The genesis and ore-controlling regularity of interbedded orebodies controlled by tectonics and lithofacies in Lutangba, Gejiu, Yunnan Province
-
摘要: 云南个旧锡矿是世界级超大型锡多金属矿床，层间矿床（锡石-硫化物）是其中重要的矿床类型之一，其成因也一直存在争议，为了进一步探讨其成因并对该类型矿床的深部勘查提供理论依据，重点对个旧锡矿高松矿田芦塘坝矿段10号矿群不同中段层间矿体的岩石矿物组构和地球化学特征进行了研究。结果表明层间矿床中的原生矿体多为块状硫化矿石，金属硫化物主要为磁黄铁矿、黄铁矿、闪锌矿、黄铜矿等，脉石矿物主要为透闪石、萤石和少量的石英等；层间矿床中的氧化矿经重砂分析，该矿中的锡石多为红褐色不规则状，少量为半自形状，粒径0.07~0.3 mm。通过对不同中段原生矿和氧化矿的对比分析，总体上氧化矿石中除S和FeO含量小于原生矿石外，SiO2、A12O3、TiO2、MnO、MgO、CaO、Na2O、K2O、P2O5和烧失量等均大于原生硫化矿石。单一原生矿体不同中段的主量元素分析结果显示，从下部到上部，矿体中的CaO和P2O5具有增大趋势，MgO、S和烧失量具有从小变大再变小的波状变化。此外，原生矿中的金属硫化物具有明显的分带性，铜矿化分布在下部，锌矿化分布在上部。在上部原生矿中可见到早期高温喷气形成的胶状黄铁矿和气孔，下部则多为自形-半自形的黄铁矿。个旧芦塘坝层间矿主要与燕山晚期岩浆期后气化-热液有关，并受构造和岩相作用控制明显。印支期南北向挤压作用在灰质白云岩层和石灰岩层间形成滑脱构造，为重要的储矿构造，燕山晚期形成的北东向断裂（如芦塘坝断裂）为重要的导矿构造。当燕山晚期岩浆期后气化-热液上侵时在层间滑脱构造带中形成缓倾斜矿体，而后在切层断裂带中形成陡倾斜矿体。该地区广泛发育的岩溶作用对成矿作用具有重大影响，在成矿前对印支期形成的储矿构造具有进一步的扩容作用，在成矿后又加速了层间矿边部的氧化。Abstract: The Gejiu tin deposit in Yunnan Province is a world-class super-large tin-polymetallic deposit, and the interbedded deposit (cassiterite-sulfide) is one of the important deposit types, but its genesis has been debated. The mineral fabric and geochemical characteristics of the interbedded orebodies of No.10 Ore Group at different levels of the Lutangba section in the Gaosong ore field were systematically studied to further discuss the genesis and provide theoretical basis for deep exploration of this type of deposit. The study results show that there is big difference between primary ore and oxidized ore. In the primary ore of the interbedded orebodies, the metallic sulfides are mainly pyrrhotite, pyrite, sphalerite, chalcopyrite, etc; the gangue minerals are mainly tremolite, fluorite and a few quartz, etc. In the oxidation ore of interbedded orebodies, most cassiterites are reddish-brown and irregular, and a small amount of cassiterite is hypidiomorphic, with a particle size of 0.07~0.3 mm according to the analysis of heavy sand. Comparing the primary ore and oxidized ore at different elevations, we found that the loss of SiO2, A12O3, TiO2, MnO, MgO, CaO, Na2O, K2O, P2O5 and ignition loss are greater than that of primary sulfide ores in general, except that the content of S and FeO in oxidized ores is less than that of primary ores. The analysis results of the main elements at different elevations of the primary ore show that CaO and P2O5 increase from the bottom to the top, while MgO, S and ignition loss show a wave-like change from small to large and then smaller. In addition, the metallic sulfide in the primary ore has obvious zonation, with copper mineralization in the lower part and zinc mineralization in the upper part. The oolitic colloidal pyrite and pores formed by early high temperature exhalation can be seen in the upper part of the primary ore, while the lower part is mostly automorphic to hypidiomorphic pyrite. We hold the opinion that the interbedded orebodies in Lutangba mainly are related to post-magmatic gasification hydrothermal of the late Yanshanian period, and are obviously controlled by the tectonics and lithofacies. In the Indosinian period, the north-south compression formed multiple interlayer detachment structures between the calcareous dolomite and limestone strata, which are the important ore-hosting structures. The NE faults (such as the Lutangba fault) formed in the late Yanshanian period are the important passable structures. During the post-magmatic gasification hydrothermal transgression through NE faults, gently inclined orebodies were formed in the multiple interlayer detachment structures, and finally, steep inclined orebodies formed in the faults. The widely developed karstification in this area has a great influence on mineralization, which further enlarges the ore-hosting structure formed in the Indosinian period before mineralization, and accelerates the oxidation of interbedded orebody margins after mineralization.
