ZHANG Ming-li, JIN Zhi-jun, LU Peng-ju, et al., 2000. FORMATION OF TAISHAN MOUNTAIN AND CENOZOIC TECTONICISM. Journal of Geomechanics, 6 (2): 23-29.
Citation: ZHANG Ming-li, JIN Zhi-jun, LU Peng-ju, et al., 2000. FORMATION OF TAISHAN MOUNTAIN AND CENOZOIC TECTONICISM. Journal of Geomechanics, 6 (2): 23-29.

FORMATION OF TAISHAN MOUNTAIN AND CENOZOIC TECTONICISM

More Information
  • This paper analyses the Cenozoic tectonism in the Taishan Mountain and the resulting topographic features.It was charactorized by a tilting and uplifting of the northern wall block of the fault front Taishan Mountain during the Cenozoic.Taishan Mountain is a young fault block mountain,being of an age of about 30 Ma.

     

  • Relative Articles

    ZHU Jinqi, GONG Xulong, YU Jun, ZHANG Yun, ZHANG Yan, YE Shujun, WANG Caihui, XU Shugang, WU Jianqiang, WANG Guangya, LIU Mingyao, GU Chunsheng, MIN Wang, GONG Yabing. 2024: Prevention and control of land subsidence and earth fissures in Suzhou–Wuxi–Changzhou region. Journal of Geomechanics, 30(5): 811-833. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2024051
    WANG Qingbing, HUANG Qiangbing, YAN Yufeng, YANG Zhao, HU Shiwei, LEI Jian. 2020: Study on influence of construction precipitation on surface settlement and stratum stress on the ground fissure site. Journal of Geomechanics, 26(2): 221-231. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2020.26.02.021
    WANG Miaomiao, FENG Chengjun, QI Bangshen, MENG Jing, ZHANG Peng, REN Siqi, TAN Chengxuan. 2018: REAEARCH ON THE MECHANISM OF THE INFLUENCE OF DYNAMIC LOAD OF HIGH-SPEED TRAIN ON LAND SUBSIDENCE SUBJECTED TO FAULT EFFECT: A CASE STUDY OF THE HUAILAI SECTION OF THE BEIJING-ZHANGJIAKOU HIGH-SPEED RAILWAY. Journal of Geomechanics, 24(3): 407-415. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2018.24.03.042
    CHEN Xing, HUANG Qiangbing, LIU Nina, ZHAO Teng. 2018: STUDY ON GROUND SETTLEMENT OF ENGINEERING SITE OF METRO TUNNEL ADJACENT TO GROUND FISSURE ZONE UNDER THE ACTION OF EARTHQUAKE. Journal of Geomechanics, 24(5): 714-722. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2018.24.05.073
    ZHAO Wei-hua, WEI Jian-xin, SUN Dong-sheng, LI A-wei, WANG Hong-cai. 2016: STUDY ON SEISMIC PROPERTY OF CRACK-INCLUDED PHYSICAL MODEL. Journal of Geomechanics, 22(4): 967-975.
    LIN Zong-man. 2014: QUERY ON THE NEOCATHAYSIAN FROM THE CONTRAST WITH SICHUAN BASIN AND JIANGHAN SUBSIDENCE AREA. Journal of Geomechanics, 20(3): 205-221.
    ZHANG Fu-shun, FAN Tai-liang, SUN Yi-pu, KU Guo-zheng, ZHANG Fang-dong. 2003: CONTROL OF STRUCTURE ON THE SEDIMENTATION IN BAIYINCHAGAN DEPRESSION,ERLIAN BASIN. Journal of Geomechanics, 9(2): 136-142.
