journal of Geomechanics, 11(1): 67-73.
    MENG Yuan-lin, WANG Yue-chuan, LUO Xian-ying, GAO Jian-jun, XIAO Li-hua, ZHOU Xin-gui, YIN Xiu-lan, WANG Zhi-guo. 2005: NUMERICAL MODELING OF THE ACCUMULATION-FORMING HISTORY OF THE KONGXI BURIED HILL,BOHAI GULF BASIN. Journal of Geomechanics, 11(1): 11-18.
    XU Shou-yu, YAN Ke. 2005: STRUCTURAL SYSTEM AND HYDROCARBON DISTRIBUTION IN THE BOHAI GULF BASIN. Journal of Geomechanics, 11(3): 259-265.
    WANG Xue-bin, PAN Yi-shan, DING Xiu-li, SHENG Qian. 2001: STUDY ON EFFECT OF PORE PRESSURE ON STRAIN LOCALIZATION OF ROCK AND DIGITAL SIMULATION. Journal of Geomechanics, 7(2): 139-143.
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-03020406080100
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 23.1 %FULLTEXT: 23.1 %META: 71.7 %META: 71.7 %PDF: 5.2 %PDF: 5.2 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 4.4 %其他: 4.4 %China: 0.3 %China: 0.3 %Fairborn: 0.1 %Fairborn: 0.1 %State College: 0.1 %State College: 0.1 %上海: 1.1 %上海: 1.1 %东莞: 0.7 %东莞: 0.7 %东营: 0.3 %东营: 0.3 %中卫: 4.2 %中卫: 4.2 %临汾: 0.3 %临汾: 0.3 %丹东: 0.2 %丹东: 0.2 %乌兰察布: 0.1 %乌兰察布: 0.1 %伊利诺伊州: 0.1 %伊利诺伊州: 0.1 %佛山: 0.1 %佛山: 0.1 %保定: 0.5 %保定: 0.5 %信阳: 0.1 %信阳: 0.1 %克拉玛依: 0.1 %克拉玛依: 0.1 %兰州: 0.3 %兰州: 0.3 %切萨皮克: 0.1 %切萨皮克: 0.1 %包头: 0.1 %包头: 0.1 %北京: 26.8 %北京: 26.8 %南京: 0.3 %南京: 0.3 %南宁: 0.3 %南宁: 0.3 %南平: 0.1 %南平: 0.1 %南昌: 0.2 %南昌: 0.2 %合肥: 0.1 %合肥: 0.1 %周口: 0.1 %周口: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %哈尔滨: 0.3 %哈尔滨: 0.3 %哈里亚纳: 0.1 %哈里亚纳: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.2 %哥伦布: 0.2 %唐山: 0.1 %唐山: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.1 %大同: 1.5 %大同: 1.5 %大庆: 0.3 %大庆: 0.3 %大连: 0.2 %大连: 0.2 %天津: 1.6 %天津: 1.6 %太原: 0.1 %太原: 0.1 %宁波: 0.2 %宁波: 0.2 %安康: 0.1 %安康: 0.1 %安阳: 0.1 %安阳: 0.1 %宜宾: 0.2 %宜宾: 0.2 %宜昌: 0.3 %宜昌: 0.3 %宜春: 0.1 %宜春: 0.1 %宣城: 0.2 %宣城: 0.2 %密蘇里城: 0.1 %密蘇里城: 0.1 %帕特森: 0.1 %帕特森: 0.1 %常德: 0.2 %常德: 0.2 %广州: 0.5 %广州: 