-
图 1 研究区地质简图
1—中三叠统法郎组(T2f); 2—中三叠统个旧组(T2g); 3—中三叠统个旧组卡房段第6层(T2g16); 4—中三叠统个旧组卡房段第5层(T2g15); 5—燕山晚期花岗岩类; 6—燕山早期辉长岩; 7—燕山早期二长岩; 8—燕山晚期碱性岩; 9—断层角砾岩; 10—断裂; 11—推测断裂; 12—地质界线; 13—缓倾斜层间矿; 14—陡倾斜层间矿; 15—矿田; 16—研究区位置; 17—图 2地质剖面位置
a—个旧高松矿田芦塘坝层间矿分布图; b—个旧区域地质略图(据庄永秋等, 1996修改)Figure 1. Geological map of the study area
(a) Distribution map of interbedded orebodies in Lutangba of the Gaosong ore field in Gejiu; (b) Sketch map of regional geology in Gejiu, Yunnan (modified after Zhuang et al., 1996)
1-Middle Triassic Falang Formation (T2f); 2-Middle Triassic Gejiu Formation (T2g); 3-The sixth layer of the Kafang member of the Gejiu Formation in Middle Triassic (T2g16); 4-The fifth layer of the Kafang member of the Gejiu Formation in Middle Triassic (T2g15); 5-Late Yanshanian granitoids; 6-Early Yanshanian gabbro; 7-Early Yanshanian monzonite; 8-Late Yanshanian alkaline rocks; 9-Fault breccia; 10-Fault; 11-Inferred fault; 12-Geological boundary; 13-Gently inclined interbedded ore; 14-Steeply inclined interbedded ore; 15-Ore field; 16-Study area; 17-Location of geological profile in Fig. 2
图 2 个旧芦塘坝10号矿群不同层间矿样品采集位置图(据马德云等, 2004修改)
1—中三叠统个旧组卡房段第6层(T2g16); 2—中三叠统个旧组卡房段第5层(T2g15); 3—断层及角砾岩; 4—断裂名称; 5—地质界线; 6—10号矿群中矿体编号; 7—坑道内钻孔位置; 8—采矿中段; 9—高程; 10—原生矿样品及编号; 11—氧化矿样品及编号; 12—图 1中地质剖面
Figure 2. Sample location from different interbedded orebodies of No.10 Ore Group in Lutangba, Gejiu (modified after Ma et al., 2004)
1-The sixth layer of the Kafang member of the Gejiu Formation in Middle Triassic (T2g16); 2-The fifth layer of the Kafang member of the Gejiu Formation in Middle Triassic (T2g15); 3-Fault and breccia; 4-Fault name; 5-Geological boundary; 6-Orebody number in No.10 Ore Group; 7-Drilling location in the tunnel; 8-Mining level; 9-Elevation; 10-Sample numbers of primary ore; 11-Sample numbers of oxidized ore; 12-Location of geological profile in Fig. 1
图 3 个旧芦塘坝层间矿石组构特征
a—1630中段10-12号矿体中的原生矿(样品LT-4);b—1630中段10-12号矿体中的氧化矿(样品LT-5);c—1660中段10-13号矿体中的氧化矿(样品LT-9);d—1660中段10-13号矿体中原生矿(样品LT-10);e—氧化矿中重砂锡石; f—1660中段10-13号矿体中原生矿(样品LT-10)中含气孔胶状黄铁矿; g—1690中段10-5号矿体中原生矿(样品LT-13)中的萤石和金属硫化物; h—1630中段10-12号矿体原生矿(样品LT-4)中的金属硫化物和透闪石; i—1630中段10-5号矿体原生矿(样品LT-5)中的透闪石和自形黄铁矿, 黄铜矿和少量石英(反射光); j—1630中段10-5号矿体原生矿(样品LT-5)中的透闪石和自形黄铁矿, 黄铜矿和少量石英(单偏光)
Figure 3. Fabric characteristics of interbedded ores in Lutangba, Gejiu
(a)Primary ore in No.10-12 orebody at the mining level of 1630 m (sample LT-4); (b)Oxidized ore in No.10-12 orebody at the mining level of 1630 m (sample LT-5); (c)Oxidized ore in No.10-13 orebody at the mining level of 1660 m(sample LT-9); (d)Primary ore in No.10-13 orebody at the mining level of 1660 m (sample LT-10); (e)Cassiterite in oxidized ore; (f)Stomatal colloidal pyrite in the primary ore from No.10-13 orebody at the mining level of 1660 m (sample LT-10); (g)Fluorite and metal sulfide in the primary ore from No.10-5 orebody at the mining level of 1690 m (sample LT-13); (h)Metallic sulfide and tremolite in the primary ore from No.10-12 orebody at the mining level of 1630 m (sample LT-4); (i)Tremolite, idiomorphic pyrite, chalcopyrite and quartz (reflected light) in the primary ore from No.10-12 orebody at the mining level of 1630 m (sample LT-5); (j)Tremolite, idiomorphic pyrite, chalcopyrite and quartz (single-polarized light) in the primary ore from No.10-12 orebody at the mining level of 1630 m (sample LT-5)