    ZHANG Jian, GE She-min, XU He-hua, XIONG Liang-ping, YANG Ji-hai, ZHANG Qi-ming. 2000: AN ESTIMATE OF THE RATE OF UNDERGROUND FLUID FLOW FROM WELL-TEMPERATURE DATA IN YING-QIONG BASIN. Journal of Geomechanics, 6(2): 1-5.
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040510152025
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 41.9 %FULLTEXT: 41.9 %META: 56.7 %META: 56.7 %PDF: 1.4 %PDF: 1.4 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 3.0 %其他: 3.0 %United States: 0.2 %United States: 0.2 %三亚: 0.4 %三亚: 0.4 %上海: 0.4 %上海: 0.4 %东莞: 0.2 %东莞: 0.2 %中卫: 3.9 %中卫: 3.9 %中山: 0.2 %中山: 0.2 %临汾: 0.2 %临汾: 0.2 %丹东: 0.2 %丹东: 0.2 %丽水: 0.2 %丽水: 0.2 %乌海: 0.2 %乌海: 0.2 %保定: 0.2 %保定: 0.2 %兰州: 0.2 %兰州: 0.2 %北京: 23.5 %北京: 23.5 %南京: 0.4 %南京: 0.4 %南宁: 0.5 %南宁: 0.5 %南平: 0.2 %南平: 0.2 %南昌: 0.2 %南昌: 0.2 %南通: 0.4 %南通: 0.4 %台州: 0.4 %台州: 0.4 %合肥: 0.2 %合肥: 0.2 %吕梁: 0.4 %吕梁: 0.4 %呼伦贝尔: 0.2 %呼伦贝尔: 0.2 %呼和浩特: 0.5 %呼和浩特: 0.5 %哥伦布: 0.2 %哥伦布: 0.2 %商丘: 0.2 %商丘: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.2 %大庆: 0.4 %大庆: 0.4 %大连: 0.4 %大连: 0.4 %天水: 0.2 %天水: 0.2 %天津: 1.1 %天津: 1.1 %太原: 0.4 %太原: 0.4 %威海: 0.2 %威海: 0.2 %娄底: 0.2 %娄底: 0.2 %安康: 0.5 %安康: 0.5 %安阳: 0.2 %安阳: 0.2 %宜春: 0.2 %宜春: 0.2 %岳阳: 0.2 %岳阳: 0.2 %常州: 0.2 %常州: 0.2 %常德: 0.4 %常德: 0.4 %广元: 0.2 %广元: 0.2 %广州: 0.2 %广州: 0.2 %廊坊: 0.4 %廊坊: 0.4 %张家口: 2.8 %张家口: 2.8 %徐州: 0.5 %徐州: 0.5 %成都: 1.1 %成都: 1.1 %扬州: 0.2 %扬州: 0.2 %承德: 0.2 %承德: 0.2 %抚顺: 0.2 %抚顺: 0.2 %昆明: 0.4 %昆明: 0.4 %晋中: 0.2 %晋中: 0.2 %晋城: 0.2 %晋城: 0.2 %朝阳: 0.7 %朝阳: 0.7 %杭州: 0.2 %杭州: 0.2 %株洲: 0.2 %株洲: 0.2 %武汉: 1.6 %武汉: 1.6 %永州: 0.2 %永州: 0.2 %汉中: 0.2 %汉中: 0.2 %沈阳: 0.4 %沈阳: 0.4 %沧州: 0.2 %沧州: 0.2 %泰安: 0.2 %泰安: 0.2 %济南: 0.2 %济南: 0.2 %海口: 0.2 %海口: 0.2 %淄博: 0.2 %淄博: 0.2 %温州: 0.5 %温州: 0.5 %湖州: 0.2 %湖州: 0.2 %滨州: 0.2 %滨州: 0.2 %漯河: 1.2 %漯河: 1.2 %潮州: 0.2 %潮州: 0.2 %烟台: 0.2 %烟台: 0.2 %焦作: 0.2 %焦作: 0.2 %白山: 0.2 %白山: 0.2 %盐城: 0.4 %盐城: 0.4 %石家庄: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.2 %福州: 0.2 %福州: 0.2 %秦皇岛: 0.4 %秦皇岛: 0.4 %芒廷维尤: 11.5 %芒廷维尤: 11.5 %芝加哥: 0.2 %芝加哥: 0.2 %苏州: 0.4 %苏州: 0.4 %衡水: 0.2 %衡水: 0.2 %衢州: 0.2 %衢州: 0.2 %西宁: 26.0 %西宁: 26.0 %西安: 0.4 %西安: 0.4 %许昌: 0.2 %许昌: 0.2 %贵阳: 0.7 %贵阳: 0.7 %赣州: 0.2 %赣州: 0.2 %运城: 0.4 %运城: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.2 %郑州: 0.4 %郑州: 0.4 %鄂州: 0.2 %鄂州: 0.2 %酒泉: 0.2 %酒泉: 0.2 %重庆: 1.1 %重庆: 1.1 %银川: 1.4 %银川: 1.4 %长沙: 0.5 %长沙: 0.5 %阜新: 0.2 %阜新: 0.2 %随州: 0.2 %随州: 0.2 %鞍山: 0.2 %鞍山: 0.2 %马鞍山: 0.2 %马鞍山: 0.2 %龙岩: 0.2 %龙岩: 0.2 %其他United States三亚上海东莞中卫中山临汾丹东丽水乌海保定兰州北京南京南宁南平南昌南通台州合肥吕梁呼伦贝尔呼和浩特哥伦布商丘嘉兴大庆大连天水天津太原威海娄底安康安阳宜春岳阳常州常德广元广州廊坊张家口徐州成都扬州承德抚顺昆明晋中晋城朝阳杭州株洲武汉永州汉中沈阳沧州泰安济南海口淄博温州湖州滨州漯河潮州烟台焦作白山盐城石家庄福州秦皇岛芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州衡水衢州西宁西安许昌贵阳赣州运城邯郸郑州鄂州酒泉重庆银川长沙阜新随州鞍山马鞍山龙岩

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (303) PDF downloads(13) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return