0.5 %库比蒂诺: 0.2 %库比蒂诺: 0.2 %廊坊: 0.4 %廊坊: 0.4 %张家口: 4.9 %张家口: 4.9 %徐州: 0.3 %徐州: 0.3 %成都: 1.4 %成都: 1.4 %扬州: 0.1 %扬州: 0.1 %抚顺: 0.1 %抚顺: 0.1 %揭阳: 0.1 %揭阳: 0.1 %新乡: 0.1 %新乡: 0.1 %无锡: 0.2 %无锡: 0.2 %昆明: 0.4 %昆明: 0.4 %昌吉: 0.1 %昌吉: 0.1 %昭通: 0.1 %昭通: 0.1 %朝阳: 0.2 %朝阳: 0.2 %杭州: 0.3 %杭州: 0.3 %梅州: 0.1 %梅州: 0.1 %武汉: 0.8 %武汉: 0.8 %永州: 0.1 %永州: 0.1 %沈阳: 0.2 %沈阳: 0.2 %沧州: 0.1 %沧州: 0.1 %泰安: 0.1 %泰安: 0.1 %泰州: 0.1 %泰州: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.5 %洛阳: 0.5 %济南: 0.3 %济南: 0.3 %济宁: 0.1 %济宁: 0.1 %海口: 0.1 %海口: 0.1 %深圳: 0.3 %深圳: 0.3 %温州: 0.2 %温州: 0.2 %湘潭: 0.1 %湘潭: 0.1 %滁州: 0.1 %滁州: 0.1 %漯河: 0.6 %漯河: 0.6 %烟台: 0.1 %烟台: 0.1 %珠海: 0.2 %珠海: 0.2 %琼海: 0.1 %琼海: 0.1 %甘孜: 0.1 %甘孜: 0.1 %盐城: 0.1 %盐城: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.6 %石家庄: 0.6 %福州: 0.1 %福州: 0.1 %秦皇岛: 0.1 %秦皇岛: 0.1 %绍兴: 0.1 %绍兴: 0.1 %绥化: 0.1 %绥化: 0.1 %绵阳: 0.1 %绵阳: 0.1 %芒廷维尤: 10.4 %芒廷维尤: 10.4 %芝加哥: 0.3 %芝加哥: 0.3 %苏州: 0.4 %苏州: 0.4 %荆门: 0.1 %荆门: 0.1 %莱芜: 0.1 %莱芜: 0.1 %萍乡: 0.1 %萍乡: 0.1 %衢州: 0.2 %衢州: 0.2 %西宁: 20.2 %西宁: 20.2 %西安: 0.7 %西安: 0.7 %西雅图: 0.1 %西雅图: 0.1 %许昌: 0.1 %许昌: 0.1 %诺沃克: 0.3 %诺沃克: 0.3 %贵阳: 0.4 %贵阳: 0.4 %赣州: 0.1 %赣州: 0.1 %运城: 1.0 %运城: 1.0 %连云港: 0.1 %连云港: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %郑州: 0.5 %郑州: 0.5 %重庆: 0.8 %重庆: 0.8 %铁岭: 0.1 %铁岭: 0.1 %锦州: 0.3 %锦州: 0.3 %长春: 0.6 %长春: 0.6 %长沙: 0.5 %长沙: 0.5 %青岛: 0.8 %青岛: 0.8 %鞍山: 0.1 %鞍山: 0.1 %马鞍山: 0.3 %马鞍山: 0.3 %黄石: 0.2 %黄石: 0.2 %齐齐哈尔: 0.1 %齐齐哈尔: 0.1 %其他ChinaFairbornState College上海东莞东营中卫临汾丹东乌兰察布伊利诺伊州佛山保定信阳克拉玛依兰州切萨皮克包头北京南京南宁南平南昌合肥周口呼和浩特哈尔滨哈里亚纳哥伦布唐山嘉兴大同大庆大连天津太原宁波安康安阳宜宾宜昌宜春宣城密蘇里城帕特森常德广州库比蒂诺廊坊张家口徐州成都扬州抚顺揭阳新乡无锡昆明昌吉昭通朝阳杭州梅州武汉永州沈阳沧州泰安泰州洛阳济南济宁海口深圳温州湘潭滁州漯河烟台珠海琼海甘孜盐城石家庄福州秦皇岛绍兴绥化绵阳芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州荆门莱芜萍乡衢州西宁西安西雅图许昌诺沃克贵阳赣州运城连云港邯郸郑州重庆铁岭锦州长春长沙青岛鞍山马鞍山黄石齐齐哈尔

Catalog

    Figures(12)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (841) PDF downloads(61) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return