图 4 个旧芦塘坝层间矿中氧化矿和原生矿主量元素平均含量变化曲线图
Figure 4. Variation curves of average content (%) of major elements in the oxidized ores and primary ores from interbedded orebodied in Lutangba, Gejiu
图 5 个旧芦塘坝层间矿10-5号原生矿在不同中段中主量元素含量变化曲线图
Figure 5. Variation curves of content (%) of major elements in the primary ores at different elevations from No.10-5 orebody in Lutangba, Gejiu
图 6 个旧芦塘坝层间矿10-5号氧化矿在不同中段中主量元素含量变化曲线图
Figure 6. Variation curves of content (%) of major elements in the oxidized ores at different elevations from No.10-5 orebody in Lutangba, Gejiu
表 1 个旧芦塘坝层间矿主量元素分析结果(%)
Table 1. Analysis results of major elements(%)of interbedded orebodies in Lutangba, Gejiu
样品编号 矿体编号 中段 采样位置 类型 SiO2 TiO2 A12O3 Fe2O3 FeO MnO MgO CaO Na2O K2O 烧失量 P2O5 Cu Zn S 总量 LT-1 10-15 1600 m T721西4 m 氧化矿 39.75 1.83 15.41 5.80 3.02 0.06 19.33 2.54 0.43 6.72 3.90 0.56 99.35 LT-2 10-13 1630 m K721西15 m 原生矿 3.87 0.54 0.25 60.41 6.20 0.01 0.04 0.20 0.10 0.04 0.50 1.10 0.41 26.04 99.71 LT-3 10-12 1630 m K1791西30 m 原生矿 1.44 0.57 0.15 60.04 5.10 0.03 0.19 0.18 0.19 0.10 1.20 1.67 0.66 28.00 99.52 LT-4 10-12 1630 m K1791东10 m 原生矿 12.93 0.46 0.15 61.41 6.58 0.02 0.27 0.33 0.25 0.12 1.15 0.46 0.29 15.10 99.52 LT-5 10-12 1630 m 氧化矿 11.31 0.89 8.59 40.8 1.07 0.48 6.10 9.30 0.14 0.36 17.75 0.93 0.28 1.60 99.60 LT-6 10-5 1630 m K181西2 m 原生矿 6.24 0.47 0.15 60.89 5.95 0.06 0.4l 0.38 0.09 0.06 0.70 0.30 24.00 99.70 LT-7 10-5 1630 m K181西3 m 氧化矿 6.00 0.64 2.53 74.54 8.69 0.33 0.51 0.84 0.20 0.09 1.00 0.70 0.44 3.10 99.61 LT-8 10-15 1660 m L1101点西20 m 氧化矿 4.60 0.50 0.15 83.57 6.90 0.06 0.15 0.27 0.09 0.08 1.44 0.67 1.28 99.76 LT-9 10-13 1660 m L901点西40 m 氧化矿 4.80 0.68 0.16 80.77 8.90 0.34 0.25 0.44 0.11 0.08 1.00 1.63 0.66 99.82 LT-10 10-13 1660 m 原生矿 6.63 0.69 0.10 55.05 16.94 0.05 0.23 1.47 0.12 0.07 1.00 0.96 0.46 16.10 99.87 LT-11 10-5 1660 m L1231东50 m 原生矿 4.84 0.40 0.10 60.89 1.90 0.11 0.51 1.84 0.15 0.04 0.80 0.46 0.29 27.28 99.61 LT-12 10-5 1660 m 氧化矿 13.40 0.71 7.67 56.94 1.78 0.26 1.24 4.22 0.16 0.31 10.09 1.17 1.66 99.61 LT-13 10-5 1690 m 1039西15 m 原生矿 8.84 0.50 0.10 65.61 4.90 0.01 0.17 2.83 0.14 0.04 0.45 0.73 0.44 15.00 99.76 LT-14 10-5 1690 m 氧化矿 12.18 1.03 12.63 42.67 3.70 1.51 1.33 4.92 0.21 0.48 14.10 1.23 1.54 1.44 99.54 LT-15 10-14 1720 m 原生矿 9.72 0.73 2.10 37.34 3.31 0.03 0.49 3.60 0.10 0.07 20.29 2.17 4.27 14.42 99.43 LT-16 10-14 1720 m 氧化矿 12.63 0.71 0.15 69.85 6.10 0.14 0.64 1.78 0.10 0.04 1.10 4.33 1.53 99.68 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 个旧芦塘坝层间矿矿物生成顺序表
Table 2. Mineral formation sequence of the interbedded ores in Lutangba, Gejiu
-
CHEN X H, CHEN Z L, YANG N, 2009. Study on regional mineralizations and ore-field structures: building of mineralizing tectonic systems[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 15(1): 1-19. (in Chinese with English abstract) CHENG Y B, MAO J W, XIE G Q, et al., 2009. Zircon U-Pb dating of granites in Gejiu superlarge tin polymetallic orefield and its significance[J]. Mineral Deposits, 28(3): 297-312. (in Chinese with English