Volume 24 Issue 6
Dec.  2018
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
WU Jun, LIAO Shaoming, WANG Kun, 2018. FACE STABILITY OF SHIELD TUNNEL WITH DIFFERENT SUPPORT MODELS IN SAND. Journal of Geomechanics, 24 (6): 879-886. DOI: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2018.24.06.092
Citation: WU Jun, LIAO Shaoming, WANG Kun, 2018. FACE STABILITY OF SHIELD TUNNEL WITH DIFFERENT SUPPORT MODELS IN SAND. Journal of Geomechanics, 24 (6): 879-886. DOI: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2018.24.06.092

FACE STABILITY OF SHIELD TUNNEL WITH DIFFERENT SUPPORT MODELS IN SAND

doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2018.24.06.092
More Information
  • Received: 2017-07-08
  • Revised: 2018-09-30
  • Published: 2018-12-01
  • Setting reasonable support pressure for different support model shield tunnel machine is extremely important for the face stability of the shield tunnel. The face stability is discussed respectively when the face is above and under water for the typical distribution of face support in tunneling by compressed air shield, slurry shield and EPB shield. The research results show that, When the effective support stress is uniformly distributed, the soil mass is unstable in the middle and the bottom of the face except for the instability in the lower part of the clay face; when the effective support stress is distributed in trapezoid with a small top and big bottom, the soil mass is unstable in the top of the face except for the instability in the lower part of the soft clay face; on the contrary, the lower half part of the face is instable for all kinds of soil mass when the effective stress distribution is in trapezoid with a big top and small bottom. In the balanced support mode of compressed air shield, slurry shield and EPB shield, the face has already gone through local instability before the overall instability of face assumed by the wedge-shaped model; therefore, traditional wedge model based on overall stability is unsafe. Furthermore, in order to facilitate the calculation of active earth pressure, active pressure coefficient and others design parameters are also provided as function of the soil friction angle and the friction between cutter and the soil.

     

  • Full-text Translaiton by iFLYTEK

    The full translation of the current issue may be delayed. If you encounter a 404 page, please try again later.
  • loading
  • [1]
    Horn M. Horizontal earth pressure on perpendicular tunnel face[A]. Hungarian National Conference of the Foundation Engineer Industry[C]. Budapest: Hungary Press,, 1961.
    [2]
    Anagnostou G, kovári K. The face stability of slurry-shield-driven tunnels[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 1994, 9(2):165~174. doi: 10.1016/0886-7798(94)90028-0
    [3]
    Anagnostou G, kovári K. Face stability conditions with earth-pressure-balanced shields[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 1996, 11(2):165~173. doi: 10.1016/0886-7798(96)00017-X
    [4]
    Chambon P, Corté J F. Shallow tunnels in cohesionless soil:stability of tunnel face[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1994, 120(7):1148~1165. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:7(1148)
    [5]
    Oblozinsky P, Kuwano J. Centrifuge experiments on stability of tunnel face[J]. Slovak Journal of Civil Engineering, 2004, (4):23~29.
    [6]
    Berthoz N, Branque D, Subrin D, et al. Face failure in homogeneous and stratified soft ground:theoretical and experimental approaches on 1g EPBS reduced scale model[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2012, 30:25~37. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2012.01.005
    [7]
    袁大军, 王飞, 董朝文, 等.盾构切削大直径钢筋混凝土桩基新型刀具研究[J].中国公路学报, 2016, 29(3):89~97. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2016.03.012

    YUAN Dajun, WANG Fei, DONG Chaowen, et al. Study on new-style cutter for shield cutting large-diameter reinforced concrete pile[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2016, 29(3):89~97. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2016.03.012
    [8]
    张稳军, 苏忍, 张高乐, 等.考虑固结影响的双洞盾构隧道非同步施工引起的土体变形研究[J].中国公路学报, 2016, 29(9):103~111, 151. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2016.09.014

    ZHANG Wenjun, SU Ren, ZHANG Gaole, et al. Study on soil deformation induced by non-synchronous construction of double-tube shield tunnels considering consolidation[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2016, 29(9):103~111, 151. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2016.09.014
    [9]
    Broere W. Tunnel face stability and new CPT application[D]. Delft: Technical University of Delft, 2001.
    [10]
    Anagnostou G. The contribution of horizontal arching to tunnel face stability[J]. Geotechnik, 2012, 35(1):34~44. doi: 10.1002/gete.v35.1
    [11]
    武军, 廖少明, 时振昊.考虑土拱效应的盾构隧道开挖面稳定性[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 43(2):213~220. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/tjdxxb201502008

    WU Jun, LIAO Shaoming, SHI Zhenhao. Workface stability of shield tunnel considering arching effect[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2015, 43(2):213~220. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/tjdxxb201502008
    [12]
    Paik K H, Salgado R. Estimation of active earth pressure against rigid retaining walls considering arching effects[J]. Geotechnique, 2003, 53(7):643~653. doi: 10.1680/geot.2003.53.7.643
    [13]
    Anagnostou G, Perazzelli P. The stability of a tunnel face with a free span and a non-uniform support[J]. Geotechnik, 2013, 36(1):40~50. doi: 10.1002/gete.201200014
    [14]
    Thorpe J P. Ground movements during tunneling in sand[D]. Kingston: Queen's University, 2007.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    Figures(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (298) PDF downloads(9) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return