abstract) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284821212_Zircon_U-Pb_dating_of_the_granites_in_Gejiu_superginat_tin_polymetallic_ore-field_and_its_significance FANG W X, GUO YQ, JIA R X, et al., 2021. On relationship between the superimposed mineralization systems and the zoning patterns of vertical tectonic lithofacies in the Gejiu concentration area of Sn-Cu-W and three rare metals in Yunnan[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 27(4): 557-584. (in Chinese with English abstract) GUO J, ZHANG R Q, SUN W D, et al., 2015. LA-ICO-MS U-Pb chronology of cassiterite from Gejiu tin polymetallic deposit, Yunnan province[J]. Acta Mineralogica Sinica(S1): 698. (in Chinese) JIA R X, FANG W X, HE J, et al., 2004. Geochemical characteristics of trace elements for Tangziwa tin polymetal deposit, Gejiu, Yunnan[J]. Acta Mineralogica Sinica, 24(2): 136-142. (in Chinese with English abstract) JIA R X, FANG W X, HE Y, et al., 2004. Geochemicalcharacteristics of rare earth elementsin Gejiu Tin Polymetallicdeposits, Yunnan province, China[J]. Journal of Rare Earths, 22(5): 714-720. doi: 10.1007/3-540-27946-6_107 JIA R X, FANG W X, HU R Z, et al., 2007. Geological and geochemical characteristics of skarns from the Tangziwa tin-polymetallic deposit, Gejiu district, Yunnan province, China[J]. Geological Review, 53(2): 281-288. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.1007/3-540-27946-6_107 JIA R X, FANG W X, HU R Z, 2010. Mineral geochemical compositions of tourmalinesand their significance in the Gejiu tin polymetallic deposits, Yunnan, China[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica (English Edition), 84(1): 155-166. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-6724.2010.00177.x JIN Z D, 1991. Denial of hydrothermal genesis of Gejiu interbedded hematite tin deposits[J]. Geology and Exploration, 27(1): 19-20. (in Chinese) KANG D M, HE K, LI J S, et al., 2016. Spatial occurrence regularity of Ore body in Damalu section of Gaosong ore field of Gejiu tin deposit[J]. Modern Mining(6): 154-157. (in Chinese) LI L Y, 2002. On the hydrogeology and controlling factors of groundwater in the east Gejiu Sn orefield[J]. Yunnan Geology, 21(3): 316-321. (in Chinese with English abstract) LI Y S, QIN D X, CHENG X Y, et al., 2009. Evidences of exhalative hydrothermal sedimentary mineralization of indo-Chinese epoch of Gejiu Tin-polymetailic deposits[J]. Nonferrous Metals, 61(3): 120-125. (in Chinese with English abstract) MA D Y, GAO Z M, TAO Y, et al., 2004. The characteristics of ore-controlling structures of the interbedded cassiterite-sulfide deposit, Gaosong ore field, Gejiu, Yunnan[J]. Acta Mineralogica Sinica, 24(2): 153-156. (in Chinese with English abstract) MAO J W, CHENG Y B, GUO C L, et al., 2008. Gejiu tin polymetallic ore-field: deposit model and discussion for several points concerned[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 82(11): 1455-1467. (in Chinese with English abstract) PENG Z X, 1992. Discussion on metallogenic model of Gejiu tin deposit[J]. Yunnan Geology, 11(4): 362-368. (in Chinese) QIAN Z K, LUO T Y, HUANG Z L, et al., 2009. Genesis discussion and mineralogical characteristics of "interbedded oxide ore" in Gejiu tin deposit[J]. Acta Mineralogica Sinica, 29(S1): 549-550. (in Chinese) QIN D X, LI Y S, TAN S C, et al., 2006. Metallogenic ages of Gejiu tin ore deposit in Yunnan province[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 41(1): 122-132. (in Chinese with English abstract) SUN S Y, 2004. Study on the multi-episodic activity of faults in the Gaosong field of Gejiu tin deposits[J]. Acta Mineralogica Sinica, 24(2): 124-128. (in Chinese with English abstract) TIAN Y L, QIN D X, LIN Y B, et al., 1999. Resent situations and progress of studies on the hydrothermal exhalative sedimentary deposit[J]. Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology, 24(1): 150-156. (in Chinese with English abstract) WANG C J, WANG Y Q, 1995. Experimental study of the prinaple and rega-larity governing tectonic stress control of ore deposits[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 1(2): 28-34. (in Chinese with English abstract) XU J J, LAI Y, CUI D, et al., 2009. Characteristics and evolution of ore-forming fluids of the Daolundaba copper-poly-metal deposit, Inner Mongolia[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 25(11): 2957-2972. (in Chinese with English abstract) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353055843_Characteristics_and_evolution_of_ore-forming_fluids_in_the_Diyanqinamu_Mo_deposit_Inner_Mongolia_Evidence_from_LA-ICP-MS_analysis_of_individual_fluid_inclusion XU X W, NIU L, HONG T, et al., 2019. Tectonic dynamics of fluids and metallogenesis[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 25(1): 1-8. (in Chinese with English abstract) https://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-DZLX201901002.htm ZHANG H, TONG X, WU J D, et al., 2007. Gejiu tin-polymetallic ore deposit: an example of landing of red sea-type submarine hydrothermal deposition[J]. Acta Mineralogica Sinica, 27(3-4): 335-341. (in Chinese with English abstract) ZHANG D, LI F, HE X L, et al., 2021. Mesozoic tectonic deformation and its rock/ore-controlmechanism in the important metallogenic belts in South China[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 27 (4): 497-528. (in Chinese with English abstract) ZHOU J P, XU K Q, HUA R M, et al., 1999. Discovery of sedimentary fabric and genesis discussion of Gejiu tin deposit[J]. Progress in Natural Science, 9(5): 419-422. (in Chinese) ZHU Q J, 2012. Metallogenesis characteristics & model of interbed oxidation ore in Damalu Sn orefield, Gejiu[J]. Yunnan Geology, 31(1): 26-31. (in Chinese with English abstract) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169136814001528 ZHU X W, 2009. Discussions on Fenglin karst in China[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 28(2): 155-168. (in Chinese with English abstract) ZHUANG Y Q, WANG R Z, YANG S P, et al., 1996. Geology of the Gejiu Tin-copper polymetallic deposit[M]. Beijing: Seismological Press: 1-145. (in Chinese with English abstract) 陈宣华, 陈正乐, 杨农, 2009. 区域成矿与矿田构造研究: 构建成矿构造体系[J]. 地质力学学报, 15(1): 1-19. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6616.2009.01.001 程彦博, 毛景文, 谢桂青, 等, 2009. 与云南个旧超大型锡矿床有关的花岗岩锆石U-Pb定年及意义[J]. 矿床地质, 28(3): 297-312. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-7106.2009.03.006 方维萱, 郭玉乾, 贾润幸, 等, 2021. 论云南个旧锡铜钨三稀金属矿集区叠加成矿系统与垂向构造岩相学结构的关系[J]. 地质力学学报, 27(4): 557-584. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2021.27.04.048 郭佳, 章荣清, 孙卫东, 等, 2015. 云南个旧锡多金属矿床锡石LA-ICP-MS U-Pb年代学[J]. 矿物学报(S1): 698. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KWXB2015S1514.htm 贾润幸, 方维萱, 赫英, 等, 2004. 个旧塘子凹锡多金属矿床微量元素地球化学特征[J]. 矿物学报, 24(2): 136-142. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4734.2004.02.007 贾润幸, 方维萱, 胡瑞忠, 等, 2007. 云南个旧塘子凹锡多金属矿床夕卡岩地质地球化学特征[J]. 地质论评, 53(2): 281-288. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0371-5736.2007.02.017 金祖德, 1991. 个旧层间赤铁矿型锡矿热液成因之否定[J]. 地质与勘探, 27(1): 19-20. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKT199101004.htm 康德明, 何柯, 栗敬书, 等, 2016. 个旧锡矿高松矿田大马芦矿段矿体空间产出规律[J]. 现代矿业(6): 154-157. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-6082.2016.06.056 李良云, 2002. 个旧锡矿东区地下水水文地质及控制因素[J]. 云南地质, 21(3): 316-321. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1885.2002.03.010 黎应书, 秦德先, 程细音, 等, 2009. 个旧锡矿区印支期喷流热水沉积成矿的证据[J]. 有色金属, 61(3): 120-125. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1744.2009.03.030 马德云, 高振敏, 陶琰, 等, 2004. 个旧高松矿田层间锡石-硫化物矿床构造控矿特征[J]. 矿物学报, 24(2): 153-156. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4734.2004.02.010 毛景文, 程彦博, 郭春丽, 等, 2008. 云南个旧锡矿田: 矿床模型及若干问题讨论[J]. 地质学报, 82(11): 1455-1467. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5717.2008.11.001 彭张翔, 1992. 个旧锡矿成矿模式商榷[J]. 云南地质, 11(4): 362-368. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YNZD199204008.htm 钱志宽, 罗泰义, 黄智龙, 等, 2009. 个旧锡矿"层间氧化矿"的矿物学特征及成因探讨[J]. 矿物学报, 29(S1): 549-550. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KWXB2009S1286.htm 秦德先, 黎应书, 谈树成, 等, 2006. 云南个旧锡矿的成矿时代[J]. 地质科学, 41(1): 122-132. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0563-5020.2006.01.010 孙绍有, 2004. 个旧锡矿高松矿田断裂构造多期活动特征研究[J]. 矿物学报, 24(2): 124-128. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4734.2004.02.005 田毓龙, 秦德先, 林幼斌, 等, 1999. 喷流热水沉积矿床研究的现状与进展[J]. 昆明理工大学学报, 24(1): 150-156. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KMLG901.025.htm 王成金, 王义强, 1995. 构造应力场控矿原理及控矿规律的实验研究[J]. 地质力学学报, 1(2): 28-34. https://journal.geomech.ac.cn/article/id/6d78e3df-b133-4a9e-90eb-e25f9134cad9 徐佳佳, 赖勇, 崔栋, 等, 2009. 内蒙古道伦达坝铜多金属矿床成矿流体特征及其演化[J]. 岩石学报, 25(11): 2957-2972. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200911027.htm 徐兴旺, 牛磊, 洪涛, 等, 2019. 流体构造动力学与成矿作用[J]. 地质力学学报, 25(1): 1-8. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2019.25.01.001 张欢, 童祥, 武俊德, 等, 2007. 个旧锡矿-红海型热水沉积登陆的实例[J]. 矿物学报, 27(3-4): 335-341. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KWXB2007Z1014.htm 张达, 李芳, 贺晓龙, 等, 2021. 华南重要成矿区带中生代构造变形及其控岩控矿机理[J]. 地质力学学报, 27(4): 497-528. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2021.27.04.045 周建平, 徐克勤, 华仁民, 等, 1999. 个旧等锡矿中沉积组构的发现与矿床成因新探[J]. 自然科学进展, 9(5): 419-422. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-008X.1999.05.006 朱启金, 2012. 个旧大马芦锡矿层间氧化矿矿床特征及成矿模式[J]. 云南地质, 31(1): 26-31. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YNZD201201008.htm 朱学稳, 2009. 我国峰林喀斯特的若干问题讨论[J]. 中国岩溶, 28(2): 155-168. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2009.02.010 庄永秋, 王任重, 扬树培, 等, 1996. 云南个旧锡铜多金属矿床[M]. 北京: 地震出版社: 1-145. -
下载:
计量
- 文章访问数: 670
- HTML全文浏览量: 224
- PDF下载量: 50
- 被引次数: 0
